Analyze Diet
The Journal of experimental biology2004; 207(Pt 20); 3507-3514; doi: 10.1242/jeb.01171

Ground reaction forces in horses trotting up an incline and on the level over a range of speeds.

Abstract: Although the forces required to support the body mass are not elevated when moving up an incline, kinematic studies, in vivo tendon and bone studies and kinetic studies suggest there is a shift in forces from the fore- to the hindlimbs in quadrupeds. However, there are no whole-animal kinetic measurements of incline locomotion. Based on previous related research, we hypothesized that there would be a shift in forces to the hindlimb. The present study measured the force produced by the fore- and hindlimbs of horses while trotting over a range of speeds (2.5 to 5 m s(-1)) on both level and up an inclined (10%) surface. On the level, forelimb peak forces increased with trotting speed, but hindlimb peak force remained constant. On the incline, both fore- and hindlimb peak forces increased with speed, but the sum of the peak forces was lower than on the level. On the level, over the range of speeds tested, total force was consistently distributed between the limbs as 57% forelimb and 43% hindlimb, similar to the weight distribution of the horses during static weight tests. On the incline, the force distribution during locomotion shifted to 52% forelimb and 48% hindlimb. Time of contact and duty factor decreased with speed for both limbs. Time of contact was longer for the forelimb than the hindlimb, a finding not previously reported for quadrupeds. Time of contact of both limbs tended to be longer when traveling up the incline than on the level, but duty factor for both limbs was similar under both conditions. Duty factor decreased slightly with increased speed for the hindlimb on the level, and the corresponding small, predicted increase in peak vertical force could not be detected statistically.
Publication Date: 2004-09-02 PubMed ID: 15339946DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01171Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research studied the distribution of forces generated by a horse’s forelimbs and hindlimbs when trotting on different surfaces and at varying speeds. It showed a shift in force toward the hindlimbs when trotting uphill, contrary to the constant forces on flat surfaces.

Introduction and Background

  • The study aimed to measure the forces produced by a horse’s forelimbs and hindlimbs when trotting uphill, and on level grounds across a range of speeds. This project builds upon past studies on the weight distribution of quadrupeds in motion, speculating a shift in forces to hindlimbs during uphill movement.

Study Design and Methodology

  • Horses were made to trot at varying speeds on both flat and inclined surfaces. The range of speeds was 2.5 to 5 m s(-1).
  • The incline was set at a 10% grade, and the forelimb and hindlimb peak forces were measured across these conditions.

Results Summary

  • The findings confirm that there is an increase in hindlimb peak force on inclined surfaces, contrasting the constant force observed on flat grounds.
  • On level ground, the total force was consistently distributed between the horse’s limbs as 57% forelimb and 43% hindlimb, which aligns with the weight distribution during static weight tests.
  • When the horse trotted uphill, the force shifted, resulting in a slightly more evenly distributed load of 52% forelimb and 48% hindlimb.
  • The time of foot contact with the ground was longer for the forelimb than the hindlimb, no matter the incline or speed.
  • However, the time of contact for both limbs was slightly longer on an incline than on a flat surface. Despite this, the “duty factor”—the percentage of one complete stride for which a foot is on the ground—remained consistent between incline and level trotting.

Discussion and Conclusion

  • The research exploits the lack of sufficient whole-animal kinetic data of uphill locomotion, and contributes to the limited resources with detailed metrics of a horse’s force exertion while trotting.
  • The shift of forces to the hindlimbs during uphill trotting could be a crucial factor for equestrians, trainers or veterinarians to understand proper equine management and health.

Cite This Article

APA
Dutto DJ, Hoyt DF, Cogger EA, Wickler SJ. (2004). Ground reaction forces in horses trotting up an incline and on the level over a range of speeds. J Exp Biol, 207(Pt 20), 3507-3514. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01171

Publication

ISSN: 0022-0949
NlmUniqueID: 0243705
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 207
Issue: Pt 20
Pages: 3507-3514

Researcher Affiliations

Dutto, Darren J
  • Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 91768, USA. ddutto@csupomona.edu
Hoyt, Donald F
    Cogger, Edward A
      Wickler, Steven J

        MeSH Terms

        • Analysis of Variance
        • Animals
        • Biomechanical Phenomena
        • Forelimb / physiology
        • Gait / physiology
        • Hindlimb / physiology
        • Horses / physiology
        • Locomotion / physiology
        • Video Recording
        • Weight-Bearing

        Grant Funding

        • S06 GM53933 / NIGMS NIH HHS

        Citations

        This article has been cited 20 times.
        1. Aoun R, Charles I, DeRouen A, Takawira C, Lopez MJ. Shoe configuration effects on third phalanx and capsule motion of unaffected and laminitic equine hooves in-situ.. PLoS One 2023;18(5):e0285475.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285475pubmed: 37155654google scholar: lookup
        2. Bailey J, Redpath A, Hallowell G, Bowen M. An objective study into the effects of an incline on naturally occurring lameness in horses.. Vet Med Sci 2022 Nov;8(6):2390-2395.
          doi: 10.1002/vms3.900pubmed: 35982535google scholar: lookup
        3. Adachi M, Aoi S, Kamimura T, Tsuchiya K, Matsuno F. Fore-Aft Asymmetry Improves the Stability of Trotting in the Transverse Plane: A Modeling Study.. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022;10:807777.
          doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.807777pubmed: 35721869google scholar: lookup
        4. Frigon A, Akay T, Prilutsky BI. Control of Mammalian Locomotion by Somatosensory Feedback.. Compr Physiol 2021 Dec 29;12(1):2877-2947.
          doi: 10.1002/cphy.c210020pubmed: 34964114google scholar: lookup
        5. Hossain I, Zhou S, Ishac K, Lind E, Sharwood L, Eager D. A Measurement of 'Walking-the-Wall' Dynamics: An Observational Study Using Accelerometry and Sensors to Quantify Risk Associated with Vertical Wall Impact Attenuation in Trampoline Parks.. Sensors (Basel) 2021 Nov 4;21(21).
          doi: 10.3390/s21217337pubmed: 34770643google scholar: lookup
        6. Li G, Zhang R, Han D, Pang H, Yu G, Cao Q, Wang C, Kong L, Chengjin W, Dong W, Li T, Li J. Forelimb joints contribute to locomotor performance in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) by maintaining stability and storing energy.. PeerJ 2020;8:e10278.
          doi: 10.7717/peerj.10278pubmed: 33240627google scholar: lookup
        7. Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ. A Review of Biomechanical Gait Classification with Reference to Collected Trot, Passage and Piaffe in Dressage Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Oct 3;9(10).
          doi: 10.3390/ani9100763pubmed: 31623360google scholar: lookup
        8. Parkes RSV, Weller R, Pfau T, Witte TH. The Effect of Training on Stride Duration in a Cohort of Two-Year-Old and Three-Year-Old Thoroughbred Racehorses.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Jul 22;9(7).
          doi: 10.3390/ani9070466pubmed: 31336595google scholar: lookup
        9. Hobbs SJ, Robinson MA, Clayton HM. A simple method of equine limb force vector analysis and its potential applications.. PeerJ 2018;6:e4399.
          doi: 10.7717/peerj.4399pubmed: 29492341google scholar: lookup
        10. Dimiskovski M, Scheinfield R, Higgin D, Krupka A, Lemay MA. Characterization and validation of a split belt treadmill for measuring hindlimb ground-reaction forces in able-bodied and spinalized felines.. J Neurosci Methods 2017 Feb 15;278:65-75.
        11. Hobbs SJ, Bertram JE, Clayton HM. An exploration of the influence of diagonal dissociation and moderate changes in speed on locomotor parameters in trotting horses.. PeerJ 2016;4:e2190.
          doi: 10.7717/peerj.2190pubmed: 27413640google scholar: lookup
        12. Wilkinson H, Thavarajah N, Codd J. The metabolic cost of walking on an incline in the Peacock (Pavo cristatus).. PeerJ 2015;3:e987.
          doi: 10.7717/peerj.987pubmed: 26056619google scholar: lookup
        13. Wang Z, Dai Z, Li W, Ji A, Wang W. How do the substrate reaction forces acting on a gecko's limbs respond to inclines?. Naturwissenschaften 2015 Feb;102(1-2):1259.
          doi: 10.1007/s00114-015-1259-6pubmed: 25645733google scholar: lookup
        14. Takahashi T, Matsui A, Mukai K, Ohmura H, Hiraga A, Aida H. The Effects of Inclination (Up and Down) of the Treadmill on the Electromyogram Activities of the Forelimb and Hind limb Muscles at a Walk and a Trot in Thoroughbred Horses.. J Equine Sci 2014;25(4):73-7.
          doi: 10.1294/jes.25.73pubmed: 25558180google scholar: lookup
        15. Kilbourne BM, Hoffman LC. Scale effects between body size and limb design in quadrupedal mammals.. PLoS One 2013;8(11):e78392.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078392pubmed: 24260117google scholar: lookup
        16. Arnold AS, Lee DV, Biewener AA. Modulation of joint moments and work in the goat hindlimb with locomotor speed and surface grade.. J Exp Biol 2013 Jun 15;216(Pt 12):2201-12.
          doi: 10.1242/jeb.082495pubmed: 23470662google scholar: lookup
        17. Self ZT, Spence AJ, Wilson AM. Speed and incline during thoroughbred horse racing: racehorse speed supports a metabolic power constraint to incline running but not to decline running.. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2012 Aug 15;113(4):602-7.
        18. Carroll AM, Biewener AA. Mono- versus biarticular muscle function in relation to speed and gait changes: in vivo analysis of the goat triceps brachii.. J Exp Biol 2009 Oct;212(Pt 20):3349-60.
          doi: 10.1242/jeb.033639pubmed: 19801439google scholar: lookup
        19. Crook TC, Cruickshank SE, McGowan CM, Stubbs N, Wakeling JM, Wilson AM, Payne RC. Comparative anatomy and muscle architecture of selected hind limb muscles in the Quarter Horse and Arab.. J Anat 2008 Feb;212(2):144-52.
        20. Lee DV, McGuigan MP, Yoo EH, Biewener AA. Compliance, actuation, and work characteristics of the goat foreleg and hindleg during level, uphill, and downhill running.. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2008 Jan;104(1):130-41.