Analyze Diet
The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice2011; 27(2); 233-242; doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2011.04.003

Embryonic stem cells and iPS cells: sources and characteristics.

Abstract: The field of regenerative medicine research is rapidly expanding. One area of interest to equine researchers is the possibility of isolating or generating pluripotent cells, capable of producing differentiated cell types derived from all 3 primary germ layers. Reports of equine embryonic stem-like (ES) cell isolation can be found in the literature. Other groups are working to produce equine-induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. This article summarizes the essential features needed to characterize a cell type as pluripotent, specific challenges in using the horse as a model organism for pluripotent cell generation, and current and upcoming clinical trials using ES/iPS cells.
Publication Date: 2011-06-16 PubMed ID: 21872756PubMed Central: PMC3479634DOI: 10.1016/j.cveq.2011.04.003Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article discusses the progress and challenges in the field of equine regenerative medicine, specifically focusing on the isolation or creation of pluripotent cells – cells which can evolve into a variety of differentiated cells originating from all three primary germ layers.

Characterizing Pluripotent Cells

The article first describes the key features required to define a cell type as pluripotent:

  • Pluripotent cells are capable of giving rise to all different cell types of an organism.
  • These cells can self-renew indefinitely and therefore hold promising potential for regenerative medicine.

Horses as Model Organisms

Detailed in the article are the specific challenges of using horses as model organisms for pluripotent cell generation:

  • Due to differences in physiology and size compared to frequently used model organisms like mice, horses present unique obstacles in regenerative medicine research.
  • There are also logistical and ethical considerations unique to horses that make them challenging to work with.

Equine Embryonic Stem-like Cells and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

The research outlines the progress in isolating equine embryonic stem-like (ES) cells and the creation of equine-induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells:

  • Equine ES cells have been found and isolated, as stated in several research reports.
  • Many research groups are actively working on generating equine iPS cells.

Current and Upcoming Clinical Trials

Finally, the review summarizes the conducted and forthcoming clinical trials utilizing pluripotent stem cells:

  • It discusses the goals and strategies of these trials as they strive to develop regenerative therapies.
  • The importance of these clinical trials to advance the field of regenerative medicine and to potentially provide new disease treatments is also emphasized.

Cite This Article

APA
Hackett CH, Fortier LA. (2011). Embryonic stem cells and iPS cells: sources and characteristics. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract, 27(2), 233-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2011.04.003

Publication

ISSN: 1558-4224
NlmUniqueID: 8511904
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 27
Issue: 2
Pages: 233-242

Researcher Affiliations

Hackett, Catherine H
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Box 32, Veterinary Medical Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Fortier, Lisa A

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Cell Culture Techniques
    • Clinical Trials as Topic
    • Embryonic Stem Cells / cytology
    • Embryonic Stem Cells / physiology
    • Embryonic Stem Cells / transplantation
    • Horses
    • Humans
    • Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells / cytology
    • Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells / physiology
    • Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells / transplantation
    • Mice
    • Stem Cell Research

    Grant Funding

    • F32 AR056187 / NIAMS NIH HHS

    References

    This article includes 34 references
    1. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, Jones JM. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts.. Science 1998 Nov 6;282(5391):1145-7.
      pubmed: 9804556doi: 10.1126/science.282.5391.1145google scholar: lookup
    2. Kaufman MH, Robertson EJ, Handyside AH, Evans MJ. Establishment of pluripotential cell lines from haploid mouse embryos.. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1983 Feb;73:249-61.
      pubmed: 6875460
    3. Guest DJ, Smith MR, Allen WR. Equine embryonic stem-like cells and mesenchymal stromal cells have different survival rates and migration patterns following their injection into damaged superficial digital flexor tendon.. Equine Vet J 2010 Oct;42(7):636-42.
    4. Guest DJ, Allen WR. Expression of cell-surface antigens and embryonic stem cell pluripotency genes in equine blastocysts.. Stem Cells Dev 2007 Oct;16(5):789-96.
      pubmed: 17999600doi: 10.1089/scd.2007.0032google scholar: lookup
    5. Saito S, Sawai K, Minamihashi A, Ugai H, Murata T, Yokoyama KK. Derivation, maintenance, and induction of the differentiation in vitro of equine embryonic stem cells.. Methods Mol Biol 2006;329:59-79.
      pubmed: 16845984doi: 10.1385/1-59745-037-5:59google scholar: lookup
    6. Saito S, Ugai H, Sawai K, Yamamoto Y, Minamihashi A, Kurosaka K, Kobayashi Y, Murata T, Obata Y, Yokoyama K. Isolation of embryonic stem-like cells from equine blastocysts and their differentiation in vitro.. FEBS Lett 2002 Nov 20;531(3):389-96.
      pubmed: 12435581doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(02)03550-0google scholar: lookup
    7. Li X, Zhou SG, Imreh MP, Ahrlund-Richter L, Allen WR. Horse embryonic stem cell lines from the proliferation of inner cell mass cells.. Stem Cells Dev 2006 Aug;15(4):523-31.
      pubmed: 16978056doi: 10.1089/scd.2006.15.523google scholar: lookup
    8. Paris DB, Stout TA. Equine embryos and embryonic stem cells: defining reliable markers of pluripotency.. Theriogenology 2010 Sep 1;74(4):516-24.
    9. Laurent LC, Ulitsky I, Slavin I, Tran H, Schork A, Morey R, Lynch C, Harness JV, Lee S, Barrero MJ, Ku S, Martynova M, Semechkin R, Galat V, Gottesfeld J, Izpisua Belmonte JC, Murry C, Keirstead HS, Park HS, Schmidt U, Laslett AL, Muller FJ, Nievergelt CM, Shamir R, Loring JF. Dynamic changes in the copy number of pluripotency and cell proliferation genes in human ESCs and iPSCs during reprogramming and time in culture.. Cell Stem Cell 2011 Jan 7;8(1):106-18.
      pmc: PMC3043464pubmed: 21211785doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.12.003google scholar: lookup
    10. Ledermann B, Bürki K. Establishment of a germ-line competent C57BL/6 embryonic stem cell line.. Exp Cell Res 1991 Dec;197(2):254-8.
      pubmed: 1959560doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(91)90430-3google scholar: lookup
    11. Kim JB, Zaehres H, Wu G, Gentile L, Ko K, Sebastiano V, Araúzo-Bravo MJ, Ruau D, Han DW, Zenke M, Schöler HR. Pluripotent stem cells induced from adult neural stem cells by reprogramming with two factors.. Nature 2008 Jul 31;454(7204):646-50.
      pubmed: 18594515doi: 10.1038/nature07061google scholar: lookup
    12. Kunisato A, Wakatsuki M, Kodama Y, Shinba H, Ishida I, Nagao K. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells by efficient reprogramming of adult bone marrow cells.. Stem Cells Dev 2010 Feb;19(2):229-38.
      pubmed: 19558219doi: 10.1089/scd.2009.0149google scholar: lookup
    13. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors.. Cell 2006 Aug 25;126(4):663-76.
      pubmed: 16904174doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024google scholar: lookup
    14. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, Tian S, Nie J, Jonsdottir GA, Ruotti V, Stewart R, Slukvin II, Thomson JA. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells.. Science 2007 Dec 21;318(5858):1917-20.
      pubmed: 18029452doi: 10.1126/science.1151526google scholar: lookup
    15. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors.. Cell 2007 Nov 30;131(5):861-72.
      pubmed: 18035408doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019google scholar: lookup
    16. Stadtfeld M, Nagaya M, Utikal J, Weir G, Hochedlinger K. Induced pluripotent stem cells generated without viral integration.. Science 2008 Nov 7;322(5903):945-9.
      pmc: PMC3987909pubmed: 18818365doi: 10.1126/science.1162494google scholar: lookup
    17. Kim D, Kim CH, Moon JI, Chung YG, Chang MY, Han BS, Ko S, Yang E, Cha KY, Lanza R, Kim KS. Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by direct delivery of reprogramming proteins.. Cell Stem Cell 2009 Jun 5;4(6):472-6.
      pmc: PMC2705327pubmed: 19481515doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.005google scholar: lookup
    18. Warren L, Manos PD, Ahfeldt T, Loh YH, Li H, Lau F, Ebina W, Mandal PK, Smith ZD, Meissner A, Daley GQ, Brack AS, Collins JJ, Cowan C, Schlaeger TM, Rossi DJ. Highly efficient reprogramming to pluripotency and directed differentiation of human cells with synthetic modified mRNA.. Cell Stem Cell 2010 Nov 5;7(5):618-30.
      pmc: PMC3656821pubmed: 20888316doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.08.012google scholar: lookup
    19. Nagy K, Sung HK, Zhang P, Laflamme S, Vincent P, Agha-Mohammadi S, Woltjen K, Monetti C, Michael IP, Smith LC, Nagy A. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from equine fibroblasts.. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2011 Sep;7(3):693-702.
      pmc: PMC3137777pubmed: 21347602doi: 10.1007/s12015-011-9239-5google scholar: lookup
    20. Watts AE, Yeager AE, Kopyov OV, Nixon AJ. Fetal derived embryonic-like stem cells improve healing in a large animal flexor tendonitis model.. Stem Cell Res Ther 2011 Jan 27;2(1):4.
      pmc: PMC3092144pubmed: 21272343doi: 10.1186/scrt45google scholar: lookup
    21. Gutierrez-Aranda I, Ramos-Mejia V, Bueno C, Munoz-Lopez M, Real PJ, Mácia A, Sanchez L, Ligero G, Garcia-Parez JL, Menendez P. Human induced pluripotent stem cells develop teratoma more efficiently and faster than human embryonic stem cells regardless the site of injection.. Stem Cells 2010 Sep;28(9):1568-70.
      pmc: PMC2996086pubmed: 20641038doi: 10.1002/stem.471google scholar: lookup
    22. Niwa H, Miyazaki J, Smith AG. Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells.. Nat Genet 2000 Apr;24(4):372-6.
      pubmed: 10742100doi: 10.1038/74199google scholar: lookup
    23. Kim JB, Sebastiano V, Wu G, Araúzo-Bravo MJ, Sasse P, Gentile L, Ko K, Ruau D, Ehrich M, van den Boom D, Meyer J, Hübner K, Bernemann C, Ortmeier C, Zenke M, Fleischmann BK, Zaehres H, Schöler HR. Oct4-induced pluripotency in adult neural stem cells.. Cell 2009 Feb 6;136(3):411-9.
      pubmed: 19203577doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.023google scholar: lookup
    24. Episkopou V. SOX2 functions in adult neural stem cells.. Trends Neurosci 2005 May;28(5):219-21.
      pubmed: 15866195doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2005.03.003google scholar: lookup
    25. Masui S, Nakatake Y, Toyooka Y, Shimosato D, Yagi R, Takahashi K, Okochi H, Okuda A, Matoba R, Sharov AA, Ko MS, Niwa H. Pluripotency governed by Sox2 via regulation of Oct3/4 expression in mouse embryonic stem cells.. Nat Cell Biol 2007 Jun;9(6):625-35.
      pubmed: 17515932doi: 10.1038/ncb1589google scholar: lookup
    26. Mitsui K, Tokuzawa Y, Itoh H, Segawa K, Murakami M, Takahashi K, Maruyama M, Maeda M, Yamanaka S. The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells.. Cell 2003 May 30;113(5):631-42.
      pubmed: 12787504doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00393-3google scholar: lookup
    27. Wernig M, Meissner A, Foreman R, Brambrink T, Ku M, Hochedlinger K, Bernstein BE, Jaenisch R. In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state.. Nature 2007 Jul 19;448(7151):318-24.
      pubmed: 17554336doi: 10.1038/nature05944google scholar: lookup
    28. Darr H, Mayshar Y, Benvenisty N. Overexpression of NANOG in human ES cells enables feeder-free growth while inducing primitive ectoderm features.. Development 2006 Mar;133(6):1193-201.
      pubmed: 16501172doi: 10.1242/dev.02286google scholar: lookup
    29. Lin T, Chao C, Saito S, Mazur SJ, Murphy ME, Appella E, Xu Y. p53 induces differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells by suppressing Nanog expression.. Nat Cell Biol 2005 Feb;7(2):165-71.
      pubmed: 15619621doi: 10.1038/ncb1211google scholar: lookup
    30. Cotterman R, Jin VX, Krig SR, Lemen JM, Wey A, Farnham PJ, Knoepfler PS. N-Myc regulates a widespread euchromatic program in the human genome partially independent of its role as a classical transcription factor.. Cancer Res 2008 Dec 1;68(23):9654-62.
    31. Page RL, Ambady S, Holmes WF, Vilner L, Kole D, Kashpur O, Huntress V, Vojtic I, Whitton H, Dominko T. Induction of stem cell gene expression in adult human fibroblasts without transgenes.. Cloning Stem Cells 2009 Sep;11(3):417-26.
      pmc: PMC2925031pubmed: 19622035doi: 10.1089/clo.2009.0015google scholar: lookup
    32. Ibrahim S, Saunders K, Kydd JH, Lunn DP, Steinbach F. Screening of anti-human leukocyte monoclonal antibodies for reactivity with equine leukocytes.. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2007 Sep 15;119(1-2):63-80.
      pubmed: 17707518doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2007.06.034google scholar: lookup
    33. Hass PE, Wada HG, Herman MM, Sussman HH. Alkaline phosphatase of mouse teratoma stem cells: immunochemical and structural evidence for its identity as a somatic gene product.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1979 Mar;76(3):1164-8.
      pmc: PMC383210pubmed: 286302doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.3.1164google scholar: lookup
    34. Sumer H, Liu J, Verma PJ. The use of signalling pathway inhibitors and chromatin modifiers for enhancing pluripotency.. Theriogenology 2010 Sep 1;74(4):525-33.

    Citations

    This article has been cited 6 times.
    1. He C, Kalafut NC, Sandoval SO, Risgaard R, Sirois CL, Yang C, Khullar S, Suzuki M, Huang X, Chang Q, Zhao X, Sousa AMM, Wang D. BOMA, a machine-learning framework for comparative gene expression analysis across brains and organoids.. Cell Rep Methods 2023 Feb 27;3(2):100409.
      doi: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2023.100409pubmed: 36936070google scholar: lookup
    2. Dessouki FBA, Singal PK, Singla DK. Rat-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells-Derived Cardiac Myocytes in a Cell Culture Dish.. Methods Mol Biol 2022;2520:37-51.
      doi: 10.1007/7651_2021_406pubmed: 34128207google scholar: lookup
    3. Rheault-Henry M, White I, Grover D, Atoui R. Stem cell therapy for heart failure: Medical breakthrough, or dead end?. World J Stem Cells 2021 Apr 26;13(4):236-259.
      doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v13.i4.236pubmed: 33959217google scholar: lookup
    4. Paz AG, Maghaireh H, Mangano FG. Stem Cells in Dentistry: Types of Intra- and Extraoral Tissue-Derived Stem Cells and Clinical Applications.. Stem Cells Int 2018;2018:4313610.
      doi: 10.1155/2018/4313610pubmed: 30057624google scholar: lookup
    5. Zhang W, Ouyang H, Dass CR, Xu J. Current research on pharmacologic and regenerative therapies for osteoarthritis.. Bone Res 2016;4:15040.
      doi: 10.1038/boneres.2015.40pubmed: 26962464google scholar: lookup
    6. Gyles C. The promise of stem cell technology.. Can Vet J 2012 Oct;53(10):1025-6, 1028.
      pubmed: 23543922