FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2023; 13(15); 2496; doi: 10.3390/ani13152496

Evaluating Overall Performance in High-Level Dressage Horse-Rider Combinations by Comparing Measurements from Inertial Sensors with General Impression Scores Awarded by Judges.

Abstract: In the sport of dressage, one or more judges score the combined performance of a horse and rider with an emphasis on the technical correctness of the movements performed. At the end of the test, a single score is awarded for the 'general impression', which considers the overall performance of the horse and rider as a team. This study explored original measures that contributed to the general impression score in a group of 20 horse-rider combinations. Horses and riders were equipped with inertial measurement units (200 Hz) to represent the angular motion of a horse's back and the motions of a rider's pelvis and trunk. Each combination performed a standard dressage test that was recorded to video. Sections of the video were identified for straight-line movements. The videos were analyzed by two or three judges. Four components were scored separately: gaits of the horse, rider posture, effectiveness of aids, and harmony with the horse. The main contributor to the score for gaits was stride frequency (R = -0.252, = 0.015), with a slower frequency being preferred. Higher rider component scores were associated with more symmetrical transverse-plane trunk motion, indicating that this original measure is the most useful predictor of rider performance.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2023-08-02 PubMed ID: 37570304PubMed Central: PMC10417551DOI: 10.3390/ani13152496Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates how measurements drawn from inertial sensors can be used to evaluate the overall performance in high-level dressage horse-rider combinations. The aim is to find out what correlates and contributes to the ‘general impression’ scores awarded by judges in the sport.

Objective of the Study

  • The research set out to investigate the effectiveness of using inertial sensors in evaluating the performance of high-level dressage horse-rider combinations.
  • The study was motivated by the need to establish objective measures of performance, focusing primarily on those original factors that contribute most to a high ‘general impression’ score from judges.

Methodology

  • The researchers used a group of 20 horse-rider combinations to gather the necessary data for the study.
  • Each horse-rider pair was equipped with inertial measurement units (IMUs) that operated at a frequency of 200Hz. These sensors recorded the angular motion of the horse’s back and the movements of the rider’s pelvis and trunk.
  • Every pair performed a standard dressage test, which was videotaped. The video was later analyzed by two or three judges, with specific emphasis on the straight-line movements of the pairs.

Results

  • The study found that lower stride frequency (R = -0.252, p = 0.015), which corresponds to slower motion, tended to have higher ‘gaits’ scores.
  • Another key finding was that more symmetrical transverse-plane motion of the rider’s trunk was associated with higher scores for the rider’s component. This suggests that this particular measure may be a reliable predictor for evaluating a rider’s performance.

Conclusion

  • The researchers concluded that inertial sensors present a potential means of objectively evaluating the performance of dressage horse-rider combinations. The study further suggested measures, such as stride frequency and trunk motion symmetry, that could accurately predict performance.
  • This study’s findings could potentially influence how dressage horse-rider combinations are evaluated, bringing in a new era of objective measures that may complement the traditional subjective evaluations by judges.

Cite This Article

APA
Hobbs SJ, Serra Braganca FM, Rhodin M, Hernlund E, Peterson M, Clayton HM. (2023). Evaluating Overall Performance in High-Level Dressage Horse-Rider Combinations by Comparing Measurements from Inertial Sensors with General Impression Scores Awarded by Judges. Animals (Basel), 13(15), 2496. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13152496

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 13
Issue: 15
PII: 2496

Researcher Affiliations

Hobbs, Sarah Jane
  • Research Centre for Applied Sport, Physical Activity and Performance, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.
Serra Braganca, Filipe Manuel
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 112-114, NL-3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rhodin, Marie
  • Department of Anatomy Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Hernlund, Elin
  • Department of Anatomy Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Peterson, Mick
  • Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering and UK Ag Equine Programs, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USA.
Clayton, Hilary M
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 55 references
  1. Fédération Equestre Internationale. Dressage Scoring: The Basics. .
  2. Fédération Equestre Internationale. FEI Dressage & FEI Para Dressage Guidelines on Use of Tack, Equipment and Dress. .
  3. . The Official Instruction Handbook of the German National Equestrian Federation. Kenilworth; Buckingham, UK: 1997. Completely Revised Edition.
  4. Eckardt F, Witte K. Horse–Rider Interaction: A New Method Based on Inertial Measurement Units. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2017;55:1–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2017.02.016google scholar: lookup
  5. Münz A, Eckardt F, Witte K. Horse-rider interaction in dressage riding.. Hum Mov Sci 2014 Feb;33:227-37.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.09.003pubmed: 24290612google scholar: lookup
  6. Wilkins CA, Nankervis K, Protheroe L, Draper SB. Static pelvic posture is not related to dynamic pelvic tilt or competition level in dressage riders.. Sports Biomech 2023 Oct;22(10):1290-1302.
    doi: 10.1080/14763141.2020.1797150pubmed: 32811291google scholar: lookup
  7. Baillet H, Thouvarecq R, Vérin E, Tourny C, Benguigui N, Komar J, Leroy D. Human Energy Expenditure and Postural Coordination on the Mechanical Horse.. J Mot Behav 2017 Jul-Aug;49(4):441-457.
    doi: 10.1080/00222895.2016.1241743pubmed: 27870595google scholar: lookup
  8. Kang OD, Ryu YC, Ryew CC, Oh WY, Lee CE, Kang MS. Comparative analyses of rider position according to skill levels during walk and trot in Jeju horse.. Hum Mov Sci 2010 Dec;29(6):956-63.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.05.010pubmed: 20800913google scholar: lookup
  9. Eckardt F, Witte K. Kinematic Analysis of the Rider According to Different Skill Levels in Sitting Trot and Canter. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2016;39:51–57.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.07.022google scholar: lookup
  10. Hobbs SJ, Baxter J, Broom L, Rossell LA, Sinclair J, Clayton HM. Posture, flexibility and grip strength in horse riders.. J Hum Kinet 2014 Sep 29;42:113-25.
    doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0066pmc: PMC4234750pubmed: 25414745google scholar: lookup
  11. Terada K. Comparison of Head Movement and EMG Activity of Muscles between Advanced and Novice Horseback Riders at Different Gaits. J. Equine Sci. 2000;11:83–90.
    doi: 10.1294/jes.11.83google scholar: lookup
  12. Byström A, Roepstroff L, Geser-von Peinen K, Weishaupt MA, Rhodin M. Differences in rider movement pattern between different degrees of collection at the trot in high-level dressage horses ridden on a treadmill.. Hum Mov Sci 2015 Jun;41:1-8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2015.01.016pubmed: 25703543google scholar: lookup
  13. Engell M.T., Clayton H.M., Egenvall A., Weishaupt M.A., Roepstorff L. Postural changes and their effects in elite riders when actively influencing the horse versus sitting passively at trot. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2016;12:27–33.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP150035google scholar: lookup
  14. Bosch S, Serra Bragança F, Marin-Perianu M, Marin-Perianu R, van der Zwaag BJ, Voskamp J, Back W, van Weeren R, Havinga P. EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse Gait.. Sensors (Basel) 2018 Mar 13;18(3).
    doi: 10.3390/s18030850pmc: PMC5877382pubmed: 29534022google scholar: lookup
  15. Moorman VJ, Reiser RF 2nd, McIlwraith CW, Kawcak CE. Validation of an equine inertial measurement unit system in clinically normal horses during walking and trotting.. Am J Vet Res 2012 Aug;73(8):1160-70.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.8.1160pubmed: 22849676google scholar: lookup
  16. Rhodin M, Persson-Sjodin E, Egenvall A, Serra Bragança FM, Pfau T, Roepstorff L, Weishaupt MA, Thomsen MH, van Weeren PR, Hernlund E. Vertical movement symmetry of the withers in horses with induced forelimb and hindlimb lameness at trot.. Equine Vet J 2018 Nov;50(6):818-824.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12844pmc: PMC6175082pubmed: 29658147google scholar: lookup
  17. Serra Bragança F.M., Roepstorff C., Rhodin M., Pfau T., van Weeren P.R., Roepstorff L. Quantitative lameness assessment in the horse based on upper body movement symmetry: The effect of different filtering techniques on the quantification of motion symmetry. Biomed. Signal Process. Control. 2020;57:101674.
    doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101674google scholar: lookup
  18. Pfau T, Stubbs NC, Kaiser LJ, Brown LE, Clayton HM. Effect of trotting speed and circle radius on movement symmetry in horses during lunging on a soft surface.. Am J Vet Res 2012 Dec;73(12):1890-9.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.12.1890pubmed: 23176414google scholar: lookup
  19. Schöllhorn WI, Peham C, Licka T, Scheidl M. A pattern recognition approach for the quantification of horse and rider interactions.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2006 Aug;(36):400-5.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2006.tb05576.xpubmed: 17402455google scholar: lookup
  20. Peham C., Licka T., Kapaun M., Scheidl M. A new method to quantify harmony of the horse-rider system in dressage. Sports Eng. 2001;4:95–101.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1460-2687.2001.00077.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  21. Fruehwirth B, Peham C, Scheidl M, Schobesberger H. Evaluation of pressure distribution under an English saddle at walk, trot and canter.. Equine Vet J 2004 Dec;36(8):754-7.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164044848235pubmed: 15656510google scholar: lookup
  22. Greve L, Dyson SJ. The interrelationship of lameness, saddle slip and back shape in the general sports horse population.. Equine Vet J 2014 Nov;46(6):687-94.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12222pubmed: 24372949google scholar: lookup
  23. Guire R., Mathie H., Fisher M., Fisher D. Riders’ perception of symmetrical pressure on their ischial tuberosities and rein contact tension whilst sitting on a static object. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2017;13:7–12.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP160026google scholar: lookup
  24. Kuhnke S., Dumbell L., Gauly M., Johnson J.L., McDonald K., von Borstel U.K. A comparison of rein tension of the rider’s dominant and non-dominant hand and the influence of the horse’s laterality. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2010;7:57–63.
    doi: 10.1017/S1755254010000243google scholar: lookup
  25. Schils S.J., Greer N.L., Stoner L.J., Kobluk C.N. Kinematic analysis of the equestrian—Walk, posting trot and sitting trot. Hum. Mov. Sci. 1993;12:693–712.
    doi: 10.1016/0167-9457(93)90011-Dgoogle scholar: lookup
  26. Olivier A, Faugloire E, Lejeune L, Biau S, Isableu B. Head Stability and Head-Trunk Coordination in Horseback Riders: The Contribution of Visual Information According to Expertise.. Front Hum Neurosci 2017;11:11.
    doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00011pmc: PMC5277006pubmed: 28194100google scholar: lookup
  27. Wolframm IA, Bosga J, Meulenbroek RG. Coordination dynamics in horse-rider dyads.. Hum Mov Sci 2013 Feb;32(1):157-70.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2012.11.002pubmed: 23290116google scholar: lookup
  28. Baxter J, Hobbs SJ, Alexander J, George LS, Sinclair J, Chohan A, Clayton HM. Rider Skill Affects Time and Frequency Domain Postural Variables When Performing Shoulder-in.. J Equine Vet Sci 2022 Feb;109:103805.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103805pubmed: 34942584google scholar: lookup
  29. Hardeman AM, Serra Bragança FM, Swagemakers JH, van Weeren PR, Roepstorff L. Variation in gait parameters used for objective lameness assessment in sound horses at the trot on the straight line and the lunge.. Equine Vet J 2019 Nov;51(6):831-839.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13075pmc: PMC6850282pubmed: 30648286google scholar: lookup
  30. Bragança FM, Bosch S, Voskamp JP, Marin-Perianu M, Van der Zwaag BJ, Vernooij JCM, van Weeren PR, Back W. Validation of distal limb mounted inertial measurement unit sensors for stride detection in Warmblood horses at walk and trot.. Equine Vet J 2017 Jul;49(4):545-551.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12651pmc: PMC5484301pubmed: 27862238google scholar: lookup
  31. Pfau T, Witte TH, Wilson AM. A method for deriving displacement data during cyclical movement using an inertial sensor.. J Exp Biol 2005 Jul;208(Pt 13):2503-14.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.01658pubmed: 15961737google scholar: lookup
  32. Biau S., Barrey E. Relationships between stride characteristics and scores in dressage tests. Pferdeheilkunde Equine Med. 2004;20:140–144.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20040205google scholar: lookup
  33. Heebner NR, Akins JS, Lephart SM, Sell TC. Reliability and validity of an accelerometry based measure of static and dynamic postural stability in healthy and active individuals.. Gait Posture 2015 Feb;41(2):535-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.12.009pubmed: 25544692google scholar: lookup
  34. Hausdorff JM, Mitchell SL, Firtion R, Peng CK, Cudkowicz ME, Wei JY, Goldberger AL. Altered fractal dynamics of gait: reduced stride-interval correlations with aging and Huntington's disease.. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1997 Jan;82(1):262-9.
    doi: 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.1.262pubmed: 9029225google scholar: lookup
  35. Peham C, Licka T, Girtler D, Scheidl M. The influence of lameness on equine stride length consistency.. Vet J 2001 Sep;162(2):153-7.
    doi: 10.1053/tvjl.2001.0593pubmed: 11531399google scholar: lookup
  36. Müller-Quirin J, Dittmann MT, Roepstorff C, Arpagaus S, Latif SN, Weishaupt MA. Riding Soundness-Comparison of Subjective With Objective Lameness Assessments of Owner-Sound Horses at Trot on a Treadmill.. J Equine Vet Sci 2020 Dec;95:103314.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103314pubmed: 33276930google scholar: lookup
  37. Graham J.H., Raz S., Hel-Or H., Nevo E. Fluctuating Asymmetry: Methods, Theory, and Applications. Symmetry 2010;2:466–540.
    doi: 10.3390/sym2020466google scholar: lookup
  38. Byström A, Rhodin M, von Peinen K, Weishaupt MA, Roepstorff L. Kinematics of saddle and rider in high-level dressage horses performing collected walk on a treadmill.. Equine Vet J 2010 May;42(4):340-5.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00063.xpubmed: 20525053google scholar: lookup
  39. Terada K., Clayton H.M., Kato K. Stabilization of wrist position during horseback riding at trot. Equine Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2006;3:179–184.
    doi: 10.1017/S1478061506337255google scholar: lookup
  40. Gardner-Morse MG, Stokes IA. The effects of abdominal muscle coactivation on lumbar spine stability.. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998 Jan 1;23(1):86-91; discussion 91-2.
    doi: 10.1097/00007632-199801010-00019pubmed: 9460158google scholar: lookup
  41. Reeves NP, Everding VQ, Cholewicki J, Morrisette DC. The effects of trunk stiffness on postural control during unstable seated balance.. Exp Brain Res 2006 Oct;174(4):694-700.
    doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0516-5pubmed: 16724177google scholar: lookup
  42. Clayton HM, Kaiser LJ, de Pue B, Kaiser L. Center-of-pressure movements during equine-assisted activities.. Am J Occup Ther 2011 Mar-Apr;65(2):211-6.
    doi: 10.5014/ajot.2011.000851pubmed: 21476369google scholar: lookup
  43. St George L, Thetford C, Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ. An exploration of stakeholder perceptions to inform the development of an evidence-based classification system in para dressage.. J Sports Sci 2022 Feb;40(4):459-469.
    doi: 10.1080/02640414.2021.1997012pubmed: 34727842google scholar: lookup
  44. Bronner S, Shippen J. Biomechanical metrics of aesthetic perception in dance.. Exp Brain Res 2015 Dec;233(12):3565-81.
    doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4424-4pubmed: 26319546google scholar: lookup
  45. Vinken P.M., Heinen T. How does the amount of movement and observer expertise shape the perception of motion aesthetics in dance?. Hum. Mov. 2022;23:46–55.
    doi: 10.5114/hm.2021.106170google scholar: lookup
  46. Bard C, Fleury M, Carrière L, Hallé M. Analysis of gymnastics judges' visual search.. Res Q Exerc Sport 1980 May;51(2):267-73.
    doi: 10.1080/02701367.1980.10605195pubmed: 7394291google scholar: lookup
  47. Vinken P.M., Stirling V., Heinen T. The aesthetics of the experts—On the relationship of observers’ and performers’ expertise when perceiving motion aesthetics in freerunning skills. J. Hum. Sport Exerc. 2022;17:782–795.
    doi: 10.14198/jhse.2022.174.06google scholar: lookup
  48. Schiffers H. What Are They Looking at? Visual Search Behaviour of Grand Prix Judges. Bachelor’s Thesis. University of Applied Science Van Hall Larenstein; Wageningen, The Netherlands: 2011.
  49. Skyrme D. A Comparison of Visual Scan Patterns for an Elite Judge, Elite Coach and Novice Judge in Dressage. Master’s Thesis. University of Chester; Chester, UK: 2013.
  50. Hobbs SJ, St George L, Reed J, Stockley R, Thetford C, Sinclair J, Williams J, Nankervis K, Clayton HM. A scoping review of determinants of performance in dressage.. PeerJ 2020;8:e9022.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.9022pmc: PMC7185025pubmed: 32355578google scholar: lookup
  51. Leach D, Cymbaluk NF. Relationships between stride length, stride frequency, velocity, and morphometrics of foals.. Am J Vet Res 1986 Sep;47(9):2090-7.
    pubmed: 3767117
  52. Back W., Barneveld A., Schamhardt H.C., Bruin G., Hartman W. Longitudinal development of the kinematics of 4-, 10-, 18- and 26-month-old Dutch Warmblood horses. Equine Vet. J. 1994;26:3–6.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1994.tb04863.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  53. Barrey E, Desliens F, Poirel D, Biau S, Lemaire S, Rivero JL, Langlois B. Early evaluation of dressage ability in different breeds.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2002 Sep;(34):319-24.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2002.tb05440.xpubmed: 12405708google scholar: lookup
  54. Heglund NC, Taylor CR, McMahon TA. Scaling stride frequency and gait to animal size: mice to horses.. Science 1974 Dec 20;186(4169):1112-3.
    doi: 10.1126/science.186.4169.1112pubmed: 4469699google scholar: lookup
  55. Gunst S, Dittmann MT, Arpagaus S, Roepstorff C, Latif SN, Klaassen B, Pauli CA, Bauer CM, Weishaupt MA. Influence of Functional Rider and Horse Asymmetries on Saddle Force Distribution During Stance and in Sitting Trot.. J Equine Vet Sci 2019 Jul;78:20-28.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.03.215pubmed: 31203980google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 8 times.
  1. Hobbs SJ, Alexander J, Wilkins C, St George L, Nankervis K, Sinclair J, Penhorwood G, Williams J, Clayton HM. Towards an Evidence-Based Classification System for Para Dressage: Associations between Impairment and Performance Measures. Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 31;13(17).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13172785pubmed: 37685049google scholar: lookup
  2. Boado A, Pollard D, Lopez-Sanroman FJ, Dyson S. Orthopaedic Injuries in 272 Dressage Horses: A Retrospective Study. Animals (Basel) 2025 Oct 14;15(20).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15202972pubmed: 41153899google scholar: lookup
  3. Resano-Zuazu M, Carmona JU, Argüelles D. Short-Term Impact of Dry Needling Treatment for Myofascial Pain on Equine Biomechanics Through Artificial Intelligence-Based Gait Analysis. Animals (Basel) 2025 May 22;15(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15111517pubmed: 40508982google scholar: lookup
  4. Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ, Rhodin M, Hernlund E, Peterson M, Bos R, Bragança FS. Vertical Movement of Head, Withers, and Pelvis of High-Level Dressage Horses Trotting in Hand vs. Being Ridden. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jan 16;15(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15020241pubmed: 39858241google scholar: lookup
  5. Asti V, Ablondi M, Molle A, Zanotti A, Vasini M, Sabbioni A. Inertial measurement unit technology for gait detection: a comprehensive evaluation of gait traits in two Italian horse breeds. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1459553.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1459553pubmed: 39479203google scholar: lookup
  6. Biau S, Leblanc M, Pycik E, Pasquiet B, Huet B. Biomechanical Characterization of Preparation for Airs above the Ground: A Mixed Approach. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jan 6;14(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14020189pubmed: 38254358google scholar: lookup
  7. Clayton HM, MacKechnie-Guire R, Hobbs SJ. Riders' Effects on Horses-Biomechanical Principles with Examples from the Literature. Animals (Basel) 2023 Dec 15;13(24).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13243854pubmed: 38136891google scholar: lookup
  8. Borowska A, Lewczuk D. Comparison of Conformation and Movement Characteristics in Dressage and Jumping Sport Warmblood Mares Based on Point Evaluation and Linear Scoring System. Animals (Basel) 2023 Oct 4;13(19).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13193101pubmed: 37835707google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,780 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.