Abstract: Thoracolumbar pain has been identified in both human and equine patients. Rehabilitation and conditioning programs have focused specifically on improving trunk and abdominal muscle function (1-5). Equine exercise programs routinely incorporate ground poles and training devices for the similar goals of increasing spinal and core stability and strength (6-8). The multifidus muscle has been an area of focus due to atrophy associated with disease (9). To date, there have been no reports on the activity of the multifidus muscle in horses in relation to therapeutic exercises. Our objectives were to use electromyography to determine the average work performed and peak muscle activity of the multifidus in horses trotting, trotting over ground poles, trotting while wearing a resistance band-based training device and trotting while wearing the training device over ground poles. We hypothesized that ground poles and the training device would each increase average work performed and peak multifidus muscle activity. Right and left cranial thoracic locations showed significant increased muscle work and peak activation when horses were trotted over ground poles versus without. The peak activation was significantly greater in horses trotting over poles in both lumbar regions, but there was no significant change in peak activation in either location due to the training device. When the influence of the training device was investigated without ground poles, left caudal thoracic muscle work and peak activity, and right lumbar muscle work were significantly lower when using the training device, as compared to without. When the training device was combined with trotting over ground poles, both left and right caudal thoracic regions showed significantly lower muscle work and peak activity when the device was used. There was no significant difference between with and without the device in either left or right lumbar muscle work. In conclusion, implementing ground poles can be an effective strategy to increase the activation of the multifidus muscle, however, caution should be taken when incorporating the use of a resistance band training device as muscle work and peak activation were significantly reduced in most locations. Further study should be performed in regards to the training device to determine its effects on epaxial musculature.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research investigates the effects of various exercises and the use of a resistance band training device on the multifidus muscle, a back muscle, in horses. It is found that using ground poles during a horse’s trotting exercise significantly increases muscle activation, while incorporating a resistance band training device might actually reduce this muscle work and peak activity in certain conditions.
Study Objectives and Hypothesis
The study aims to observe the average work performed and peak muscle activity of the multifidus muscle in horses during different exercises. This includes horses simply trotting, trotting over ground poles, trotting while wearing a resistance band-based training device, and trotting while wearing the training device and moving over ground poles. Electromyography, a diagnostic method used to evaluate the health of muscles and nerve cells that control them, was utilized to collect these data.
The researchers hypothesized that both ground poles and the training device would increase the average work performed and peak multifidus muscle activity.
Key Findings
When horses trotted over ground poles, a significant increase was seen in muscle work and peak activation of the multifidus muscle. This was particularly noticeable on the right and left cranial thoracic locations, showing that the use of ground poles during trotting exercise can effectively engage the multifidus muscle.
However, when the resistance band-based training device was used, the results varied. The training device didn’t have a significant effect on peak activation in lumbar regions of the horses when they trotted over poles.
In exercises where the training device was incorporated without ground poles, left caudal thoracic muscle work and peak activity, as well as right lumbar muscle work, were significantly lower compared to when no training device was used.
When the training device was paired with trotting over ground poles, the muscle activity in caudal thoracic regions was significantly reduced. There were no significant differences observed in the lumbar regions with or without the device.
Conclusion and Further Research
The study concludes that implementing ground poles can be a useful strategy to increase activation of the equine multifidus muscle. Care should be taken, however, when incorporating the use of a resistance band-based training device, as this may actually decrease muscle work and peak activity in the horse, especially in certain areas.
Further studies are recommended to explore the effects of the training device on the equine back muscles, the epaxial musculature, due to the reduction in muscle activation observed in this study.
Cite This Article
APA
Ursini T, Shaw K, Levine D, Richards J, Adair HS.
(2022).
Electromyography of the Multifidus Muscle in Horses Trotting During Therapeutic Exercises.
Front Vet Sci, 9, 844776.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.844776
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Equine Performance and Rehabilitation Center, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Shaw, Karen
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Equine Performance and Rehabilitation Center, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Levine, David
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN, United States.
Richards, Jim
Allied Health Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Lancashire, United Kingdom.
Adair, Henry Steve
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Equine Performance and Rehabilitation Center, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
This article includes 43 references
Areeudomwong P, Buttagat V. Comparison of core stabilisation exercise and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation training on pain-related and neuromuscular response outcomes for chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial.. Malaysian J Med Sci (2019) 26:77–89.
Berry DB, Padwal J, Johnson S, Englund EK, Ward SR, Shahidi B. The effect of high-intensity resistance exercise on lumbar musculature in patients with low back pain: a preliminary study.. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord (2019) 20:290.
Farragher JB, Pranata A, Williams G, El-Ansary D, Parry SM, Kasza J. Effects of lumbar extensor muscle strengthening and neuromuscular control retraining on disability in patients with chronic low back pain: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.. BMJ Open (2019) 9:e028259.
Tagliaferri SD, Miller CT, Ford JJ, Hahne AJ, Main LC, Rantalainen T. Randomized trial of general strength and conditioning versus motor control and manual therapy for chronic low back pain on physical and self-report outcomes.. J Clin Med (2020) 9:1726.
Wirth K, Hartmann H, Mickel C, Szilvas E, Keiner M, Sander A. Core stability in athletes: a critical analysis of current guidelines.. Sports Med (2017) 47:401–14.
Frick A, Hethcote B. Fitness in Motion: Keeping Your Equine's Zones at Peak Performance.. G - Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary Subjects Series Guilford, CT: Globe Pequot Press; (2007).
McGowan CM, Goff L. Animal Physiotherapy: Assessment, Treatment, and Rehabilitation of Animals, 2nd ed.. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Inc; (2016).
Kalichman L, Carmeli E, Been E. The association between imaging parameters of the paraspinal muscles, spinal degeneration, and low back pain.. BioMed Res Int (2017) 2017:2562957.
Creze M, Soubeyrand M, Timoh KN, Gagey O. Organization of the fascia and aponeurosis in the lumbar paraspinal compartment.. Surg Radiol Anat (2018) 40:1231–42.
He K, Head J, Mouchtouris N, Hines K, Shea P, Schmidt R. The implications of paraspinal muscle atrophy in low back pain, thoracolumbar pathology, and clinical outcomes after spine surgery: a review of the literature.. Global Spine J (2020) 10:657–66.
Hides JA, Murphy M, Jang E, Blackwell L, Sexton M, Sexton C. Predicting a beneficial response to motor control training in patients with low back pain: a longitudinal cohort study.. Eur Spine J (2019) 28:2462–9.
St. George L, Roy SH, Richards J, Sinclair J, Hobbs SJ. Surface EMG signal normalisation and filtering improves sensitivity of equine gait analysis.. Comp Exerc Physiol (2019) 15:173–185.
Richards J, Selfe J, Sinclair J, May K, Thomas G. The effect of different decline angles on the biomechanics of double limb squats and the implications to clinical and training practice.. J Hum Kinet (2016) 52:125–38.
Richards J, Thewlis D, Selfe J, Cunningham A, Hayes C. A biomechanical investigation of a single-limb squat: implications for lower extremity rehabilitation exercise.. J Athl Train (2008) 43:477–82.
Fortin M, Lazary A, Varga PP, Battie MC. Association between paraspinal muscle morphology, clinical symptoms and functional status in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.. Eur Spine J (2017) 26:2543–51.
Liu Y, Liu Y, Hai Y, Liu T, Guan L, Chen X. Multifidus muscle fatty infiltration as an index of dysfunction in patients with single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a case-control study based on propensity score matching.. J Clin Neurosci (2020) 75:139–48.
Shafaq N, Suzuki A, Matsumura A, Terai H, Toyoda H, Yasuda H. Asymmetric degeneration of paravertebral muscles in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis.. Spine (2012) 37:1398–406.
Castejon-Riber C, Riber C, Dolores Rubio M, Aguera E, Munoz A. Objectives, principles, and methods of strength training for horses.. J Equine Vet Sci (2017) 56:93–103.
Cain RM, Stanford K, Drum M, Richards J, Levine D, Millis D, Ursini T. Forelimb muscle activity during level and progressive incline and decline walking in dogs and implications for rehabilitation. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1649009.