Analyze Diet
Journal of morphology1992; 212(3); 269-280; doi: 10.1002/jmor.1052120306

Four forearm flexor muscles of the horse, Equus caballus: anatomy and histochemistry.

Abstract: Two of the forearm flexors of the horse, the superficial and deep digital flexor muscles, are critical to support the digital and fetlock joints, exhibit differing insertions, and are passively supported by the proximal and distal check ligaments, respectively. These two muscles differ in histochemical composition and architecture. The differences are correlated with the different stress levels transmitted through their tendons, and the different frequencies of clinical breakdown that have been reported. Both muscles contain type I and type IIa fibers. A few type IIb fibers occurred in the deep digital flexor. The superficial digital flexor contained approximately 56% type I fibers, extremely short muscle fibers, and extensive connective tissue investment. In contrast, the deep digital flexor had three muscle heads: ulnar, radial, and "long" and "short" regions of the humeral head. The "long" and "short" regions of the humeral head contained 33% and 44% type I fibers, respectively, fiber lengths three to four times as long as those in the superficial digital flexor, and relatively less connective tissue investment. Flexor carpi radialis and flexor carpi ulnaris compared most closely with the humeral head of the deep digital flexor. These data suggest a correlation of the unique architecture of superficial digital flexor with its proposed elastic storage properties during locomotion in horses, and an explanation for the frequent breakdown of the superficial digital flexor in athletic horses.
Publication Date: 1992-06-01 PubMed ID: 1507240DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1052120306Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study explores the anatomy and histochemistry of two significant forearm flexor muscles in horses. By examining the superficial and deep digital flexor muscles, the study attempts to understand the correlation between the different stress levels endured by these muscles, their differing compositions, and their inherent propensity towards clinical damage.

Anatomical and Histochemical Aspects of Horse Forearm Flexors

The investigation focuses on four main aspects related with the superficial and deep digital flexor muscles of the horse:

  • The role these muscles play in supporting the digital and fetlock joints of the horse. These muscles have different insertion points and receive passive support from the proximal and distal check ligaments respectively.
  • The discrepancy in the histochemical composition and structure of these muscles. Substance and texture of these muscles are significant in understanding the varying stress levels they undergo, and their different tendencies towards clinical malfunctions.
  • The presence of type I and type IIa fibers in both muscles, with few occurrences of type IIb fibers in the deep digital flexor. The superficial digital flexor features approximately 56% type I fibers, exceptionally short muscle fibers, and has a substantial connective tissue investment.
  • A comparison of the structures of the deep digital flexor and the superficial digital flexor. The deep digital flexor contains three muscle heads (ulnar, radial, and humeral) with the humeral head having both “long” and “short” parts, consisting of 33% and 44% type I fibers respectively. These muscle heads have fiber lengths that are three to four times longer than those in the superficial digital flexor and a relatively lesser connective tissue investment. This muscle heads are compared to the flexor carpi radialis and flexor carpi ulnaris muscles.

Implications of the Research

These findings suggest a relationship between the unique architecture of the superficial digital flexor, its elasticity during locomotion in horses, and its increased tendency to break down in athletic horses. Insight into the anatomy and histochemistry of these muscles could potentially guide more effective clinical, therapeutic, and training strategies for horses, specifically ones that are constantly engaged in athletic activities.

Cite This Article

APA
Hermanson JW, Cobb MA. (1992). Four forearm flexor muscles of the horse, Equus caballus: anatomy and histochemistry. J Morphol, 212(3), 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1052120306

Publication

ISSN: 0362-2525
NlmUniqueID: 0406125
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 212
Issue: 3
Pages: 269-280

Researcher Affiliations

Hermanson, J W
  • Department of Anatomy, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853.
Cobb, M A

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Female
    • Forelimb / anatomy & histology
    • Histocytochemistry
    • Horses / anatomy & histology
    • Muscles / anatomy & histology
    • Muscles / chemistry

    Citations

    This article has been cited 8 times.
    1. Charles J, Kissane R, Hoehfurtner T, Bates KT. From fibre to function: are we accurately representing muscle architecture and performance?. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2022 Aug;97(4):1640-1676.
      doi: 10.1111/brv.12856pubmed: 35388613google scholar: lookup
    2. Mossor AM, Austin BL, Avey-Arroyo JA, Butcher MT. A Horse of a Different Color?: Tensile Strength and Elasticity of Sloth Flexor Tendons.. Integr Org Biol 2020;2(1):obaa032.
      doi: 10.1093/iob/obaa032pubmed: 33796818google scholar: lookup
    3. Butcher MT, Bertram JE, Syme DA, Hermanson JW, Chase PB. Frequency dependence of power and its implications for contractile function of muscle fibers from the digital flexors of horses.. Physiol Rep 2014 Oct 1;2(10).
      doi: 10.14814/phy2.12174pubmed: 25293602google scholar: lookup
    4. Butcher MT, Chase PB, Hermanson JW, Clark AN, Brunet NM, Bertram JE. Contractile properties of muscle fibers from the deep and superficial digital flexors of horses.. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2010 Oct;299(4):R996-R1005.
      doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00510.2009pubmed: 20702801google scholar: lookup
    5. Payne RC, Hutchinson JR, Robilliard JJ, Smith NC, Wilson AM. Functional specialisation of pelvic limb anatomy in horses (Equus caballus).. J Anat 2005 Jun;206(6):557-74.
    6. Payne RC, Veenman P, Wilson AM. The role of the extrinsic thoracic limb muscles in equine locomotion.. J Anat 2005 Feb;206(2):193-204.
    7. Payne RC, Veenman P, Wilson AM. The role of the extrinsic thoracic limb muscles in equine locomotion.. J Anat 2004 Dec;205(6):479-90.
    8. Brown NA, Pandy MG, Kawcak CE, McIlwraith CW. Force- and moment-generating capacities of muscles in the distal forelimb of the horse.. J Anat 2003 Jul;203(1):101-13.