FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Equine veterinary journal2005; 36(8); 758-763; doi: 10.2746/0425164044848000

Effects of girth, saddle and weight on movements of the horse.

Abstract: Although the saddle is seen as one of the biggest causes of back pain, and weightbearing is seen as an important aetiological factor in 'kissing spine' syndrome (KSS), the effects of a saddle and weight on the back movements of the horse have never been studied. Objective: To determine the effects of pressure on the back, exerted by tack and weight, on movements of the horse. Objective: Weight has an extending effect on the horse's back and, as a compensatory mechanism to this extension, an alteration in pro- and retraction angles was expected. A similar but smaller effect was expected from a saddle only and a lungeing girth. Methods: Data were captured during treadmill locomotion at walk, trot and canter under 4 conditions: unloaded; with lungeing girth; saddle only; and saddle with 75 kg of weight. Data were expressed as maximal extension, maximal flexion angles, range of motion of L3 and L5 and maximal pro- and retraction angles of the limbs. Results: At walk and trot, there was a significant influence on back kinematics in the 'saddle with weight' situation, but not in the other conditions. Overall extension of the back increased, but the range of movement remained the same. Limb kinematics changed in the sense that forelimb retraction increased. At canter, both the 'saddle with weight' and 'saddle only' conditions had a significant extending effect on the back, but there was no effect on limb kinematics. Conclusions: Weight and a saddle induce an overall extension of the back. This may contribute to soft tissue injuries and the KSS. The data from this study may help in understanding the reaction of the equine back to the challenges imposed by man when using the animal for riding.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2005-01-20 PubMed ID: 15656511DOI: 10.2746/0425164044848000Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates the impact of a saddle, girth and rider weight on the movement of a horse. It finds that these factors, especially the combination of a saddle with significant weight, can lead to extensions in the horse’s back which may result in strain or injury.

Introduction and Aims

  • The aim of this study is to measure the effects of various pressures on a horse’s back. These pressures are caused by a saddle, a lunging girth (a piece of training equipment), and rider weight.
  • The researchers hypothesize that these pressures have an extending effect on a horse’s back and may trigger physical adjustments such as changes in limb movement, known as pro- and retraction angles.
  • There is a specific interest in the conditions that contribute to ‘kissing spine’ syndrome (KSS), a painful condition in horses where the spinous processes of the vertebrae touch or rub together.

Methods

  • The research was conducted using horses on a treadmill under four separate conditions: without any load, with a lunging girth, with only a saddle, and with a saddle carrying a 75 kg weight.
  • Different gaits were studied including walk, trot, and canter.
  • Data including maximum extension and flexion angles, range of motion at specific vertebrae (L3 and L5), and maximum pro- and retraction angles of the limbs were collected and analysed.

Results

  • At a walk and trot, the movement of the horse’s back (kinematics) was significantly influenced in the ‘saddle with weight’ situation but not with other conditions.
  • An overall extension of the back was observed, though the range of back movement remained consistent. The limb kinematics changed with increased retraction of the forelimb.
  • During a canter, both the ‘saddle with weight’ and ‘saddle only’ situations resulted in a significantly extended back, however, there were no observed changes to limb kinematics.

Conclusions

  • The study concludes that a saddle and rider’s weight can cause an overall extension in a horse’s back. This extension can contribute to soft tissue injuries and potentially cause Kussing Spine Syndrome.
  • These findings provide valuable insight into how the horse’s back reacts to pressures induced by riding, and could thus inform more effective and safe riding practices.

Cite This Article

APA
de Cocq P, van Weeren PR, Back W. (2005). Effects of girth, saddle and weight on movements of the horse. Equine Vet J, 36(8), 758-763. https://doi.org/10.2746/0425164044848000

Publication

Equine veterinary journal
ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 36
Issue: 8
Pages: 758-763

Researcher Affiliations

de Cocq, P
  • Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 12, NL 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands.
van Weeren, P R
    Back, W

      MeSH Terms

      • Adaptation, Physiological
      • Animals
      • Back / physiology
      • Back Pain / etiology
      • Back Pain / veterinary
      • Biomechanical Phenomena
      • Exercise Test / veterinary
      • Female
      • Gait / physiology
      • Horse Diseases / etiology
      • Horses / anatomy & histology
      • Horses / physiology
      • Locomotion / physiology
      • Male
      • Movement / physiology
      • Weight-Bearing / physiology

      Citations

      This article has been cited 20 times.
      1. Grandgeorge M, Lerch N, Delarue A, Hausberger M. From Human Perception of Good Practices to Horse (Equus Caballus) Welfare: Example of Equine-Assisted Activities. Animals (Basel) 2024 Sep 2;14(17).
        doi: 10.3390/ani14172548pubmed: 39272332google scholar: lookup
      2. MacKechnie-Guire R, Williams JM, Fisher D, Nankervis K. The Role of Equestrian Professionals in Saddle Fit for Horses and Riders in the United Kingdom. Animals (Basel) 2024 Aug 28;14(17).
        doi: 10.3390/ani14172495pubmed: 39272280google scholar: lookup
      3. Domańska-Kruppa N, Wierzbicka M, Stefanik E. Advances in the Clinical Diagnostics to Equine Back Pain: A Review of Imaging and Functional Modalities. Animals (Basel) 2024 Feb 23;14(5).
        doi: 10.3390/ani14050698pubmed: 38473083google scholar: lookup
      4. Clayton HM, MacKechnie-Guire R, Hobbs SJ. Riders' Effects on Horses-Biomechanical Principles with Examples from the Literature. Animals (Basel) 2023 Dec 15;13(24).
        doi: 10.3390/ani13243854pubmed: 38136891google scholar: lookup
      5. Egenvall A, Clayton HM, Byström A. Pilot study of locomotor asymmetry in horses walking in circles with and without a rider. PeerJ 2023;11:e16373.
        doi: 10.7717/peerj.16373pubmed: 37933258google scholar: lookup
      6. Keener MM, Tumlin KI. The Triple-E Model: Advancing Equestrian Research with Perspectives from One Health. Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 16;13(16).
        doi: 10.3390/ani13162642pubmed: 37627432google scholar: lookup
      7. Nuchprayoon N, Ritruechai P, Watchararat K, Limroongruengrat W, Wongtawan T, Arya N. Equine spinal kinematics derived from different riding positions during asymmetrical bareback riding. J Equine Sci 2021;32(3):81-89.
        doi: 10.1294/jes.32.81pubmed: 34539209google scholar: lookup
      8. Mao A, Huang E, Gan H, Parkes RSV, Xu W, Liu K. Cross-Modality Interaction Network for Equine Activity Recognition Using Imbalanced Multi-Modal Data. Sensors (Basel) 2021 Aug 29;21(17).
        doi: 10.3390/s21175818pubmed: 34502709google scholar: lookup
      9. Kongsawasdi S, Brown JL, Boonprasert K, Pongsopawijit P, Wantanajittikul K, Khammesri S, Tajarernmuang T, Thonglorm N, Kanta-In R, Thitaram C. Impact of Weight Carriage on Joint Kinematics in Asian Elephants Used for Riding. Animals (Basel) 2021 Aug 17;11(8).
        doi: 10.3390/ani11082423pubmed: 34438880google scholar: lookup
      10. Sapone M, Martin P, Ben Mansour K, Chateau H, Marin F. The Protraction and Retraction Angles of Horse Limbs: An Estimation during Trotting Using Inertial Sensors. Sensors (Basel) 2021 May 30;21(11).
        doi: 10.3390/s21113792pubmed: 34070859google scholar: lookup
      11. MacKechnie-Guire R, Pfau T. Differential rotational movement and symmetry values of the thoracolumbosacral region in high-level dressage horses when trotting. PLoS One 2021;16(5):e0251144.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251144pubmed: 33956858google scholar: lookup
      12. MacKechnie-Guire R, Pfau T. Differential Rotational Movement of the Thoracolumbosacral Spine in High-Level Dressage Horses Ridden in a Straight Line, in Sitting Trot and Seated Canter Compared to In-Hand Trot. Animals (Basel) 2021 Mar 20;11(3).
        doi: 10.3390/ani11030888pubmed: 33804702google scholar: lookup
      13. Egenvall A, Engström H, Byström A. Kinematic effects of the circle with and without rider in walking horses. PeerJ 2020;8:e10354.
        doi: 10.7717/peerj.10354pubmed: 33240661google scholar: lookup
      14. Shakeshaft A, Tabor G. The Effect of a Physiotherapy Intervention on Thoracolumbar Posture in Horses. Animals (Basel) 2020 Oct 28;10(11).
        doi: 10.3390/ani10111977pubmed: 33126478google scholar: lookup
      15. Maśko M, Zdrojkowski L, Domino M, Jasinski T, Gajewski Z. The Pattern of Superficial Body Temperatures in Leisure Horses Lunged with Commonly Used Lunging Aids. Animals (Basel) 2019 Dec 7;9(12).
        doi: 10.3390/ani9121095pubmed: 31817842google scholar: lookup
      16. MacKechnie-Guire R, MacKechnie-Guire E, Fairfax V, Fisher D, Fisher M, Pfau T. The Effect of Tree Width on Thoracolumbar and Limb Kinematics, Saddle Pressure Distribution, and Thoracolumbar Dimensions in Sports Horses in Trot and Canter. Animals (Basel) 2019 Oct 21;9(10).
        doi: 10.3390/ani9100842pubmed: 31640213google scholar: lookup
      17. Hobbs SJ, Clayton HM. Collisional mechanics of the diagonal gaits of horses over a range of speeds. PeerJ 2019;7:e7689.
        doi: 10.7717/peerj.7689pubmed: 31576241google scholar: lookup
      18. Soroko M, Zaborski D, Dudek K, Yarnell K, Górniak W, Vardasca R. Evaluation of thermal pattern distributions in racehorse saddles using infrared thermography. PLoS One 2019;14(8):e0221622.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221622pubmed: 31449556google scholar: lookup
      19. Gunnarsson V, Stefánsdóttir GJ, Jansson A, Roepstorff L. The effect of rider weight and additional weight in Icelandic horses in tölt: part II. Stride parameters responses. Animal 2017 Sep;11(9):1567-1572.
        doi: 10.1017/S1751731117000568pubmed: 28320491google scholar: lookup
      20. Meyers MC. Effect of equitation training on health and physical fitness of college females. Eur J Appl Physiol 2006 Sep;98(2):177-84.
        doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0258-xpubmed: 16896731google scholar: lookup
      Subscribe to our newsletter
      Join 99,850 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.