Factors Influencing Equine Affiliate Opinion on Reporting of Equine Strangles in the United States.
Abstract: Although equine strangles is reportable in all states, synchronous reporting of this disease does not occur across the country. States have variable regulations on reporting (actionable, notifiable, and monitored) and no mandatory comprehensive databases exist for tracking prevalence. In this study, which is a companion to our recent publication on veterinarians' opinions on this topic, we solicited equine affiliates' (including horse owners, horse business owners/trainers, breeders, and barn managers) opinions on reporting of strangles and factors influencing their opinion. A total of 518 equine affiliates/stakeholders living within the United States. A structured survey was administered online. Eighty-one participants (17.8%) believed that strangles should continue to be nationally monitored and that individual states should have jurisdiction over laboratory confirmed positive cases; 124 (27.2%) believed strangles should become nationally monitored with mandatory notification of positive cases to a central forum; 77 participants (16.9%) thought strangles should become notifiable nationally; and 157 (34.4%) thought strangles should become notifiable and actionable. Participants who ranked strangles as "important" or "very important" compared to other infectious disease were more likely to want increased reporting (OR = 3.62, P = .054), and participants who were more familiar with the disease were more likely to rank it as important: for every 1-point increase in correct total score on the 5-question basic knowledge exam included, there was a 49% increase in odds of ranking strangles as important or very important (P = .003). Equine stakeholders who perceived their horses to be at medium or high risk of acquiring the disease were 2.76 times more likely to rank strangles as important or very important (P = .014). Of the sampled equine stakeholder community, the majority of respondents (78.5%) favored increased reporting. Information obtained in this study regarding current views of those involved in the equine industry on strangles reporting could inform future policy regarding the disease.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2023-04-28 PubMed ID: 37121361DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104534Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research studies the opinions of people involved in the equine industry (like horse owners and trainers) on the reporting of equine strangles in the United States. The study found that the majority of respondents believe there should be more comprehensive reporting on this contagious disease affecting horses.
Introduction to the Study
- This study explores the opinions of stakeholders in the horse industry (nicknamed ‘equine affiliates’) including horse owners, business owners/trainers, breeders, and barn managers on the reporting of a disease known as equine strangles.
- While this infectious disease is reportable in all the states, there is no uniform reporting across the US. Regulations on reporting vary greatly among the states and there are no mandatory, comprehensive databases for tracking the disease’s prevalence, implying that existing reporting methods may be less efficient.
The Purpose and Method of Study
- The purpose of this study was to gather insights from the people directly affected by this disease about the sufficiency and effectiveness of the reporting system.
- A total of 518 equine affiliates living within the United States were involved in this study.
- These affiliates were given a structured survey online to gather their views on the topic.
Results from the study
- The respondents’ opinions varied: some wanted the disease to be closely monitored at a national level, others wanted mandatory reporting of confirmed cases to a central forum, while the rest preferred having the disease as notifiable at a national level, or notifiable and actionable.
- Those who viewed strangles as an “important” or “very important” disease were more likely to favour increased reporting.
- Similarly, participants who were more knowledgeable about the disease ranked it as being more important.
- Those who perceived their horses at medium or high risk of acquiring the disease were 2.76 times more likely to rank strangles as important or very important.
- Interestingly, a majority of the respondents (78.5%) advocated for increased reporting of the disease.
Implication of the findings
- Findings from this study contribute valuable data about the views of stakeholders in the horse industry on the reporting of strangles.
- These views can potentially inform future policy decisions regarding the control and management of this disease.
- This could potentially lead to the development of comprehensive and uniform reporting regulations across the United States, improving the management of equine strangles.
Cite This Article
APA
Martin KH, Redding LE, Boyle AG.
(2023).
Factors Influencing Equine Affiliate Opinion on Reporting of Equine Strangles in the United States.
J Equine Vet Sci, 128, 104534.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104534 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, PA. Electronic address: khmartinvmd@gmail.com.
- Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, PA.
- Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, PA.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Horses
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- United States / epidemiology
- Streptococcal Infections / veterinary
- Disease Notification
Conflict of Interest Statement
Declaration of Competing Interest Regarding the manuscript Factors Influencing Equine Affiliate Opinion on Reporting of Equine Strangles in the United States, the authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists