FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Front Vet Sci / Evidence in Practice – A Pilot Study Leveraging Compan...
Frontiers in veterinary science2016; 3; 116; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00116

Evidence in Practice – A Pilot Study Leveraging Companion Animal and Equine Health Data from Primary Care Veterinary Clinics in New Zealand.

Abstract: Veterinary practitioners have extensive knowledge of animal health from their day-to-day observations of clinical patients. There have been several recent initiatives to capture these data from electronic medical records for use in national surveillance systems and clinical research. In response, an approach to surveillance has been evolving that leverages existing computerized veterinary practice management systems to capture animal health data recorded by veterinarians. Work in the United Kingdom within the VetCompass program utilizes routinely recorded clinical data with the addition of further standardized fields. The current study describes a prototype system that was developed based on this approach. In a 4-week pilot study in New Zealand, clinical data on presentation reasons and diagnoses from a total of 344 patient consults were extracted from two veterinary clinics into a dedicated database and analyzed at the population level. New Zealand companion animal and equine veterinary practitioners were engaged to test the feasibility of this national practice-based health information and data system. Strategies to ensure continued engagement and submission of quality data by participating veterinarians were identified, as were important considerations for transitioning the pilot program to a sustainable large-scale and multi-species surveillance system that has the capacity to securely manage big data. The results further emphasized the need for a high degree of usability and smart interface design to make such a system work effectively in practice. The geospatial integration of data from multiple clinical practices into a common operating picture can be used to establish the baseline incidence of disease in New Zealand companion animal and equine populations, detect unusual trends that may indicate an emerging disease threat or welfare issue, improve the management of endemic and exotic infectious diseases, and support research activities. This pilot project is an important step toward developing a national surveillance system for companion animals and equines that moves beyond emerging infectious disease detection to provide important animal health information that can be used by a wide range of stakeholder groups, including participating veterinary practices.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2016-12-23 PubMed ID: 28066777PubMed Central: PMC5179563DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00116Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article explores a pilot study carried out in New Zealand that uses health data gathered from companion animals and horses in primary care veterinary clinics to help develop a nation-wide surveillance system. The study leverages electronic medical records from day-to-day veterinary practice.

Objective of the Research

  • The primary objective of this research was to prototype a system that captures clinical data from veterinary clinics for use in nationwide surveillance and research. The system adopted an approach followed by the VetCompass program in the United Kingdom, where routine clinical details are recorded with additional standardized fields.

Pilot Study in New Zealand

  • A four-week pilot study was conducted where data from 344 patient consultations were extracted from two veterinary clinics and analyzed at the population level.
  • The purpose of the pilot study was to test the feasibility and engagement level of New Zealand companion animal and equine veterinary practitioners with the prototype system. The data extracted consisted of the reasons for presentation and diagnoses.

Key Considerations and Identified Strategies

  • To ensure ongoing engagement and submission of high-quality data by participating veterinarians, it was essential to identify appropriate strategies. Among these, the development of a secure system capable of managing big data was highlighted. This is crucial for the evolution of the pilot program into a comprehensive and multi-species surveillance system.
  • An effective and user-friendly interface was identified as critical for the system to simplify its use and increase its effectiveness in day-to-day practice. This would enable a high degree of usability and foster better interaction with the system.

Potential Benefits of the System

  • The research suggests that integrating data from multiple clinical practices into a common system may provide a detailed picture of disease baseline incidence in New Zealand’s companion animals and equine populations.
  • This system would also be crucial in detecting unusual trends that could indicate emerging disease threats or welfare issues, improving the management of endemic and exotic infectious diseases, and supporting research activities.

Conclusion and Future Prospects

  • This pilot project is deemed an essential step towards a national surveillance system for companion animals and equines in New Zealand. It aims to go beyond merely detecting emerging infectious diseases and contribute valuable health information for the benefit of various stakeholder groups, including participating veterinary practices.

Cite This Article

APA
Muellner P, Muellner U, Gates MC, Pearce T, Ahlstrom C, O'Neill D, Brodbelt D, Cave NJ. (2016). Evidence in Practice – A Pilot Study Leveraging Companion Animal and Equine Health Data from Primary Care Veterinary Clinics in New Zealand. Front Vet Sci, 3, 116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00116

Publication

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 3
Pages: 116
PII: 116

Researcher Affiliations

Muellner, Petra
  • Epi-interactive Ltd. , Wellington , New Zealand.
Muellner, Ulrich
  • Epi-interactive Ltd. , Wellington , New Zealand.
Gates, M Carolyn
  • Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University , Palmerston North , New Zealand.
Pearce, Trish
  • Equine Health Association , Wellington , New Zealand.
Ahlstrom, Christina
  • Epi-interactive Ltd. , Wellington , New Zealand.
O'Neill, Dan
  • The Royal Veterinary College , Hatfield , UK.
Brodbelt, Dave
  • The Royal Veterinary College , Hatfield , UK.
Cave, Nick John
  • Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University , Palmerston North , New Zealand.

References

This article includes 42 references
  1. O'Neill DG, Church DB, McGreevy PD, Thomson PC, Brodbelt DC. Approaches to canine health surveillance.. Canine Genet Epidemiol 2014;1:2.
    doi: 10.1186/2052-6687-1-2pmc: PMC4574389pubmed: 26401319google scholar: lookup
  2. Lund EM, Armstrong PJ, Kirk CA, Kolar LM, Klausner JS. Health status and population characteristics of dogs and cats examined at private veterinary practices in the United States.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999 May 1;214(9):1336-41.
    pubmed: 10319174
  3. Wohlfender-Remy F, Struchen R, Graubner C, Balmer S, Hadorn D. Re-launch of Equinella: a web-based equine disease reporting and information platform. J Equine Vet Sci 2016 39:S17.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.02.035google scholar: lookup
  4. Sánchez-Vizcaíno F, Jones PH, Menacere T, Heayns B, Wardeh M, Newman J, Radford AD, Dawson S, Gaskell R, Noble PJ, Everitt S, Day MJ, McConnell K. Small animal disease surveillance.. Vet Rec 2015 Dec 12;177(23):591-4.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.h6174pubmed: 26667432google scholar: lookup
  5. Jones PH, Radford AD, Noble P-JM, Sánchez-Vizcaíno F, Menacere T, Heayns B. SAVSNET: collating veterinary electronic health records for research and surveillance. Online J Public Health Inform 2016 8(1).
    doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v8i1.6543google scholar: lookup
  6. Kao RR, Haydon DT, Lycett SJ, Murcia PR. Supersize me: how whole-genome sequencing and big data are transforming epidemiology.. Trends Microbiol 2014 May;22(5):282-91.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.02.011pmc: PMC7125769pubmed: 24661923google scholar: lookup
  7. Pfeiffer DU, Stevens KB. Spatial and temporal epidemiological analysis in the Big Data era.. Prev Vet Med 2015 Nov 1;122(1-2):213-20.
    doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.05.012pmc: PMC7114113pubmed: 26092722google scholar: lookup
  8. Kearsley-Fleet L, O'Neill DG, Volk HA, Church DB, Brodbelt DC. Prevalence and risk factors for canine epilepsy of unknown origin in the UK.. Vet Rec 2013 Mar 30;172(13):338.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.101133pubmed: 23300065google scholar: lookup
  9. Mattin M, O'Neill D, Church D, McGreevy PD, Thomson PC, Brodbelt D. An epidemiological study of diabetes mellitus in dogs attending first opinion practice in the UK.. Vet Rec 2014 Apr 5;174(14):349.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.101950pubmed: 24570406google scholar: lookup
  10. O Neill DG, Church DB, McGreevy PD, Thomson PC, Brodbelt DC. Prevalence of disorders recorded in dogs attending primary-care veterinary practices in England.. PLoS One 2014;9(3):e90501.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090501pmc: PMC3942437pubmed: 24594665google scholar: lookup
  11. O'Neill D. Building practice-based research in the UK.. Vet Rec 2015 May 2;176(18):461-2.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.h2067pubmed: 25934743google scholar: lookup
  12. Lanyon L. Collecting the evidence for EBVM: who pays?. Vet Rec 2016 Jan 30;178(5):120-1.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.i254pubmed: 26823312google scholar: lookup
  13. Robinson NJ, Dean RS, Cobb M, Brennan ML. Investigating common clinical presentations in first opinion small animal consultations using direct observation.. Vet Rec 2015 May 2;176(18):463.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.102751pmc: PMC4431344pubmed: 25564472google scholar: lookup
  14. Klompas M, Murphy M, Lankiewicz J, McVetta J, Lazarus R, Eggleston E, Daly P, Oppedisano P, Beagan B, Kirby C, Platt R. Harnessing electronic health records for public health surveillance.. Online J Public Health Inform 2011;3(3).
    doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v3i3.3794pmc: PMC3615793pubmed: 23569616google scholar: lookup
  15. Kass PH, Weng HY, Gaona MA, Hille A, Sydow MH, Lund EM, Markwell PJ. Syndromic surveillance in companion animals utilizing electronic medical records data: development and proof of concept.. PeerJ 2016;4:e1940.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.1940pmc: PMC4860311pubmed: 27168966google scholar: lookup
  16. Mateus A, Brodbelt DC, Barber N, Stärk KD. Antimicrobial usage in dogs and cats in first opinion veterinary practices in the UK.. J Small Anim Pract 2011 Oct;52(10):515-21.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01098.xpubmed: 21824147google scholar: lookup
  17. Radford AD, Noble PJ, Coyne KP, Gaskell RM, Jones PH, Bryan JG, Setzkorn C, Tierney Á, Dawson S. Antibacterial prescribing patterns in small animal veterinary practice identified via SAVSNET: the small animal veterinary surveillance network.. Vet Rec 2011 Sep 17;169(12):310.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.d5062pubmed: 21911433google scholar: lookup
  18. Buckland EL, O'Neill D, Summers J, Mateus A, Church D, Redmond L, Brodbelt D. Characterisation of antimicrobial usage in cats and dogs attending UK primary care companion animal veterinary practices.. Vet Rec 2016 Nov 12;179(19):489.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.103830pubmed: 27543064google scholar: lookup
  19. Venom Coding Group. VeNom Veterinary Nomenclature. 2015.
  20. Crump JA, Murdoch DR, Baker MG. Emerging infectious diseases in an island ecosystem: the New Zealand perspective.. Emerg Infect Dis 2001 Sep-Oct;7(5):767-72.
    doi: 10.3201/eid0705.017501pmc: PMC2631882pubmed: 11747690google scholar: lookup
  21. Li G, Ji S, Li C, Feng J. Efficient fuzzy full-text type-ahead search. VLDB J 2011 20(4):617–40.
    doi: 10.1007/s00778-011-0218-xgoogle scholar: lookup
  22. Core Team R. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2016.
  23. Spackman KA, Campbell KE, Côté RA. SNOMED RT: a reference terminology for health care.. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1997;:640-4.
    pmc: PMC2233423pubmed: 9357704
  24. WHO. International Classification of Disease (ICD). 2016.
  25. O'Neill DG, Scudder C, Faire JM, Church DB, McGreevy PD, Thomson PC, Brodbelt DC. Epidemiology of hyperadrenocorticism among 210,824 dogs attending primary-care veterinary practices in the UK from 2009 to 2014.. J Small Anim Pract 2016 Jul;57(7):365-73.
    doi: 10.1111/jsap.12523pubmed: 27279104google scholar: lookup
  26. O'Neill DG, Meeson RL, Sheridan A, Church DB, Brodbelt DC. The epidemiology of patellar luxation in dogs attending primary-care veterinary practices in England.. Canine Genet Epidemiol 2016;3:4.
    doi: 10.1186/s40575-016-0034-0pmc: PMC4898461pubmed: 27280025google scholar: lookup
  27. Wang X, Chase H, Markatou M, Hripcsak G, Friedman C. Selecting information in electronic health records for knowledge acquisition.. J Biomed Inform 2010 Aug;43(4):595-601.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.03.011pmc: PMC2902678pubmed: 20362071google scholar: lookup
  28. Carroll LN, Au AP, Detwiler LT, Fu TC, Painter IS, Abernethy NF. Visualization and analytics tools for infectious disease epidemiology: a systematic review.. J Biomed Inform 2014 Oct;51:287-98.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.04.006pmc: PMC5734643pubmed: 24747356google scholar: lookup
  29. Reeder B, Revere D, Hills RA, Baseman JG, Lober WB. Public Health Practice within a Health Information Exchange: Information Needs and Barriers to Disease Surveillance.. Online J Public Health Inform 2012;4(3).
    doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v4i3.4277pmc: PMC3615831pubmed: 23569649google scholar: lookup
  30. Vourc'h G, Bridges VE, Gibbens J, De Groot BD, McIntyre L, Poland R, Barnouin J. Detecting emerging diseases in farm animals through clinical observations.. Emerg Infect Dis 2006 Feb;12(2):204-10.
    doi: 10.3201/eid1202.050498pmc: PMC3293432pubmed: 16494743google scholar: lookup
  31. del Rocio Amezcua M, Pearl DL, Friendship RM, McNab WB. Evaluation of a veterinary-based syndromic surveillance system implemented for swine.. Can J Vet Res 2010 Oct;74(4):241-51.
    pmc: PMC2949336pubmed: 21197223
  32. Zurbrigg KJ, Van den Borre NM. Factors associated with good compliance and long-term sustainability in a practitioner-based livestock disease surveillance system.. Can Vet J 2013 Mar;54(3):243-8.
    pmc: PMC3573629pubmed: 23997260
  33. Muellner UJ, Vial F, Wohlfender F, Hadorn D, Reist M, Muellner P. Timely Reporting and Interactive Visualization of Animal Health and Slaughterhouse Surveillance Data in Switzerland.. Front Vet Sci 2015;2:47.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00047pmc: PMC4672233pubmed: 26664974google scholar: lookup
  34. Henning KJ. What is syndromic surveillance?. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004 7–11.
  35. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, Morton SC, Shekelle PG. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care.. Ann Intern Med 2006 May 16;144(10):742-52.
    doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125pubmed: 16702590google scholar: lookup
  36. Moore GE, Lund E. Disease reporting and surveillance: where do companion animal diseases fit in?. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2009 Mar;39(2):225-40.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2008.10.009pubmed: 19185190google scholar: lookup
  37. Dórea FC, Sanchez J, Revie CW. Veterinary syndromic surveillance: Current initiatives and potential for development.. Prev Vet Med 2011 Aug 1;101(1-2):1-17.
    doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.05.004pubmed: 21640415google scholar: lookup
  38. Ward MP, Kelman M. Companion animal disease surveillance: a new solution to an old problem?. Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol 2011 Sep;2(3):147-57.
    doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2011.07.009pmc: PMC7102770pubmed: 22748174google scholar: lookup
  39. Robertson C, Nelson TA, MacNab YC, Lawson AB. Review of methods for space-time disease surveillance.. Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol 2010 Jul;1(2-3):105-16.
    doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2009.12.001pmc: PMC7185413pubmed: 22749467google scholar: lookup
  40. Rogers CW, Cogger N. A cross-sectional survey of biosecurity practices on Thoroughbred stud farms in New Zealand.. N Z Vet J 2010 Apr;58(2):64-8.
    doi: 10.1080/00480169.2010.65087pubmed: 20383239google scholar: lookup
  41. Sawford K, Vollman AR, Stephen C. A focused ethnographic study of Alberta cattle veterinarians' decision making about diagnostic laboratory submissions and perceptions of surveillance programs.. PLoS One 2013;8(5):e64811.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064811pmc: PMC3669388pubmed: 23741397google scholar: lookup
  42. Summers JF, O'Neill DG, Church DB, Thomson PC, McGreevy PD, Brodbelt DC. Prevalence of disorders recorded in Cavalier King Charles Spaniels attending primary-care veterinary practices in England.. Canine Genet Epidemiol 2015;2:4.
    doi: 10.1186/s40575-015-0016-7pmc: PMC4579365pubmed: 26401332google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 7 times.
  1. Özçelik R, Remy-Wohlfender F, Küker S, Visschers V, Hadorn D, Dürr S. Potential and Challenges of Community-Based Surveillance in Animal Health: A Pilot Study Among Equine Owners in Switzerland. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:641448.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.641448pubmed: 34150880google scholar: lookup
  2. George J, Häsler B, Mremi I, Sindato C, Mboera L, Rweyemamu M, Mlangwa J. A systematic review on integration mechanisms in human and animal health surveillance systems with a view to addressing global health security threats. One Health Outlook 2020;2:11.
    doi: 10.1186/s42522-020-00017-4pubmed: 33829132google scholar: lookup
  3. O'Neill DG, James H, Brodbelt DC, Church DB, Pegram C. Prevalence of commonly diagnosed disorders in UK dogs under primary veterinary care: results and applications. BMC Vet Res 2021 Feb 17;17(1):69.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02775-3pubmed: 33593363google scholar: lookup
  4. Prata JC. Strategies for the Improvement of Pet Health and Welfare in Portugal Based on a Pilot Survey on Husbandry, Opinion, and Information Needs. Animals (Basel) 2020 May 14;10(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10050848pubmed: 32423069google scholar: lookup
  5. Weng HY, Gaona MAL, Kass PH. Evaluation of a novel syndromic surveillance system for the detection of the 2007 melamine-related nephrotoxicosis foodborne outbreak in dogs and cats in the United States. PeerJ 2020;8:e9093.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.9093pubmed: 32419988google scholar: lookup
  6. O'Neill DG, Ballantyne ZF, Hendricks A, Church DB, Brodbelt DC, Pegram C. West Highland White Terriers under primary veterinary care in the UK in 2016: demography, mortality and disorders. Canine Genet Epidemiol 2019;6:7.
    doi: 10.1186/s40575-019-0075-2pubmed: 31508236google scholar: lookup
  7. Luckman C, Gates MC. Epidemiology and clinical outcomes of feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukaemia virus in client-owned cats in New Zealand. JFMS Open Rep 2017 Jul-Dec;3(2):2055116917729311.
    doi: 10.1177/2055116917729311pubmed: 30202540google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,383 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.