FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Evolution of In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Equine...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2020; 10(5); doi: 10.3390/ani10050812

Evolution of In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Equine Clinical Isolates in France between 2016 and 2019.

Abstract: The present study described the evolution of antimicrobial resistance in equine pathogens isolated from 2016 to 2019. A collection of 7806 bacterial isolates were analysed for their in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility using the disk diffusion method. The most frequently isolated pathogens were group C Streptococci (27.0%), Escherichia coli (18.0%), Staphylococcus aureus (6.2%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3.4%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (2.3%) and Enterobacter spp. (2.1%). The majority of these pathogens were isolated from the genital tract (45.1%, n = 3522). With the implementation of two French national plans (named ECOANTIBIO 1 and 2) in 2012-2016 and 2017-2021, respectively, and a reduction in animal exposure to veterinary antibiotics, our study showed decreases in the resistance of group C Streptococci, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli against five classes, four classes and one class of antimicrobials tested, respectively. However, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Enterobacter spp. presented an increased resistance against all the tested classes, excepted for two fifths of E. coli. Moreover, the percentages of multi-drug resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterobacter spp. also increased from 24.5% to 37.4% and from 26.3% to 51.7%, respectively. The data reported here are relevant to equine practitioners and will help to improve knowledge related to antimicrobial resistance in common equine pathogens.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-05-07 PubMed ID: 32392891PubMed Central: PMC7278474DOI: 10.3390/ani10050812Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research deals with the assessment of the evolution of antimicrobial resistance in common bacterial pathogens found in horses from 2016 to 2019 in France.

Research Methodology

  • The scientists analyzed an extensive collection of 7806 bacterial isolates for their in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility. The examination was conducted using a standard method known as disk diffusion.
  • The most frequently isolated pathogens included group C Streptococci (27.0%), Escherichia coli (18.0%), Staphylococcus aureus (6.2%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3.4%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (2.3%), and Enterobacter spp. (2.1%). Most of these bacteria were isolated from horse genital tracts.
  • The data collection and analysis period coincided with the implementation of two French national plans, ECOANTIBIO 1 (2012 – 2016) and ECOANTIBIO 2 (2017 – 2021), aimed at reducing animal exposure to veterinary antibiotics.

Key Findings

  • Following the implementation of the ECOANTIBIO plans, the researchers observed decreased resistance in several key equine pathogens. Resistance in group C Streptococci, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Escherichia coli declined against five, four, and one classes of antimicrobials tested, respectively.
  • On the other hand, other bacteria like Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Enterobacter spp. showed an increase in resistance against most of the tested classes, except for a fifth of E.coli isolates.
  • Strikingly, the percentages of multi-drug resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterobacter spp. exhibited significant growth, jumping from 24.5% to 37.4% and from 26.3% to 51.7%, respectively.

Significance of the Study

  • The study presents valuable data on the evolution of antimicrobial resistance in common horse pathogens. It follows the implementation of national plans aimed at reducing veterinary antibiotic use, providing insight into their effectiveness.
  • Despite observed successes, the research underscores the increasingly resistant nature of some bacteria to the spectrum of tested antimicrobials.
  • The information from the study is crucial for equine practitioners. It can inform better treatment strategies and encourage further research into antimicrobial resistance in common equine pathogens.

Cite This Article

APA
Léon A, Castagnet S, Maillard K, Paillot R, Giard JC. (2020). Evolution of In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Equine Clinical Isolates in France between 2016 and 2019. Animals (Basel), 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10050812

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 10
Issue: 5

Researcher Affiliations

Léon, Albertine
  • LABÉO Frank Duncombe, 14053 CAEN, France.
  • Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, U2RM, 14033 Caen, France.
Castagnet, Sophie
  • LABÉO Frank Duncombe, 14053 CAEN, France.
Maillard, Karine
  • LABÉO Frank Duncombe, 14053 CAEN, France.
Paillot, Romain
  • LABÉO Frank Duncombe, 14053 CAEN, France.
  • Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, Biotargen, 14033 Caen, France.
Giard, Jean-Christophe
  • Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, U2RM, 14033 Caen, France.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 29 references
  1. World Health Organization and Antimicrobial Resistance. [(accessed on 16 March 2020)]; Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/antimicrobial-resistance.
  2. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations and Antimicrobial Resistance. [(accessed on 16 March 2020)]; Available online: http://www.fao.org/antimicrobial-resistance/fr/
  3. World Organisation for Animal Health-OIE and Antimicrobial Resistance. [(accessed on 16 March 2020)]; Available online: https://www.oie.int/en/for-the-media/amr/
  4. The ECOANTIBIO Plan 2012–2017. [(accessed on 25 March 2020)]; Available online: https://agriculture.gouv.fr/plan-ecoantibio-2012-2017-lutte-contre-lantibioresistance.
  5. ECOANTIBIO2. [(accessed on 25 March 2020)]; Available online: https://agriculture.gouv.fr/le-plan-ecoantibio-2-2017-2021.
  6. Chipangura JK, Chetty T, Kgoete M, Naidoo V. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance from bacterial culture and susceptibility record from horse samples in South Africa. Prev. Vet. Med. 2017;148:37–43.
    doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.10.004pubmed: 29157372google scholar: lookup
  7. Clark C, Greenwood S, Boison JO, Chirino-Trejo M, Dowling PM. Bacterial isolates from equine infections in western Canada (1998–2003). Can. Vet. J. 2008;49:153–160.
    pmc: PMC2216435pubmed: 18309745
  8. Malo A, Cluzel C, Labrecque O, Beauchamp G, Lavoie JP, Leclere M. Evolution of in vitro antimicrobial resistance in an equine hospital over 3 decades. Can. Vet. J. 2016;57:747–751.
    pmc: PMC4904812pubmed: 27429463
  9. van Spijk JN, Schmitt S, Fürst AE, Schoster A. A retrospective analysis of antimicrobial resistance in bacterial pathogens in an equine hospital (2012–2015). Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilkd. 2016;158:433–442.
    doi: 10.17236/sat00069pubmed: 27504838google scholar: lookup
  10. Johns IC, Adams EL. Trends in antimicrobial resistance in equine bacterial isolates: 1999–2012. Vet. Rec. 2015;176:334.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.102708pubmed: 25628448google scholar: lookup
  11. Duchesne R, Castagnet S, Maillard K, Petry S, Cattoir V, Giard JC, Leon A. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of equine clinical isolates from France, 2006–2016. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2019;19:144–153.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.03.006pubmed: 30880244google scholar: lookup
  12. Bourély C, Cazeau G, Jarrige N, Haenni M, Gay E, Leblond A. Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from diseased horses in France. Equine Vet. J. 2020;52:112–119.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13133pubmed: 31033041google scholar: lookup
  13. CA-SFM/EUCAST. [(accessed on 3 April 2020)]; Available online: https://www.sfm-microbiologie.org/2019/05/06/casfm-eucast-2019-v2/
  14. Schmiedel J, Falgenhauer L, Domann E, Bauerfeind R, Prenger-Berninghoff E, Imirzalioglu C, Chakraborty T. Multiresistant extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae from humans, companion animals and horses in central Hesse, Germany. BMC Microbiol. 2014;12:14–187.
    doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-187pmc: PMC4105247pubmed: 25014994google scholar: lookup
  15. EMA/CVMP/AWP/401740/2013 Reflection Paper on the Risk of Antimicrobial Resistance Transfer from Companion Animals. [(accessed on 25 March 2020)]; Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/reflection-paper-risk-antimicrobial-resistance-transfer-companion-animals_en.pdf.
  16. Argudín MA, Deplano A, Meghraoui A, Dodémont M, Heinrichs A, Denis O, Nonhoff C, Roisin S. Bacteria from Animals as a Pool of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes. Antibiotics 2017;6:12.
    doi: 10.3390/antibiotics6020012pmc: PMC5485445pubmed: 28587316google scholar: lookup
  17. WHO Global Priority List of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria to Guide Research, Discovery, and Development of New Antibiotics. [(accessed on 26 March 2020)];2017 Available online: https://www.who.int/medicines/publications/global-priority-list-antibiotic-resistant-bacteria/en/
  18. Ferrandière M, Cattier B, Dequin PF. Septicemia and meningitis due to Streptococcus zooepidemicus. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1998;17:290–291.
    doi: 10.1007/BF01699990pubmed: 9707316google scholar: lookup
  19. Friederichs J, Hungerer S, Werle R, Militz M, Bühren W. Human bacterial arthritis caused by Streptococcus zooepidemicus: Report of a case. Int. J. Inf. Dis. 2010:e233–e235.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2009.08.009pubmed: 20004124google scholar: lookup
  20. Björnsdóttir S, Harris SR, Svansson V, Gunnarsson E, Gammeljord K, Steward KF, Newton JR, Robinson C, Charbonneau AR, Parkhill J. Genomic dissection of an Icelandic epidemic of respiratory disease in horses and associated zoonotic cases. mBio 2017;8:e00826-17.
    doi: 10.1128/mBio.00826-17pmc: PMC5539424pubmed: 28765219google scholar: lookup
  21. Waller AS. Strangles: A pathogenic legacy of the war horse. Vet. Rec. 2016;178:91–92.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.i123pubmed: 26795860google scholar: lookup
  22. Waller AS. Science-in-brief: Streptococcus zooepidemicus: A versatile opportunistic pathogen that hedges its bets in horses. Equine Vet. J. 2017;49:146–148.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12658pubmed: 28177154google scholar: lookup
  23. Boyle AG, Timoney JF, Newton JR, Hines MT, Waller AS, Buchanan BR. Streptococcus equi Infections in Horses: Guidelines for Treatment, Control, and Prevention of Strangles-Revised Consensus Statement. J. Vet. Intern Med. 2018;32:633–647.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15043pmc: PMC5867011pubmed: 29424487google scholar: lookup
  24. Petersen MR, Skive B, Christoffersen M, Lu K, Nielsen JM, Troedsson MH, Bojesen AM. Activation of persistent Streptococcus equi subspecies zooepidemicus in mares with subclinical endometritis. Vet. Microbiol. 2015;179:119–125.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.06.006pubmed: 26123371google scholar: lookup
  25. Muranaka M, Yamanaka T, Katayama Y, Niwa H, Oku K, Matsumura T, Oyamada T. Time-related Pathological Changes in Horses Experimentally Inoculated with Equine Influenza A Virus. J. Eq. Sci. 2012;23:17–26.
    doi: 10.1294/jes.23.17pmc: PMC4013977pubmed: 24833992google scholar: lookup
  26. Paillot R, Prowse L, Montesso F, Huang CM, Barnes H, Escala J. Whole inactivated equine influenza vaccine: Efficacy against a representative clade 2 equine influenza virus, IFNgamma synthesis and duration of humoral immunity. Vet. Microbiol. 2013;162:396–407.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.10.019pubmed: 23146168google scholar: lookup
  27. Guérin F, Fines-Guyon M, Meignen P, Delente G, Fondrinier C, Bourdon N, Cattoir V, Léon A. Nationwide molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus responsible for horse infections in France. BMC Microbiol. 2017;17:104.
    doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0924-zpmc: PMC5415774pubmed: 28468636google scholar: lookup
  28. Theelen MJ, Wilson WD, Edman JM, Magdesian KG, Kass PH. Temporal trends in in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacteria isolated from foals with sepsis: 1979-2010. Equine Vet. J. 2014;46:161–168.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12130pubmed: 23808791google scholar: lookup
  29. Davis HA, Stanton MB, Thungrat K, Boothe DM. Uterine bacterial isolates from mares and their resistance to antimicrobials: 8296 cases (2003–2008). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2013;242:977–983.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.242.7.977pubmed: 23517211google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.