Analyze Diet
Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition2018; 103(1); 295-304; doi: 10.1111/jpn.13006

Influence of various concentrate-to-roughage ratios on dietary intake and nutrient digestibilities of weanling horses.

Abstract: The objective of this study was to compare the feed intake and the apparent digestibilities of three different diets varying in concentrate-to-roughage ratios in weanling horses (n = 24) at 5 and 8 months of age. Horses were stratified by breed, gender, birth date and body weight and assigned to one of three dietary treatments containing the following concentrate-to-roughage ratios on an as-fed basis: 70:30 (High Con), 50:50 (Equal) and 30:70 (Low Con). All horses were fed their respective diets for a 10-day adaptation period and a 4-day collection period at 5 and 8 months. There were no differences in BW or daily feed intake among treatments during both trials. The horses consuming Low Con had a greater amount of faecal output than High Con at both 5 and 8 months (p < 0.01). At 5 months, High Con had the highest crude protein (CP) digestibility (p < 0.05). At 8 months, High Con had a higher CP digestibility than Low Con (p < 0.01) and tended to be higher than Equal (p = 0.07). Acid detergent fibre (ADF) digestibility did not differ among treatments; however, horses fed the Low Con tended to digest a higher percentage of neutral detergent fibre (NDF) than both the Equal and High Con treatments (p = 0.09). Horses in the High Con treatment tended to digest a higher percentage of energy than those in the Low Con treatment (p = 0.06). Weanlings seem to digest protein more thoroughly when fed high-concentrate diets and may digest fibre more efficiently when fed diets higher in fibre.
Publication Date: 2018-10-23 PubMed ID: 30353578DOI: 10.1111/jpn.13006Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Clinical Trial
  • Veterinary
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study explores how feeding weanling horses diets of varying concentrate-to-roughage ratios affects their feed intake and nutrient digestion. The findings reveal that weanlings might digest protein more effectively with high-concentration diets but may digest fibre more efficiently with high-fibre diets.

Research Objectives and Methodology

  • The study aimed to compare the dietary intake and apparent digestibilities of three different diets with variable concentrate-to-roughage ratios, formulated for weanling horses aged 5 and 8 months.
  • The horses were divided into three groups, based on breed, gender, birth date, and body weight. They were then subjected to dietary treatments including 70:30 (High Con), 50:50 (Equal), and 30:70 (Low Con) concentrate-to-roughage ratios.
  • The diet was given to the horses for an adaptation period of 10 days followed by a collection period of 4 days at both 5 and 8 months of age.

Research Findings

  • The researchers found no significant difference in body weight or daily feed intake across the treatments in both trials.
  • The Low Con group produced more faecal output than the High Con group at both ages, which is a clear indication of higher roughage content.
  • At 5 months, the High Con group showed the highest crude protein digestibility. Similarly, at 8 months, the High Con group showed a higher protein digestibility compared to the Low Con group, indicating the influence of higher concentrate feed in protein digestion.
  • Acid detergent fibre (ADF) digestibility did not vary among the treatments, but the horses on the Low Con diet tended to digest a higher percentage of neutral detergent fibre (NDF) than those on both the Equal and High Con diets. This points out the higher fibre digestibility on lower concentrate diets.
  • The High Con group tended to digest a higher percentage of energy than the Low Con group, suggesting better energy absorption from high concentrate diets.

Conclusion

  • Based on the findings, the study concluded that weanling horses might digest protein more efficiently when fed high-concentrate diets, whereas they seem to digest fibre more effectively when fed diets higher in fibre.
  • The research helps in understanding the dietary needs and digestion patterns of weanling horses, which would be pivotal in formulating their diet to ensure optimal growth and health.

Cite This Article

APA
Turcott-White SK, Nielsen BD, Robison CI, Skelly CD, Rosenstein DS, Pritchard A, Herdt T. (2018). Influence of various concentrate-to-roughage ratios on dietary intake and nutrient digestibilities of weanling horses. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl), 103(1), 295-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13006

Publication

ISSN: 1439-0396
NlmUniqueID: 101126979
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 103
Issue: 1
Pages: 295-304

Researcher Affiliations

Turcott-White, Susan K
  • Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Nielsen, Brian D
  • Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Robison, Cara I
  • Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Skelly, Christine D
  • Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Rosenstein, Diane S
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Pritchard, Abby
  • Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Herdt, Thomas
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.

MeSH Terms

  • Aging
  • Animal Feed / analysis
  • Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
  • Animals
  • Diet / veterinary
  • Digestion / physiology
  • Female
  • Horses / physiology
  • Male
  • Nutrients / physiology
  • Random Allocation

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.