Analyze Diet
Journal of veterinary medicine2014; 2014; 234738; doi: 10.1155/2014/234738

Ex Vivo Anatomical Characterization of Handsewn or Stapled Jejunocecal Anastomosis in Horses by Computed Tomography Scan.

Abstract: The aim of this study is to compare handsewn and stapled jejunocecal anastomosis with different stomal lengths in terms of anatomical differences. Group 1 underwent a two-layer handsewn jejunocecal side-to-side anastomosis (HS); Group 2 received a stapled jejunocecal side-to-side anastomosis (GIA). Each group was divided into two subgroups (HS80 and HS100, GIA80 and GIA100). Specimens were inflated and CT scanned. The stomal/jejunal area ratio and blind end pouch volume/area were measured and compared. Effective length of the stoma was measured and compared with the initial length. Stomal/jejunal area ratio was 1.1 for both 80 techniques, 1.6 for the GIA100, and 1.9 for the HS100 technique. Both HS and GIA techniques produced a blind end pouch and exhibited a mean increase of the final stomal length ranging from 6 to 11% greater than the original stomal length. All techniques will exhibit a length increase of the final stomal length compared to the intended stomal length, with a consequent increase in stomal area. Stapled techniques consistently produced a large distal blind end pouch. Length of a jejunocecal anastomosis should be selected in accordance with the diameter of afferent jejunum, and the 80 mm stomal length could be deemed sufficient in horses.
Publication Date: 2014-12-03 PubMed ID: 26464922PubMed Central: PMC4590882DOI: 10.1155/2014/234738Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article details a study conducted to compare the anatomical differences between handsewn and stapled jejunocecal anastomosis (a surgical connection between two parts of the intestine) in horses, specifically examining different lengths of the connection.

Methodology

  • The horses were divided into two primary groups: one underwent a handsewn side-to-side jejunocecal anastomosis (HS), while the other received a stapled side-to-side jejunocecal anastomosis (GIA).
  • These groups were further divided into subgroups: HS80 and HS100 for handsewn anastomosis groups, and GIA80 and GIA100 for stapled anastomosis groups.
  • Specimens were then inflated and subjected to a CT scan for further analysis and measurements.

Measurements and Findings

  • The stomal/jejunal area ratio, the blind end pouch volume/area, and the effective length of the stoma were measured and compared across all groups and subgroups.
  • The stomal/jejunal area ratio remained same for both 80 techniques (1.1), but was higher for GIA100 (1.6) and highest for HS100 (1.9).
  • Both HS and GIA techniques turned out to create a blind end pouch.
  • The final length of the stoma in all examined cases showed a mean increase from 6 to 11% more than the initially intended stomal length.

Conclusions

  • The research concluded that any technique used for the jejunocecal anastomosis will result in an increase of the final stoma’s length, therefore leading to a consequent rise in the stomal area.
  • Stapled techniques were found to consistently form a larger distal blind end pouch compared to handsewn techniques.
  • The study also recommended that the chosen length of a jejunocecal anastomosis should be aligned with the diameter of the afferent jejunum, suggesting that an 80 mm stomal length could be seen as sufficient for horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Giusto G, Iotti B, Sammartano F, Valazza A, Gandini M. (2014). Ex Vivo Anatomical Characterization of Handsewn or Stapled Jejunocecal Anastomosis in Horses by Computed Tomography Scan. J Vet Med, 2014, 234738. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/234738

Publication

ISSN: 2356-7708
NlmUniqueID: 101627989
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 2014
Pages: 234738
PII: 234738

Researcher Affiliations

Giusto, Gessica
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Braccini 2-5, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.
Iotti, Bryan
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Braccini 2-5, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.
Sammartano, Federica
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Braccini 2-5, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.
Valazza, Alberto
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Braccini 2-5, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.
Gandini, Marco
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Braccini 2-5, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.

References

This article includes 18 references
  1. Freeman DE. Surgery of the small intestine.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1997 Aug;13(2):261-301.
    pubmed: 9290184doi: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30240-7google scholar: lookup
  2. Rocken M, Ross MW. Vergleichsstudie uber die jejunocaecostomie als end-zu-seitanastomose und seit-zu-seitanastomose. Pferdeheilkunde 1989;10:311–315.
  3. Freeman DE, Schaeffer DJ. Comparison of complications and long-term survival rates following hand-sewn versus stapled side-to-side jejunocecostomy in horses with colic.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2010 Nov 1;237(9):1060-7.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.237.9.1060pubmed: 21034346google scholar: lookup
  4. Proudman CJ, Edwards GB, Barnes J. Differential survival in horses requiring end-to-end jejunojejunal anastomosis compared to those requiring side-to-side jejunocaecal anastomosis.. Equine Vet J 2007 Mar;39(2):181-5.
    doi: 10.2746/042516407X171354pubmed: 17378448google scholar: lookup
  5. Huskamp B. [Ileum resection and jejunocecostomy in the horse].. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 1973 May 1;86(9):161-3.
    pubmed: 4722027
  6. Roger T, Malbert CH. Caracteristiques anatomo-fonctionelles de la jonction ileocecale du poney. Revue de Médecine Vétérinaire 1989;140:851–855.
  7. Dabareiner RM, Sullins KE, Snyder JR, White NA 2nd, Gardner IA. Evaluation of the microcirculation of the equine small intestine after intraluminal distention and subsequent decompression.. Am J Vet Res 1993 Oct;54(10):1673-82.
    pubmed: 8250393
  8. Freeman DE, Hammock P, Baker GJ, Goetz T, Foreman JH, Schaeffer DJ, Richter RA, Inoue O, Magid JH. Short- and long-term survival and prevalence of postoperative ileus after small intestinal surgery in the horse.. Equine Vet J Suppl 2000 Jun;(32):42-51.
  9. Freeman DE, Schaeffer DJ. Short-term survival after surgery for epiploic foramen entrapment compared with other strangulating diseases of the small intestine in horses.. Equine Vet J 2005 Jul;37(4):292-5.
    pubmed: 16028615doi: 10.2746/0425164054529436google scholar: lookup
  10. Freeman DE. Surgical techniques. In: White N. A., Mair T. S., Moore J. N., editors. The Equine Acute Abdomen. Jackson, Wyo, USA: Teton NewMedia; 2008.
  11. Gandini M, Giusto G, Iotti B, Valazza A, Sammartano F. In vitro description of a new technique for stapled side-to-side jejunocecal anastomosis in horses and CT scan anatomical comparison with other techniques.. BMC Vet Res 2014;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9.
    pmc: PMC4122904pubmed: 25238113doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-s1-s9google scholar: lookup
  12. Giusto G, Gandini M, Amedeo S. Effects of staple size, tissue thickness, and precompression time on staple shape in side-to-side jejunocecal anastomosis in specimens obtained from healthy horses at an abattoir.. Am J Vet Res 2014 Jul;75(7):680-4.
    pubmed: 24959735doi: 10.2460/ajvr.75.7.680google scholar: lookup
  13. Edwards GB. Resection and anastomosis of small intestine: current methods applicable to the horse.. Equine Vet J 1986 Jul;18(4):322-30.
  14. Freeman DE. Jejunocecostomy—technique and tips to success. Proceedings of the ACVS Veterinary Symposium 2012; p. p. 79.
  15. Srivastava LM, Srivastava VP. Peristaltic transport of a non-Newtonian fluid: applications to the vas deferens and small intestine.. Ann Biomed Eng 1985;13(2):137-53.
    doi: 10.1007/BF02584235pubmed: 4003876google scholar: lookup
  16. Shapiro AH, Jaffrin MY, Weinberg SL. Peristaltic pumping with long wavelength at low Reynolds number. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1969;97:799–825.
  17. Ferrua MJ, Singh RP. Modeling the fluid dynamics in a human stomach to gain insight of food digestion.. J Food Sci 2010 Sep;75(7):R151-62.
  18. Edwards GB. Obstruction of the ileum in the horse: a report of 27 clinical cases.. Equine Vet J 1981 Jul;13(3):158-66.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.