The Journal of experimental biology1985; 115; 253-262; doi: 10.1242/jeb.115.1.253

Force development during sustained locomotion: a determinant of gait, speed and metabolic power.

Abstract: This paper develops three simple ideas about force development during sustained locomotion which provide some insights into the mechanisms that determine why animals change gait, how fast they can run, and how much metabolic energy they consume. The first idea is that the alternate stretch-shorten pattern of activity of the muscles involved in locomotion allows muscle-tendon units to function as springs, affecting the amount of force a given cross-sectional area of muscle develops, and the metabolic requirements of the muscles for force development. Animals select speeds and stride frequencies which optimize the performance of these springs. The second idea is that muscle stress (force/cross-sectional area) determines when animals change gait, how fast they run and their peak accelerations and decelerations. It is proposed that terrestrial birds and mammals develop similar muscle stresses under equivalent conditions (i.e. preferred speed within a gait) and that animals change gaits in order to reduce peak stresses as they increase speed. Finally, evidence is presented to support the idea that it is the time course of force development during locomotion, rather than the mechanical work that the muscles perform, that determines the metabolic cost of locomotion.
Publication Date: 1985-03-01 PubMed ID: 4031768DOI: 10.1242/jeb.115.1.253Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • Non-P.H.S.
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses the role of force development during sustained locomotion in determining an animal’s gait, speed, and metabolic energy consumption. It presents the idea that muscle-tendon units respond like springs during locomotion and this affects the force developed by the muscle and its metabolic needs.

Muscle-Tendon Units Function as Springs

  • The paper starts by presenting the first idea of muscle-tendon units acting like springs during locomotion. This is due to their alternate stretch-shorten pattern of activity. This spring-like function influences the amount of force that a cross-sectional area of a muscle can develop, plus the metabolic requirements of the muscles for creating such force.
  • The animals adjust their speeds and stride frequencies to optimize the performance of these natural springs, enhancing their movement efficiency.

Muscle Stress Dictates Speed and Gait

  • The second part of the paper explains that muscle stress, which is defined as the force per cross-sectional area, determines when animals change their gait, how fast they run, and their peak accelerations and decelerations.
  • The research proposes that terrestrial birds and mammals develop similar muscle stresses under equivalent conditions (e.g. preferred speed within a gait). It further proposes that animals switch their gait to reduce peak stresses as they increase their speed, helping to regulate their energy use and protect their muscle structures.

Link between Time Course of Force Development and Metabolic Cost

  • Lastly, the article provides evidence to support the third idea that it is the timeline of force development during locomotion, not the mechanical work the muscles perform, that determines the metabolic cost of locomotion. This finding highlights the importance of efficient force development to keep the metabolic cost low during sustained locomotion.

Cite This Article

APA
Taylor CR. (1985). Force development during sustained locomotion: a determinant of gait, speed and metabolic power. J Exp Biol, 115, 253-262. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.115.1.253

Publication

ISSN: 0022-0949
NlmUniqueID: 0243705
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 115
Pages: 253-262

Researcher Affiliations

Taylor, C R

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Cattle
    • Dogs
    • Gait
    • Goats
    • Horses
    • Humans
    • Locomotion
    • Muscle Contraction
    • Muscles / metabolism
    • Muscles / physiology
    • Sciuridae

    Grant Funding

    • 2R01-AM18140-09 / NIADDK NIH HHS

    Citations

    This article has been cited 22 times.
    1. Manjatika AT, Mazengenya P, Davimes JG. Topographical anatomy and clinical implications of the metatarsal diaphyseal nutrient foramina across South African populations.. Surg Radiol Anat 2023 Aug 22;.
      doi: 10.1007/s00276-023-03233-5pubmed: 37606792google scholar: lookup
    2. Monte A, Tecchio P, Nardello F, Zamparo P. Achilles Tendon Mechanical Behavior and Ankle Joint Function at the Walk-to-Run Transition.. Biology (Basel) 2022 Jun 14;11(6).
      doi: 10.3390/biology11060912pubmed: 35741433google scholar: lookup
    3. Hammerberg AG, Kramer PA. Consistent inconsistencies in braking: a spatial analysis.. Interface Focus 2021 Oct 6;11(5):20200058.
      doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2020.0058pubmed: 34938429google scholar: lookup
    4. Gu00fcnther M, Mu00f6rl F. Giraffes and hominins: reductionist model predictions of compressive loads at the spine base for erect exponents of the animal kingdom.. Biol Open 2021 Jan 22;10(1).
      doi: 10.1242/bio.057224pubmed: 33380420google scholar: lookup
    5. Raffalt PC, Kent JA, Wurdeman SR, Stergiou N. To walk or to run - a question of movement attractor stability.. J Exp Biol 2020 Jul 1;223(Pt 13).
      doi: 10.1242/jeb.224113pubmed: 32527966google scholar: lookup
    6. Carrard A, Fontana E, Malatesta D. Mechanical Determinants of the U-Shaped Speed-Energy Cost of Running Relationship.. Front Physiol 2018;9:1790.
      doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01790pubmed: 30618803google scholar: lookup
    7. Orsbon CP, Gidmark NJ, Ross CF. Dynamic Musculoskeletal Functional Morphology: Integrating diceCT and XROMM.. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2018 Feb;301(2):378-406.
      doi: 10.1002/ar.23714pubmed: 29330951google scholar: lookup
    8. Jackson RW, Dembia CL, Delp SL, Collins SH. Muscle-tendon mechanics explain unexpected effects of exoskeleton assistance on metabolic rate during walking.. J Exp Biol 2017 Jun 1;220(Pt 11):2082-2095.
      doi: 10.1242/jeb.150011pubmed: 28341663google scholar: lookup
    9. Daniel TL, Kingsolver JG, Meyhu00f6fer E. Mechanical determinants of nectar-feeding energetics in butterflies: muscle mechanics, feeding geometry, and functional equivalence.. Oecologia 1989 Apr;79(1):66-75.
      doi: 10.1007/BF00378241pubmed: 28312814google scholar: lookup
    10. Hubel TY, Usherwood JR. Children and adults minimise activated muscle volume by selecting gait parameters that balance gross mechanical power and work demands.. J Exp Biol 2015 Sep;218(Pt 18):2830-9.
      doi: 10.1242/jeb.122135pubmed: 26400978google scholar: lookup
    11. O'Neill S, Watson PJ, Barry S. WHY ARE ECCENTRIC EXERCISES EFFECTIVE FOR ACHILLES TENDINOPATHY?. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2015 Aug;10(4):552-62.
      pubmed: 26347394
    12. Wilkinson H, Thavarajah N, Codd J. The metabolic cost of walking on an incline in the Peacock (Pavo cristatus).. PeerJ 2015;3:e987.
      doi: 10.7717/peerj.987pubmed: 26056619google scholar: lookup
    13. Amano S, Kegelmeyer D, Hong SL. Rethinking energy in parkinsonian motor symptoms: a potential role for neural metabolic deficits.. Front Syst Neurosci 2014;8:242.
      doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00242pubmed: 25610377google scholar: lookup
    14. Kiyota T, Fujiwara K. Dominant side in single-leg stance stability during floor oscillations at various frequencies.. J Physiol Anthropol 2014 Aug 15;33(1):25.
      doi: 10.1186/1880-6805-33-25pubmed: 25127541google scholar: lookup
    15. Arellano CJ, Kram R. Partitioning the metabolic cost of human running: a task-by-task approach.. Integr Comp Biol 2014 Dec;54(6):1084-98.
      doi: 10.1093/icb/icu033pubmed: 24838747google scholar: lookup
    16. Holland C, Vollrath F, Gill HS. Horses and cows might teach us about human knees.. Naturwissenschaften 2014 Apr;101(4):351-4.
      doi: 10.1007/s00114-014-1163-5pubmed: 24585006google scholar: lookup
    17. Lindstedt SL, Mineo PM, Schaeffer PJ. Animal galloping and human hopping: an energetics and biomechanics laboratory exercise.. Adv Physiol Educ 2013 Dec;37(4):377-83.
      doi: 10.1152/advan.00045.2013pubmed: 24292916google scholar: lookup
    18. Scott CB, Fountaine C. Estimating the energy costs of intermittent exercise.. J Hum Kinet 2013;38:107-13.
      doi: 10.2478/hukin-2013-0050pubmed: 24235988google scholar: lookup
    19. Schrack JA, Simonsick EM, Chaves PH, Ferrucci L. The role of energetic cost in the age-related slowing of gait speed.. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012 Oct;60(10):1811-6.
    20. Roig M, Shadgan B, Reid WD. Eccentric exercise in patients with chronic health conditions: a systematic review.. Physiother Can 2008 Spring;60(2):146-60.
      doi: 10.3138/physio.60.2.146pubmed: 20145778google scholar: lookup
    21. Payne RC, Hutchinson JR, Robilliard JJ, Smith NC, Wilson AM. Functional specialisation of pelvic limb anatomy in horses (Equus caballus).. J Anat 2005 Jun;206(6):557-74.
    22. Cavagna GA, Franzetti P, Heglund NC, Willems P. The determinants of the step frequency in running, trotting and hopping in man and other vertebrates.. J Physiol 1988 May;399:81-92.
      doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017069pubmed: 3404473google scholar: lookup