Analyze Diet
Drug discovery today2019; 25(2); 265-268; doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.10.003

Horses for courses: an approach to the qualification of clinical trial sites and investigators in ATMPs.

Abstract: The advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) landscape is entirely different from classical drug development. Academia has been the major source of ATMP development, and academic hospitals act as trial sites for the clinical testing of ATMPs, including early academic-led trials as well as industry-sponsored trials that pursue the full developmental pathway to market authorization. The recent breakthrough developments in some ATMPs, such as genetically engineered immune cells, have confronted academic hospitals with a substantial amount of public demand, competitive pressure, and costs. At the same time, risks, toxicities, and necessary countermeasures demand an appropriate infrastructure, expertise and training which have not yet been fully standardized. How can Ethics Committees consider trial sites and investigators in clinical trials with ATMPs as appropriately qualified?
Publication Date: 2019-10-16 PubMed ID: 31628993DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.10.003Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper focuses on the complexity of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) clinical trials. It explores the various challenges faced by academic hospitals—usually the centers for these trials—due to an increase in public demand, competition, and costs. The research also highlights the necessity for appropriate infrastructure, expertise, and standardized training for performing such trials.

Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) and Clinical Trials

  • In the field of drug development, ATMPs represent a completely different sphere engaging more with academia. These are innovative therapies often involving genes or cells that hold potential to revolutionize disease treatment.
  • Clinical trials for ATMPs are usually conducted in academic hospitals. The settings range from early tests led by academics to full-fledged, industry-funded trials aimed at achieving market authorization.
  • Recent breakthroughs in some ATMPs—specifically genetically engineered immune cells—have put academic hospitals in the spotlight, leading to heightened public interest, amplified competitive tension and increased costs.

Challenges and Required Parameters

  • Despite the above, introducing advances like these can bring certain risks and toxicities. To effectively navigate these, appropriate infrastructure and expertise are crucial.
  • Moreover, given the novelty and complexity of these therapies, standardized training is a paramount need to mitigate potential errors or complications during the course of clinical trials. However, the standardization process is not yet fully completed.

Ethics Committees and Qualification Criteria

  • Considering the factors discussed, the paper ponder on how Ethics Committees, that supervise the conduct of clinical trials, can consider trial sites and investigators as qualified for ATMP trials.
  • This vital issue of qualification draws attention to the importance of a strong, consistent evaluation metric for academic hospitals and investigators involved in ATMP clinical trials to ensure patient safety and overall efficacy of the study.

Cite This Article

APA
Hildebrandt M. (2019). Horses for courses: an approach to the qualification of clinical trial sites and investigators in ATMPs. Drug Discov Today, 25(2), 265-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2019.10.003

Publication

ISSN: 1878-5832
NlmUniqueID: 9604391
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 25
Issue: 2
Pages: 265-268
PII: S1359-6446(19)30386-1

Researcher Affiliations

Hildebrandt, Martin
  • Ethics Committee of the State of Berlin, Berlin, Germany; TUMCells Interdisciplinary Center for Cellular Therapies, TUM School of Medicine, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: martin.hildebrandt@tum.de.

MeSH Terms

  • Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Genetic Therapy
  • Hospitals
  • Humans
  • Immunotherapy, Adoptive / adverse effects
  • Receptors, Chimeric Antigen
  • Tissue Engineering

Citations

This article has been cited 4 times.
  1. de Jongh D, Massey EK, Cronin AJ, Schermer MHN, Bunnik EM. Early-Phase Clinical Trials of Bio-Artificial Organ Technology: A Systematic Review of Ethical Issues. Transpl Int 2022;35:10751.
    doi: 10.3389/ti.2022.10751pubmed: 36388425google scholar: lookup
  2. de Kanter AJ, Jongsma KR, Verhaar MC, Bredenoord AL. The Ethical Implications of Tissue Engineering for Regenerative Purposes: A Systematic Review. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2023 Apr;29(2):167-187.
    doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0033pubmed: 36112697google scholar: lookup
  3. Priesner C, Hildebrandt M. Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products and the Changing Role of Academia. Transfus Med Hemother 2022 Jun;49(3):158-162.
    doi: 10.1159/000524392pubmed: 35813600google scholar: lookup
  4. Li A, James D, Lim R. The Gibco(™) CTS(™) Rotea(™) system story-a case study of industry-academia collaboration. Gene Ther 2023 Apr;30(3-4):192-196.
    doi: 10.1038/s41434-021-00266-6pubmed: 34108630google scholar: lookup