Analyze Diet
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association2021; 259(8); 892-898; doi: 10.2460/javma.259.8.892

Effects of forelimb instrumentation on lameness detection in horses using a portable inertial sensor-based system.

Abstract: To investigate the effects of a small sensor attached to the pastern region of a forelimb on lameness detection and quantification with a portable inertial sensor-based system (PISBS) for lameness detection and quantification in horses. 20 adult horses (body weight, 410 to 650 kg) with no visible lameness at the walk. In a crossover study design, horses were evaluated at the trot twice using the PISBS with the gyroscope alternately attached to the right forelimb pastern region (as recommended by the manufacturer) or to the left forelimb pastern region (with the sensor flipped 180° on the frontal plane relative to the standard position). Agreement between the 2 instrumentation approaches was investigated graphically and by repeated-measures ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis, and Bland-Altman analysis. No effects of instrumentation of a forelimb with the gyroscope were detected on the lame limb or limbs or on lameness severity. Attachment of the gyroscope to a forelimb had no effect on forelimb or hind limb lameness (ie, did not cause or mask lameness) as measured with the PISBS. Instrumentation of a forelimb with a lightweight gyroscope for lameness evaluations with a PISBS had no effects on lameness measurements in horses. Results suggested that, when indicated, the gyroscope can be attached (while flipped 180° on the frontal plane relative to the standard position) to the left forelimb (rather than the right forelimb).
Publication Date: 2021-10-06 PubMed ID: 34609192DOI: 10.2460/javma.259.8.892Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigated if placing a gyroscope sensor on a horse’s forelimb interferes with detecting lameness using a portable inertial sensor-based system (PISBS). The study found that placement did not affect the results, suggesting that gyroscopes can be freely positioned without obscuring lameness detection.

Objective of the Research

  • The main objective of this research was to determine whether the placement of a small gyroscope sensor on a horse’s forelimb affects the detection and measurement of lameness in horses using a PISBS.

Study Design

  • The study was conducted in a crossover design, where horses were evaluated twice using PISBS. In each evaluation process, the gyroscope was attached alternately to the right forelimb pastern region (as recommended by the manufacturer) or to the left forelimb pastern region.
  • The two methods were compared graphically and analyzed using repeat measures ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis, and Bland-Altman analysis to ensure statistical accuracy.
  • The subject of the study was adult horses that showed no visible signs of lameness during a walk.

Results and Conclusions

  • The study found no effect of the gyroscope placement on the detection or quantification of lameness in the forelimb or hind limb of the horses.
  • These results suggest that affixing a lightweight gyroscope for lameness evaluations using a PISBS does not affect the results of the lameness measurements.
  • In other words, placement of the instrument did not cause or mask lameness as per the measurements taken with PISBS.
  • Finally, it was concluded that, when necessary, the gyroscope could be attached to the left forelimb instead of the right forelimb.

Cite This Article

APA
Lopes MAF, Nichols JT, Dearo ACO, Nelson SR. (2021). Effects of forelimb instrumentation on lameness detection in horses using a portable inertial sensor-based system. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 259(8), 892-898. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.259.8.892

Publication

ISSN: 1943-569X
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 259
Issue: 8
Pages: 892-898

Researcher Affiliations

Lopes, Marco A F
    Nichols, Jeremiah T
      Dearo, Antonio Cezar O
        Nelson, Shanna R

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Biomechanical Phenomena
          • Cross-Over Studies
          • Forelimb
          • Gait
          • Hindlimb
          • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
          • Horses
          • Lameness, Animal / diagnosis

          Citations

          This article has been cited 2 times.
          1. Figueirinhas P, Sanchez A, Rodríguez O, Vilar JM, Rodríguez-Altónaga J, Gonzalo-Orden JM, Quesada A. Development of an Artificial Neural Network for the Detection of Supporting Hindlimb Lameness: A Pilot Study in Working Dogs. Animals (Basel) 2022 Jul 8;12(14).
            doi: 10.3390/ani12141755pubmed: 35883302google scholar: lookup
          2. Pasquiet B, Biau S, Trébot Q, Debril JF, Durand F, Fradet L. Detection of Horse Locomotion Modifications Due to Training with Inertial Measurement Units: A Proof-of-Concept. Sensors (Basel) 2022 Jul 1;22(13).
            doi: 10.3390/s22134981pubmed: 35808476google scholar: lookup