FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / BMC Vet Res / Effects of different grain types on nutrient apparent digest...
BMC veterinary research2025; 21(1); 273; doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04716-w

Effects of different grain types on nutrient apparent digestibility, glycemic responses, and fecal VFA content in weaned foals.

Abstract: China's equine industry has shifted from traditional rough grazing to modern intensive farming, expanding the roles of horses into eventing, leisure, tourism, and meat and dairy production. Concurrently, equine nutrition has evolved from a forage-based diet to a more diverse regimen incorporating grain supplements to meet the heightened energy demands of intensive farming. However, nutrient digestibility and glycemic response vary considerably based on grain type, starch content, composition, and structural properties. Optimal grain selection is therefore essential for energy supplementation across developmental stages to sustain growth and performance. This study examines the impact of diets incorporating steam-flaked grains (corn, oats, and barley) on apparent nutrient digestibility, glycemic response, and fecal volatile fatty acid (VFA) composition in the weaned Kazakh foals. Methods: Eighteen male Kazakh foals, weaned at 5 months, were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 6 per group) based on grain type: corn group (CG), oats group (OG), and barley group (BG). The daily starch intake for the foals was set at 2 g starch (DM)/kg body weight per day to determine the amount of concentrate supplements to be fed, based on the principle of equal grain starch intake over a 60-day feeding trial. Results: Results indicated that the apparent nutrient digestibility was lower in OG than in CG and BG (P > 0.05). However, amylose intake and digestibility were significantly higher in OG compared to CG (P < 0.01). Plasma glucose and glucagon levels were elevated in CG relative to OG and BG (P < 0.01), while the insulin/glucose ratio was highest in the BG. Additionally, BG increased fecal lactic acid and total VFA (TVFA) concentrations while reducing fecal pH. Conclusions: For weaned Kazakh foals, steam-flaked corn could be recommended in advance of steam-flaked oats and barley in cereal-based energy supplementation alongside basal forage diets. It may reduce amylose intake, improve glycemic responses, increase plasma glucose levels and reduce fecal lactic acid content.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-04-14 PubMed ID: 40229645PubMed Central: PMC11995512DOI: 10.1186/s12917-025-04716-wGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article examines the impact of different types of steam-flaked grains (corn, oats, and barley) on nutrient digestibility, blood sugar responses, and fecal volatile fatty acid composition in weaned Kazakh foals, to inform optimal grain selection for energy supplementation in intensive horse farming.

Background of Study

  • The study arises from the shifting agriculture practices in China’s equine industry from traditional grazing to modern intensive farming, resulting in expanded roles for horses in areas such as eventing, tourism, meat and dairy production.
  • This evolution in practices has necessitated the incorporation of grain supplements into the traditionally forage-based horse diet to meet increased energy demands.
  • Considering that nutrient digestibility and glycemic response vary significantly by grain type, the study seeks to facilitate optimal grain selection for energy supplementation.

    • Methodology

    • The study involved eighteen weaned male Kazakh foals split into three groups, with each group receiving a diet consisting of a different grain: corn, oats, or barley.
    • The experimental diets were constructed so that each foal consumed 2g of starch (in dry matter form) per kilogram of body weight per day over the 60-day feeding trial, with the principle of equal grain starch intake.

      • Findings

      • Results showed that nutrient digestibility was lowest in the oats group as compared to the corn and barley groups.
      • Amylose intake and digestibility were found to be significantly higher in the oats group than the corn group, indicating a potential advantage in reducing the intake of high-amylose grains.
      • Corn group foals displayed higher levels of blood glucose and glucagon, while the barley group had the highest insulin/glucose ratio, suggesting a different glycemic response for each grain.
      • The barley group also exhibited increased fecal lactic acid and total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations and a reduced fecal pH, indicating this grain’s impact on the digestive system’s microbiota.

        • Conclusion

        • Based on the observed outcomes, the researchers recommend steam-flaked corn over steam-flaked oats and barley for cereal-based energy supplementation in a basal forage diet for weaned Kazakh foals.
        • The corn-based diet may decrease amylose intake, better regulate blood glucose levels, and reduce fecal lactic acid content.

Cite This Article

APA
Huang X, Li Q, Li X, Li C, Li J, He L, Jing H, Yang F, Li X. (2025). Effects of different grain types on nutrient apparent digestibility, glycemic responses, and fecal VFA content in weaned foals. BMC Vet Res, 21(1), 273. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04716-w

Publication

BMC veterinary research
ISSN: 1746-6148
NlmUniqueID: 101249759
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 21
Issue: 1
Pages: 273
PII: 273

Researcher Affiliations

Huang, Xinxin
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Herbivore Nutrition for Meat & Milk, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Equine Breeding and Exercise Physiology, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830052, China.
Li, Qian
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Herbivore Nutrition for Meat & Milk, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Equine Breeding and Exercise Physiology, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830052, China.
Li, Xuanyue
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Herbivore Nutrition for Meat & Milk, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Equine Breeding and Exercise Physiology, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830052, China.
Li, Chao
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Herbivore Nutrition for Meat & Milk, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Equine Breeding and Exercise Physiology, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830052, China.
Li, Jiahao
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Herbivore Nutrition for Meat & Milk, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Equine Breeding and Exercise Physiology, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830052, China.
He, Linjiao
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Herbivore Nutrition for Meat & Milk, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Equine Breeding and Exercise Physiology, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830052, China.
Jing, Hongxin
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Herbivore Nutrition for Meat & Milk, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Equine Breeding and Exercise Physiology, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830052, China.
Yang, Fan
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Herbivore Nutrition for Meat & Milk, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Equine Breeding and Exercise Physiology, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830052, China.
Li, Xiaobin
  • College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Herbivore Nutrition for Meat & Milk, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Equine Breeding and Exercise Physiology, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830052, China. 172387243@qq.com.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / physiology
  • Feces / chemistry
  • Male
  • Animal Feed / analysis
  • Digestion / physiology
  • Diet / veterinary
  • Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
  • Edible Grain / classification
  • Fatty Acids, Volatile / analysis
  • Blood Glucose
  • Weaning
  • Hordeum
  • Avena
  • Zea mays

Grant Funding

  • 2022A02013-2-3 / Major Science and Technology Special Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region
  • 31860649 / National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • PT2311 / The Innovation Environment (Talent, Base ) Construction Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: All protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Xinjiang Agricultural University (permission number 2018012). Informed consent—Owners gave informed consent for their animals’ inclusion in the study. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations for the use of animal subjects. The study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

This article includes 72 references
  1. Henry S, Zanella AJ, Sankey C, Richard-Yris MA, Marko A, Hausberger M. Adults may be used to alleviate weaning stress in domestic foals (Equus caballus).. Physiol Behav 2012;106(4):428–38.
    pubmed: 22406387
  2. Waran NK, Clarke N, Farnworth M. The effects of weaning on the domestic horse (Equus caballus).. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2008;110(1–2):42–57.
  3. Erber R, Wulf M, Rose-Meierhöfer S, Becker-Birck M, Möstl E, Aurich J. Behavioral and physiological responses of young horses to different weaning protocols: a pilot study.. Stress 2012;15(2):184–94.
    pubmed: 21875302
  4. Merkies K, DuBois C, Marshall K, Paroiset S, Graham L, Haley D. A two-stage method to approach weaning stress in horses using a physical barrier to prevent nursing.. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2016;183:68–76.
  5. Holland JL, Kronfeld DS, Hoffman RM, Greiwe-Crandell KM, Boyd TL, Cooper WL. Weaning stress is affected by nutrition and weaning methods.. Pferdeheilkunde 1996;12:257–60.
  6. Varloud M, de Fombelle A, Goachet AG, Drogoul C, Julliand V. Partial and total apparent digestibility of dietary carbohydrates in horses as affected by the diet.. Anim Sci 2004;79(1):61–72.
  7. Andrew JE, Kline KH, Smith JL. Effects of feed form on growth and blood glucose in weanling horses.. J Equine Vet 2006;26(8):349–55.
  8. Perricone V, Sandrini S, Irshad N, Comi M, Lecchi C, Savoini G. The Role of Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Supporting Gut Health in Horses: An Updated Review on Its Effects on Digestibility and Intestinal and Fecal Microbiota.. Animals 2022;12(24):3475.
    pmc: PMC9774806pubmed: 36552396
  9. Hymøller L, Dickow MS, Brøkner C, Austbø D, Jensen SK. Cereal starch, protein, and fatty acid pre-caecal disappearance is affected by both feed technological treatment and efficiency of the chewing action in horses.. Livest Sci 2012;150(1–3):159–69.
  10. Biddle AS, Black SJ, Blanchard JL. An in vitro model of the horse gut microbiome enables identification of lactate-utilizing bacteria that differentially respond to starch induction.. PLoS ONE 2013;8(10): e77599.
    pmc: PMC3788102pubmed: 24098591
  11. Medina B, Girard ID, Jacotot E, Julliand V. Effect of a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on microbial profiles and fermentation patterns in the large intestine of horses fed a high fiber or a high starch diet.. J Anim Sci 2002;80(10):2600–9.
    pubmed: 12413082
  12. Richards N. Starch digestion in the equine small intestine[PhD Thesis].. [New South Wales(NSW)]: University of new England. 2003.
  13. Nielsen BD, O’Connor-Robison CI, Spooner HS, Shelton J. Glycemic and insulinemic responses are affected by age of horse and method of feed processing.. J Equine Vet 2010;30(5):249–58.
  14. Hoekstra KE, Newman K, Kennedy MAP, Pagan JD. Effect of corn processing on glycemic responses in horses.. In Proceedings of the XVI Equine Nutrition and Physiology Symposium of The Equine Nutrition and Physiology Society 1999.pp,144–148.
  15. Yao QF, Zhao YP, Mang L, Wu NEF. Study Progress on Diversity of Germplasm Resources of Chinese Local Horses.. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science 2009;30(10):126–30.
  16. NRC. Nutrient requirements of horses.. 6th ed. Washington, DC: National Research Council of the National Academies. 2007. p. 224–226.
  17. Harlow BE, Lawrence LM, Hayes SH, Crum A, Flythe MD. Effect of dietary starch source and concentration on equine fecal microbiota.. PLoS ONE 2016;11: e0154037.
    pmc: PMC4851386pubmed: 27128793
  18. Hydock KL, Nissley SG, Staniar WB. A standard protocol for fecal pH measurement in the horse.. The Prodessional Anim Scientist 2014;30(6):643–8.
  19. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis.. 18th ed, Benjamin Franklin Station, Washington DC, Association of Official Analytical Chemists International. 2010.
  20. Zhou RH, Yang X, Wang GY, Zhang Y, Su W, Zheng T. Laboratory animals—Formula feeds—Determination of routine nutrients.. National Standards of the People's Republic of China 2001; China GB/T 14924.9–2001. Aug 29.
  21. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.. J Dairy Sci 1991;74(10):3583–97.
    pubmed: 1660498
  22. Chavan P, Sinhmar A, Nehra M, Thory R, Pathera AK, Sundarraj AA. Impact on various properties of native starch after synthesis of starch nanoparticles: A review.. Food Chem 2021;364: 130416.
    pubmed: 34192635
  23. Yu M, Liu B, Zhong F, Wan Q, Zhu S, Huang D. Interactions between caffeic acid and corn starch with varying amylose content and their effects on starch digestion.. Food Hydrocolloids 2021;114:106544.
  24. Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association. Japanese Feeding Standard for Horses.. In: Mang L, editors. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press; 2004. p. 70–71.
  25. Duvnjak M, Bošnjak A, Zadravec M, Pintar J, Grbeša D, Kiš G. Starch in horse diet improves feces microbiota, in vitro digestibility of fiber and dry matter.. Journal of Central European Agriculture 2018;19(4):918–30.
  26. Vervuert I, Coenen M, Bothe C. Effects of corn processing on the glycaemic and insulinaemic responses in horses.. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2004;88(9–10):348–55.
    pubmed: 15387851
  27. Gobesso AAO, Etchichury M, de Freitas Jr JE, Rennó FP, Tosi H. Evaluation of Pre-Cecal, Ileal Digestibility and Glycemic Response in Fistulated Horses Fed with Different Starch Sources.. Food Nutr Sci 2015;6(01):151.
  28. Li XB, Huang XX, Zang CJ, Ma C, Chen KX, Zhao GD. Effects of steam-flaked grains on foals’ growth and faecal microbiota.. BMC Vet Res 2021;17:1–11.
    pmc: PMC8418754pubmed: 34481494
  29. Hussein HS, Vogedes LA, Fernandez GCJ, Frankeny RL. Effects of cereal grain supplementation on apparent digestibility of nutrients and concentrations of fermentation end-products in the feces and serum of horses consuming alfalfa cubes1.. J Anim Sci 2004;82(7):1986–96.
    pubmed: 15309945
  30. Direkvandi E, Kamyab KR. Fecal volatile fatty acids and blood metabolites in the Turkmen horse associated with type and source of cereal grains.. J Appl Anim Res 2018;46(1):1078–83.
  31. Särkijärvi S, Saastamoinen M. Feeding value of various processed oat grains in equine diets.. Livest Sci 2006;100(1):3–9.
  32. Schmitz E, Nordberg Karlsson E, Adlercreutz P. Warming weather changes the chemical composition of oat hulls.. Plant Biol 2020;22(6):1086–91.
    pmc: PMC7702143pubmed: 33463881
  33. Richardson K, Murray JAMD. Fiber for performance horses: a review.. J Equine Vet 2016;46:31–9.
  34. Springer RW, Cherry NM, Raub RH, Wellmann KB, Jones TN. Estimation of In Vitro True Digestibility and Fiber Degradation from Feedstuff Fiber Composition When Incubated in Equine Fecal Inoculum.. Animals 2023;13(23):3699.
    pmc: PMC10705138pubmed: 38067050
  35. Ermers C, McGilchrist N, Fenner K, Wilson B, McGreevy P. The Fibre Requirements of Horses and the Consequences and Causes of Failure to Meet Them.. Animals 2023;13(8):1414.
    pmc: PMC10135103pubmed: 37106977
  36. Pyles MB, Fowler AL, Bill VT, Harlow BE, Crum AD, Hayes SH. Effect of maternal diet on select fecal bacteria of foals.. Translational Animal Science 2019;3(1):204–11.
    pmc: PMC7200522pubmed: 32704792
  37. Faubladier C, Julliand V, Danel J, Philippeau C. Bacterial carbohydrate-degrading capacity in foal faeces: changes from birth to pre-weaning and the impact of maternal supplementation with fermented feed products.. Br J Nutr 2013;110(6):1040–52.
    pubmed: 23388384
  38. Faubladier C, Sadet-Bourgeteau S, Philippeau C, Jacotot E, Julliand V. Molecular monitoring of the bacterial community structure in foal feces pre-and post-weaning.. Anaerobe 2014;25:61–6.
    pubmed: 24315809
  39. Costa MC, Stämpfli HR, Allen-Vercoe E, Weese JS. Development of the faecal microbiota in foals.. Equine Vet J 2016;48(6):681–8.
    pubmed: 26518456
  40. Kalantari RK, Rouzbehan Y, Fazaeli H, Direkvandi E, Salem AZM. The Effect of Three Levels of Concentrate and Grain Processing on Feeding Behavior, Nutrient Digestibility, Blood Metabolites and Fecal pH Of Turkmen Horses.. J Equine Vet 2021;104: 103690.
    pubmed: 34416994
  41. Julliand V, De Fombelle A, Varloud M. Starch digestion in horses: the impact of feed processing.. Livest Sci 2006;100(1):44–52.
  42. Vervuert I, Bothe C, Coenen M. Glycaemic and insulinaemic responses to mechanical or thermal processed barley in horses.. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2007;91(5–6):263–8.
    pubmed: 17516950
  43. Giuberti G, Gallo A, Masoero F, Ferraretto LF, Hoffman PC, Shaver RD. Factors affecting starch utilization in large animal food production system: A review.. Starch-Stärke 2014;66(1–2):72–90.
  44. Ma D, Li J, Huang C, Yang F, Wu Y, Liu L. Determination of the energy contents and nutrient digestibility of corn, waxy corn and steam-flaked corn fed to growing pigs.. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 2019;32(10):1573–9.
    pmc: PMC6718911pubmed: 31011011
  45. White GA, Doucet FJ, Hill SE, Wiseman J. Physicochemical changes to starch granules during micronisation and extrusion processing of wheat, and their implications for starch digestibility in the newly weaned piglet.. Animal 2008;2(9):1312–23.
    pubmed: 22443820
  46. Kokić B, Lević J, Chrenková M, Formelová Z, Poláčiková M, Rajský M. Influence of thermal treatments on starch gelatinization and in vitro organic matter digestibility of corn.. Food and Feed research 2013;40(2):93–9.
  47. Henry S, Sigurjónsdóttir H, Klapper A, Joubert J, Montier G, Hausberger M. Domestic foal weaning: need for re-thinking breeding practices?. Animals 2020;10(2):361.
    pmc: PMC7070483pubmed: 32102206
  48. Punia S. Barley starch: Structure, properties and in vitro digestibility-A review.. Int J Biol Macromol 2020;155:868–75.
    pubmed: 31786300
  49. Stevenson DG, Jane J, Inglett GE. Structure and physicochemical properties of starches from sieve fractions of oat flour compared with whole and pin-milled flour.. Cereal Chem 2007;84(6):533–9.
  50. Mishra S, Rai T. Morphology and functional properties of corn, potato and tapioca starches.. Food Hydrocolloids 2006;20(5):557–66.
  51. Ovando-Martínez M, Whitney K, Reuhs BL, Doehlert DC, Simsek S. Effect of hydrothermal treatment on physicochemical and digestibility properties of oat starch.. Food Res Int 2013;52(1):17–25.
  52. Potter GD, Arnold FF, Householder DD, Hansen DH, Brown KM. Digestion of starch in the small or large intestine of the equine.. Pferdeheilkunde 1992;1(4):107–111.
  53. Shamekh S, Forssell P, Suortti T, Autio K, Poutanen K. Fragmentation of oat and barley starch granules during heating.. J Cereal Sci 1999;30(2):173–82.
  54. Harlow BE. Impact of Starch Source on Equine Hindgut Microbial Ecology[PhD Thesis].. [Lexington]: Kentucky University. 2015.
  55. Meyer H, Radicke S, Kienzle E, Wilke S, Kleffken D, Illenseer M. Investigations on preileal digestion of starch from grain, potato and manioc in horses.. J Vet Med Ser A 1995;42(1–10):371–81.
    pubmed: 7495169
  56. Vervuert I, Coenen M, Bothe C. Effect of oat processing on the glycaemic and insulin responses in horses.. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2003;87(3–4):96–104.
    pubmed: 14511133
  57. Jose-Cunilleras E, Taylor LE, Hinchcliff KW. Glycemic index of cracked corn, oat groats and rolled barley in horses.. J Anim Sci 2004;82(9):2623–9.
    pubmed: 15446479
  58. Arnold FF, Potter GD, Schelling JL, Jenkins WL. Carbohydrate digestion in the small and large intestine of the equine.. In Proc 7th Equine Nutr Physiol Symp 1981;pp,19–22.
  59. Regmi PR, Matter JJ, Van Kempen TATG, Zijlstra RT. Starch chemistry affects kinetics of glucose absorption and insulin response in swine.. Livest Sci 2010;134(1–3):44–6.
  60. Täufel A. Barley: Chemistry and Technology.. Herausgegeben von AW MacGregor und RS Bhatty. 486 Seiten, zahlr. Abb. und Tab. American Association of Cereal Chemistry, Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. 1994;38:344–345.
  61. Shen RL, Cai FL, Dong JL, Hu XZ. Hypoglycemic Effects and Biochemical Mechanisms of Oat Products on Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Mice.. J Agric Food Chem 2011;59(16):8895–900.
    pubmed: 21749041
  62. Murphy EJ, Rezoagli E, Major I, Rowan NJ, Laffey JG. β-glucan metabolic and immunomodulatory properties and potential for clinical application.. Journal of Fungi 2020;6(4):356.
    pmc: PMC7770584pubmed: 33322069
  63. Miyamoto J, Watanabe K, Taira S, Kasubuchi M, Li X, Irie J. Barley β-glucan improves metabolic condition via short-chain fatty acids produced by gut microbial fermentation in high fat diet fed mice.. PLoS ONE 2018;13(4): e0196579.
    pmc: PMC5919537pubmed: 29698465
  64. Tang C, Ahmed K, Gille A, Lu S, Gröne H-J, Tunaru S. Loss of FFA2 and FFA3 increases insulin secretion and improves glucose tolerance in type 2 diabetes.. Nat Med 2015;21:173–7.
    pubmed: 25581519
  65. Ma J. Effects of Dietary Amylose/Amylopectin Ratio and Amylase on Growth Performance of Broilers and Their Interaction Effects[Master's Thesis].. [Changsha City]: Hunan Agricultural University (in China). 2019.
  66. Tan F, Zijlstra R. Increasing dietary amylose reduces rate of starch digestion and stimulates microbial fermentation in weaned pigs.. Current Developments in Nutrition 2021;5:545.
  67. Fouhse JM, Gänzle MG, Regmi PR, van Kempen Theo ATG, Zijlstra RT. High amylose starch with low in vitro digestibility stimulates hindgut fermentation and has a bifidogenic effect in weaned pigs.. J Nutr 2015;145(11):2464–70.
    pubmed: 26377761
  68. De Fombelle A, Varloud M, Goachet AG, Jacotot E, Philippeau C, Drogoul C. Characterization of the microbial and biochemical profile of the different segments of the digestive tract in horses given two distinct diets.. Anim Sci 2003;77(2):293–304.
  69. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Horses: 6th ed.. Washington, DC: National Research Council of the National Academies. 2007;pp,35–37.
  70. Ericsson AC, Johnson PJ, Lopes MA, Perry SC, Lanter HR. A microbiological map of the healthy equine gastrointestinal tract.. PLoS ONE 2016;11(11): e0166523.
    pmc: PMC5112786pubmed: 27846295
  71. Donohoe DR, Garge N, Zhang X, Sun W, O’Connell TM, Bunger MK. The microbiome and butyrate regulate energy metabolism and autophagy in the mammalian colon.. Cell Metab 2011;13(5):517–26.
    pmc: PMC3099420pubmed: 21531334
  72. Berg EL, Fu CJ, Porter JH, Kerley MS. Fructooligosaccharide supplementation in the yearling horse: effects on fecal pH, microbial content, and volatile fatty acid concentrations.. J Anim Sci 2005;83(7):1549–53.
    pubmed: 15956463

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.