Analyze Diet

Efficacy of a commercial vaccine for preventing disease caused by influenza virus infection in horses.

Abstract: To evaluate efficacy of a commercial vaccine for prevention of infectious upper respiratory tract disease (IURD) caused by equine influenza virus. Methods: Double-masked, randomized, controlled field trial. Methods: 462 horses stabled at a Thoroughbred racetrack. Methods: Vaccine or saline solution placebo was administered 4 times in the population at 6-week intervals. The vaccine contained 3 strains of inactivated influenza virus, and inactivated equine herpesvirus type 4. Horses received 1 or 2 doses of vaccine or placebo prior to onset of a natural influenza epidemic, and were examined 5 d/wk to identify and monitor horses with IURD. Serum antibody concentrations were determined, and virus isolation was performed. Results: Vaccination of horses prior to the influenza epidemic did not result in significant decrease in risk of developing respiratory tract disease. Severity of clinical disease was not different between affected vaccinated horses with IURD and controls with IURD, but median duration of clinical disease was 3 days shorter in vaccinated horses. Serum concentrations of antibodies to H3N8 influenza viruses were lower prior to initial vaccination in horses that were sick during the epidemic, and did not increase in these horses in response to vaccination. On arrival at the racetrack, young horses had lower antibody concentrations than older horses, and did not respond to vaccination as well. Conclusions: Vaccination was of questionable benefit. A greater degree of protection must be obtained for influenza vaccines to be effective in protecting horses from IURD. Objective field evaluations of commercial vaccines are needed to adequately document their efficacy.
Publication Date: 1999-07-09 PubMed ID: 10397067
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Clinical Trial
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study examined the effectiveness of a commercial vaccine in preventing equine influenza, a respiratory disease in horses. Despite the use of the vaccine, no significant decrease was detected in the risk of developing respiratory disease during an influenza outbreak, and in turn, vaccine’s overall benefit to protecting horses from the disease was found to be questionable.

Methodology

  • The study was a double-masked, randomized, controlled field trial involving 462 horses at a Thoroughbred racetrack.
  • Horses were given either the vaccine or a saline solution placebo. This was done four times over regular 6-week intervals.
  • The vaccine contained three strains of deactivated influenza virus as well as a deactivated strain of the equine herpesvirus type 4.
  • A minimum of one or two doses of the vaccine or placebo was administered prior to the onset of a natural influenza epidemic. Horses in the study were closely monitored, with check-ups 5 days a week to identify any cases of respiratory disease, while antibody levels in the blood serum were measured and virus detection was performed.

Results

  • The study found that vaccination prior to the influenza outbreak did not significantly decrease the chance of the horses developing respiratory tract disease.
  • The severity of the disease observed in vaccinated horses was no different from those that hadn’t been vaccinated. However, the duration of the disease was found to be three days shorter on average for the vaccinated horses.
  • Horses that fell ill during the epidemic showed lower antibody levels against the H3N8 influenza viruses prior to the initial vaccination. Their antibody levels did not increase following the vaccination.
  • Upon arrival at the racetrack, younger horses were found to have lower antibody concentrations than older horses and did not respond as well to the vaccination.

Conclusions

  • The vaccine’s benefit in overall disease prevention was questionable based on the study results.
  • It was highlighted that for an influenza vaccine to be effective in protecting horses from respiratory diseases, a greater level of protection is necessary.
  • The study concluded by emphasizing the need for objective field evaluations of commercial vaccines to properly document their efficacy in preventing equine influenza.

Cite This Article

APA
Morley PS, Townsend HG, Bogdan JR, Haines DM. (1999). Efficacy of a commercial vaccine for preventing disease caused by influenza virus infection in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 215(1), 61-66.

Publication

ISSN: 0003-1488
NlmUniqueID: 7503067
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 215
Issue: 1
Pages: 61-66

Researcher Affiliations

Morley, P S
  • Department of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Townsend, H G
    Bogdan, J R
      Haines, D M

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Antibodies, Viral / blood
        • Disease Outbreaks / veterinary
        • Double-Blind Method
        • Female
        • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
        • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
        • Horses
        • Influenza A virus / immunology
        • Male
        • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / epidemiology
        • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / prevention & control
        • Orthomyxoviridae Infections / veterinary
        • Vaccination / veterinary
        • Vaccines, Inactivated / standards
        • Viral Vaccines / standards

        Citations

        This article has been cited 2 times.
        1. Ault A, Zajac AM, Kong WP, Gorres JP, Royals M, Wei CJ, Bao S, Yang ZY, Reedy SE, Sturgill TL, Page AE, Donofrio-Newman J, Adams AA, Balasuriya UB, Horohov DW, Chambers TM, Nabel GJ, Rao SS. Immunogenicity and clinical protection against equine influenza by DNA vaccination of ponies. Vaccine 2012 Jun 6;30(26):3965-74.
          doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.026pubmed: 22449425google scholar: lookup
        2. Quinlivan M, Zamarin D, García-Sastre A, Cullinane A, Chambers T, Palese P. Attenuation of equine influenza viruses through truncations of the NS1 protein. J Virol 2005 Jul;79(13):8431-9.