Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2025; 149; 105568; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105568

Exploring equine behavior: Wearable sensors data and explainable AI for enhanced classification.

Abstract: Understanding equine behavior through advanced monitoring technologies is crucial for improving animal welfare, optimizing training strategies, and enabling early detection of health or stress-related issues. This study integrates wearable sensor data with Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques, particularly SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations), to enhance interpretability in equine behavior classification. The data used in this study were sourced from an open-source dataset, ensuring transparency and reproducibility. Orginally, data were collected from 18 horses using sensor devices attached to a collar around the neck, including a three-axis accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer, sampling at 100 Hz to capture a wide range of motion data. Our dataset consists of 17 equine behavior classes, including walking, grazing, and galloping. A multi-class classification framework was developed, employing machine learning models such as Random Forest, KNN, and XGBoost. The Random Forest model outperformed others with an accuracy of 82.3 %, demonstrating its effectiveness in distinguishing complex behaviors. A key novelty of this study is the use of SHAP for feature attribution analysis, allowing us to determine which sensor modalities contribute most to each behavior class. The SHAP analysis revealed that locomotion behaviors like 'galloping' were dominated by accelerometer features capturing motion intensity, while stationary behaviors like 'standing' relied primarily on magnetometer data for orientation detection. Stress-related behaviors, such as 'head-shaking,' were characterized by gyroscopic angular velocity, highlighting their dynamic nature. By leveraging SHAP to bridge the gap between "black-box" machine learning models and interpretable decision-making, this study provides actionable insights for real-time monitoring, stress detection, and veterinary interventions. The findings enhance the transparency and applicability of AI-driven animal behavior analysis, setting a new benchmark for explainable behavior classification in equine studies. By advancing both predictive accuracy and model interpretability, this research lays the groundwork for more comprehensive and trustworthy applications in equine welfare and veterinary decision-making.
Publication Date: 2025-04-10 PubMed ID: 40221060DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105568Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and wearable technology in understanding horse behavior to enhance animal welfare, optimize training, and detect health issues early.

Methodology

  • For the purpose of this study, data was obtained from an open-source dataset, collected from 18 horses using wearable sensors attached to neck collars. These sensors included a three-axis accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer, sampling at a frequency of 100 Hz to capture a wide range of motion data.
  • The data was categorized into 17 different horse behavior classes, such as walking, grazing, and galloping.
  • A classification framework was developed using machine learning models including the Random Forest, KNN, and XGBoost. The Random Forest model was the top performer with an accuracy rate of 82.3%, demonstrating its capacity to distinguish complex behaviors.

Use of SHAP

  • SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) was employed to understand which features of the sensor data contributed most to the classification of each behavior.
  • The SHAP analysis showed that locomotion behaviors, such as ‘galloping,’ were dominated by accelerometer features recording motion intensity. In contrast, stationary behaviors, such as ‘standing,’ relied heavily on magnetometer data for orientation detection, while stress-related behaviors, such as ‘head-shaking,’ were characterized by gyroscopic angular velocity data.
  • The use of SHAP is a novel approach in this study, as it allows for effective feature attribution, making machine learning model reasoning more interpretable and actionable.

Findings and Implications

  • The outcomes of this research hold potential for providing real-time monitoring, stress detection, and helping with veterinary intervention decisions.
  • This study brings transparency and applicability to AI-driven animal behavior analysis, setting a benchmark for explainable behavior classification in equine studies.
  • By improving both predictive accuracy and model interpretability, this study prepares the way for more thorough and trustworthy applications in equine welfare and veterinary decision-making.

Cite This Article

APA
Cetintav B, Yalcin A. (2025). Exploring equine behavior: Wearable sensors data and explainable AI for enhanced classification. J Equine Vet Sci, 149, 105568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105568

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 149
Pages: 105568

Researcher Affiliations

Cetintav, Bekir
  • Veterinary Faculty, Department of Biostatistics, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Istiklal Campus, 15030 Burdur, Türkiye. Electronic address: bekircetintav@mehmetakif.edu.tr.
Yalcin, Ahmet
  • Institute of Science, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Istiklal Campus, 15030 Burdur, Türkiye. Electronic address: ahmtylcinn15@gmail.com.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / physiology
  • Behavior, Animal / classification
  • Behavior, Animal / physiology
  • Wearable Electronic Devices / veterinary
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Accelerometry / veterinary
  • Machine Learning

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.