Analyze Diet
Frontiers in neuroanatomy2019; 13; 89; doi: 10.3389/fnana.2019.00089

Equine Stereotaxtic Population Average Brain Atlas With Neuroanatomic Correlation.

Abstract: There is growing interest in the horse for behavioral, neuroanatomic and neuroscientific research due to its large and complex brain, cognitive abilities and long lifespan making it neurologically interesting and a potential large animal model for several neuropsychological diseases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a powerful neuroscientific research tool that can be performed , with adapted equine facilities, or in the research setting. The brain atlas is a fundamental resource for neuroimaging research, and have been created for a multitude animal models, however, none currently exist for the equine brain. In this study, we document the creation of a high-resolution stereotaxic population average brain atlas of the equine. The atlas was generated from nine unfixed equine cadaver brains imaged within 4 h of euthanasia in a 3-tesla MRI. The atlas was generated using linear and non-linear registration methods and quality assessed using signal and contrast to noise calculations. Tissue segmentation maps (TSMs) for white matter (WM), gray matter (GM) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), were generated and manually segmented anatomic priors created for multiple subcortical brain structures. The resulting atlas was validated and correlated to gross anatomical specimens and is made freely available at as an online resource for researchers (https://doi.org/10.7298/cyrs-7b51.2). The mean volume metrics for the whole brain, GM and WM for the included subjects were documented and the effect of age and laterality assessed. Alterations in brain volume in relation to age were identified, though these variables were not found to be significantly correlated. All subjects had higher whole brain, GM and WM volumes on the right side, consistent with the well documented right forebrain dominance of horses. This atlas provides an important tool for automated processing in equine and translational neuroimaging research.
Publication Date: 2019-10-03 PubMed ID: 31636547PubMed Central: PMC6787676DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2019.00089Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article describes the development of a detailed brain atlas for horses, generated from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of nine cadaver brains. This resource, now freely available online, is a crucial tool for equine neuroimaging research, providing insights into normal brain structures and their variations with age and side of the brain.

Methodology

  • The researchers used nine unfixed equine cadaver brains for this study, scanning them with a 3-tesla MRI within 4 hours of euthanasia to ensure high image quality.
  • Creating the atlas involved both linear and non-linear registration methods, which essentially means adjusting and aligning the brain images to create a standard model.
  • The atlas was quality assessed using signal and contrast to noise calculations to ensure accuracy and clarity.

Brain Mapping and Segmentation

  • The atlas includes tissue segmentation maps (TSMs) for white matter (WM), gray matter (GM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) providing a detailed view of different brain components.
  • Further, researchers manually segmented anatomic priors for multiple subcortical brain structures to provide detailed anatomical context.

Validation and Correlation

  • The researchers validated this brain atlas and correlated it with gross anatomical specimens for increased accuracy.
  • The resulting atlas is made freely available at https://doi.org/10.7298/cyrs-7b51.2 as an online resource for researchers.

Data Analysis and Findings

  • The study documented mean volume metrics for the whole brain, GM, WM, and assessed the effect of age and laterality (right or left side of the brain).
  • A key finding was the identification of alterations in brain volume in relation to age, although these were not found to be significantly correlated.
  • The researchers observed higher whole brain, GM and WM volumes on the right side in all subjects, which is consistent with the well-documented right forebrain dominance in horses.

Significance of Research

  • The development of this high-resolution equine brain atlas is an important tool for automated processing in equine neuroimaging research.
  • It’s useful for studying normal brain structures, their variations and potential implications in neurological diseases.
  • The availability of this free online resource provides a valuable tool for researchers worldwide.

Cite This Article

APA
Johnson PJ, Janvier V, Luh WM, FitzMaurice M, Southard T, Barry EF. (2019). Equine Stereotaxtic Population Average Brain Atlas With Neuroanatomic Correlation. Front Neuroanat, 13, 89. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2019.00089

Publication

ISSN: 1662-5129
NlmUniqueID: 101477943
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 13
Pages: 89
PII: 89

Researcher Affiliations

Johnson, Philippa J
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Cornell College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Janvier, Valentin
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Cornell College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Luh, Wen-Ming
  • Cornell Magnetic Resonance Imaging Facility, Cornell College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
FitzMaurice, Marnie
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Southard, Teresa
  • Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Barry, Erica F
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Cornell College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.

References

This article includes 33 references
  1. Allen JS, Damasio H, Grabowski TJ, Bruss J, Zhang W. Sexual dimorphism and asymmetries in the gray-white composition of the human cerebrum.. Neuroimage 2003 Apr;18(4):880-94.
    doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00034-xpubmed: 12725764google scholar: lookup
  2. Arencibia A, Vazquez JM, Ramirez JA, Ramirez G, Vilar JM, Rivero MA, Alayon S, Gil F. Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal equine brain.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2001 Sep-Oct;42(5):405-9.
  3. Austin NP, Rogers LJ. Asymmetry of flight and escape turning responses in horses.. Laterality 2007 Sep;12(5):464-74.
    doi: 10.1080/13576500701495307pubmed: 17712716google scholar: lookup
  4. Avants BB, Tustison NJ, Song G, Cook PA, Klein A, Gee JC. A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration.. Neuroimage 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2033-44.
  5. Boltze J, Ferrara F, Hainsworth AH, Bridges LR, Zille M, Lobsien D, Barthel H, McLeod DD, Gräßer F, Pietsch S, Schatzl AK, Dreyer AY, Nitzsche B. Lesional and perilesional tissue characterization by automated image processing in a novel gyrencephalic animal model of peracute intracerebral hemorrhage.. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2019 Dec;39(12):2521-2535.
    doi: 10.1177/0271678x18802119pmc: PMC6893983pubmed: 30239258google scholar: lookup
  6. Cozzi B, Povinelli M, Ballarin C, Granato A. The brain of the horse: weight and cephalization quotients.. Brain Behav Evol 2014;83(1):9-16.
    doi: 10.1159/000356527pubmed: 24335261google scholar: lookup
  7. Datta R, Lee J, Duda J, Avants BB, Vite CH, Tseng B, Gee JC, Aguirre GD, Aguirre GK. A digital atlas of the dog brain.. PLoS One 2012;7(12):e52140.
  8. Farmer K, Krueger K, Byrne RW. Visual laterality in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) interacting with humans.. Anim Cogn 2010 Mar;13(2):229-38.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0260-xpubmed: 19618222google scholar: lookup
  9. Farmer K, Krüger K, Byrne RW, Marr I. Sensory laterality in affiliative interactions in domestic horses and ponies (Equus caballus).. Anim Cogn 2018 Sep;21(5):631-637.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-1196-9pmc: PMC6097077pubmed: 29948296google scholar: lookup
  10. Friston KJ, Ashburner J, Frith CD, Poline JB, Heather JD, Frackowiak RSJ. Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum. Brain Mapp. 3, 165–189.
    doi: 10.1002/hbm.460030303google scholar: lookup
  11. Hemmings A, McBride SD, Hale CE. Perseverative responding and the aetiology of equine oral stereotypy. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 104, 143–150.
  12. Hutchinson EB, Schwerin SC, Radomski KL, Sadeghi N, Jenkins J, Komlosh ME, Irfanoglu MO, Juliano SL, Pierpaoli C. Population based MRI and DTI templates of the adult ferret brain and tools for voxelwise analysis.. Neuroimage 2017 May 15;152:575-589.
  13. Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. FSL.. Neuroimage 2012 Aug 15;62(2):782-90.
  14. Jenkinson M, Smith S. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images.. Med Image Anal 2001 Jun;5(2):143-56.
    pubmed: 11516708doi: 10.1016/s1361-8415(01)00036-6google scholar: lookup
  15. Kimberlin L, zur Linden A, Ruoff L. Atlas of Clinical Imaging and Anatomy of the Equine Head. .
  16. Lang A, Wirth G, Gasse H. Review of the surface architecture of the equine neopallium: Principle elements of a cartographic pattern of sulci revisited and further elaborated.. Anat Histol Embryol 2018 Aug;47(4):280-297.
    doi: 10.1111/ahe.12355pubmed: 29542168google scholar: lookup
  17. Larose C, Richard-Yris MA, Hausberger M, Rogers LJ. Laterality of horses associated with emotionality in novel situations.. Laterality 2006 Jul;11(4):355-67.
    doi: 10.1080/13576500600624221pubmed: 16754236google scholar: lookup
  18. Liu C, Ye FQ, Yen CC, Newman JD, Glen D, Leopold DA, Silva AC. A digital 3D atlas of the marmoset brain based on multi-modal MRI.. Neuroimage 2018 Apr 1;169:106-116.
  19. Manso-Díaz G, Dyson SJ, Dennis R, García-López JM, Biggi M, García-Real MI, San Román F, Taeymans O. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of equine head disorders: 84 cases (2000-2013).. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2015 Mar-Apr;56(2):176-87.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.12210pubmed: 25139131google scholar: lookup
  20. Morton AJ, Howland DS. Large genetic animal models of Huntington's Disease.. J Huntingtons Dis 2013;2(1):3-19.
    doi: 10.3233/JHD-130050pubmed: 25063426google scholar: lookup
  21. Nitzsche B, Frey S, Collins LD, Seeger J, Lobsien D, Dreyer A, Kirsten H, Stoffel MH, Fonov VS, Boltze J. A stereotaxic, population-averaged T1w ovine brain atlas including cerebral morphology and tissue volumes.. Front Neuroanat 2015;9:69.
    doi: 10.3389/fnana.2015.00069pmc: PMC4455244pubmed: 26089780google scholar: lookup
  22. Pascalau R, Aldea CC, Padurean VA, Szabo B. Comparative Study of the Major White Matter Tracts Anatomy in Equine, Feline and Canine Brains by Use of the Fibre Dissection Technique.. Anat Histol Embryol 2016 Oct;45(5):373-85.
    doi: 10.1111/ahe.12208pubmed: 26394884google scholar: lookup
  23. Pease A, Mair T, Spriet M. Imaging the equine head and spine.. Equine Vet J 2017 Jan;49(1):13-14.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12640pubmed: 27928832google scholar: lookup
  24. Roberts K, Hemmings AJ, McBride SD, Parker MO. Developing a 3-choice serial reaction time task for examining neural and cognitive function in an equine model.. J Neurosci Methods 2017 Dec 1;292:45-52.
  25. Scola E, Conte G, Palumbo G, Avignone S, Cinnante CM, Boito S, Persico N, Rizzuti T, Triulzi F. High resolution post-mortem MRI of non-fixed in situ foetal brain in the second trimester of gestation: Normal foetal brain development.. Eur Radiol 2018 Jan;28(1):363-371.
    doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4965-ypubmed: 28755056google scholar: lookup
  26. Smith SM. Fast robust automated brain extraction.. Hum Brain Mapp 2002 Nov;17(3):143-55.
    doi: 10.1002/hbm.10062pmc: PMC6871816pubmed: 12391568google scholar: lookup
  27. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H, Bannister PR, De Luca M, Drobnjak I, Flitney DE, Niazy RK, Saunders J, Vickers J, Zhang Y, De Stefano N, Brady JM, Matthews PM. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.. Neuroimage 2004;23 Suppl 1:S208-19.
  28. Stolzberg D, Wong C, Butler BE, Lomber SG. Catlas: An magnetic resonance imaging-based three-dimensional cortical atlas and tissue probability maps for the domestic cat (Felis catus).. J Comp Neurol 2017 Oct 15;525(15):3190-3206.
    doi: 10.1002/cne.24271pubmed: 28653335google scholar: lookup
  29. Tustison NJ, Avants BB, Cook PA, Zheng Y, Egan A, Yushkevich PA, Gee JC. N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction.. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010 Jun;29(6):1310-20.
    doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2046908pmc: PMC3071855pubmed: 20378467google scholar: lookup
  30. Ullmann JF, Janke AL, Reutens D, Watson C. Development of MRI-based atlases of non-human brains.. J Comp Neurol 2015 Feb 15;523(3):391-405.
    doi: 10.1002/cne.23678pubmed: 25236843google scholar: lookup
  31. Zhang Y, Brady M, Smith S. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm.. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001 Jan;20(1):45-57.
    doi: 10.1109/42.906424pubmed: 11293691google scholar: lookup
  32. Zilles K, Armstrong E, Schleicher A, Kretschmann HJ. The human pattern of gyrification in the cerebral cortex.. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1988;179(2):173-9.
    doi: 10.1007/bf00304699pubmed: 3232854google scholar: lookup
  33. Zilles K, Palomero-Gallagher N, Amunts K. Development of cortical folding during evolution and ontogeny.. Trends Neurosci 2013 May;36(5):275-84.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2013.01.006pubmed: 23415112google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 6 times.
  1. Nour Eddin J, Dorez H, Curcio V. Automatic brain extraction and brain tissues segmentation on multi-contrast animal MRI.. Sci Rep 2023 Apr 19;13(1):6416.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33289-7pubmed: 37076580google scholar: lookup
  2. Arribarat G, Cartiaux B, Boucher S, Montel C, Gros-Dagnac H, Fave Y, Péran P, Mogicato G, Deviers A. Ex vivo susceptibility-weighted imaging anatomy of canine brain-comparison of imaging and histological sections.. Front Neuroanat 2022;16:948159.
    doi: 10.3389/fnana.2022.948159pubmed: 36124091google scholar: lookup
  3. Baragli P, Scopa C, Felici M, Reddon AR. Horses show individual level lateralisation when inspecting an unfamiliar and unexpected stimulus.. PLoS One 2021;16(8):e0255688.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255688pubmed: 34351986google scholar: lookup
  4. Bitschi ML, Bagó Z, Rosati M, Reese S, Goehring LS, Matiasek K. A Systematic Approach to Dissection of the Equine Brain-Evaluation of a Species-Adapted Protocol for Beginners and Experts.. Front Neuroanat 2020;14:614929.
    doi: 10.3389/fnana.2020.614929pubmed: 33390909google scholar: lookup
  5. Chang SJ, Santamaria AJ, Sanchez FJ, Villamil LM, Pinheiro Saraiva P, Rodriguez J, Nunez-Gomez Y, Opris I, Solano JP, Guest JD, Noga BR. In vivo Population Averaged Stereotaxic T2w MRI Brain Template for the Adult Yucatan Micropig.. Front Neuroanat 2020;14:599701.
    doi: 10.3389/fnana.2020.599701pubmed: 33281567google scholar: lookup
  6. Boucher S, Arribarat G, Cartiaux B, Lallemand EA, Péran P, Deviers A, Mogicato G. Diffusion Tensor Imaging Tractography of White Matter Tracts in the Equine Brain.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:382.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00382pubmed: 32850994google scholar: lookup