FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / PLoS One / Flogging tired horses: Who wants whipping and who would walk...
PloS one2018; 13(2); e0192843; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192843

Flogging tired horses: Who wants whipping and who would walk away if whipping horses were withheld?

Abstract: Recent studies have cast doubt on the effectiveness of whipping horses during races and this has led to questions concerning its continuing justification. Furthermore, it has been argued that whipping tired horses in racing is the most televised form of violence to animals. The present study used de-identified data from a recent independent Australian poll (n = 1,533) to characterise the 26% of respondents (113 females and 271 males) who support the whipping of racehorses and the 10% of racing enthusiasts in the sample (44 females and 63 males) who would stop watching races and betting on them if whipping were banned. Logistic regression models examining associations between age, gender, and income level of respondents demonstrated that those who support racehorse whipping are significantly more likely to be male. Among racing enthusiasts who would stop watching races and betting on them if whipping were banned, those in the lowest income bracket were over-represented. The more frequently respondents attended races or gambled on them, the more likely they were to agree that horses should be hit with a whip during the normal course of a race. These findings align with previous studies of violence among men and women but may also be attributed to male support of traditional gambling practices. Globally, racing organisations may consider the findings of the present study helpful in their deliberations on the merits of continuing the practice of whipping tired horses in the name of sport. The study might also provide important data for stakeholders who demand that it continues.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2018-02-21 PubMed ID: 29466458PubMed Central: PMC5821321DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192843Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research explores people’s attitudes towards the controversial practice of whipping horses during races. It found that supporters tend to be male and frequent race-goers or gamblers; if whipping were banned, those most likely to abandon watching or betting on races were people in the lowest income bracket.

Introduction to the Study

  • The study emerged from a growing body of research questioning the effectiveness and morality of whipping horses in races.
  • It scrutinises a contentious issue in the racing industry: the common practice of hitting tired horses, often televised, to encourage them to run faster.
  • This research aimed to understand who supports horse whipping during races, and who would stop watching or betting if the practice was banned.

Data Source and Analysis

  • This research used de-identified data from an independent Australian survey, involving 1,533 respondents.
  • It analysed this data to find patterns associating age, gender, and income level with people’s views on horse whipping and their potential behaviour if it were outlawed.
  • Statistical analysis was completed using logistic regression models to investigate and determine these associations.

Study Findings

  • The study found that 26% of respondents, predominately male, support whipping racehorses.
  • Among racing enthusiasts, 10% said they would stop watching races and betting on them if whipping was prohibited, this group was over-represented by individuals in the lowest income bracket.
  • The more frequently respondents attended races or gambled on them, the more likely they were to believe horses should be whipped during a race.

Implications and Interpretations

  • The findings suggest a link between frequency of attendance or gambling at races and support for whipping.
  • Typically, males and those at lower income levels appear more likely to stop watching or betting on races if whipping was banned.
  • The outcomes correspond with previous studies on violence among different genders, although they may also reflect male support for longstanding gambling practices.
  • This study’s findings could be useful to global racing organisations during their considerations about the ongoing use of whipping, providing a view of the stakeholders who might insist that the tradition continues.

Cite This Article

APA
McGreevy PD, Griffiths MD, Ascione FR, Wilson B. (2018). Flogging tired horses: Who wants whipping and who would walk away if whipping horses were withheld? PLoS One, 13(2), e0192843. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192843

Publication

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
NlmUniqueID: 101285081
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 13
Issue: 2
Pages: e0192843
PII: e0192843

Researcher Affiliations

McGreevy, Paul D
  • Sydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Griffiths, Mark D
  • International Gaming Research Unit, Psychology Department, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Ascione, Frank R
  • Graduate School of Social Work, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Wilson, Bethany
  • Sydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

MeSH Terms

  • Animal Welfare
  • Animals
  • Fatigue
  • Female
  • Gambling / psychology
  • Horses
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Running
  • Sex Factors
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Sports / psychology

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

This article includes 27 references
  1. Jones B, McGreevy PD. Ethical equitation: applying a cost-benefit approach.. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 5: 196–202.
  2. McLean AN, McGreevy PD. Ethical equitation: capping the price horses pay for human glory.. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 5: 203–209.
  3. McGreevy PD. The advent of equitation science.. Vet J 2007 Nov;174(3):492-500.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.09.008pubmed: 17157542google scholar: lookup
  4. British Horseracing Authority. Responsible regulation: A review of the use of the whip in horseracing.. .
  5. Evans D, McGreevy P. An investigation of racing performance and whip use by jockeys in thoroughbred races.. PLoS One 2011 Jan 27;6(1):e15622.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015622pmc: PMC3026808pubmed: 21283587google scholar: lookup
  6. McGreevy PD, Corken RA, Salvin H, Black CM. Whip use by jockeys in a sample of Australian Thoroughbred races--an observational study.. PLoS One 2012;7(3):e33398.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033398pmc: PMC3307719pubmed: 22442687google scholar: lookup
  7. McGreevy PD, Ralston L. The distribution of whipping of Australian Thoroughbred racehorses in the penultimate 200 meters of races is influenced by jockeys’ experience.. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 7: 186–190.
  8. McGreevy PD, Caspar G, Evans DL. A pilot investigation into the opinions and beliefs of Australian and UK jockeys.. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 8: 100–105.
  9. McGreevy PD, Hawson LA, Salvin H, McLean AN. A note on the force of whip impacts delivered by jockeys using forehand and backhand strikes.. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 8: 395–399.
  10. McGreevy PD, Corken RA, Salvin H, Black CM. Whip use by jockeys in a sample of Australian Thoroughbred races--an observational study.. PLoS One 2012;7(3):e33398.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033398pmc: PMC3307719pubmed: 22442687google scholar: lookup
  11. Hood J, McDonald C, Wilson B, McManus P, McGreevy P. Whip Rule Breaches in a Major Australian Racing Jurisdiction: Welfare and Regulatory Implications.. Animals (Basel) 2017 Jan 16;7(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani7010004pmc: PMC5295154pubmed: 28275207google scholar: lookup
  12. McGreevy PD, Oddie CF. Holding the whip hand–a note on the distribution of jockeys’ whip-hand preferences in Australian Thoroughbred racing.. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 6(5): 287–289.
  13. Felson RB. Violence and gender reexamined. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association.
  14. Burchfield KB. The Nature of Animal Crime: Scope and Severity in Chicago.. Crime & Delinquency .
    doi: 10.1177/0011128717719515google scholar: lookup
  15. Albert A, Bulcroft K. Pets, families, and the life course.. Journal of Marriage and the Family 2: 543–552.
  16. Duvall-Antonacopoulos NM, Pychyl TA. An examination of the relations between social support, anthropomorphism and stress among dog owners.. Anthrozoös 21(2): 139–142.
  17. Ascione FR, Shapiro K. People and animals, kindness and cruelty: Research directions and policy implications.. Journal of Social Issues 65(3): 569–587.
  18. Visser EK, Van Wijk-Jansen EEC. Diversity in horse enthusiasts with respect to horse welfare: An explorative study.. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 7(5): 295–304.
  19. Morris T. Using a whip in a horserace is not cruel but racing must explain why.. The Guardian September 29.
  20. Goodfellow J, Hood J. Cup Week leaves racing law looking like a prize-winning assn. The Conversation November 7, (2014).
  21. Canale N, Santinello M, Griffiths MD. Validation of the reasons for gambling questionnaire (RGQ) in a British population survey.. Addict Behav 2015 Jun;45:276-80.
    doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.01.035pubmed: 25746361google scholar: lookup
  22. Griffiths MD. Gambling psychology: Motivation, emotion and control.. Casino and Gaming International (3)4: 71–76.
  23. Wilson B, McGreevy PD. Longitudinal trends in the frequency of medium and fast race winning times in Australian harness racing: relationships with rules moderating whip use.. PLoS ONE Accepted.
  24. Deuel NR, Lawrence LM. Effects of urging by the rider on gallop stride characteristics of quarter horses.. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 8: 240–243.
  25. Pinchbeck GL, Clegg PD, Proudman CJ, Morgan KL, French NR. Whip use and race progress are associated with horse falls in hurdle and steeplechase racing in the UK.. Equine Vet J 2004 Jul;36(5):384-9.
    pubmed: 15253077doi: 10.2746/0425164044868387google scholar: lookup
  26. Ueda Y, Yoshida K, Oikawa M. Analyses of race accident conditions through use of patrol video.. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 13:707–710.
  27. Bergmann I. Sustainability, thoroughbred racing and the need for change.. Pferdeheilkunde 31:490–498.

Citations

This article has been cited 4 times.
  1. Stallones L, McManus P, McGreevy P. Sustainability and the Thoroughbred Breeding and Racing Industries: An Enhanced One Welfare Perspective.. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jan 31;13(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13030490pubmed: 36766378google scholar: lookup
  2. Wilson BJ, Thompson KR, McGreevy PD. The race that segments a nation: Findings from a convenience poll of attitudes toward the Melbourne Cup Thoroughbred horse race, gambling and animal cruelty.. PLoS One 2021;16(3):e0248945.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248945pubmed: 33760873google scholar: lookup
  3. Anzulewicz A, Fenner K, Hyde M, Heald S, Burattini B, Romness N, McKenzie J, Wilson B, McGreevy P. The Impact of the Sex of Handlers and Riders on the Reported Social Confidence, Compliance and Touch Sensitivity of Horses in Their Care.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jan 8;11(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11010130pubmed: 33430130google scholar: lookup
  4. Thompson K, McManus P, Stansall D, Wilson BJ, McGreevy PD. Is Whip Use Important to Thoroughbred Racing Integrity? What Stewards' Reports Reveal about Fairness to Punters, Jockeys and Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Oct 29;10(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10111985pubmed: 33137898google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.