Analyze Diet
Irish veterinary journal2026; doi: 10.1186/s13620-026-00344-4

Genetic diversity of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from members of the families camelidae and equidae worldwide: a systematic review.

Abstract: Toxoplasma gondii is an apicomplexan parasite with a global distribution and significant public health and veterinary treatment implications. The present systematic review collates worldwide information on the genotypic diversity of T. gondii isolates infecting Camelidae (camels, alpacas, llamas, etc.) and Equidae (horses, donkeys, zebras, mules, etc.) and highlights their potential role as sentinels of environmental contamination and zoonotic spread. An exhaustive literature search of six electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, Science Direct, and Google Scholar) from inception to 20 July 2025 identified 20 relevant studies reporting genotypic information from 103 isolates. The present analysis reveals key geographical differences: atypical genotypes predominated in the Americas (88.2%) and Africa (83.3%), reflecting high regional diversity. Asian isolates featured the greatest complexity and presented mostly mixed infections (61.1%), and the China I genotype (ToxoDB #9) emerged as the dominant individual lineage. European isolates presented a very separate profile by mainly consisting of Type III (57.1%), but atypical genotypes were also reported. These findings indicate that Camelidae and Equidae hosts carry rich and diverse populations of T. gondii that closely mirror local strains in their environment rather than classical clonal Types. The co-existence of genotypes linked with human virulence (e.g., Type I and China I) in these food animals highlights their significant risk as sources in zoonotic transmission. This review advises the adoption of high genotyping resolution and One Health approaches within subsequent surveillance exercises to effectively assess public health risk and illuminate transmission dynamics relevant to these economically and culturally significant hosts.
Publication Date: 2026-05-07 PubMed ID: 42098818DOI: 10.1186/s13620-026-00344-4Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This systematic review examines the genetic diversity of Toxoplasma gondii parasites found in animals from the camelidae (camels, alpacas, llamas) and equidae (horses, donkeys, zebras, mules) families worldwide.
  • The study highlights geographical differences in parasite genotypes and underscores the importance of these animals as indicators and potential sources of T. gondii infection to humans.

Background and Importance

  • Toxoplasma gondii is a globally prevalent parasite affecting both humans and animals.
  • It poses significant public health and veterinary challenges due to its zoonotic potential—meaning it can be transmitted from animals to humans.
  • Camelidae and Equidae species are important environmentally and economically as livestock and may act as reservoirs or sentinels for environmental contamination by T. gondii.
  • Understanding the genotypic diversity of T. gondii isolates in these animals is crucial for monitoring transmission dynamics and managing human and animal health risks.

Research Approach

  • The authors performed a systematic review, searching six electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, Science Direct, Google Scholar) up to July 20, 2025.
  • Selection criteria focused on studies that reported genotypic data of T. gondii isolated from camelidae and equidae species.
  • A total of 20 relevant studies were identified, encompassing genotypic information from 103 T. gondii isolates worldwide.

Key Findings by Geographic Region

  • Americas and Africa:
    • Atypical genotypes were predominant (88.2% in the Americas and 83.3% in Africa).
    • These regions showed high genetic diversity among T. gondii isolates, indicating multiple unique strains circulating in local environments.
  • Asia:
    • The greatest complexity in genotypes was observed, with mostly mixed infections found in 61.1% of isolates.
    • The China I genotype (ToxoDB #9) was identified as the dominant individual lineage.
  • Europe:
    • A distinct genotype profile was seen, with Type III predominating in 57.1% of isolates.
    • However, atypical genotypes were also present, indicating some diversity.

Implications of Findings

  • T. gondii populations infecting camelidae and equidae hosts are diverse and largely reflect the parasite strains circulating within their specific geographic environments.
  • The predominance of non-classical (“atypical”) genotypes contrasts with traditional clonal types (I, II, III), suggesting regional evolutionary variation and adaptation.
  • Significant co-existence of genotypes associated with high human virulence (such as Type I and China I) in food animals highlights a real risk for zoonotic transmission to humans consuming or handling these animals.
  • These animals can therefore serve as key sentinels for environmental contamination and as direct sources of infection, emphasizing their public health importance.

Recommendations and Future Directions

  • Researchers and public health authorities should adopt high-resolution genotyping techniques for T. gondii to provide clearer insight into parasite diversity and transmission patterns.
  • A One Health approach is advised, integrating human, animal, and environmental health surveillance to effectively monitor and mitigate T. gondii risks.
  • Such surveillance strategies can improve understanding of transmission dynamics, guiding interventions to protect human health and support the economic and cultural value of camelidae and equidae livestock.
  • Future studies are encouraged to expand the geographical scope and host range to better map global genetic diversity and zoonotic risk factors.

Cite This Article

APA
Hataminejad M, Lashaki EK, Behboudi E, Esmaeili B, Ahmadi S, Galeh TM. (2026). Genetic diversity of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from members of the families camelidae and equidae worldwide: a systematic review. Ir Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13620-026-00344-4

Publication

ISSN: 2046-0481
NlmUniqueID: 0100762
Country: Ireland
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Hataminejad, Maryam
  • Student Research Committee, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
  • Toxoplasmosis Research Center, Communicable Diseases Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
  • Department of Parasitology, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Lashaki, Elham Kia
  • Department of Parasitology and Mycology, To.C., Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran.
Behboudi, Emad
  • Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Khoy University of Medical Sciences, Khoy, Iran.
Esmaeili, Behnaz
  • Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Khoy University of Medical Sciences, Khoy, Iran.
Ahmadi, Somayyeh
  • Student Research Committee, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
  • Toxoplasmosis Research Center, Communicable Diseases Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Galeh, Tahereh Mikaeili
  • Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran. T.mikaeili@yahoo.com.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of Maragheh University of Medical Sciences (Code: IR.MARAGHEHPHC.REC.1404.025). All procedures were performed in accordance with the relevant ethical guidelines and regulations. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.