Analyze Diet
American journal of veterinary research2011; 72(11); 1489-1495; doi: 10.2460/ajvr.72.11.1489

Evaluation of biomechanical effects of four stimulation devices placed on the hind feet of trotting horses.

Abstract: To compare effects of 4 types of stimulation devices attached to the hind feet on hoof flight, joint angles, and net joint powers of trotting horses. Methods: 8 clinically normal horses. Methods: Horses were evaluated under 5 conditions in random order: no stimulators, loose straps (10 g), lightweight tactile stimulators (55 g), limb weights (700 g), and limb weights with tactile stimulators (700 g). Reflective markers on the hind limbs were tracked during the swing phase of 6 trotting trials performed at consistent speed to determine peak hoof heights and flexion angles of the hip, stifle, tarsal, and metatarsophalangeal joints. Inverse dynamic analysis was used to calculate net joint energies. Comparisons among stimulators were made. Results: Peak hoof height was lowest for no stimulators (mean ± SD, 5.42 ± 1.38 cm) and loose straps (6.72 ± 2.19 cm), intermediate for tactile stimulators (14.13 ± 7.33 cm) and limb weights (16.86 ± 15.93 cm), and highest for limb weights plus tactile stimulators (24.35 ± 13.06 cm). Compared with no stimulators, net tarsal energy generation increased for tactile stimulators, limb weights, and limb weights plus tactile stimulators, but only the weighted conditions increased net energy generation across the hip joint. Conclusions: The type and weight of foot stimulators affected the magnitude of the kinematic and kinetic responses and the joints affected. These findings suggest that different types of foot stimulators are appropriate for rehabilitation of specific hind limb gait deficits, such as toe dragging and a short stride.
Publication Date: 2011-10-26 PubMed ID: 22023127DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.72.11.1489Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research is about understanding how four different types of foot stimulation devices can affect the movement of trotting horses. The results suggest that the different types of devices can be used for specific hind limb gait issues such as toe dragging and a short stride.

Methodology

  • The study used eight clinically normal horses to observe the effects of the stimulators.
  • The horses were evaluated under five different conditions: no stimulators on their feet, loose straps weighing 10g, lightweight tactile stimulators weighing 55g, limb weights of 700g, and limb weights with tactile stimulators, also 700g.
  • Reflective markers on the hind limbs were tracked during movement to measure peak hoof heights and flexion angles across different joints, specifically the hip, stifle, tarsal, and metatarsophalangeal joints. This was done over the course of six trotting trials done at a constant speed.

Analysis

  • Net joint energies were calculated using inverse dynamic analysis.
  • The effects of the different stimulators were compared against each other.

Results

  • The lowest peak hoof height was observed when no stimulators were used, with loose straps coming in second.
  • Intermediate hoof heights were recorded for the tactile stimulators and limb weights.
  • The highest peak hoof height was observed when limb weights were combined with tactile stimulators.
  • Compared to when no stimulators were used, net tarsal energy generation increased when tactile stimulators, limb weights, and limb weights plus tactile stimulators were used, but only the weighted conditions led to increased net energy generation across the hip joint.

Conclusion

  • The type and weight of foot stimulators do affect the kinematic and kinetic responses as well as which joints are affected.
  • The researchers concluded that these findings suggest that different types of foot stimulators can be utilized for rehabilitating specific hind limb gait deficits in horses, like a short stride or toe dragging.

Cite This Article

APA
Clayton HM, Lavagnino M, Kaiser LJ, Stubbs NC. (2011). Evaluation of biomechanical effects of four stimulation devices placed on the hind feet of trotting horses. Am J Vet Res, 72(11), 1489-1495. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.72.11.1489

Publication

ISSN: 1943-5681
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 72
Issue: 11
Pages: 1489-1495

Researcher Affiliations

Clayton, Hilary M
  • Mary Anne McPhail Equine Performance Center, Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. claytonh@cvm.msu.edu
Lavagnino, Michael
    Kaiser, LeeAnn J
      Stubbs, Narelle C

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Biomechanical Phenomena
        • Female
        • Gait
        • Hindlimb / physiology
        • Horses / physiology
        • Joints / physiology
        • Physical Stimulation

        Citations

        This article has been cited 2 times.
        1. Atalaia T, Prazeres J, Abrantes J, Clayton HM. Equine Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 22;11(6).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11061508pubmed: 34067449google scholar: lookup
        2. Greco-Otto P, Baggaley M, Edwards WB, Léguillette R. Water treadmill exercise reduces equine limb segmental accelerations and increases shock attenuation. BMC Vet Res 2019 Sep 13;15(1):329.
          doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2075-6pubmed: 31519197google scholar: lookup