Analyze Diet
Tijdschrift voor diergeneeskunde2006; 131(14-15); 524-530;

[Frequent deworming in horses; it usually does not do any good, but it often harms].

Abstract: Due to excessive and inappropriate use of dewormers anthelmintic resistance has developed as a significant problem in horse parasites in the Netherlands. Since it is unlikely that new classes of anthelmintics against horse nematodes will be introduced in the near future, it is important to use the present drugs wisely. Veterinarians should advice horse owners about worm control programs with a more targeted approach. The number of anthelmintic treatments should be reduced and, through selective anthelmintic treatments, further development of anthelmintic resistance should be delayed. Preferably, horses with a low faecal egg count should not be treated at all to ascertain a reduction of the selection pressure for anthelmintic resistance. The propensity for low faecal egg counts is hereditary. This implies that mature horses with consistent low egg counts can be detected by faecal examination and that it is not necessary to repeat faecal examination each time in these animals. New horses on the farm should always be dewormed on arrival and should be introduced only after the efficacy of treatment has been determined. Anthelmintic resistance can also be introduced with the arrival of a new animal that is infected with drug-resistant parasites.
Publication Date: 2006-08-19 PubMed ID: 16916198
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • English Abstract
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article examines the problem of drug-resistant parasites in horses in the Netherlands, caused by overuse of dewormers, and suggests more efficient and targeted approaches to anthelmintic treatments to delay further resistance.

Overview and Context

  • This research was conducted due to a developing problem in the Netherlands where horse parasites have been increasingly showing resistance to anthelmintics, the medicines typically used for deworming, due to excessive and misguided use.
  • The authors point out that it isn’t likely that new classes of deworming drugs for horses will be introduced soon, making it critical to apply the current drugs in a more discerning manner.

Recommendations for Veterinarians and Horse Owners

  • The article suggests veterinarians should advise horse owners to adopt more targeted parasite control programs.
  • They should try to reduce the number of anthelmintic treatments given, and through selective, targeted treatments, aim to delay the development of further drug resistance.

Not Treating Horses with Low Faecal Egg Count

  • Importantly, the researchers propose that horses with a low faecal egg count should not be treated to ensure a reduction in the selection pressure for drug immunity.
  • Based on findings, it is revealed that the propensity for low faecal egg counts is inherited. Therefore, mature horses with consistently low egg counts can be identified by faecal examination without having to repeat tests every time.

Precautions with New Horses

  • New horses should always be dewormed upon arrival to a farm, and they should only be introduced once the effectiveness of the treatment is confirmed.
  • The paper highlights the fact that the introduction of a new horse infected with drug-resistant parasites could pose the risk of introducing anthelmintic resistance into the existing population.

In conclusion, this research emphasizes the importance of more strategic and judicious use of deworming treatments in horses to prevent increased resistance to anthelmintic drugs. If the findings are duly implemented, they may effectively manage and control the growing problem of anthelmintic resistance in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Eysker M, van Doorn DC, Lems SN, Weteling A, Ploeger HW. (2006). [Frequent deworming in horses; it usually does not do any good, but it often harms]. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd, 131(14-15), 524-530.

Publication

ISSN: 0040-7453
NlmUniqueID: 0031550
Country: Netherlands
Language: dut
Volume: 131
Issue: 14-15
Pages: 524-530

Researcher Affiliations

Eysker, M
  • Afdeling Klinische Infectiologie, Departement Infectieziekten en Immunologie, Faculteit der Diergeneeskunde, Universiteit Utrecht, Postbus 80.165, 3508 TD Utrecht.
van Doorn, D C K
    Lems, S N
      Weteling, A
        Ploeger, H W

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Anthelmintics / adverse effects
          • Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
          • Drug Administration Schedule / veterinary
          • Drug Resistance
          • Feces / parasitology
          • Helminthiasis, Animal / drug therapy
          • Helminthiasis, Animal / prevention & control
          • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
          • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
          • Horses
          • Parasite Egg Count / veterinary
          • Time Factors

          References

          This article includes 25 references

          Citations

          This article has been cited 2 times.
          1. Hinney B, Wirtherle NC, Kyule M, Miethe N, Zessin KH, Clausen PH. A questionnaire survey on helminth control on horse farms in Brandenburg, Germany and the assessment of risks caused by different kinds of management. Parasitol Res 2011 Dec;109(6):1625-35.
            doi: 10.1007/s00436-011-2434-0pubmed: 21559764google scholar: lookup
          2. Nielsen MK. Restrictions of anthelmintic usage: perspectives and potential consequences. Parasit Vectors 2009 Sep 25;2 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7.
            doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-2-S2-S7pubmed: 19778468google scholar: lookup