Energetic cost of locomotion on different equine treadmills.
Abstract: Human athletes run faster and experience fewer injuries when running on surfaces with a stiffness 'tuned' to their bodies. We questioned if the same might be true for horses, and if so, would running on surfaces of different stiffness cause a measurable change in the amount of energy required to move at a given speed? Objective: Different brands of commercial treadmills have pans of unequal stiffness, and this difference would result in different metabolic power requirements to locomote at a given speed. Methods: We tested for differences in stiffness between a Mustang 2200 and a Säto I commercial treadmill by incrementally loading each treadmill near the centre of the pan with fixed weights and measuring the displacement of the pan as weights were added or removed from the pan. We trained six 3-year-old Thoroughbreds to run on the 2 treadmills. After 4 months the horses ran with reproducible specific maximum rates of O2 consumption (VO2max/kg bwt, 2.62 +/- 0.23 (s.d.) mlO2 STPD/sec/kg) at 14.2 +/- 0.7 (s.d.) m/sec. They were alternately run on the 2 treadmills at identical grade (0.40 +/- 0.02%) and speeds (1.83 (walk), 4.0 (trot) and 8.0 (canter) m/sec, all +/- 0.03 m/sec) while wearing an open-flow mask for measurement of VO2. Results: The Mustang treadmill was over 6 times stiffer than the Säto. The VO2/kg bwt increased by approximately 4-fold over the range of speeds studied on both treadmills. Oxygen consumption was significantly lower at all speeds for the Mustang treadmill compared to the Säto. The fractional difference in energy cost decreased by a factor of 6 with increasing speed, although absolute difference in cost was relatively constant. Conclusions: We suggest it costs less energy for horses to walk, trot or canter on a stiffer treadmill than on a more compliant treadmill, at least within the ranges of stiffness evaluated. Conclusions: It may be possible to define a substrate stiffness 'tuned' to a horse's body enabling maximal energetic economy when running. The differences between treadmills allows more accurate comparisons between physiological studies conducted on treadmills of different stiffness, and might help to identify an ideal track stiffness to reduce locomotor injuries in equine athletes.
Publication Date: 2007-04-04 PubMed ID: 17402449DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2006.tb05570.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Comparative Study
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research explores how the stiffness of different treadmill surfaces affects the energy horses expend while running at a set speed. The study finds that horses use less energy when running on stiffer treadmills, suggesting that it may be possible to determine an optimal surface stiffness for maximum energy efficiency in horses.
Study Objectives and Methods
- The primary objective of this research was to understand if running on treadmill surfaces of varying stiffness would result in changes in the amount of energy horses need to move at a fixed speed.
- The researchers hypothesized that differences in the stiffness of different commercial treadmill brands would lead to varying metabolic energy requirements for movement at a given speed.
- The stiffness of two commercial treadmills (Mustang 2200 and Säto I) was tested by applying fixed weights near the centre of the treadmill and measuring the resulting displacement.
- Six 3-year-old Thoroughbreds were trained to run on the two different treadmills for four months, after which they achieved a consistent rate of maximum oxygen consumption at a set speed.
Results
- The results of the study showed that the Mustang treadmill was more than six times stiffer than the Säto treadmill.
- The horses’ oxygen consumption, a measure of energy expenditure, was significantly lower at all speeds on the stiffer Mustang treadmill compared to the less rigid Säto treadmill.
- The proportional difference in energy use decreased as speed increased, although the absolute difference in energy expenditure remained relatively constant.
Conclusions
- The conclusion of this study suggests that it costs horses less energy to walk, trot, or canter on a stiffer treadmill than on a more pliant one within the evaluated stiffness range.
- It could be possible to establish a substrate stiffness ideally ‘tuned’ to a horse’s body to allow for maximum energetic economy when running.
- Furthermore, the differences between treadmills could lead to more accurate comparisons in physiological studies conducted on treadmills of varying stiffness, potentially aiding in the identification of an ideal track stiffness to reduce locomotor injuries in equine athletes.
Cite This Article
APA
Jones JH, Ohmura H, Stanley SD, Hiraga A.
(2007).
Energetic cost of locomotion on different equine treadmills.
Equine Vet J Suppl(36), 365-369.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2006.tb05570.x Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Energy Metabolism / physiology
- Exercise Test / adverse effects
- Exercise Test / instrumentation
- Exercise Test / methods
- Exercise Test / veterinary
- Female
- Horses / metabolism
- Horses / physiology
- Locomotion / physiology
- Male
- Oxygen Consumption
- Physical Conditioning, Animal / physiology
Citations
This article has been cited 4 times.- Araneda OF. Horse Racing as a Model to Study the Relationship between Air Pollutants and Physical Performance. Animals (Basel) 2022 Apr 28;12(9).
- Witkowska-Piłaszewicz O, Maśko M, Domino M, Winnicka A. Infrared Thermography Correlates with Lactate Concentration in Blood during Race Training in Horses. Animals (Basel) 2020 Nov 9;10(11).
- Poole DC, Copp SW, Colburn TD, Craig JC, Allen DL, Sturek M, O'Leary DS, Zucker IH, Musch TI. Guidelines for animal exercise and training protocols for cardiovascular studies. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2020 May 1;318(5):H1100-H1138.
- Birks EK, Ohmura H, Jones JH. Measuring V̇O(2) in hypoxic and hyperoxic conditions using dynamic gas mixing with a flow-through indirect calorimeter. J Equine Sci 2019;30(4):87-92.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists