In vitro evaluation of four methods of attaching transfixation pins into a fiberglass cast for use in horses.
Abstract: To compare the axial stability provided by 4 methods of attaching transfixation pins into a fiberglass cast. Methods: Axial stability of 4 methods of transfixation pin attachment to a fiberglass cast cylinder was determined in vitro. Methods of attachment included simple incorporation of the pins into the cast, placement of a washer and nut on the pin and incorporation into the cast, extension of pins beyond the cast and attachment to a steel halo, and washers within the cast and attachment to a steel halo. Methods: A model was designed to simulate a transfixation cast applied to the equine metacarpus. 8 identical constructs were present in each of the 4 groups. 6 fiberglass cylinders were also tested to identify the contribution of the cast cylinder to the overall stability of the transfixation cast. Methods: Load-sufficient curves were recorded, and a stiffness modulus was calculated for each treatment group and for a simple fiberglass cylinder without transfixation pins. Conclusions: There was no significant difference among the 4 methods of attachment. The fiberglass cast material appears to be the major determinant of axial stability.
Publication Date: 1996-07-01 PubMed ID: 8807028
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research aims to understand the effectiveness of four different techniques of attaching stabilization pins to a fiberglass cast which is often used for treatment purposes in horses. The study, which was conducted in a controlled laboratory setting, infers that the type of attachment method does not significantly influence the axial stability of the cast, but the cast material itself does.
Objective of the Research
- The goal of this research is to compare the axial stability provided by four distinct techniques of attaching transfixation pins into a fiberglass cast. Transfixation pins are used in veterinary orthopedic procedures to immobilize a fracture or to allow certain types of fractures to heal.
Methods
- The four methods of attachment tested in this study were: simply incorporating the pins into the cast, using a washer and nut on the pin and incorporating these into the cast, extending the pins beyond the cast and attaching them to a steel halo, and using the washers within the cast and attaching these to a steel halo.
- The study utilised a specially designed model that imitates a transfixation cast applied to the equine metacarpus, or the region of a horse’s limb that corresponds to the human hand or foot excluding the fingers or toes, to test the stability of the fixation pins.
- Each of the four groups contained eight identical constructs, and six fiberglass cylinders without transfixation pins were also tested to understand the cast material’s contribution to the overall stability of the transfixation cast.
- Through recording load-sufficient curves, a stiffness modulus was calculated for each treatment group as well as for a simple fiberglass cylinder without the pins to compare the effectiveness of each method.
Conclusions
- The research found no significant difference among the stability provided by the four different methods of pin attachment. This implies that the choice of method does not influence the outcome considerably.
- The study concluded that the fiberglass material used to make the cast is the major contributor to the axial stability of the transfixation cast rather than the technique used to attach the pins.
Cite This Article
APA
McClure SR, Watkins JP, Hogan HA.
(1996).
In vitro evaluation of four methods of attaching transfixation pins into a fiberglass cast for use in horses.
Am J Vet Res, 57(7), 1098-1101.
Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Large Animal Medicine and Surgery, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-4475, USA.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Casts, Surgical / veterinary
- Equipment Design
- External Fixators / veterinary
- Fractures, Bone / surgery
- Fractures, Bone / veterinary
- Glass
- Horse Diseases
- Horses
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists