Analyze Diet
Journal of applied genetics2026; doi: 10.1007/s13353-026-01053-y

Horse racing towards antibiotic resistance. Accompanying animals as a source of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Abstract: Antibiotic resistance is a significant issue in modern infectious medicine and veterinary science, with animals, including horses, playing a crucial role in its dissemination. Antibiotics, used both for treatment and prevention of diseases in animals, influence the composition of the microbiota and promote the selection of resistant strains that can be transmitted to humans through direct or environmental contact. Horses, currently classified as companion animals, serve as a reservoir of commensal and pathogenic bacteria, including multidrug-resistant strains capable of horizontal gene transfer. Of particular importance are plasmids and integrons that carry genes encoding β-lactamases, which significantly reduce the effectiveness of therapy in both humans and animals. Analysis of the equine oral and gut microbiota highlights the potential of these environments as sources and vectors of resistance. Understanding the mechanisms underlying the transfer and persistence of resistance genes in horses is crucial for public health and helps define new directions for research within the One Health framework.
Publication Date: 2026-04-29 PubMed ID: 42050107PubMed Central: 163149DOI: 10.1007/s13353-026-01053-yGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This article explains how horses can carry and spread antibiotic‑resistant bacteria to people and the environment, and why this matters for both human and animal health. It emphasizes mobile genetic elements like plasmids and integrons that move resistance genes—especially those for β‑lactamases—within the horse microbiota and across species, calling for a One Health approach.

What the article is about and why it matters

  • The paper reviews evidence that horses, now broadly categorized as companion animals, can act as reservoirs for both harmless (commensal) and disease‑causing (pathogenic) bacteria that are resistant to multiple antibiotics.
  • It argues that antibiotic use in veterinary care shapes the equine microbiota and selects for resistant strains that can be transmitted to humans via direct contact or through the shared environment (stables, pastures, water, equipment).
  • The review highlights mobile genetic elements—especially plasmids and integrons—that carry β‑lactamase genes, which undermine the efficacy of key antibiotics in both veterinary and human medicine.
  • By situating horses within the One Health framework, the article underscores interconnected risks and the need for integrated surveillance, stewardship, and research across human, animal, and environmental sectors.

Key concepts and definitions

  • Antibiotic resistance: The ability of bacteria to survive or grow despite exposure to antibiotics that would normally inhibit or kill them.
  • Commensal vs. pathogenic bacteria: Commensals typically live harmlessly on mucosal surfaces (e.g., gut, oral cavity) and can act as reservoirs of resistance genes; pathogens cause disease and can acquire resistance from commensals.
  • Multidrug resistance (MDR): Resistance to multiple antibiotic classes, making infections harder to treat.
  • Horizontal gene transfer (HGT): Movement of genes between bacteria via mechanisms such as conjugation (plasmid transfer), transformation, or transduction, enabling rapid spread of resistance traits.
  • Plasmids and integrons: Plasmids are transferable DNA molecules often carrying resistance genes; integrons are genetic platforms that capture and express gene cassettes, including those encoding resistance determinants like β‑lactamases.
  • β‑lactamases: Enzymes that inactivate β‑lactam antibiotics (e.g., penicillins, cephalosporins); their genes commonly reside on plasmids/integrons, facilitating spread across bacterial species.

Why horses are important in the resistance landscape

  • Classification and contact: As companion animals, horses have frequent, close contact with owners, veterinarians, and stable workers—creating opportunities for bidirectional transfer of resistant bacteria.
  • Veterinary antibiotic use: Therapeutic and preventive antibiotic use in equine medicine exerts selection pressure, enriching resistant populations within the horse microbiota.
  • Environmental interface: Manure, bedding, tack, water troughs, and pasture runoff can disseminate resistant bacteria and genes beyond the stable, potentially reaching other animals and people.
  • Movement and aggregation: Training, competition, transport, and hospitalization bring horses together, increasing transmission and mixing of microbial communities.

Equine oral and gut microbiota as reservoirs

  • Oral cavity:
    • Harbors dense, diverse biofilm communities on teeth, tongue, and tack (e.g., bits), which can facilitate gene exchange and persistence of resistance determinants.
    • Frequent human–horse contact (feeding, grooming, dental care) and droplet spread during handling create opportunities for transfer.
    • Saliva and oral secretions contaminate shared equipment and surfaces, seeding resistant organisms in stables and trailers.
  • Gastrointestinal tract:
    • The hindgut contains large microbial populations where antibiotic exposure perturbs community structure and promotes selection of resistant strains.
    • Fecal shedding releases resistant bacteria and mobile genetic elements into the environment, supporting onward spread and environmental persistence.
    • Co-selection pressures (e.g., metals, disinfectants) can maintain resistance even when antibiotic exposure is intermittent or reduced.

Mobile genetic elements and the role of β‑lactamases

  • Plasmids:
    • Carry clusters of resistance genes, enabling simultaneous resistance to multiple antibiotic classes.
    • Transfer readily between commensal and pathogenic bacteria within the horse, and potentially to human-associated bacteria.
  • Integrons:
    • Capture and express gene cassettes, including β‑lactamase genes, streamlining the assembly of multidrug resistance profiles.
    • Facilitate rapid adaptation to antibiotic pressures encountered in veterinary care settings.
  • β‑lactamases:
    • Reduce the effectiveness of widely used β‑lactam antibiotics in both humans and animals, complicating empirical therapy.
    • When encoded on plasmids and integrons, they can spread swiftly across species and environments associated with horses.

Transmission pathways from horses to humans and other ecosystems

  • Direct contact: Handling, grooming, riding, veterinary procedures, and wound care can transfer resistant organisms to human skin, nares, or mucosa.
  • Indirect and environmental routes: Contaminated tack, grooming tools, stalls, manure piles, soil, water runoff, and aerosols within barns facilitate spread.
  • Healthcare interfaces: Equine clinics and hospitals concentrate antibiotic use and susceptible hosts, increasing selection and dissemination risks.
  • Inter-species spillover: Farm and companion animals sharing facilities or pastures may exchange resistant bacteria, amplifying regional spread.

Public health and One Health implications

  • Integrated risk: Resistance in equine settings can compromise treatment options across species and propagate via environmental reservoirs.
  • Surveillance needs: Coordinated monitoring of horses, humans in contact with horses, and surrounding environments helps detect and track resistance trends and mobile elements.
  • Stewardship alignment: Harmonizing veterinary and human antibiotic stewardship reduces selection pressure and slows resistance emergence.

Practical mitigation strategies (inferred from One Health principles)

  • Antibiotic stewardship in equine practice:
  • Infection prevention and control:
    • Hand hygiene, personal protective equipment for high‑risk tasks, and equipment disinfection protocols in barns and clinics.
    • Isolation of horses with suspected contagious infections; cohorting and traffic flow management during outbreaks.
  • Environmental management:
    • Manure handling and composting practices that reduce bacterial survival and runoff contamination.
    • Regular cleaning of water troughs, feed bins, and tack; design of drainage to prevent spread to surrounding waterways.
  • Education and communication:
    • Training for owners, riders, stable staff, and veterinarians on resistance risks and preventive practices.
    • Clear guidance on when to seek diagnostics and how to administer prescribed treatments responsibly.

Research directions highlighted by the review

  • Mechanistic studies:
    • Elucidate how plasmids and integrons circulate within equine oral and gut communities and across species boundaries.
    • Identify ecological factors (diet, housing, co‑medications, disinfectants) that drive selection and persistence of resistance genes.
  • Genomic and metagenomic surveillance:
    • Longitudinal profiling of the equine resistome and mobilome across farms, clinics, and competition settings.
    • High‑resolution mapping to link specific resistance genes and β‑lactamases to their bacterial hosts and transmission networks.
  • Intervention trials:
    • Evaluate stewardship bundles, biosecurity enhancements, and environmental controls for measurable impact on resistance prevalence.
    • Assess microbiota‑sparing therapies and alternative approaches where appropriate and evidence supports safety and efficacy.

Limitations and cautions when interpreting the evidence

  • Heterogeneity in study designs, sampling sites (oral vs. gut), and detection methods can yield variable resistance estimates.
  • Geographic and facility‑type biases (e.g., referral hospitals vs. community stables) may limit generalizability.
  • Cross‑sectional snapshots reveal presence but not directionality or persistence of transmission; longitudinal data are needed.

Take‑home message

  • Horses can act as important reservoirs and conduits for antibiotic‑resistant bacteria via their oral and gut microbiota, with plasmids and integrons—especially those carrying β‑lactamase genes—driving spread and persistence.
  • Mitigating this risk requires coordinated One Health actions: prudent antibiotic use, robust infection control, environmental management, and integrated surveillance and research.

Cite This Article

APA
Lepianka A, Sitkiewicz I. (2026). Horse racing towards antibiotic resistance. Accompanying animals as a source of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. J Appl Genet. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-026-01053-y

Publication

ISSN: 2190-3883
NlmUniqueID: 9514582
Country: England
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Lepianka, Aleksandra
  • Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW Institute of Biology, Nowoursynowska 159, Warsaw, 02-776, Poland.
Sitkiewicz, Izabela
  • Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW Institute of Biology, Nowoursynowska 159, Warsaw, 02-776, Poland. izabela_sitkiewicz@sggw.edu.pl.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declarations. Ethics approval: This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. The manuscript does not require ethics approval. Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Consent to participate: The review does not require Informed consent. Consent to publish: The manuscript does not contain personal data and does not require consent to publish.

References

This article includes 54 references
  1. Adedeji WA. THE TREASURE CALLED ANTIBIOTICS. Annals Ib Postgrad Med 14(2):56–57.
  2. Andersson DI, Hughes D. Selection and Transmission of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria. Microbiol Spectr 5(4).
  3. Bauernfeind A, Stemplinger I, Jungwirth R, Ernst S, Casellas JM. Sequences of beta-lactamase genes encoding CTX-M-1 (MEN-1) and CTX-M-2 and relationship of their amino acid sequences with those of other beta-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40(2):509–513.
    pubmed: 8834913pmc: 163149doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.2.509google scholar: lookup
  4. Blázquez J, Couce A, Rodríguez-Beltrán J, Rodríguez-Rojas A. Antimicrobials as promoters of genetic variation. Curr Opin Microbiol 15(5):561–569.
    pubmed: 22890188doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2012.07.007google scholar: lookup
  5. Bush K, Bradford PA. Epidemiology of β-Lactamase-Producing Pathogens. Clin Microbiol Rev 33(2):e00047–19.
    doi: 10.1128/cmr.00047-19google scholar: lookup
  6. Bush K, Jacoby GA, Medeiros AA. A functional classification scheme for beta-lactamases and its correlation with molecular structure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39(6):1211–1233.
    pubmed: 7574506pmc: 162717doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.6.1211google scholar: lookup
  7. Costa MC, Stämpfli HR, Arroyo LG, Allen-Vercoe E, Gomes RG, Weese JS. Changes in the equine fecal microbiota associated with the use of systemic antimicrobial drugs. BMC Vet Res 11:19.
    pubmed: 25644524pmc: 4323147doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0335-7google scholar: lookup
  8. da Pimenta C, Saavedra J, da Silva MJ, G J, Cotovio M. Multidrug-resistant Serratia rubidaea strains in the oral microbiota of healthy horses. Open Veterinary J 11(4):598–602.
    doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2021.v11.i4.9google scholar: lookup
  9. de Lagarde M, Fairbrother JM, Arsenault J. Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Characterization of Multidrug Resistant and ESBL/AmpC Producing Escherichia coli in Healthy Horses in Quebec, Canada, in 2015–2016. Animals 10(3):523.
    pubmed: 32245112pmc: 7143171doi: 10.3390/ani10030523google scholar: lookup
  10. Dolejska M, Villa L, Minoia M, Guardabassi L, Carattoli A. Complete sequences of IncHI1 plasmids carrying blaCTX-M-1 and qnrS1 in equine Escherichia coli provide new insights into plasmid evolution. J Antimicrob Chemother 69(9):2388–2393.
    pubmed: 24862095doi: 10.1093/jac/dku172google scholar: lookup
  11. Domingues S, da Silva GJ, Nielsen KM. Integrons. Mob Genetic Elem 2(5):211–223.
    doi: 10.4161/mge.22967google scholar: lookup
  12. Dor Z, Shnaiderman-Torban A, Kondratyeva K, Davidovich-Cohen M, Rokney A, Steinman A, Navon-Venezia S. Emergence and Spread of Different ESBL-Producing Salmonella enterica Serovars in Hospitalized Horses Sharing a Highly Transferable IncM2 CTX-M-3-Encoding Plasmid. Front Microbiol 11,616032.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.616032google scholar: lookup
  13. Elias L, Gillis DC, Gurrola-Rodriguez T, Jeon JH, Lee JH, Kim TY, Lee SH, Murray SA, Ohta N, Scott HM, Wu J, Rogovskyy AS. The Occurrence and Characterization of Extended-Spectrum-Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli Isolated from Clinical Diagnostic Specimens of Equine Origin. Animals 10(1):28.
    pubmed: 31877788pmc: 7022413doi: 10.3390/ani10010028google scholar: lookup
  14. Eskola K, Aimo-Koivisto E, Heikinheimo A, Mykkänen A, Hautajärvi T, Grönthal T. Prevalence, risk factors, and characterisation of extended-spectrum β-lactamase -producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) in horses entering an equine hospital and description of longitudinal excretion. BMC Vet Res 20(1):412.
    pubmed: 39272173pmc: 11396584doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04260-zgoogle scholar: lookup
  15. Franco BE, Altagracia Martínez M, Sánchez Rodríguez MA, Wertheimer AI. The determinants of the antibiotic resistance process. Infect Drug Resist 2:1–11.
    pubmed: 21694883pmc: 3108730
  16. Gebreyes WA, Dupouy-Camet J, Newport MJ, Oliveira CJB, Schlesinger LS, Saif YM, Kariuki S, Saif LJ, Saville W, Wittum T, Hoet A, Quessy S, Kazwala R, Tekola B, Shryock T, Bisesi M, Patchanee P, Boonmar S, King LJ. The Global One Health Paradigm: Challenges and Opportunities for Tackling Infectious Diseases at the Human, Animal, and Environment Interface in Low-Resource Settings. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8(11):e3257.
    pubmed: 25393303pmc: 4230840doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003257google scholar: lookup
  17. Gillings MR, Gaze WH, Pruden A, Smalla K, Tiedje JM, Zhu Y-G. Using the class 1 integron-integrase gene as a proxy for anthropogenic pollution. ISME J 9(6):1269–1279.
    pubmed: 25500508doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.226google scholar: lookup
  18. Gomez D, Toribio R, Caddey B, Costa M, Vijan S, Dembek K. Longitudinal effects of oral administration of antimicrobial drugs on fecal microbiota of horses. J Vet Intern Med 37(6):2562–2572.
    pubmed: 37681574pmc: 10658497doi: 10.1111/jvim.16853google scholar: lookup
  19. Haaber J, Penadés JR, Ingmer H. Transfer of Antibiotic Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Trends Microbiol 25(11):893–905.
    pubmed: 28641931doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.05.011google scholar: lookup
  20. Hu Y, Gao GF, Zhu B. The antibiotic resistome: gene flow in environments, animals and human beings. Front Med 11(2):161–168.
    pubmed: 28500429doi: 10.1007/s11684-017-0531-xgoogle scholar: lookup
  21. Jousset AB, Bouabdallah L, Birer A, Rosinski-Chupin I, Mariet J-F, Oueslati S, Emeraud C, Girlich D, Glaser P, Naas T, Bonnin RA, Dortet L. Population Analysis of Escherichia coli Sequence Type 361 and Reduced Cefiderocol Susceptibility, France. Emerg Infect Dis 29(9), 1877–188.
    doi: 10.3201/eid2909.230390google scholar: lookup
  22. Katonge JH, Ally ZK. Evolutionary relationships and genetic diversity in the BlaTEM gene among selected gram-negative bacteria. Biochem Biophys Rep 42:101985.
    pubmed: 40207084pmc: 11979915doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2025.101985google scholar: lookup
  23. Kauter A, Epping L, Ghazisaeedi F, Lübke-Becker A, Wolf SA, Kannapin D, Stoeckle SD, Semmler T, Günther S, Gehlen H, Walther B. Frequency, Local Dynamics, and Genomic Characteristics of ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli Isolated From Specimens of Hospitalized Horses. Front Microbiol 12, 671676.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.671676google scholar: lookup
  24. Kennedy R, Lappin DF, Dixon PM, Buijs MJ, Zaura E, Crielaard W, O’Donnell L, Bennett D, Brandt BW, Riggio MP. The microbiome associated with equine periodontitis and oral health. Vet Res 47(1):49.
    pubmed: 27080859pmc: 4832512doi: 10.1186/s13567-016-0333-1google scholar: lookup
  25. Langley R, Morris T. That horse bit me: zoonotic infections of equines to consider after exposure through the bite or the oral/nasal secretions. J Agromed 14(3):370–381.
    doi: 10.1080/10599240903058087google scholar: lookup
  26. Lönker NS, Fechner K, Wahed AE, A. Horses as a Crucial Part of One Health. Veterinary Sci 7(1):28.
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci7010028google scholar: lookup
  27. Léon A, Castagnet S, Maillard K, Paillot R, Giard J-C. Evolution of In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Equine Clinical Isolates in France between 2016 and 2019. Animals 10(5):812.
    pubmed: 32392891pmc: 7278474doi: 10.3390/ani10050812google scholar: lookup
  28. Loncaric I, Cabal Rosel A, Szostak MP, Licka T, Allerberger F, Ruppitsch W, Spergser J. Broad-Spectrum Cephalosporin-Resistant Klebsiella spp. Isolated from Diseased Horses in Austria. Animals 10(2):332.
    pubmed: 32093201pmc: 7070950doi: 10.3390/ani10020332google scholar: lookup
  29. Lupo A, Haenni M, Saras E, Gradin J, Madec J-Y, Börjesson S. Is bla Riding the Same Plasmid Among Horses in Sweden and France?. Microb Drug Resist 24(10):1580–1586.
    doi: 10.1089/mdr.2017.0412google scholar: lookup
  30. Maddox TW, Clegg PD, Williams NJ, Pinchbeck GL. Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from horses: Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance. Equine Vet J 47(6):756–765.
    pubmed: 26084443doi: 10.1111/evj.12471google scholar: lookup
  31. Mitchell SW, Moran RA, Elbourne LDH, Chapman B, Bull M, Muscatello G, Coleman NV. Impacts of Domestication and Veterinary Treatment on Mobile Genetic Elements and Resistance Genes in EquineFecal Bacteria. Applied and environmental microbiology 89(3), e0159022.
    doi: 10.1128/aem.01590-22google scholar: lookup
  32. Modi SR, Lee HH, Spina CS, Collins JJ. Antibiotic treatment expands the resistance reservoir and ecological network of the phage metagenome. Nature 499(7457):219–222.
    pubmed: 23748443pmc: 3710538doi: 10.1038/nature12212google scholar: lookup
  33. Motlagh AM, Bhattacharjee AS, Goel R. Microbiological study of bacteriophage induction in the presence of chemical stress factors in enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR). Water Res 81:1–14.
    pubmed: 26024959doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.023google scholar: lookup
  34. Murray CJL, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Robles Aguilar G, Gray A, Han C, Bisignano C, Rao P, Wool E, Johnson SC, Browne AJ, Chipeta MG, Fell F, Hackett S, Haines-Woodhouse G, Hamadani K, Kumaran BH, McManigal EAP, Naghavi B, M. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 399(10325):629–655.
  35. Nadeem SF, Gohar UF, Tahir SF, Mukhtar H, Pornpukdeewattana S, Nukthamna P, Moula Ali AM, Bavisetty SCB, Massa S. Antimicrobial resistance: more than 70 years of war between humans and bacteria. Crit Rev Microbiol 46(5):578–599.
    pubmed: 32954887doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2020.1813687google scholar: lookup
  36. Nikaido H. Multidrug Resistance in Bacteria. Annu Rev Biochem 78(1):119–146.
  37. Palumbi SR. Humans as the World’s Greatest Evolutionary Force. Science 293(5536):1786–1790.
    pubmed: 11546863doi: 10.1126/science.293.5536.1786google scholar: lookup
  38. Pimenta J, Pinto AR, Saavedra MJ, Cotovio M. Equine Gram-Negative Oral Microbiota: An Antimicrobial Resistances Watcher?. Antibiot (Basel Switzerland) 12(4), 792.
  39. Roy Chowdhury P, Hastak P, DeMaere M, Wyrsch E, Li D, Elankumaran P, Dolejska M, Browning GF, Marenda MS, Gottlieb T, Cheong E, Merlino J, Myers GSA, Djordjevic SP. Phylogenomic analysisof a global collection of Escherichia coli ST38: evidence of interspecies and environmental transmission?. mSystems 8(5), e0123622.
    doi: 10.1128/msystems.01236-22google scholar: lookup
  40. Sadikalay S, Reynaud Y, Guyomard-Rabenirina S, Falord M, Ducat C, Fabre L, Le Hello S, Talarmin A, Ferdinand S. High genetic diversity of extended-spectrum β-lactamases producing Escherichia coli in feces of horses. Vet Microbiol 219:117–122.
    pubmed: 29778183doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.04.016google scholar: lookup
  41. Scott AM, Beller E, Glasziou P, Clark J, Ranakusuma RW, Byambasuren O, Bakhit M, Page SW, Trott D, Mar C, Del. Is antimicrobial administration to food animals a direct threat to human health? A rapid systematic review. Int J Antimicrob Agents 52(3):316–323.
  42. Shnaiderman-Torban A, Navon-Venezia S, Dor Z, Paitan Y, Arielly H, Abu Ahmad W, Kelmer G, Fulde M, Steinman A. Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Shedding in Farm Horses Versus Hospitalized Horses: Prevalence and Risk Factors. Animals 10(2):282.
    pubmed: 32054111pmc: 7070874doi: 10.3390/ani10020282google scholar: lookup
  43. Shnaiderman-Torban A, Navon-Venezia S, Paitan Y, Archer H, Abu Ahmad W, Bonder D, Hanael E, Nissan I, Valenci Z, Weese G, S J, Steinman A. Extended spectrum β lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae shedding by race horses in Ontario, Canada. BMC Vet Res 16(1):479.
    pubmed: 33298039pmc: 7726890doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02701-zgoogle scholar: lookup
  44. Shnaiderman-Torban A, Paitan Y, Arielly H, Kondratyeva K, Tirosh-Levy S, Abells-Sutton G, Navon-Venezia S, Steinman A. Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Hospitalized Neonatal Foals: Prevalence, Risk Factors for Shedding and Association with Infection. Animals 9(9):600.
    pubmed: 31450865pmc: 6770135doi: 10.3390/ani9090600google scholar: lookup
  45. Sitkiewicz I, Green NM, Guo N, Mereghetti L, Musser JM. Lateral gene transfer of streptococcal ICE element RD2 (region of difference 2) encoding secreted proteins. BMC Microbiol 11(1):65.
    pubmed: 21457552pmc: 3083328doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-65google scholar: lookup
  46. Stanczak-Mrozek KI, Laing KG, Lindsay JA. Resistance gene transfer: induction of transducing phage by sub-inhibitory concentrations of antimicrobials is not correlated to induction of lytic phage. J Antimicrob Chemother 72(6):1624–1631.
    pubmed: 28369562pmc: 5437526doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx056google scholar: lookup
  47. Sukmawinata E, Uemura R, Sato W, Thu Htun M, Sueyoshi M. Multidrug-Resistant ESBL/AmpC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated from Healthy Thoroughbred Racehorses in Japan. Animals 10(3):369.
    pubmed: 32106501pmc: 7143125doi: 10.3390/ani10030369google scholar: lookup
  48. Surette MD, Wright GD. Lessons from the Environmental Antibiotic Resistome. Annu Rev Microbiol 71(1):309–329.
  49. Tang SS, Apisarnthanarak A, Hsu LY. Mechanisms of β-lactam antimicrobial resistance and epidemiology of major community- and healthcare-associated multidrug-resistant bacteria. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 78:3–13.
    pubmed: 25134490doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.08.003google scholar: lookup
  50. Theelen MJP, Luiken REC, Wagenaar JA, van Sloet MM, Rossen JWA, Schaafstra FJWC, van Doorn DA, Zomer AL. Longitudinal study of the short- and long-term effects of hospitalisation and oral trimethoprim-sulfadiazine administration on the equine faecal microbiome and resistome. Microbiome 11(1):33.
    pubmed: 36850017pmc: 9969626doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01465-6google scholar: lookup
  51. Tiseo K, Huber L, Gilbert M, Robinson TP, Van Boeckel TP. Global Trends in Antimicrobial Use in Food Animals from 2017 to 2030. Antibiotics 9(12):918.
    pubmed: 33348801pmc: 7766021doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9120918google scholar: lookup
  52. Volkova VV, Lu Z, Besser T, Gröhn YT. Modeling the Infection Dynamics of Bacteriophages in Enteric Escherichia coli: Estimating the Contribution of Transduction to Antimicrobial Gene Spread. Appl Environ Microbiol 80(14):4350–4362.
    pubmed: 24814786pmc: 4068684doi: 10.1128/AEM.00446-14google scholar: lookup
  53. von Wintersdorff CJH, Penders J, van Niekerk JM, Mills ND, Majumder S, van Alphen LB, Savelkoul PHM, Wolffs PFG. Dissemination of Antimicrobial Resistance in Microbial Ecosystems through Horizontal Gene Transfer. Front Microbiol 7, 173.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00173google scholar: lookup
  54. Walsh CT, Wencewicz TA. Prospects for new antibiotics: a molecule-centered perspective. J Antibiot 67(1):7–22.
    doi: 10.1038/ja.2013.49google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.