Analyze Diet
Journal of animal science2009; 87(7); 2291-2298; doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1461

Effects on the equine colon ecosystem of grass silage and haylage diets after an abrupt change from hay.

Abstract: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of an abrupt change from grass hay (81% DM) to grass silage (36% DM) or grass haylage (55% DM), fed at similar DM intakes, and to compare the effects of silage and haylage on the composition and activities of the colon microflora. The forages were from the same swath harvested on the same day. Four adult colon-fistulated geldings were randomly assigned to diets in a crossover design. The study started with a preperiod when all 4 horses received the hay diet, followed by an abrupt feed change to the haylage diet for 2 horses and the silage diet for 2 horses. All 4 horses then had a new second preperiod of hay, followed by an abrupt feed change to the opposite haylage and silage diet. The periods were 21 d long, and the forage-only diets were supplemented with minerals and salt. The abrupt feed changes were made at 0800 h. Colon samples were taken before the abrupt feed change, 4 and 28 h after the feed change, and 8, 15, and 21 d after the feed change, all at 1200 h. Colon bacterial counts, VFA, pH, and DM concentrations were unchanged throughout the first 28 h after the abrupt feed change from hay to haylage and silage. Also, fecal pH and DM concentrations were unchanged during the first 28 h. During the weekly observations, colon lactobacilli counts increased (P = 0.023) in horses receiving the silage diet and were greater than on the haylage diet at 21 d. Streptococci counts decreased (P = 0.046) in horses receiving the haylage diet and were less than on the silage diet at 15 and 21 d. Total VFA concentrations and colon and fecal pH did not differ between diets and were unchanged throughout the weekly observations. The DM concentration of colon digesta and feces decreased (P = 0.030 and 0.049, respectively) on both diets during the weekly observations. The results suggest that in horses fed at the maintenance level of energy intake, an abrupt feed change from grass hay to grass silage or grass haylage from the same crop does not induce any major alterations in the colon ecosystem during the first 28 h. During the subsequent 3-wk period, colon and fecal DM decreased and there were alterations in the lactobacilli and streptococci bacterial counts. The changes in lactobacilli and streptococci counts need further investigation.
Publication Date: 2009-03-27 PubMed ID: 19329474DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-1461Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article focuses on examining the impacts of an abrupt diet change from grass hay to grass silage or grass haylage on the colon ecosystem of horses. The investigation revealed that such sudden diet modifications did not cause major alterations in the horse’s colon ecosystem during the first 28 hours. However, changes in the counts of lactobacilli and streptococci, two types of bacteria, were observed over subsequent weeks.

Study Design and Methodology

  • The study involved a total of four adult colon-fistulated geldings (castrated male horses) that were randomly assigned to different diets in a crossover design setup.
  • The research was divided into various periods, with each horse initially receiving a hay diet during a ‘preperiod’. This was followed by an abrupt change of their feed either to a haylage or silage diet.
  • Following this, all horses had a new second preperiod of hay, which was abruptly changed to the opposite diets of silage and haylage.
  • All diet periods lasted 21 days and were exclusively forage-based, supplemented with minerals and salt. The abrupt feed changes were carried out at 8 am.

Data Collection and Observations

  • For data collection, samples from the colon were obtained at various intervals before and after the abrupt feed changes to evaluate changes in the colon microflora, particularly bacterial counts, VFA (Volatile Fatty Acids), pH, and DM (Dry Matter) concentrations.
  • Results revealed that these parameters remained consistent for the initial 28 hours after the diet shift from hay to haylage and silage.
  • However, the weekly investigations showed an increase in the colon’s lactobacilli bacterial counts in the horses on the silage diet. At the same time, streptococci bacterial counts decreased in those receiving the haylage diet.

Conclusion and Further Research

  • The study concluded that an abrupt shift in diet from grass hay to grass silage or grass haylage does not cause significant changes to the colon ecosystem of horses within the first 28 hours.
  • However, in the subsequent three-week period, there were alterations in the lactobacilli and streptococci bacterial counts, which needs further investigation to understand its implications on horses’ intestinal health and overall welfare better.

Cite This Article

APA
Muhonen S, Julliand V, Lindberg JE, Bertilsson J, Jansson A. (2009). Effects on the equine colon ecosystem of grass silage and haylage diets after an abrupt change from hay. J Anim Sci, 87(7), 2291-2298. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1461

Publication

ISSN: 1525-3163
NlmUniqueID: 8003002
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 87
Issue: 7
Pages: 2291-2298

Researcher Affiliations

Muhonen, S
  • Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. Sara.Muhonen@huv.slu.se
Julliand, V
    Lindberg, J E
      Bertilsson, J
        Jansson, A

          MeSH Terms

          • Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
          • Animals
          • Colon / chemistry
          • Colon / microbiology
          • Cross-Over Studies
          • Diet / veterinary
          • Gastrointestinal Contents / chemistry
          • Gastrointestinal Contents / microbiology
          • Horses
          • Male
          • Poaceae / chemistry
          • Silage / analysis

          Citations

          This article has been cited 13 times.
          1. Muhonen S, Philippeau C, Julliand V. Effects of Differences in Fibre Composition and Maturity of Forage-Based Diets on the Fluid Balance, Water-Holding Capacity and Viscosity in Equine Caecum and Colon Digesta.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Nov 29;12(23).
            doi: 10.3390/ani12233340pubmed: 36496860google scholar: lookup
          2. Weinert-Nelson JR, Biddle AS, Williams CA. Fecal microbiome of horses transitioning between warm-season and cool-season grass pasture within integrated rotational grazing systems.. Anim Microbiome 2022 Jun 21;4(1):41.
            doi: 10.1186/s42523-022-00192-xpubmed: 35729677google scholar: lookup
          3. Lindroth KM, Lindberg JE, Johansen A, Müller CE. Feeding and Management of Horses with and without Free Faecal Liquid: A Case-Control Study.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Aug 30;11(9).
            doi: 10.3390/ani11092552pubmed: 34573518google scholar: lookup
          4. Muhonen S, Sadet-Bourgeteau S, Julliand V. Effects of Differences in Fibre Composition and Maturity of Forage-Based Diets on the Microbial Ecosystem and Its Activity in Equine Caecum and Colon Digesta and Faeces.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Aug 8;11(8).
            doi: 10.3390/ani11082337pubmed: 34438794google scholar: lookup
          5. Jansson A, Harris P, Davey SL, Luthersson N, Ragnarsson S, Ringmark S. Straw as an Alternative to Grass Forage in Horses-Effects on Post-Prandial Metabolic Profile, Energy Intake, Behaviour and Gastric Ulceration.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 24;11(8).
            doi: 10.3390/ani11082197pubmed: 34438656google scholar: lookup
          6. Johnson ACB, Biddle AS. A Standard Scale to Measure Equine Keeper Status and the Effect of Metabolic Tendency on Gut Microbiome Structure.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 1;11(7).
            doi: 10.3390/ani11071975pubmed: 34359102google scholar: lookup
          7. Zhu Y, Wang X, Deng L, Chen S, Zhu C, Li J. Effects of Pasture Grass, Silage, and Hay Diet on Equine Fecal Microbiota.. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 7;11(5).
            doi: 10.3390/ani11051330pubmed: 34066969google scholar: lookup
          8. Garber A, Hastie P, McGuinness D, Malarange P, Murray JA. Abrupt dietary changes between grass and hay alter faecal microbiota of ponies.. PLoS One 2020;15(8):e0237869.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237869pubmed: 32810164google scholar: lookup
          9. Pyles MB, Fowler AL, Bill VT, Harlow BE, Crum AD, Hayes SH, Flythe MD, Lawrence LM. Effect of maternal diet on select fecal bacteria of foals.. Transl Anim Sci 2019 Jan;3(1):204-211.
            doi: 10.1093/tas/txy141pubmed: 32704792google scholar: lookup
          10. Lindroth KM, Johansen A, Båverud V, Dicksved J, Lindberg JE, Müller CE. Differential Defecation of Solid and Liquid Phases in Horses-A Descriptive Survey.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jan 1;10(1).
            doi: 10.3390/ani10010076pubmed: 31906279google scholar: lookup
          11. Biddle AS, Tomb JF, Fan Z. Microbiome and Blood Analyte Differences Point to Community and Metabolic Signatures in Lean and Obese Horses.. Front Vet Sci 2018;5:225.
            doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00225pubmed: 30294603google scholar: lookup
          12. Schoster A, Weese JS, Guardabassi L. Probiotic use in horses - what is the evidence for their clinical efficacy?. J Vet Intern Med 2014 Nov-Dec;28(6):1640-52.
            doi: 10.1111/jvim.12451pubmed: 25231539google scholar: lookup
          13. Williams S, Horner J, Orton E, Green M, McMullen S, Mobasheri A, Freeman SL. Water intake, faecal output and intestinal motility in horses moved from pasture to a stabled management regime with controlled exercise.. Equine Vet J 2015 Jan;47(1):96-100.
            doi: 10.1111/evj.12238pubmed: 24528106google scholar: lookup