Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2023; 127; 104825; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104825

Equids in Equine Assisted Services: A Scoping Review.

Abstract: Equid welfare in equine assisted services (EAS) is an area that has received attention, but less attention than the documentation of human outcomes in response to EAS. To safeguard the well-being of equids and minimize human risk of injury, continued research on the effects of EAS programming and participants on equids needs to occur. The aims of this systematic scoping review were to identify the approaches taken for describing and understanding equids in EAS and the methods employed in evaluating equids' responses to EAS programming, participants, or both. Literature searches were performed in relevant databases to identify titles and abstracts for screening. Fifty-three articles were identified for full-text review. Fifty-one articles met the inclusion criteria and were retained for information and data extraction. The qualitative grouping of articles by study aim resulted in four categories: (1) characterization and description of equids in EAS; (2) the acute responses of equids to EAS programming, participants, or both; (3) the effects of management practices; and (4) the chronic responses of equids to EAS programming and participants. The latter three areas are in need of more research, especially as it relates to differentiating acute and chronic effects of EAS on the equids involved. Detailed reporting of information on study design, programming and participant characteristics, equid demographics, and workload are needed to facilitate comparison among studies and permit eventual meta-analysis of studies. Multi-faceted approaches including an array of measurements as well as relevant and informative control groups or conditions are required to identify the complex effects of EAS work on equids, their welfare, well-being, and affective states.
Publication Date: 2023-05-26 PubMed ID: 37244632DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104825Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Systematic Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper focuses on the well-being of equids (e.g., horses, donkeys, mules) used in equine-assisted services (EAS) — therapeutic or developmental activities involving equines. The study systematically reviews existing research on how EAS impacts these animals and reveals that more research is needed in this area, especially on differentiating acute and chronic effects of EAS on equids.

Research Methodology

  • The researchers conducted a systematic scoping review of existing literature, searching relevant databases for titles and abstracts linked to equids and EAS.
  • Out of 53 articles chosen for full-text review, 51 met the criteria for inclusion into the study.
  • These selected articles were then grouped qualitatively by study aim into four categories for easier analysis.

Review Findings

  • The first category was related to the characterization and description of equids in EAS, giving a sense of the nature of equids’ involvement in these services.
  • The second category involved studies on acute responses of equids to EAS programming, participants or both. ‘Acute’ refers to immediate or short-term responses of the animals to EAS.
  • The third category addressed the effects of management practices on equids. This included exploring how the handling and care of these animals can impact their wellbeing in the context of EAS.
  • The last category dealt with the chronic responses of equids to EAS programming and participants, looking at long-term effects on the animals involved.

Conclusions and Recommendations

  • The review indicated a need for more research, particularly in understanding the differences between the acute and chronic effects of EAS on equids.
  • The researchers suggested that more detailed reporting on the study design, participant characteristics, equid demographics and workload is necessary for facilitating comparison among studies and future meta-analysis.
  • They called for multi-faceted research approaches, incorporating multiple types of measurements and a range of relevant control groups or conditions, to identify the intricate impacts of EAS work on equids.

Cite This Article

APA
Rankins EM, McKeever KH, Malinowski K. (2023). Equids in Equine Assisted Services: A Scoping Review. J Equine Vet Sci, 127, 104825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104825

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 127
Pages: 104825
PII: S0737-0806(23)00631-7

Researcher Affiliations

Rankins, Ellen M
  • Rutgers Equine Science Center, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ. Electronic address: mckeever@sebs.rutgers.edu.
McKeever, Kenneth H
  • Rutgers Equine Science Center, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
Malinowski, Karyn
  • Rutgers Equine Science Center, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Humans
  • Horses
  • Equine-Assisted Therapy

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of Competing Interest There were no conflicts of concern when conducting this literature review.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.