Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal. Supplement2011; (38); 431-435; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00243.x

Heel movement in horses: comparison between glued and nailed horse shoes at different speeds.

Abstract: It has been suggested that the heel of the horse's hoof expands in the stance phase and this reduces the concussion at impact and helps pump blood into the hoof. Therefore, farriers usually leave a gap in the heel region when using the traditional nailed shoe. Recently glued shoes which are attached firmly to the heel have been developed and these could restrict heel movement. Objective: To compare the degree of mediolateral heel movement between glued and nailed shoes. Methods: Seven Thoroughbreds were used. Either their fore- or hind hooves were shod with plain aluminium shoes, attached first with glue and later with nails. Measurements were collected continuously with a displacement sensor fixed between the medial and lateral hoof walls at the heel. The horses ran on a treadmill at a walk (1.8 m/s), trot (3.5 m/s), canter (8 m/s) and gallop (12 m/s). The mediolateral heel movement in a nonweightbearing position was set at zero for each hoof and thus positive and negative numbers represented expansion and contraction, respectively. Average values of 10 consecutive strides at each speed were compared between the 2 shoeing methods by paired t test. Results: At all running speeds, the heels expanded in the first 70-80% of the stance phase and contracted at breakover. The total heel movement calculated as the sum of the maximum expansion and contraction value was less with glued shoeing than with nailed shoeing for walking (all limbs), trotting (all limbs), cantering (leading forelimb and both hindlimbs) and galloping (both hindlimbs). Conclusions: Glueing restricted heel movement, suggesting possible interference with shock absorption and blood pumping in the hoof. Further study is needed to evaluate the influence of glued shoeing on hoof mechanics.
Publication Date: 2011-05-27 PubMed ID: 21059041DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00243.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research studied how the manner of horse shoe attachment (nailing versus gluing) affects lateral heel movement in running horses, indicating that glued shoes restricted this movement potentially impacting hoof’s shock absorption and blood flow.

Objective of the Study

  • The study’s objective was to investigate the differences in lateral heel movement in horses when wearing either glued or nailed shoes. It aimed to validate the suggestion that the horse’s hoof expands during the stance phase to cushion impact and aid in blood flow and that this expansion could be restricted by glued shoes which are more firmly attached to the heel compared to traditional nail-attached shoes.

Methods Used in the Study

  • Seven Thoroughbreds participated in the study. Their either fore- or hind hooves were shod with plain aluminum shoes, initially attached with glue and later with nails.
  • A displacement sensor was fixed between the medial (inside) and lateral (outside) hoof walls at the heel to continuously measure the horses’ heel movement.
  • The horses were made to run on a treadmill at varying speeds – walk (1.8 m/s), trot (3.5 m/s), canter (8 m/s), and gallop (12 m/s).
  • The mediolateral heel movement when not bearing weight was set as zero for each hoof so that positive and negative values would represent the hoof’s expansion and contraction, respectively.
  • Using a paired t-test, the average values from ten consecutive strides at each speed were compared between the two shoeing methods.

Results and Conclusion of the Study

  • Throughout all running speeds, the first 70-80% of the stance phase saw an expansion in the heels, while a contraction occurred at breakover.
  • When totaled, the heel movements calculated as the total sum of maximum expansion and contraction were less for glued shoeing than for nailed shoeing at all speeds and running conditions. This difference was more pronounced for walking and trotting (in all limbs), cantering (leading forelimb and both hindlimbs), and galloping (both hindlimbs).
  • These results indicate that glueing led to less heel movement, hinting at potential interference with the hoof’s shock absorption and blood circulation mechanisms.
  • However, further research is needed to fully comprehend the effects of glued shoeing on hoof mechanics.

Cite This Article

APA
Yoshihara E, Takahashi T, Otsuka N, Isayama T, Tomiyama T, Hiraga A, Wada S. (2011). Heel movement in horses: comparison between glued and nailed horse shoes at different speeds. Equine Vet J Suppl(38), 431-435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00243.x

Publication

NlmUniqueID: 9614088
Country: United States
Language: English
Issue: 38
Pages: 431-435

Researcher Affiliations

Yoshihara, E
  • Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Tokami-cho, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan. eirurich@gmail.com
Takahashi, T
    Otsuka, N
      Isayama, T
        Tomiyama, T
          Hiraga, A
            Wada, S

              MeSH Terms

              • Animals
              • Biomechanical Phenomena
              • Foot / physiology
              • Forelimb
              • Hindlimb
              • Hoof and Claw
              • Horses / physiology
              • Locomotion / physiology
              • Shoes

              Citations

              This article has been cited 8 times.
              1. Hobbs SJ, Curtis S, Martin J, Sinclair J, Clayton HM. Hoof Matters: Developing an Athletic Thoroughbred Hoof. Animals (Basel) 2022 Nov 11;12(22).
                doi: 10.3390/ani12223119pubmed: 36428348google scholar: lookup
              2. Horan K, Coburn J, Kourdache K, Day P, Carnall H, Brinkley L, Harborne D, Hammond L, Peterson M, Millard S, Pfau T. Hoof Impact and Foot-Off Accelerations in Galloping Thoroughbred Racehorses Trialling Eight Shoe-Surface Combinations. Animals (Basel) 2022 Aug 23;12(17).
                doi: 10.3390/ani12172161pubmed: 36077882google scholar: lookup
              3. Horan K, Kourdache K, Coburn J, Day P, Carnall H, Harborne D, Brinkley L, Hammond L, Millard S, Lancaster B, Pfau T. The effect of horseshoes and surfaces on horse and jockey centre of mass displacements at gallop. PLoS One 2021;16(11):e0257820.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257820pubmed: 34813584google scholar: lookup
              4. Horan K, Coburn J, Kourdache K, Day P, Harborne D, Brinkley L, Carnall H, Hammond L, Peterson M, Millard S, Pfau T. Influence of Speed, Ground Surface and Shoeing Condition on Hoof Breakover Duration in Galloping Thoroughbred Racehorses. Animals (Basel) 2021 Sep 3;11(9).
                doi: 10.3390/ani11092588pubmed: 34573553google scholar: lookup
              5. Mieszkowska M, Adamiak Z, Holak P, Głodek J, Jastrzębska E, Wolińska K, Mieszkowski M. The Effect of Horse Shoeing with Egg Bar Shoes and Shoes with Wedge Pads on the Results of Thermal Imaging of the Equine Distal Limb. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 21;11(6).
                doi: 10.3390/ani11061479pubmed: 34063756google scholar: lookup
              6. Moore LV, Zsoldos RR, Licka TF. Trot Accelerations of Equine Front and Hind Hooves Shod with Polyurethane Composite Shoes and Steel Shoes on Asphalt. Animals (Basel) 2019 Dec 11;9(12).
                doi: 10.3390/ani9121119pubmed: 31835771google scholar: lookup
              7. Ferreira CMC, Simões BD, Marques EAS, Carbas RJC, da Silva LFM. Exploring Adhesive Performance in Horseshoe Bonding Through Advanced Mechanical and Numerical Analysis. Biomimetics (Basel) 2024 Dec 24;10(1).
                doi: 10.3390/biomimetics10010002pubmed: 39851718google scholar: lookup
              8. Dahl VE, Singer ER, Garcia TC, Hawkins DA, Stover SM. Hoof Expansion, Deformation, and Surface Strains Vary with Horseshoe Nail Positions. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jun 4;13(11).
                doi: 10.3390/ani13111872pubmed: 37889766google scholar: lookup