Analyze Diet
Journal of veterinary medicine. A, Physiology, pathology, clinical medicine2001; 48(5); 277-285; doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0442.2001.00344.x

Inter-breed differences in equine forelimb kinematics at the walk.

Abstract: Linear, temporal and angular biokinematic characteristics of the forelimb at the walk in different breeds were determined, highlighting inter-breed differences. Twenty-three healthy stallions were used: ten Andalusians (AN), seven Arabs (AR) and six Anglo-Arabs (AA). Height at the withers was significantly different between groups (P < 0.001). Six trials per horse were recorded using a levelled video camera (sampling frame rate 25 frames/s), digitized and analysed using a semi-automatic movement analysis system. No statistically significant differences in speeds were recorded between breeds (P > 0.05). The only temporal parameter which was similar in the three breeds was the moment at which the hoof reached the highest point in its trajectory. The variables presenting the most significant differences were the percentages of deceleration and propulsion within the stance phase. ANOVA for angular variables showed that the greatest difference was in the range of angular movement of the carpal joint, being higher in AN, due to a lower minimum value. In the fetlock joint, the greatest difference was observed in minimum values, which differed in all three breeds. Significant inter-breed differences were also observed for maximum limb retraction, being lowest in the AN group, followed by the AA and AR groups. This finding was reflected in the angular range of motion, despite smaller differences in the degree of limb protraction; very similar values were reported in all three breeds. As regards the elbow joint, no inter-breed differences were observed in terms of minimum values, whereas differences were recorded for maximum and angular range of motion, higher values being displayed by the AR and AN groups than by AA animals. In conclusion, inter-breed differences may be determined in equine forelimb biokinematics at the walk. This study distinguished between AN, AR and AA horses.
Publication Date: 2001-07-31 PubMed ID: 11475902DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0442.2001.00344.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article is about identifying the differences in forelimb motion among different breeds of horses – Andalusians, Arabs, and Anglo-Arabs – during walking.

Objective of the Research

  • The main aim of this study was to determine the biokinematic characteristics of the forelimbs in different horse breeds while walking. By identifying these differences, researchers can better understand each breed’s unique movement characteristics.

Methodology

  • A total of twenty-three healthy stallions – ten Andalusians, seven Arabs, and six Anglo-Arabs were used in this study.
  • Each horse’s walk was video recorded, digitized, and analysed using a semi-automatic movement analysis system.
  • Parameters such as the degrees of deceleration and propulsion, the angular movement of the carpal joint, the range of motion in the fetlock joint, limb retraction, and the angular range of the elbow joint, were examined.

Observations

  • There were no significant differences in speed among the different breeds.
  • The moment the hoof reached its highest point in its trajectory was similar across the breeds.
  • The most significant differences were observed in the percentages of deceleration and propulsion within the stance phase.
  • The Andalusian horses showed higher angular movement in the carpal joint.
  • For the fetlock joint, there were significant differences in minimum values among all three breeds.
  • The maximum limb retraction was lowest in the Andalusian group, followed by the Anglo-Arabs and Arabs.
  • Regarding the elbow joint, the Arab and Andalusian groups showed higher values of maximum and angular range of the motion compared to the Anglo-Arabs.

Conclusion

  • The study concluded that distinct differences could be determined in equine forelimb biokinematics at the walk among the Andalusian, Arab, and Anglo-Arab horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Galisteo AM, Morales JL, Cano MR, Miró F, Agüera E, Vivo J. (2001). Inter-breed differences in equine forelimb kinematics at the walk. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med, 48(5), 277-285. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0442.2001.00344.x

Publication

ISSN: 0931-184X
NlmUniqueID: 100955112
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 48
Issue: 5
Pages: 277-285

Researcher Affiliations

Galisteo, A M
  • Department of Compared Anatomy and Pathology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Córdoba, Edificio de Sanidad Animal, Campus Universitario de Rabanales, Cra. De Madrid Km 396, Córdoba 14071, Spain.
Morales, J L
    Cano, M R
      Miró, F
        Agüera, E
          Vivo, J

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Breeding
            • Forelimb
            • Gait / physiology
            • Horses / physiology
            • Male

            Citations

            This article has been cited 3 times.
            1. Sparrow LM, Pellatt E, Yu SS, Raichlen DA, Pontzer H, Rolian C. Gait changes in a line of mice artificially selected for longer limbs. PeerJ 2017;5:e3008.
              doi: 10.7717/peerj.3008pubmed: 28243533google scholar: lookup
            2. Crook TC, Cruickshank SE, McGowan CM, Stubbs N, Wilson AM, Hodson-Tole E, Payne RC. A comparison of the moment arms of pelvic limb muscles in horses bred for acceleration (Quarter Horse) and endurance (Arab). J Anat 2010 Jul;217(1):26-37.
            3. Zupan Šemrov M, Přibylová L, Gobbo E. Task-specific morphological and kinematic differences in Lipizzan horses. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1569067.
              doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1569067pubmed: 40599329google scholar: lookup