Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2017; 221; 6-10; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.12.018

Effects of the rider on the kinematics of the equine spine under the saddle during the trot using inertial measurement units: Methodological study and preliminary results.

Abstract: Many factors associated with the saddle and the rider could produce pain in horses thus reducing performance. However, studies of horse-saddle-rider interactions are limited and determining their effects remains challenging. The aim of this study was to test a novel method for assessing equine thoracic and lumbar spinal movement under the saddle and collect data during trotting. Back movement was measured using inertial measurement units (n = 5) fixed at the levels of thoracic vertebrae T6, T12 and T16, and lumbar vertebrae L2 and L5. To compare unridden and ridden conditions, three horses were trotted in hand then at the rising trot (seated phase: left diagonal, rider seated; standing phase: right diagonal, rider standing). The protraction-retraction angles of the forelimbs and the hind limbs were also calculated in two dimensions (2D) using reflective markers. To compare conditions, linear mixed-effects regression models were used and estimated means (standard error) were calculated. The range of motion (ROM) of the caudal thoracic and thoracolumbar regions decreased respectively by -1.3 (0.4)° and -0.6 (0.2)° during the seated phase compared to the unridden condition. Concomitantly, the ROM of protraction and retraction angles increased in the ridden condition. This study demonstrated the ability of inertial measurement units to assess equine vertebral movements under the saddle. The rider, at the rising trot, affected the horse's global locomotion with measurable changes in the vertebral kinematics under the saddle.
Publication Date: 2017-01-03 PubMed ID: 28283082DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.12.018Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research presents a novel method to analyze the motion of a horse’s spine under a saddle while trotting, and explores how the presence of a rider impacts the movement of the equine thoracic and lumbar spine.

Introduction to the Research

  • The aim of this study is to assess how a horse’s spine moves under the saddle during trotting, and how this may alter in the presence of a rider. It’s an area of research that arises from concerns about the impact saddles and riders could have on horse health and performance.
  • The researchers indicate previous studies in this field are limited, making the effects of horse-saddle-rider interaction complex to determine.

Research Methodology

  • The scientists utilized inertial measurement units (IMUs), a type of sensor that measures body movement and orientation, to study the motion of the horse’s back under the saddle. Five of these units were attached to various parts of the horse’s spine at the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae locations for accurate measurements.
  • The study involved comparing scenarios where the horse was trotted without a rider and with a rider practicing the rising trot, a particular gait that involves rhythmic standing and sitting phases associated with trotting.
  • The movement of the horse’s limbs was also examined using reflective markers to calculate the angles of extension and retraction in two dimensions.
  • Researchers then used statistical modelling to compare the outcomes from the ridden and unridden conditions.

Results

  • The study found that the range of motion in the areas closest to the saddle, the caudal thoracic and thoracolumbar regions, decreased whilst the horse was ridden. However, the angles of limb protraction and retraction increased when the horse was ridden.
  • The inertial measurement units were able to effectively document these changes in equine vertebral movements under the saddle.

Conclusions

  • The preliminary results from the study demonstrate that the rider’s presence and the act of trotting have a measurable impact on the horse’s overall locomotion, specifically on the kinematic behavior of the vertebral column under the saddle.
  • This suggests the developed method using inertial measurement units holds potential for further research into the dynamics of saddling and riding on horse performance and well-being.

Cite This Article

APA
Martin P, Cheze L, Pourcelot P, Desquilbet L, Duray L, Chateau H. (2017). Effects of the rider on the kinematics of the equine spine under the saddle during the trot using inertial measurement units: Methodological study and preliminary results. Vet J, 221, 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.12.018

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2971
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 221
Pages: 6-10
PII: S1090-0233(17)30003-5

Researcher Affiliations

Martin, P
  • Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, IFSTTAR, LBMC UMR_T9406, F69622 Lyon, France; Université Paris-Est, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, USC 957 BPLC, Maisons-Alfort F-94704, France; INRA, USC 957 BPLC, Maisons-Alfort F-94704, France; CWD France-Sellerie de Nontron, Nontron F-24300, France. Electronic address: pmartin@cwdsellier.com.
Cheze, L
  • Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, IFSTTAR, LBMC UMR_T9406, F69622 Lyon, France.
Pourcelot, P
  • Université Paris-Est, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, USC 957 BPLC, Maisons-Alfort F-94704, France; INRA, USC 957 BPLC, Maisons-Alfort F-94704, France.
Desquilbet, L
  • Université Paris-Est, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, UMR 7179, Laboratoire Mecadev, CNRS/MNHN, 7 avenue du Général de Gaulle, Maisons-Alfort F-94704, France.
Duray, L
  • CWD France-Sellerie de Nontron, Nontron F-24300, France.
Chateau, H
  • Université Paris-Est, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, USC 957 BPLC, Maisons-Alfort F-94704, France; INRA, USC 957 BPLC, Maisons-Alfort F-94704, France.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Biomechanical Phenomena / physiology
  • Horses / physiology
  • Humans
  • Locomotion / physiology
  • Spine / physiology
  • Weight-Bearing / physiology

Citations

This article has been cited 11 times.
  1. Crecan CM, Peștean CP. Inertial Sensor Technologies-Their Role in Equine Gait Analysis, a Review.. Sensors (Basel) 2023 Jul 11;23(14).
    doi: 10.3390/s23146301pubmed: 37514599google scholar: lookup
  2. Egenvall A, Engström H, Byström A. Back motion in unridden horses in walk, trot and canter on a circle.. Vet Res Commun 2023 May 2;.
    doi: 10.1007/s11259-023-10132-ypubmed: 37127806google scholar: lookup
  3. Biedrzycki AH, Elane GL. Three-Dimensional Modeling and In Silico Kinematic Evaluation of Interspinous Ligament Desmotomy in Horses.. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022;10:817300.
    doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.817300pubmed: 35433641google scholar: lookup
  4. Pfau T, Scott WM, Sternberg Allen T. Upper Body Movement Symmetry in Reining Quarter Horses during Trot In-Hand, on the Lunge and during Ridden Exercise.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Feb 27;12(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12050596pubmed: 35268165google scholar: lookup
  5. Kongsawasdi S, Brown JL, Boonprasert K, Pongsopawijit P, Wantanajittikul K, Khammesri S, Tajarernmuang T, Thonglorm N, Kanta-In R, Thitaram C. Impact of Weight Carriage on Joint Kinematics in Asian Elephants Used for Riding.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Aug 17;11(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11082423pubmed: 34438880google scholar: lookup
  6. Byström A, Hardeman AM, Serra Bragança FM, Roepstorff L, Swagemakers JH, van Weeren PR, Egenvall A. Differences in equine spinal kinematics between straight line and circle in trot.. Sci Rep 2021 Jun 18;11(1):12832.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92272-2pubmed: 34145339google scholar: lookup
  7. MacKechnie-Guire R, Pfau T. Differential rotational movement and symmetry values of the thoracolumbosacral region in high-level dressage horses when trotting.. PLoS One 2021;16(5):e0251144.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251144pubmed: 33956858google scholar: lookup
  8. MacKechnie-Guire R, Pfau T. Differential Rotational Movement of the Thoracolumbosacral Spine in High-Level Dressage Horses Ridden in a Straight Line, in Sitting Trot and Seated Canter Compared to In-Hand Trot.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Mar 20;11(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11030888pubmed: 33804702google scholar: lookup
  9. Schmutz A, Chèze L, Jacques J, Martin P. A Method to Estimate Horse Speed per Stride from One IMU with a Machine Learning Method.. Sensors (Basel) 2020 Jan 17;20(2).
    doi: 10.3390/s20020518pubmed: 31963422google scholar: lookup
  10. MacKechnie-Guire R, MacKechnie-Guire E, Fairfax V, Fisher D, Fisher M, Pfau T. The Effect of Tree Width on Thoracolumbar and Limb Kinematics, Saddle Pressure Distribution, and Thoracolumbar Dimensions in Sports Horses in Trot and Canter.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Oct 21;9(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9100842pubmed: 31640213google scholar: lookup
  11. Bosch S, Serra Bragança F, Marin-Perianu M, Marin-Perianu R, van der Zwaag BJ, Voskamp J, Back W, van Weeren R, Havinga P. EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse Gait.. Sensors (Basel) 2018 Mar 13;18(3).
    doi: 10.3390/s18030850pubmed: 29534022google scholar: lookup