Abstract: Equine health is important in regard to trade, economy, society, and the veterinary, as well as public health. To reduce the burden of equine infectious diseases internationally, it is important to collect, review, and distribute equine health surveillance data as accurate and timely as possible. Within this study, we aimed at providing a comprehensive descriptive analysis of data submitted to Equinella, a voluntary veterinary-based surveillance system of non-notifiable equine infectious diseases and clinical signs, in Switzerland. This was achieved by reviewing the reports submitted since its relaunch in November 2013 and until April 2019, as well as assessing the data validity, activeness of participating veterinarians, coverage of the equine population, geographical representativeness, and timeliness of the system. In total, 630 reports have been submitted. Data validity ranged between 88.2 and 100%. The coverage of Equinella was assessed to be 50.8% of the Swiss equine population. Over the 5.5 years, of all 102 registered veterinarians, 67 (65.7%) submitted at least one report. On average, these veterinarians submitted 1.7 reports per year (median = 4 reports). More recently, in 2018, approximately only one-third [29 (28.4%)] of all registered veterinarians submitted at least one report. However, 59 (57.8%) have responded to the monthly reminder emails to confirm that they have not observed any relevant clinical case to be reported at least once (median number of confirmation per veterinarian = 9 of 12 reminder emails). The incidence of reports varied between cantons (member states of the Swiss confederation). The median timeliness of report submission was found to be 7 days. Overall, Equinella has been receiving reports since its initiation and contributed continuously to the surveillance of infectious diseases in the Swiss equine population and provided an output for the international equine community. Challenges encountered in achieving a higher number of submitted reports and increasing the coverage of the equine population, as well as the overall activeness of veterinarians, require further work. With our study, we provide a comprehensive overview of a veterinary-based voluntary surveillance system for equine health, assessed challenges of such, and suggest concrete improvements with transdisciplinary approaches for similar veterinary-based surveillance systems.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research evaluates Equinella, an infectious disease surveillance system for equines in Switzerland over a 5.5-year period – looking at the information collected and how effective its implementation has been in monitoring equine health.
Background
The study centers around Equinella, a voluntary veterinary-based surveillance system in Switzerland for monitoring non-notifiable equine infectious diseases and clinical signs.
For the importance of trade, economy, society, veterinary, and public health, a thorough horse health surveillance system is essential.
The study aimed at a comprehensive analysis of data collected by Equinella from its re-launch in November 2013 till April 2019.
Methodology and Findings
The researchers evaluated the data validity, the activeness of participating veterinarians, the coverage of the equine population under this surveillance, geographical representativeness, and the timeliness of the system.
Digging into the data gathered, a total of 630 reports had been submitted during the observational period, with a data validity ranging between 88.2 and 100%.
The coverage of the Equinella program was estimated to be 50.8% of the total Swiss equine population.
Among 102 registered veterinarians, 67 (65.7%) submitted at least one report, on average making 1.7 reports per year.
However, in 2018, only 29 (28.4%) of all registered veterinarians submitted at least one report. Despite this, a substantial number of veterinarians (n=59, 57.8%), have responded to the monthly reminder emails confirming absence of any relevant clinical case to be reported.
The incidence of reports differed across various cantons (member states of the Swiss confederation).
The median time taken to submit a report was found to be 7 days.
Conclusions
Since its inception, Equinella has been receiving and providing continuous output on the surveillance of infectious diseases in the Swiss equine population for the international equine community.
However, certain challenges were identified such as increasing the number of submitted reports, enhancing the coverage of the equine population, and improving the general activeness of veterinarians.
The study provides a comprehensive overview and analysis of a voluntary veterinary-based surveillance system for equine health and suggests potential improvements for similar veterinary-based surveillance systems using a transdisciplinary approach.
Cite This Article
APA
Özçelik R, Graubner C, Remy-Wohlfender F, Dürr S, Faverjon C.
(2020).
Evaluating 5.5 Years of Equinella: A Veterinary-Based Voluntary Infectious Disease Surveillance System of Equines in Switzerland.
Front Vet Sci, 7, 327.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00327
Veterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Graubner, Claudia
ISME-Equine Clinic Bern, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Remy-Wohlfender, Franziska
ISME-Equine Clinic Bern, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Dürr, Salome
Veterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Faverjon, Céline
Veterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
References
This article includes 46 references
Balasuriya UBR, Carossino M, Timoney PJ. Equine viral arteritis: a respiratory and reproductive disease of significant economic importance to the equine industry.. Equine Vet Educ (2018) 30:497–512.
Sack A, Cullinane A, Daramragchaa U, Chuluunbaatar M, Gonchigoo B, Gray GC. Equine influenza virus- a neglected, reemergent disease threat.. Emerg Infect Dis (2019) 25:1185–91.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (2002). Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5657660/pdf/mm6602a3.pdf (accessed July 24, 2019).
Playford EG, McCall B, Smith G, Slinko V, Allen G, Smith I, Moore F, Taylor C, Kung YH, Field H. Human Hendra virus encephalitis associated with equine outbreak, Australia, 2008.. Emerg Infect Dis 2010 Feb;16(2):219-23.
European Center for Disease Prevention and Control nCommunicable Disease Threats Reports. (2019). Available online at: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/threats-and-outbreaks/reports-and-data/weekly-threats (accessed June 17, 2020).
Campbell GL, Marfin AA, Lanciotti RS, Gubler DJ. West Nile virus.. Lancet Infect Dis 2002 Sep;2(9):519-29.
Porter RS, Leblond A, Lecollinet S, Tritz P, Cantile C, Kutasi O, Zientara S, Pradier S, van Galen G, Speybroek N, Saegerman C. Clinical diagnosis of West Nile Fever in Equids by classification and regression tree (CART) analysis and comparative study of clinical appearance in three European countries.. Transbound Emerg Dis 2011 Jun;58(3):197-205.
Andersson K, Lehtola M. Regulating the new equine industry in finland. Wicked problems, governance models and gendered power structures.. Sociol Ruralis (2011) 51:387–403.
Vanderman KS, Swinker AM, Gill BE, Radhakrishna RB, Kniffen DM, Staniar WB. Survey on the implementation of National equine identification in the United States.. J Equine Vet Sci (2009) 29:819–22.
Murray G, Munstermann S, Lam K. Benefits and Challenges Posed by the Worldwide Expansion of Equestrian Events – New Standards for the Population of Competition Horses and Equine Diseases Free Zones (EDFZ) in Countries.. (2013).
Wohlfender FD, Schüpbach G, Gerber V, Wehrli Eser M, Hauser R, Meier HP. A review of twenty years of equine infectious disease monitoring in Switzerland: past, present and future.. J Equine Vet Sci (2012) 32:S92.
Wohlfender-Remy F, Struchen R, Graubner C, Balmer S, Hadorn D. Re-launch of Equinella: a web-based equine disease reporting and information platform.. J Equine Vet Sci (2016) 39:S17.
. Data Quality Monitoring and Surveillance System Evaluation: A Handbook of Methods and Applications.. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control ECDC, 2014. (2014).
Jackman S, Tahk A, Zeileis A, Maimone C, Fearon J, Maintainer ZM. Political Science Computational Laboratory Version 1.5.2, R Package “pscl”.. (2017).
Vial F, Berezowski J. A practical approach to designing syndromic surveillance systems for livestock and poultry.. Prev Vet Med 2015 Jun 1;120(1):27-38.
Faverjon C, Berezowski J. Choosing the best algorithm for event detection based on the intended application: A conceptual framework for syndromic surveillance.. J Biomed Inform 2018 Sep;85:126-135.
Jajosky RA, Groseclose SL. Evaluation of reporting timeliness of public health surveillance systems for infectious diseases.. BMC Public Health 2004 Jul 26;4:29.
Faverjon C, Andersson MG, Decors A, Tapprest J, Tritz P, Sandoz A, Kutasi O, Sala C, Leblond A. Evaluation of a Multivariate Syndromic Surveillance System for West Nile Virus.. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2016 Jun;16(6):382-90.
del Rocio Amezcua M, Pearl DL, Friendship RM, McNab WB. Evaluation of a veterinary-based syndromic surveillance system implemented for swine.. Can J Vet Res 2010 Oct;74(4):241-51.