Analyze Diet
Journal of veterinary internal medicine2016; 30(3); 885-891; doi: 10.1111/jvim.13934

Evaluation of Four Diagnostic Tests for Insulin Dysregulation in Adult Light-Breed Horses.

Abstract: Several tests have been evaluated in horses for quantifying insulin dysregulation to support a diagnosis of equine metabolic syndrome. Comparing the performance of these tests in the same horses will provide clarification of their accuracy in the diagnosis of equine insulin dysregulation. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between basal serum insulin concentrations (BIC), the oral sugar test (OST), the combined glucose-insulin test (CGIT), and the frequently sampled insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGTT). Methods: Twelve healthy, light-breed horses. Methods: Randomized, prospective study. Each of the above tests was performed on 12 horses. Results: Minimal model analysis of the FSIGTT was considered the reference standard and classified 7 horses as insulin resistant (IR) and 5 as insulin sensitive (IS). In contrast, BIC and OST assessment using conventional cut-off values classified all horses as IS. Kappa coefficients, measuring agreement among BIC, OST, CGIT, and FSIGTT were poor to fair. Sensitivity of the CGIT (positive phase duration of the glucose curve >45 minutes) was 85.7% and specificity was 40%, whereas CGIT ([insulin]45 >100 μIU/mL) sensitivity and specificity were 28.5% and 100%, respectively. Area under the glucose curve (AUCg0-120 ) was significantly correlated among the OST, CGIT, and FSIGTT, but Bland-Altman method and Lin's concordance coefficient showed a lack of agreement. Conclusions: Current criteria for diagnosis of insulin resistance using BIC and the OST are highly specific but lack sensitivity. The CGIT displayed better sensitivity and specificity, but modifications may be necessary to improve agreement with minimal model analysis.
Publication Date: 2016-03-25 PubMed ID: 27013065PubMed Central: PMC4913564DOI: 10.1111/jvim.13934Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Evaluation Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study is aimed at evaluating and comparing the effectiveness of four different diagnostic tests in identifying insulin dysregulation, which could be indicative of equine metabolic syndrome, in adult light-breed horses.

Objective of the Study

  • The primary objective of the study was to compare the effectiveness and agreement of four diagnostic tests: basal serum insulin concentrations (BIC), oral sugar test (OST), combined glucose-insulin test (CGIT), and frequently sampled insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGTT) in identifying insulin dysregulation in adult light-breed horses.

Methods Used

  • In this randomized, prospective study, the four tests were applied to twelve healthy, light-breed horses.
  • FSIGTT was considered the reference standard with its results used for comparison with the outcomes of the other three tests.

Results of the Research

  • FSIGTT classified seven horses as insulin resistant (IR) and five as insulin sensitive (IS).
  • The BIC and OST, when used with conventional cut-off values, classified all the horses as insulin sensitive – revealing a lack of agreement with the reference standard results.
  • The CGIT displayed sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 40% when the positive phase duration of the glucose curve was more than 45 minutes – which means that CGIT successfully identified 85.7% of genuine insulin resistance cases, and correctly ruled out 40% of non-cases.
  • This sensitivity and specificity changed to 28.5% and 100% respectively, when using another criterion ([insulin]45 >100 μIU/mL).

Conclusion of the Study

  • The study concludes that BIC and OST criteria for diagnosis of insulin resistance are highly specific, but they lack sensitivity, i.e., they can accurately identify non-cases but fail to correctly diagnose actual cases of insulin resistance.
  • On the other hand, CGIT showed better sensitivity and specificity, but the researchers suggest that modifications may be necessary for it to fall in agreement with minimal model analysis.

Cite This Article

APA
Dunbar LK, Mielnicki KA, Dembek KA, Toribio RE, Burns TA. (2016). Evaluation of Four Diagnostic Tests for Insulin Dysregulation in Adult Light-Breed Horses. J Vet Intern Med, 30(3), 885-891. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.13934

Publication

ISSN: 1939-1676
NlmUniqueID: 8708660
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 30
Issue: 3
Pages: 885-891

Researcher Affiliations

Dunbar, L K
  • Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbus, OH.
Mielnicki, K A
  • Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbus, OH.
Dembek, K A
  • Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbus, OH.
Toribio, R E
  • Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbus, OH.
Burns, T A
  • Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbus, OH.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Blood Glucose / analysis
  • Female
  • Glucose Tolerance Test / veterinary
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / metabolism
  • Horses
  • Insulin / blood
  • Insulin Resistance
  • Male
  • Prospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

References

This article includes 37 references
  1. Frank N, Geor RJ, Bailey SR, Durham AE, Johnson PJ. Equine metabolic syndrome.. J Vet Intern Med 2010 May-Jun;24(3):467-75.
  2. Frank N, Tadros EM. Insulin dysregulation.. Equine Vet J 2014 Jan;46(1):103-12.
    pubmed: 24033478doi: 10.1111/evj.12169google scholar: lookup
  3. McCue ME, Geor RJ, Schultz N. Equine metabolic syndrome: A complex disease influenced by genetics and the environement. J Equine Vet Sci 2015;35:367–375.
  4. Treiber KH, Kronfeld DS, Geor RJ. Insulin resistance in equids: possible role in laminitis.. J Nutr 2006 Jul;136(7 Suppl):2094S-2098S.
    pubmed: 16772509doi: 10.1093/jn/136.7.2094sgoogle scholar: lookup
  5. Asplin KE, Sillence MN, Pollitt CC, McGowan CM. Induction of laminitis by prolonged hyperinsulinaemia in clinically normal ponies.. Vet J 2007 Nov;174(3):530-5.
    pubmed: 17719811doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.07.003google scholar: lookup
  6. de Laat MA, McGowan CM, Sillence MN, Pollitt CC. Equine laminitis: induced by 48 h hyperinsulinaemia in Standardbred horses.. Equine Vet J 2010 Mar;42(2):129-35.
    pubmed: 20156248doi: 10.2746/042516409x475779google scholar: lookup
  7. Noble GK, Sillence MN. Diurnal rhythm and effects of feeding, exercise and recombinant equine growth hormone on serum insulin concentrations in the horse.. Equine Vet J 2013 Nov;45(6):745-50.
    pubmed: 23452063doi: 10.1111/evj.12057google scholar: lookup
  8. Eiler H, Frank N, Andrews FM, Oliver JW, Fecteau KA. Physiologic assessment of blood glucose homeostasis via combined intravenous glucose and insulin testing in horses.. Am J Vet Res 2005 Sep;66(9):1598-604.
    pubmed: 16261835doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1598google scholar: lookup
  9. Firshman AM, Valberg SJ. Factors affecting clinical assessment of insulin sensitivity in horses.. Equine Vet J 2007 Nov;39(6):567-75.
    pubmed: 18065318doi: 10.2746/042516407x238512google scholar: lookup
  10. Muniyappa R, Lee S, Chen H, Quon MJ. Current approaches for assessing insulin sensitivity and resistance in vivo: advantages, limitations, and appropriate usage.. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2008 Jan;294(1):E15-26.
    pubmed: 17957034doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00645.2007google scholar: lookup
  11. Treiber KH, Kronfeld DS, Hess TM, Boston RC, Harris PA. Use of proxies and reference quintiles obtained from minimal model analysis for determination of insulin sensitivity and pancreatic beta-cell responsiveness in horses.. Am J Vet Res 2005 Dec;66(12):2114-21.
    pubmed: 16379656doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.2114google scholar: lookup
  12. Pratt SE, Geor RJ, McCutcheon LJ. Repeatability of 2 methods for assessment of insulin sensitivity and glucose dynamics in horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2005 Nov-Dec;19(6):883-8.
  13. Schuver A, Frank N, Chameroy K, Elliott S. Assessment of insulin and glucose dynamics by using an oral sugar test in horses. J Equine Vet Sci 2014;34:465–470.
  14. Smith S, Harris PA, Menzies-Gow NJ. Comparison of the in-feed glucose test and the oral sugar test.. Equine Vet J 2016 Mar;48(2):224-7.
    pubmed: 25582152doi: 10.1111/evj.12413google scholar: lookup
  15. Carroll CL, Huntington PJ. Body condition scoring and weight estimation of horses.. Equine Vet J 1988 Jan;20(1):41-5.
  16. Henneke DR, Potter GD, Kreider JL, Yeates BF. Relationship between condition score, physical measurements and body fat percentage in mares.. Equine Vet J 1983 Oct;15(4):371-2.
  17. Carter RA, Geor RJ, Burton Staniar W, Cubitt TA, Harris PA. Apparent adiposity assessed by standardised scoring systems and morphometric measurements in horses and ponies.. Vet J 2009 Feb;179(2):204-10.
    pubmed: 18440844doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.02.029google scholar: lookup
  18. Frank N. Equine metabolic syndrome.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2011 Apr;27(1):73-92.
    pubmed: 21392655doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2010.12.004google scholar: lookup
  19. Tóth F, Frank N, Elliott SB, Perdue K, Geor RJ, Boston RC. Optimisation of the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test to reduce urinary glucose spilling in horses.. Equine Vet J 2009 Dec;41(9):844-51.
    pubmed: 20383980doi: 10.2746/042516409x439661google scholar: lookup
  20. Hackett ES, McCue PM. Evaluation of a veterinary glucometer for use in horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2010 May-Jun;24(3):617-21.
  21. Freestone JF, Wolfsheimer KJ, Kamerling SG, Church G, Hamra J, Bagwell C. Exercise induced hormonal and metabolic changes in Thoroughbred horses: effects of conditioning and acepromazine.. Equine Vet J 1991 May;23(3):219-23.
  22. Tinworth KD, Wynn PC, Boston RC, Harris PA, Sillence MN, Thevis M, Thomas A, Noble GK. Evaluation of commercially available assays for the measurement of equine insulin.. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2011 Aug;41(2):81-90.
  23. Bergman RN. Minimal model: perspective from 2005.. Horm Res 2005;64 Suppl 3:8-15.
    pubmed: 16439839doi: 10.1159/000089312google scholar: lookup
  24. Boston RC, Stefanovski D, Moate PJ, Sumner AE, Watanabe RM, Bergman RN. MINMOD Millennium: a computer program to calculate glucose effectiveness and insulin sensitivity from the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test.. Diabetes Technol Ther 2003;5(6):1003-15.
    pubmed: 14709204doi: 10.1089/152091503322641060google scholar: lookup
  25. Tóth F, Frank N, Martin-Jiménez T, Elliott SB, Geor RJ, Boston RC. Measurement of C-peptide concentrations and responses to somatostatin, glucose infusion, and insulin resistance in horses.. Equine Vet J 2010 Mar;42(2):149-55.
    pubmed: 20156251doi: 10.2746/042516409x478497google scholar: lookup
  26. Carter RA, McCutcheon LJ, Valle E, Meilahn EN, Geor RJ. Effects of exercise training on adiposity, insulin sensitivity, and plasma hormone and lipid concentrations in overweight or obese, insulin-resistant horses.. Am J Vet Res 2010 Mar;71(3):314-21.
    pubmed: 20187833doi: 10.2460/ajvr.71.3.314google scholar: lookup
  27. Burns TA, Geor RJ, Mudge MC, McCutcheon LJ, Hinchcliff KW, Belknap JK. Proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine gene expression profiles in subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue depots of insulin-resistant and insulin-sensitive light breed horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2010 Jul-Aug;24(4):932-9.
  28. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.. Lancet 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10.
    pubmed: 2868172
  29. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.. Biometrics 1989 Mar;45(1):255-68.
    pubmed: 2720055
  30. McBride GB. A proposal for strength‐of‐agreement criteria for Lin's concordance coefficient. NIWA Client Report HAM 2005‐062. May 2005.
  31. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.. Biometrics 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74.
    pubmed: 843571
  32. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P. Clinical Epidemiology a Basic Science for Clinical Medicine, 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown and Company; 1991.
  33. Pratt-Phillips SE, Geor RJ, McCutcheon LJ. Comparison among the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp, insulin-modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test, and oral glucose tolerance test for assessment of insulin sensitivity in healthy Standardbreds.. Am J Vet Res 2015 Jan;76(1):84-91.
    pubmed: 25535665doi: 10.2460/ajvr.76.1.84google scholar: lookup
  34. Tadros EM, Frank N. Endocrine disorders and laminitis. Equine Vet Educ 2013;25:152–162.
  35. Frank N, Elliott SB, Brandt LE, Keisler DH. Physical characteristics, blood hormone concentrations, and plasma lipid concentrations in obese horses with insulin resistance.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006 May 1;228(9):1383-90.
    pubmed: 16649943doi: 10.2460/javma.228.9.1383google scholar: lookup
  36. Saad MF, Anderson RL, Laws A, Watanabe RM, Kades WW, Chen YD, Sands RE, Pei D, Savage PJ, Bergman RN. A comparison between the minimal model and the glucose clamp in the assessment of insulin sensitivity across the spectrum of glucose tolerance. Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study.. Diabetes 1994 Sep;43(9):1114-21.
    pubmed: 8070611doi: 10.2337/diab.43.9.1114google scholar: lookup
  37. Asplin KE, Patterson-Kane JC, Sillence MN, Pollitt CC, Mc Gowan CM. Histopathology of insulin-induced laminitis in ponies.. Equine Vet J 2010 Nov;42(8):700-6.

Citations

This article has been cited 12 times.
  1. Delarocque J, Feige K, Carslake HB, Durham AE, Fey K, Warnken T. Development of a Web App to Convert Blood Insulin Concentrations among Various Immunoassays Used in Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 24;13(17).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13172704pubmed: 37684968google scholar: lookup
  2. Williams NJ, Furr M, Navas de Solis C, Campolo A, Davis M, Lacombe VA. Investigating the Relationship Between Cardiac Function and Insulin Sensitivity in Horses: A Pilot Study.. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:899951.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.899951pubmed: 35873691google scholar: lookup
  3. Timko KJ, Hostnik LD, Watts MR, Chen C, Bercz A, Toribio RE, Belknap JK, Burns TA. Diagnostic evaluation of insulin and glucose dynamics in light-breed horses receiving dexamethasone.. Can Vet J 2022 Jun;63(6):617-626.
    pubmed: 35656529
  4. Kinsella HM, Hostnik LD, Snyder HA, Mazur SE, Kamr AM, Burns TA, Mossbarger JC, Toribio RE. Comparison of insulin sensitivity between healthy neonatal foals and horses using minimal model analysis.. PLoS One 2022;17(1):e0262584.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262584pubmed: 35030228google scholar: lookup
  5. Lindåse S, Nostell K, Bergsten P, Forslund A, Bröjer J. Evaluation of fasting plasma insulin and proxy measurements to assess insulin sensitivity in horses.. BMC Vet Res 2021 Feb 15;17(1):78.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02781-5pubmed: 33588833google scholar: lookup
  6. Gehlen H, Schwarz B, Bartmann C, Gernhardt J, Stöckle SD. Pituitary Pars Intermedia Dysfunction and Metabolic Syndrome in Donkeys.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 8;10(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10122335pubmed: 33302557google scholar: lookup
  7. Horn R, Bertin FR. Evaluation of combined testing to simultaneously diagnose pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction and insulin dysregulation in horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2019 Sep;33(5):2249-2256.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15617pubmed: 31498947google scholar: lookup
  8. Hodge E, Kowalski A, Torcivia C, Lindborg S, Stefanovski D, Hart K, Frank N, van Eps A. Effect of thyrotropin-releasing hormone stimulation testing on the oral sugar test in horses when performed as a combined protocol.. J Vet Intern Med 2019 Sep;33(5):2272-2279.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15601pubmed: 31432575google scholar: lookup
  9. Meier A, de Laat M, Reiche D, Fitzgerald D, Sillence M. The efficacy and safety of velagliflozin over 16 weeks as a treatment for insulin dysregulation in ponies.. BMC Vet Res 2019 Feb 26;15(1):65.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1811-2pubmed: 30808423google scholar: lookup
  10. Durham AE, Frank N, McGowan CM, Menzies-Gow NJ, Roelfsema E, Vervuert I, Feige K, Fey K. ECEIM consensus statement on equine metabolic syndrome.. J Vet Intern Med 2019 Mar;33(2):335-349.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15423pubmed: 30724412google scholar: lookup
  11. Lindåse S, Nostell K, Söder J, Bröjer J. Relationship Between β-cell Response and Insulin Sensitivity in Horses based on the Oral Sugar Test and the Euglycemic Hyperinsulinemic Clamp.. J Vet Intern Med 2017 Sep;31(5):1541-1550.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.14799pubmed: 28796307google scholar: lookup
  12. Frank N, Walsh DM. Repeatability of Oral Sugar Test Results, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Measurements, and Serum High-Molecular-Weight Adiponectin Concentrations in Horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2017 Jul;31(4):1178-1187.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.14725pubmed: 28543933google scholar: lookup