Analyze Diet
Tropical animal health and production2013; 45(8); 1669-1676; doi: 10.1007/s11250-013-0412-5

Importance of the horse and financial impact of equine trypanosomiasis on cattle raising in Venezuela.

Abstract: In Venezuela, horses are indispensable for extensive cattle raising, and extensive cattle raising prevails in all regions. This determines the numerical relationship between horses and cattle (r = 0.93) to be relatively constant nationwide. At regional level, the average extension of cattle ranches varies greatly. However, in relation to the area covered by pastures, the numbers of horses (r = 0.95) and cattle (r = 0.93) are relatively uniform nationwide. Water buffalo occupy small fractions of the territory; therefore, their numbers are related to the area of pastures less strongly (r = 0.56). There is no information on the numerical relationship between the numbers of horses and water buffalo. In the Llanos region of the country, equine trypanosomiasis is responsible for a high mortality in horses, causing considerable financial losses to cattle ranches. So far, such losses have not been assessed. For this region, in 2008, it can be calculated that: (1) with no treatment, losses owing to horse mortality caused by this hemoparasitosis would have amounted to US$7,486,000; (2) the diagnosis and treatment of affected horses would have required an investment of US$805,000; and (3) in terms of horses saved, this investment would have resulted in benefit of US$6,232,000. Therefore, for every monetary unit invested, there would be a benefit 7.75 times greater, this ratio being applicable to any year and all regions of the country. It follows that the profitability of investing in the diagnosis and treatment of equine trypanosomiasis is guaranteed.
Publication Date: 2013-05-11 PubMed ID: 23666515DOI: 10.1007/s11250-013-0412-5Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper outlines the importance of horses in cattle raising in Venezuela, and the financial impact of equine trypanosomiasis, a disease causing high mortality in horses, on this industry. It concludes that investing in diagnosis and treatment of this disease is financially beneficial for the country’s cattle ranches.

Importance of Horses in Cattle Raising

  • The researchers emphasize the crucial role of horses in extensive cattle raising in Venezuela. This becomes apparent in the strong numerical relationship observed between horses and cattle across the nation, which remains on average relatively constant, no matter the region.
  • The terrain and size of cattle ranches can vary by region, but the number of horses and cattle remain relatively uniform nationwide in relation to the square footage dedicated to pastures.

The Role of Water Buffalo and the Lack of Information

  • Water buffalo occupy a smaller portion of the land in comparison to horses and cattle, hence their numerical relationship to the area of pastures is less pronounced.
  • The researchers note a lack of information regarding the numerical relationship between horses and water buffalo.

Impact of Equine Trypanosomiasis

  • In the Llanos region of Venezuela, equine trypanosomiasis, a disease impacting horses, is responsible for high rates of horse mortality, which results in significant financial losses for cattle ranches.
  • Until now, these financial losses have been uncalculated and overlooked.

Financial Analysis and Implications

  • Using 2008 data from the Llanos region, the researchers determined that without treating the disease, losses due to horse mortality would have reached around US$7.5 million.
  • On the other hand, diagnosing and treating the affected horses would have required an investment of approximately US$800,000. This investment, however, would have resulted in the saving of horses and a calculated benefit of over US$6.2 million.
  • In terms of cost-benefit ratio, it implies that for every monetary unit invested in the diagnosis and treatment of equine trypanosomiasis, there would be a return 7.75 times greater. According to the researchers, this ratio could be applicable in any year and in all regions of the country.
  • The conclusion drawn is that the profitability of investing in the diagnosis and treatment of equine trypanosomiasis is guaranteed, reinforcing the importance of this investment for the benefit of the country’s cattle raising industry.

Cite This Article

APA
Moreno SA, Concepción JL, Nava M, Molinari J. (2013). Importance of the horse and financial impact of equine trypanosomiasis on cattle raising in Venezuela. Trop Anim Health Prod, 45(8), 1669-1676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-013-0412-5

Publication

ISSN: 1573-7438
NlmUniqueID: 1277355
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 45
Issue: 8
Pages: 1669-1676

Researcher Affiliations

Moreno, S Andrea
  • Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Los Andes, Mérida, 05101, Estado Mérida, Venezuela, sandrea@ula.ve.
Concepción, Juan Luis
    Nava, Mayerly
      Molinari, Jesús

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Antiprotozoal Agents / economics
        • Antiprotozoal Agents / therapeutic use
        • Cost-Benefit Analysis
        • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
        • Horse Diseases / economics
        • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
        • Horse Diseases / parasitology
        • Horses
        • Trypanosoma / growth & development
        • Trypanosomiasis / drug therapy
        • Trypanosomiasis / economics
        • Trypanosomiasis / epidemiology
        • Trypanosomiasis / parasitology
        • Trypanosomiasis / veterinary
        • Venezuela / epidemiology

        References

        This article includes 8 references
        1. Arias JF, García F, Rivera M, López R. Trypanosoma evansi in capybara from Venezuela.. J Wildl Dis 1997 Apr;33(2):359-61.
          pubmed: 9131577doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-33.2.359google scholar: lookup
        2. Seidl A, Moraes AS, Aguilar R, Silva MS. A financial analysis of treatment strategies for Trypanosoma evansi in the Brazilian Pantanal.. Prev Vet Med 1998 Jan;33(1-4):219-34.
          pubmed: 9500176doi: 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00049-4google scholar: lookup
        3. Lun ZR, Desser SS. Is the broad range of hosts and geographical distribution of Trypanosoma evansi attributable to the loss of maxicircle kinetoplast DNA?. Parasitol Today 1995 Apr;11(4):131-3.
          pubmed: 15275353doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(95)80129-4google scholar: lookup
        4. Foil LD. Tabanids as vectors of disease agents.. Parasitol Today 1989 Mar;5(3):88-96.
          pubmed: 15463186doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(89)90009-4google scholar: lookup
        5. Reyna-Bello A, García FA, Rivera M, Sansó B, Aso PM. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection of anti-Trypanosoma evansi equine antibodies.. Vet Parasitol 1998 Dec 31;80(2):149-57.
          pubmed: 9870367doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(98)00199-xgoogle scholar: lookup
        6. Sumba AL, Mihok S, Oyieke FA. Mechanical transmission of Trypanosoma evansi and T. congolense by Stomoxys niger and S. taeniatus in a laboratory mouse model.. Med Vet Entomol 1998 Oct;12(4):417-22.
        7. Brun R, Hecker H, Lun ZR. Trypanosoma evansi and T. equiperdum: distribution, biology, treatment and phylogenetic relationship (a review).. Vet Parasitol 1998 Oct;79(2):95-107.
          pubmed: 9806490doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(98)00146-0google scholar: lookup
        8. Franke CR, Greiner M, Mehlitz D. Investigations on naturally occurring Trypanosoma evansi infections in horses, cattle, dogs and capybaras (Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris) in Pantanal de Poconé (Mato Grosso, Brazil).. Acta Trop 1994 Nov;58(2):159-69.
          pubmed: 7887341doi: 10.1016/0001-706x(94)90055-8google scholar: lookup

        Citations

        This article has been cited 6 times.
        1. Maldonado C, Cáceres A, Burgos A, Hinojosa D, Enríquez S, Celi-Erazo M, Vaca F, Ron L, Rodríguez-Hidalgo R, Benítez-Ortiz W, Martínez-Fresneda M, Eleizalde MC, Mendoza M, Navarro JC, Ramírez-Iglesias JR. Seroprevalence of trypanosomosis and associated risk factors in cattle from coast and amazonian provinces of Ecuador. Vet Res Commun 2024 Jun;48(3):1891-1898.
          doi: 10.1007/s11259-024-10333-zpubmed: 38369611google scholar: lookup
        2. Bonsi M, Anderson NE, Carder G. The Socioeconomic Impact of Diseases of Working Equids in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Critical Review. Animals (Basel) 2023 Dec 15;13(24).
          doi: 10.3390/ani13243865pubmed: 38136902google scholar: lookup
        3. Molinari J, Moreno SA. Trypanosoma brucei Plimmer & Bradford, 1899 is a synonym of T. evansi (Steel, 1885) according to current knowledge and by application of nomenclature rules. Syst Parasitol 2018 Mar;95(2-3):249-256.
          doi: 10.1007/s11230-018-9779-zpubmed: 29411297google scholar: lookup
        4. Ramírez-Iglesias JR, Eleizalde MC, Reyna-Bello A, Mendoza M. Molecular diagnosis of cattle trypanosomes in Venezuela: evidences of Trypanosoma evansi and Trypanosoma vivax infections. J Parasit Dis 2017 Jun;41(2):450-458.
          doi: 10.1007/s12639-016-0826-xpubmed: 28615858google scholar: lookup
        5. Moreno SA, Nava M. Trypanosoma evansi is alike to Trypanosoma brucei brucei in the subcellular localisation of glycolytic enzymes. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2015 Jun;110(4):468-75.
          doi: 10.1590/0074-02760150024pubmed: 26061149google scholar: lookup
        6. Camargo R, Izquier A, Uzcanga GL, Perrone T, Acosta-Serrano A, Carrasquel L, Arias LP, Escalona JL, Cardozo V, Bubis J. Variant surface glycoproteins from Venezuelan trypanosome isolates are recognized by sera from animals infected with either Trypanosoma evansi or Trypanosoma vivax. Vet Parasitol 2015 Jan 15;207(1-2):17-33.
          doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.11.004pubmed: 25468674google scholar: lookup