Analyze Diet
Journal of biomechanics2013; 46(13); 2320-2325; doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.06.004

Functional limits of agreement applied as a novel method comparison tool for accuracy and precision of inertial measurement unit derived displacement of the distal limb in horses.

Abstract: Over ground motion analysis in horses is limited by a small number of strides and restraints of the indoor gait laboratory. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) are transforming the knowledge of human motion and objective clinical assessment through the opportunity to obtain clinically relevant data under various conditions. When using IMUs on the limbs of horses to determine local position estimates, conditions with high dynamic range of both accelerations and rotational velocities prove particularly challenging. Here we apply traditional method agreement and suggest a novel method of functional data analysis to compare motion capture with IMUs placed over the fetlock joint in seven horses. We demonstrate acceptable accuracy and precision at less than or equal to 5% of the range of motion for detection of distal limb mounted cranio-caudal and vertical position. We do not recommend the use of the latero-medial position estimate of the distal metacarpus/metatarsus during walk where the average error is 10% and the maximum error 111% of the range. We also show that functional data analysis and functional limits of agreement are sensitive methods for comparison of cyclical data and could be applied to differentiate changes in gait for individuals across time and conditions.
Publication Date: 2013-07-23 PubMed ID: 23891315DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.06.004Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research is about the use of inertial measurement units (IMUs) to study movements in horse limbs, focusing on their precision and possibilities for improvement. The paper shows the accuracy of the information provided by IMUs when placed on a horse’s leg, identifying certain positions which are more accurately tracked than others.

Issues with Over Ground Motion Analysis

  • The study first notes the limitations of traditional over ground motion analysis in horses. These difficulties include the limited number of strides that can be studied and the indoor gait laboratory’s restraints.
  • In lieu of this method, researchers are turning to Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) as an innovative way to gather detailed, clinically relevant data under a variety of conditions.

Challenges of Using IMUs

  • The researchers point out the challenges of using IMUs on horse limbs, especially under conditions with high dynamic ranges of accelerations and rotational velocities.
  • Despite these challenges, the study’s main focus is to apply a novel functional limits of agreement method to compare the accuracy of motion capture with IMUs and traditional methods.

Evaluations and Recommendations

  • The study found that the accuracy and precision of the IMUs were acceptable when placed over the fetlock joint in seven horses when determining the local position estimates.
  • However, the researchers did not recommend using the latero-medial position estimates during a walk due to high error levels.
  • They instead recommend focusing on the cranio-caudal and vertical position for more precise readings.

Functional Data Analysis and Functional Limits of Agreement

  • The researchers underscored the value of the newly applied functional data analysis and functional limits of agreement methods.
  • They were found to be highly sensitive methods for comparing cyclical data, and could potentially be further utilized for differentiating changes in gait for individual horses over time and differing conditions.

In essence, this study shows how a novel analysis method can be applied to examine the effectiveness of a new technology (IMUs) in better understanding horse limb motion. The results underscore its potential for accurate motion capture and provide guidance for its optimal application, suggesting further studies should explore these applications in different gait changes and conditions.

Cite This Article

APA
Olsen E, Pfau T, Ritz C. (2013). Functional limits of agreement applied as a novel method comparison tool for accuracy and precision of inertial measurement unit derived displacement of the distal limb in horses. J Biomech, 46(13), 2320-2325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.06.004

Publication

ISSN: 1873-2380
NlmUniqueID: 0157375
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 46
Issue: 13
Pages: 2320-2325
PII: S0021-9290(13)00268-6

Researcher Affiliations

Olsen, Emil
  • Department of Large Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. eolsen@rvc.ac.uk
Pfau, Thilo
    Ritz, Christian

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Extremities / physiology
      • Female
      • Gait / physiology
      • Horses
      • Joints / physiology
      • Male
      • Monitoring, Ambulatory / instrumentation
      • Movement / physiology

      Citations

      This article has been cited 6 times.
      1. Pagliara E, Marenchino M, Antenucci L, Costantini M, Zoppi G, Giacobini MDL, Bullone M, Riccio B, Bertuglia A. Fetlock Joint Angle Pattern and Range of Motion Quantification Using Two Synchronized Wearable Inertial Sensors per Limb in Sound Horses and Horses with Single Limb Naturally Occurring Lameness. Vet Sci 2022 Aug 25;9(9).
        doi: 10.3390/vetsci9090456pubmed: 36136672google scholar: lookup
      2. Hatrisse C, Macaire C, Sapone M, Hebert C, Hanne-Poujade S, De Azevedo E, Marin F, Martin P, Chateau H. Stance Phase Detection by Inertial Measurement Unit Placed on the Metacarpus of Horses Trotting on Hard and Soft Straight Lines and Circles. Sensors (Basel) 2022 Jan 18;22(3).
        doi: 10.3390/s22030703pubmed: 35161452google scholar: lookup
      3. Tijssen M, Hernlund E, Rhodin M, Bosch S, Voskamp JP, Nielen M, Serra Braganςa FM. Automatic hoof-on and -off detection in horses using hoof-mounted inertial measurement unit sensors. PLoS One 2020;15(6):e0233266.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233266pubmed: 32492034google scholar: lookup
      4. Bosch S, Serra Bragança F, Marin-Perianu M, Marin-Perianu R, van der Zwaag BJ, Voskamp J, Back W, van Weeren R, Havinga P. EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse Gait. Sensors (Basel) 2018 Mar 13;18(3).
        doi: 10.3390/s18030850pubmed: 29534022google scholar: lookup
      5. Fercher C, Bartsch J, Kluge S, Schneider F, Liedtke AM, Schleichardt A, Ueberschär O. Applying Multi-Purpose Commercial Inertial Sensors for Monitoring Equine Locomotion in Equestrian Training. Sensors (Basel) 2024 Dec 21;24(24).
        doi: 10.3390/s24248170pubmed: 39771905google scholar: lookup
      6. Das K, de Paula Oliveira T, Newell J. Comparison of markerless and marker-based motion capture systems using 95% functional limits of agreement in a linear mixed-effects modelling framework. Sci Rep 2023 Dec 18;13(1):22880.
        doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49360-2pubmed: 38129434google scholar: lookup