FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Front Vet Sci / Fracture Resistance of Equine Cheek Teeth With and Without O...
Frontiers in veterinary science2021; 8; 699940; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.699940

Fracture Resistance of Equine Cheek Teeth With and Without Occlusal Fissures: A Standardized ex vivo Model.

Abstract: fracture models are frequently used in human dentistry to provide insights in the fracture mechanisms of teeth. Equine cheek teeth fractures are an important dental pathology, but there has been no research performed to examine the fracture resistance . To evaluate the fracture resistance of equine cheek teeth and identify anatomical predictors that might influence fracture resistance in healthy teeth. It was further evaluated if the presence of a fissure caused a decrease in fracture resistance. experimental design. Individual cheek teeth were subjected to a compression load in a universal testing machine until fracture occurred. Testing was performed in two study groups. A first group of healthy cheek teeth was tested to examine anatomical predictors on fracture resistance. A second group comprised cheek teeth with occlusal fissures and an equal number of age- and size-matched fissure-free teeth as controls. The effect of possible predictors on fracture resistance was investigated by regression analysis. In the first group, fracture resistance was significantly influenced by the location on the tooth where testing was performed in both maxillary ( < 0.001) and mandibular teeth ( < 0.001). Additional significantly associated factors were Triadan number in mandibular ( = 0.009) and the mesiodistal length of the occlusal surface of maxillary teeth ( = 0.01). Experimentally induced crown fractures that extended below the simulated bone level were more frequently associated with pulp horn exposure ( < 0.001). In the second group, significant lower fracture loads were recorded in teeth with fissures (mandibular = 0.006; maxillary < 0.001), compared to fissure-free teeth. This model does not imitate the masticatory forces and lacks the shock-absorbing properties of the periodontal ligament. The methodology used in this study provides an experimental set-up to test fracture resistance of equine cheek teeth enabling evidence-based research to examine the potentially weakening effects of tooth pathology and its treatments. Crown resistance to fracture differed along the occlusal surface of healthy equine cheek teeth, and the presence of fissures further decreased fracture resistance.
Copyright © 2021 Pollaris, Broeckx, Rajasekharan, Cauwels and Vlaminck.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-09-07 PubMed ID: 34557539PubMed Central: PMC8453076DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.699940Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates the fracture resistance of horse cheek bones, focusing on the impact of certain anatomical factors and the presence of fissures on the bone’s susceptibility to fractures. The findings highlight the influence of tooth location, Triadan number and tooth surface length on fracture resistance, and reveal that teeth with fissures have a significantly lower fracture resistance.

Objective and Experimental Design

  • The study aims to understand the fracture resistance of equine cheek teeth, with particular emphasis on the effect of anatomical predictors and the presence of fissures. The absence of relevant research prompted this investigation.
  • The researchers employed an experimental design that subjected individual cheek teeth to compression load in a universal testing machine until fracture occurred. The tests were conducted across two groups – one with healthy teeth, and the other comprising equal numbers of fissure-containing teeth and age- and size-matched fissure-free teeth.
  • Regression analysis was used to investigate the effect of different predictors on fracture resistance.

Findings

  • In the first group, the location of teeth significantly influenced fracture resistance in both upper and lower teeth.
  • Further associated factors were the Triadan number in lower teeth and the length of the tooth’s chewing surface in upper teeth.
  • Induced crown fractures that extended below the simulated bone level were generally associated with exposure of the pulp horn.
  • In the second group, teeth with fissures demonstrated a significantly lower fracture resistance when compared to fissure-free teeth.

Limitations and Future Recommendations

  • One limitation of the study was that the model did not mimic the masticatory forces and lacked the shock-absorbing properties of the periodontal ligament.
  • Despite this, the methodology used in this study offers a promising experimental setup to examine fracture resistance of equine cheek teeth, providing an evidence base for future research investigating the weakening effects of tooth pathology and its potential treatments.

Conclusions

  • In conclusion, the study demonstrated that fracture resistance in horse cheek teeth can vary across the tooth’s occlusal surface, and that the presence of fissures can further decrease this fracture resistance.

Cite This Article

APA
Pollaris E, Broeckx BJG, Rajasekharan S, Cauwels R, Vlaminck L. (2021). Fracture Resistance of Equine Cheek Teeth With and Without Occlusal Fissures: A Standardized ex vivo Model. Front Vet Sci, 8, 699940. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.699940

Publication

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 8
Pages: 699940
PII: 699940

Researcher Affiliations

Pollaris, Elke
  • Department of Surgery and Anaesthesiology of Domestic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Broeckx, Bart J G
  • Department of Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Rajasekharan, Sivaprakash
  • Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Special Care, PAECOMEDIS Research Cluster, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Cauwels, Rita
  • Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Special Care, PAECOMEDIS Research Cluster, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Vlaminck, Lieven
  • Department of Surgery and Anaesthesiology of Domestic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 33 references
  1. Clauss M, Schiele K, Ortmann S, Fritz J, Codron D, Hummel J, Kienzle E. The effect of very low food intake on digestive physiology and forage digestibility in horses.. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2014 Feb;98(1):107-18.
    doi: 10.1111/jpn.12053pubmed: 23402587google scholar: lookup
  2. Staszyk C, Lehmann F, Bienert A, Ludwig K, Gasse H. Measurement of masticatory forces in the horse. Pferdeheilkunde (2006) 22:12–6.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20060102google scholar: lookup
  3. Huthmann S, Staszyk C, Jacob HG, Rohn K, Gasse H. Biomechanical evaluation of the equine masticatory action: calculation of the masticatory forces occurring on the cheek tooth battery.. J Biomech 2009 Jan 5;42(1):67-70.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.09.040pubmed: 19056084google scholar: lookup
  4. Dixon PM, Tremaine WH, Pickles K, Kuhns L, Hawe C, McCann J, McGorum BC, Railton DI, Brammer S. Equine dental disease. Part 3: A long-term study of 400 cases: disorders of wear, traumatic damage and idiopathic fractures, tumours and miscellaneous disorders of the cheek teeth.. Equine Vet J 2000 Jan;32(1):9-18.
    doi: 10.2746/042516400777612099pubmed: 10661379google scholar: lookup
  5. Dacre I, Kempsot S, Dixon PM. Equine idiopathic cheek teeth fractures. Part 1: Pathological studies on 35 fractured cheek teeth.. Equine Vet J 2007 Jul;39(4):310-8.
    doi: 10.2746/042516407X182721pubmed: 17722721google scholar: lookup
  6. Dixon PM, Barakzai SZ, Collins NM, Yates J. Equine idiopathic cheek teeth fractures: part 3: a hospital-based survey of 68 referred horses (1999-2005).. Equine Vet J 2007 Jul;39(4):327-32.
    doi: 10.2746/042516407X182983pubmed: 17722724google scholar: lookup
  7. Dixon PM, Tremaine WH, Pickles K, Kuhns L, Hawe C, McCann J, McGorum BC, Railton DI, Brammer S. Equine dental disease part 4: a long-term study of 400 cases: apical infections of cheek teeth.. Equine Vet J 2000 May;32(3):182-94.
    doi: 10.2746/042516400776563581pubmed: 10836472google scholar: lookup
  8. Taylor L, Dixon PM. Equine idiopathic cheek teeth fractures: part 2: a practice-based survey of 147 affected horses in Britain and Ireland.. Equine Vet J 2007 Jul;39(4):322-6.
    doi: 10.2746/042516407X182802pubmed: 17722723google scholar: lookup
  9. van den Enden MS, Dixon PM. Prevalence of occlusal pulpar exposure in 110 equine cheek teeth with apical infections and idiopathic fractures.. Vet J 2008 Dec;178(3):364-71.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.09.026pubmed: 19010702google scholar: lookup
  10. Fuks AB, Nuni E. Pulp therapy for the young permanent dentition. In: Muthu MS, Kumar S, editors. Pediatric Dentistry. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Health Sciences; (2019). p. 482–96.
  11. Sathorn C, Palamara JE, Palamara D, Messer HH. Effect of root canal size and external root surface morphology on fracture susceptibility and pattern: a finite element analysis.. J Endod 2005 Apr;31(4):288-92.
    doi: 10.1097/01.don.0000140579.17573.f7pubmed: 15793386google scholar: lookup
  12. Pollaris E, Broeckx BJG, Vlaminck L. Occlusal Fissures in Equine Cheek Teeth: A Prospective Longitudinal in vivo Study.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:604420.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.604420pmc: PMC7705111pubmed: 33282936google scholar: lookup
  13. Muylle S, Simoens P, Lauwers H. Ageing horses by an examination of their incisor teeth: an (im)possible task?. Vet Rec 1996 Mar 30;138(13):295-301.
    pubmed: 8730689doi: 10.1136/vr.138.13.295google scholar: lookup
  14. Pollaris E, Haspeslagh M, Van den Wyngaert G, Vlaminck L. Equine cheek teeth occlusal fissures: Prevalence, association with dental wear abnormalities and occlusal angles.. Equine Vet J 2018 Nov;50(6):787-792.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12828pubmed: 29509311google scholar: lookup
  15. Masschaele B, Dierick M, Van Loo D, Boone MN, Brabant L, Pauwels E. HECTOR: a 240 kV micro-CT setup optimized for research. In: Conference Series 463: 11th International Conference on X-ray Microscopy (XRM2012); 2012 Aug 5–10; Shanghai. IOP Publishing; (2013). p. 48–51.
  16. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; (2008).
  17. Schatz D, Alfter G, Göz G. Fracture resistance of human incisors and premolars: morphological and patho-anatomical factors.. Dent Traumatol 2001 Aug;17(4):167-73.
    doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2001.170406.xpubmed: 11585143google scholar: lookup
  18. Masset A, Staszyk C, Gasse H. The blood vessel system in the periodontal ligament of the equine cheek teeth--part II: The micro-architecture and its functional implications in a constantly remodelling system.. Ann Anat 2006 Nov;188(6):535-9.
    doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2006.06.007pubmed: 17140146google scholar: lookup
  19. Staszyk C, Gasse H. Distinct fibro-vascular arrangements in the periodontal ligament of the horse.. Arch Oral Biol 2005 Apr;50(4):439-47.
    doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2004.10.001pubmed: 15748697google scholar: lookup
  20. Carmalt JL. Evidence-based equine dentistry: preventive medicine.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2007 Aug;23(2):519-24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2007.03.002pubmed: 17616326google scholar: lookup
  21. Mondelli RF, Ishikiriama SK, de Oliveira Filho O, Mondelli J. Fracture resistance of weakened teeth restored with condensable resin with and without cusp coverage.. J Appl Oral Sci 2009 May-Jun;17(3):161-5.
    doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572009000300006pmc: PMC4399525pubmed: 19466244google scholar: lookup
  22. Schestatsky R, Dartora G, Felberg R, Spazzin AO, Sarkis-Onofre R, Bacchi A, Pereira GKR. Do endodontic retreatment techniques influence the fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis.. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2019 Feb;90:306-312.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.10.030pubmed: 30396044google scholar: lookup
  23. Kilic S, Dixon PM, Kempson SA. A light microscopic and ultrastructural examination of calcified dental tissues of horses: 1. The occlusal surface and enamel thickness.. Equine Vet J 1997 May;29(3):190-7.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb01670.xpubmed: 9234011google scholar: lookup
  24. Shaw DJ, Dacre IT, Dixon PM. Pathological studies of cheek teeth apical infections in the horse: 2. Quantitative measurements in normal equine dentine.. Vet J 2008 Dec;178(3):321-32.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.09.023pubmed: 19036617google scholar: lookup
  25. Mitchell SR, Kempson SA, Dixon PM. Structure of peripheral cementum of normal equine cheek teeth.. J Vet Dent 2003 Dec;20(4):199-208.
    doi: 10.1177/089875640302000401pubmed: 14974168google scholar: lookup
  26. Windley Z, Weller R, Tremaine WH, Perkins JD. Two- and three-dimensional computed tomographic anatomy of the enamel, infundibulae and pulp of 126 equine cheek teeth. Part 1: Findings in teeth without macroscopic occlusal or computed tomographic lesions.. Equine Vet J 2009 May;41(5):433-40.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X390214pubmed: 19642402google scholar: lookup
  27. Simhofer H, Griss R, Zetner K. The use of oral endoscopy for detection of cheek teeth abnormalities in 300 horses.. Vet J 2008 Dec;178(3):396-404.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.09.029pubmed: 19041805google scholar: lookup
  28. Carmalt JL, Allen AL. Morphology of the occlusal surfaces of premolar and molar teeth as an indicator of age in the horse.. J Vet Dent 2008 Sep;25(3):182-8.
    doi: 10.1177/089875640802500304pubmed: 19025139google scholar: lookup
  29. Kopke S, Angrisani N, Staszyk C. The dental cavities of equine cheek teeth: three-dimensional reconstructions based on high resolution micro-computed tomography.. BMC Vet Res 2012 Sep 25;8:173.
    doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-173pmc: PMC3514392pubmed: 23006500google scholar: lookup
  30. Pollaris E, Staszyk C, Proost K, Boone MN, Josipovic I, Pardon B, Vlaminck L. Occlusal fissures in equine cheek teeth: μCT and histological findings.. Vet J 2020 Jan;255:105421.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2019.105421pubmed: 31982081google scholar: lookup
  31. Bettiol N, Dixon PM. An anatomical study to evaluate the risk of pulpar exposure during mechanical widening of equine cheek teeth diastemata and 'bit seating'.. Equine Vet J 2011 Mar;43(2):163-9.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00138.xpubmed: 21592210google scholar: lookup
  32. White C, Dixon PM. A study of the thickness of cheek teeth subocclusal secondary dentine in horses of different ages.. Equine Vet J 2010 Mar;42(2):119-23.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X475409pubmed: 20156246google scholar: lookup
  33. Marshall R, Shaw DJ, Dixon PM. A study of sub-occlusal secondary dentine thickness in overgrown equine cheek teeth.. Vet J 2012 Jul;193(1):53-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.10.003pubmed: 22112631google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Xu X, Zhu J, Mei ML, Wu H, Xie K, Wang S, Chen Y. Exploration and preliminary clinical investigation of an adhesive approach for primary tooth restoration. J Biomed Res 2022 Nov 28;37(2):138-147.
    doi: 10.7555/JBR.36.20220188pubmed: 36894170google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.