Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2013; 46(2); 139-145; doi: 10.1111/evj.12199

Faecal worm egg count analysis for targeting anthelmintic treatment in horses: points to consider.

Abstract: Equine gastrointestinal nematodes are ubiquitous; in horses that graze contaminated pasture and that are not treated appropriately, large numbers of worms can accumulate, which can lead to serious clinical disease. Nematode control has traditionally followed interval treatment regimens, which involve regular anthelmintic administration to all horses based on the strongyle egg reappearance periods of each drug, usually defined around the time of licensing. Interval treatment programmes have resulted in substantial reductions in large strongyle disease, but have made major contributions to the development of anthelmintic resistance, particularly in cyathostomins. Cyathostomin resistance to 2 of the 3 available anthelmintic classes is widespread, and resistance to both classes in single populations is not uncommon. Reduced efficacy of the most commonly used macrocyclic lactone anthelmintics, as measured by shortened egg reappearance periods after treatment, is emerging in cyathostomins. Macrocyclic lactone resistance is also now commonly reported in Parascaris equorum on stud farms. Faecal worm egg counts (FWEC) are increasingly being used as part of targeted approaches to parasite control, whereby only those horses with moderate to high FWEC within a group are treated with an anthelmintic. The objective of this approach is to reduce environmental contamination, while leaving a proportion of the worm population in some horses unexposed to selection pressure for anthelmintic resistance. This article reviews recent findings in equine parasitology research that will underpin guidelines for control, with a particular focus on how to optimise the value of FWEC methodologies and anthelmintic efficacy analyses.
Publication Date: 2013-12-10 PubMed ID: 24131301DOI: 10.1111/evj.12199Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses the issue of anthelmintic resistance in common gastrointestinal nematodes found in horses, and suggests the use of faecal worm egg counts (FWEC) and strategic treatment to control the nematode populations without promoting resistance.

Nematode Infestations in Horses

  • The study begins by highlighting the prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes in horses, especially those that graze contaminated pasture. Without proper treatment, these worms can multiply and cause serious health problems.
  • Until now, most treatment programs for nematodes have followed interval treatment regimens, which involve administering anthelmintics to all horses on a regular basis based on the egg reappearance periods of the worms, detected post-treatment.

Anthelmintic Resistance

  • The paper points out that while interval treatment programs have led to significant reductions in large strongyle disease, they have also contributed to the emergence of widespread anthelmintic resistance, particularly in a type of nematode known as cyathostomins.
  • The study reveals that cyathostomins have developed resistance to two out of three available classes of anthelmintic drugs, with instances of resistance to both classes in a single population not being uncommon.
  • Furthermore, the effectiveness of macrocyclic lactone anthelmintics, a commonly used drug class, has been diminishing due to emerging resistance in cyathostomins.
  • The study also reports growing resistance to macrocyclic lactone drugs in another worm species, Parascaris equorum; commonly found in stud farms.

Strategic Parasite Control through FWEC

  • The paper proposes the use of faecal worm egg counts (FWEC) as a part of targeted approaches for parasite control. In this method, only those horses with moderate to high FWEC levels are treated with an anthelmintic.
  • The aim of this strategy is to reduce environmental contamination by the nematodes, while also leaving some of the worm populations in certain horses untreated. This leaves a portion of the worm population unexposed to the drugs, thereby reducing the selection pressure for anthelmintic resistance.
  • The paper then reviews recent findings in equine parasitology research which could be used to develop guidelines for controlling nematode infestations in horses, with a primary focus on the optimisation of FWEC methodologies and improving the analyzation of anthelmintic efficacy.

Cite This Article

APA
Lester HE, Matthews JB. (2013). Faecal worm egg count analysis for targeting anthelmintic treatment in horses: points to consider. Equine Vet J, 46(2), 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12199

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 46
Issue: 2
Pages: 139-145

Researcher Affiliations

Lester, H E
  • Moredun Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
Matthews, J B

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Anthelmintics / administration & dosage
    • Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
    • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
    • Horse Diseases / parasitology
    • Horses
    • Parasite Egg Count
    • Parasitic Diseases, Animal / drug therapy

    Citations

    This article has been cited 20 times.
    1. Mapagha-Boundoukou K, Boundenga L, Mohamed-Djawad MH, Longo-Pendy NM, Makouloutou-Nzassi P, Said MB, Maganga GD. Diversity and prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in small ruminants in Franceville, Gabon. Parasite Epidemiol Control 2025 Nov;31:e00465.
      doi: 10.1016/j.parepi.2025.e00465pubmed: 41362436google scholar: lookup
    2. Ndwandwe KC, Chimonyo M, Tsotetsi-Khambule AM, Marufu MC. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Communal Goat Farmers on the Prevalence and Control of Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. J Parasitol Res 2025;2025:1443083.
      doi: 10.1155/japr/1443083pubmed: 40766087google scholar: lookup
    3. Brachmann J, Fiedler S, Fischer H, Schmidt JS, Radek R, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Krücken J. Old world camels in Germany: parasitic nematode communities characterized by nemabiome analysis showed reduced anthelmintic efficacy according to the fecal egg count reduction test. Parasit Vectors 2025 Jul 24;18(1):294.
      doi: 10.1186/s13071-025-06930-9pubmed: 40708027google scholar: lookup
    4. Whitlock F, van Dijk J, Hodgkinson JE, Grewar JD, Newton JR. Reasons to be fearful? Rising proportions of positive faecal worm egg counts among UK horses (2007-2023). Equine Vet J 2025 Nov;57(6):1572-1583.
      doi: 10.1111/evj.14478pubmed: 39840839google scholar: lookup
    5. Hamad MH, Jitsamai W, Chinkangsadarn T, Ngangam TS, Wattanapornpilom T, Naraporn D, Ouisuwan S, Taweethavonsawat P. Prevalence, risk factors, and species diversity of strongylid nematodes in domesticated Thai horses: insights from ITS-2 rDNA metabarcoding. Parasitol Res 2024 Dec 17;123(12):410.
      doi: 10.1007/s00436-024-08438-0pubmed: 39688721google scholar: lookup
    6. Lejeune M, Mann S, White H, Maguire D, Hazard J, Young R, Stone C, Antczak D, Bowman D. Evaluation of Fecal Egg Count Tests for Effective Control of Equine Intestinal Strongyles. Pathogens 2023 Oct 26;12(11).
      doi: 10.3390/pathogens12111283pubmed: 38003748google scholar: lookup
    7. Matthews JB, Peczak N, Lightbody KL. The Use of Innovative Diagnostics to Inform Sustainable Control of Equine Helminth Infections. Pathogens 2023 Oct 11;12(10).
      doi: 10.3390/pathogens12101233pubmed: 37887749google scholar: lookup
    8. Elghryani N, McOwan T, Mincher C, Duggan V, de Waal T. Estimating the Prevalence and Factors Affecting the Shedding of Helminth Eggs in Irish Equine Populations. Animals (Basel) 2023 Feb 7;13(4).
      doi: 10.3390/ani13040581pubmed: 36830368google scholar: lookup
    9. D'Anza E, Buono F, Albarella S, Castaldo E, Pugliano M, Iannuzzi A, Cascone I, Battista E, Peretti V, Ciotola F. Chromosome Instability in Pony of Esperia Breed Naturally Infected by Intestinal Strongylidae. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 18;12(20).
      doi: 10.3390/ani12202817pubmed: 36290203google scholar: lookup
    10. Boelow H, Krücken J, Thomas E, Mirams G, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Comparison of FECPAK(G2), a modified Mini-FLOTAC technique and combined sedimentation and flotation for the coproscopic examination of helminth eggs in horses. Parasit Vectors 2022 May 12;15(1):166.
      doi: 10.1186/s13071-022-05266-ypubmed: 35549990google scholar: lookup
    11. Ghafar A, Abbas G, King J, Jacobson C, Hughes KJ, El-Hage C, Beasley A, Bauquier J, Wilkes EJA, Hurley J, Cudmore L, Carrigan P, Tennent-Brown B, Nielsen MK, Gauci CG, Beveridge I, Jabbar A. Comparative studies on faecal egg counting techniques used for the detection of gastrointestinal parasites of equines: A systematic review. Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis 2021;1:100046.
      doi: 10.1016/j.crpvbd.2021.100046pubmed: 35284858google scholar: lookup
    12. Scala A, Tamponi C, Sanna G, Predieri G, Dessì G, Sedda G, Buono F, Cappai MG, Veneziano V, Varcasia A. Gastrointestinal Strongyles Egg Excretion in Relation to Age, Gender, and Management of Horses in Italy. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 3;10(12).
      doi: 10.3390/ani10122283pubmed: 33287298google scholar: lookup
    13. Seeber PA, Kuzmina TA, Greenwood AD, East ML. Effects of life history stage and climatic conditions on fecal egg counts in plains zebras (Equus quagga) in the Serengeti National Park. Parasitol Res 2020 Oct;119(10):3401-3413.
      doi: 10.1007/s00436-020-06836-8pubmed: 32780185google scholar: lookup
    14. Parker JM, Goldenberg SZ, Letitiya D, Wittemyer G. Strongylid infection varies with age, sex, movement and social factors in wild African elephants. Parasitology 2020 Mar;147(3):348-359.
      doi: 10.1017/S0031182019001653pubmed: 31840634google scholar: lookup
    15. Saeed MA, Beveridge I, Abbas G, Beasley A, Bauquier J, Wilkes E, Jacobson C, Hughes KJ, El-Hage C, O'Handley R, Hurley J, Cudmore L, Carrigan P, Walter L, Tennent-Brown B, Nielsen MK, Jabbar A. Systematic review of gastrointestinal nematodes of horses from Australia. Parasit Vectors 2019 Apr 29;12(1):188.
      doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3445-4pubmed: 31036059google scholar: lookup
    16. Mitchell CJ, O'Sullivan CM, Pinloche E, Wilkinson T, Morphew RM, McEwan NR. Using next-generation sequencing to determine diversity of horse intestinal worms: identifying the equine 'nemabiome'. J Equine Sci 2019 Mar;30(1):1-5.
      doi: 10.1294/jes.30.1pubmed: 30944540google scholar: lookup
    17. Seyoum Z, Zewdu A, Dagnachew S, Bogale B. Anthelmintic Resistance of Strongyle Nematodes to Ivermectin and Fenbendazole on Cart Horses in Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:5163968.
      doi: 10.1155/2017/5163968pubmed: 28265572google scholar: lookup
    18. Love JW, Kelly LA, Lester HE, Nanjiani I, Taylor MA, Robertson C. Investigating anthelmintic efficacy against gastrointestinal nematodes in cattle by considering appropriate probability distributions for faecal egg count data. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2017 Apr;7(1):71-82.
      doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2017.01.002pubmed: 28161555google scholar: lookup
    19. Pauling CD, Oller AR, Jackson V. Fecal parasite identification by microscopy and PCR in scimitar-horned oryx, Oryx dammah, managed at two sites. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl 2016 Dec;5(3):312-320.
      doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2016.11.001pubmed: 27942456google scholar: lookup
    20. Matthews JB. Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2014 Dec;4(3):310-5.
      doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2014.10.003pubmed: 25516842google scholar: lookup