Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2026; doi: 10.1002/evj.70317

Intraoperative monitoring and anaesthetic complications in horses: A secondary analysis of the CEPEF4 multicentre cohort.

Abstract: CEPEF4 provides the most comprehensive contemporary dataset on perianaesthetic risk in horses. Intraoperative complications, monitoring and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)-stratified associations with death remain incompletely described. Objective: To describe monitoring and complication incidence, assess associations with ASA physical status, and compare ASA-stratified mortality by complication status. Methods: Secondary analysis of a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Methods: Data from 47,371 equine general anaesthetics were analysed. Monitoring was described overall and by ASA grade. Complication incidence was calculated within monitored subsets for hypotension, hypoxaemia, hypercapnia, arrhythmias and hypothermia. Intraoperative awakening and severe haemorrhage were analysed in the full cohort. Logistic regression estimated ASA-graded odds ratios for complications. The primary outcome analysis used the predefined CEPEF4-DEAD endpoint and compared complication-positive and complication-negative horses within ASA I-II and ASA III-V strata. Sensitivity analyses used DEAD-or-EUTHANASIA, centre-cluster and monitor-restricted approaches. Results: Monitoring coverage was high for electrocardiography (92.2%), pulse oximetry (89.2%), capnography (86.8%) and invasive arterial pressure (82.0%). Among monitored cases, hypotension occurred in 16,926/41,939 (40.4%), hypoxaemia in 2346/44,279 (5.3%), hypercapnia in 2512/42,941 (5.8%), arrhythmias in 720/43,666 (1.6%) and hypothermia in 851/18,358 (4.6%). Intraoperative awakening and severe haemorrhage occurred in 5499/47,371 (11.6%) and 378/47,371 (0.8%) cases, respectively. The odds of most complications increased with ASA grade, whereas intraoperative awakening showed no clear association. Within ASA strata, the main DEAD-only associations were observed for hypotension, hypoxaemia, arrhythmias and severe haemorrhage; hypercapnia was associated with DEAD-only outcome in ASA III-V horses. Sensitivity analyses generally supported these findings, although marginal associations and estimates based on the broader DEAD-or-EUTHANASIA endpoint were interpreted cautiously. Conclusions: Event detection depended on monitoring availability and clinician recording; causal inference was precluded. Conclusions: Intraoperative complications increased with ASA grade, with hypotension most frequent. Findings provide contemporary reference values and identify clinically relevant complication patterns for future outcome-focused analyses.
Publication Date: 2026-08-23 PubMed ID: 42634144DOI: 10.1002/evj.70317Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study analyzed detailed intraoperative monitoring data and complications during general anesthesia in horses to understand the frequency of complications, their association with the horses’ health status, and the impact on mortality risk.

Background and Objectives

  • The CEPEF4 study provides a large and comprehensive dataset related to anesthesia in horses.
  • There was previously limited detailed information on the incidence of intraoperative complications, monitoring practices, and how these relate to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status grading and mortality.
  • The main goals were to:
    • Describe how horses were monitored during anesthesia.
    • Calculate the incidence rates of various intraoperative complications.
    • Examine how complication rates vary with ASA physical status grades.
    • Investigate the relationship between complications and mortality within different ASA groups.

Methods

  • Conducted a secondary analysis of the CEPEF4 dataset, which included 47,371 general anesthetic episodes in horses across multiple centers.
  • Monitoring data were examined overall and by ASA status, focusing on:
    • Electrocardiography (ECG)
    • Pulse oximetry
    • Capnography (measuring CO₂ levels)
    • Invasive arterial pressure monitoring
  • Complications analyzed included:
    • Hypotension (low blood pressure)
    • Hypoxaemia (low blood oxygen)
    • Hypercapnia (high carbon dioxide levels)
    • Arrhythmias (irregular heartbeats)
    • Hypothermia (low body temperature)
    • Intraoperative awakening
    • Severe hemorrhage (heavy bleeding)
  • Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the odds of complications across ASA grades.
  • Mortality outcomes were classified using a predefined CEPEF4-DEAD endpoint, with sensitivity analyses including euthanasia and accounting for differences between centers and monitoring availability.

Results

  • Monitoring coverage was very high:
    • ECG in 92.2% of cases
    • Pulse oximetry in 89.2%
    • Capnography in 86.8%
    • Invasive arterial pressure in 82.0%
  • Incidence of complications among monitored cases:
    • Hypotension observed in 40.4% (16,926/41,939)
    • Hypoxaemia in 5.3%
    • Hypercapnia in 5.8%
    • Arrhythmias in 1.6%
    • Hypothermia in 4.6%
  • In the full dataset, intraoperative awakening occurred in 11.6%, and severe hemorrhage in 0.8% of cases.
  • Higher ASA grades were associated with increased odds of most complications, except that intraoperative awakening showed no clear pattern by ASA grade.
  • Mortality (DEAD endpoint) was significantly associated with hypotension, hypoxaemia, arrhythmias, and severe hemorrhage across ASA groups.
  • Hypercapnia was associated with mortality only in the higher risk groups (ASA III-V).
  • Sensitivity analyses largely supported these associations but suggested careful interpretation particularly when including euthanasia or considering monitoring availability.

Conclusions and Implications

  • Monitoring availability influences detection of adverse events and depends on accurate clinical recording, so definitive causal relationships cannot be established from this observational data.
  • The frequency of intraoperative complications increases with the ASA physical status score, meaning sicker horses have more complications during anesthesia.
  • Hypotension was the most common complication, highlighting it as a key area for clinical attention.
  • The findings provide valuable benchmark data for anesthesia monitoring and complication rates in horses.
  • This study identifies significant complication patterns linked to mortality, guiding future research focused on improving anesthetic outcomes in equine practice.

Cite This Article

APA
Redondo JI, Taylor PM, Bettschart-Wolfensberger R, Johnston GM, Domenech L, Gozalo-Marcilla M. (2026). Intraoperative monitoring and anaesthetic complications in horses: A secondary analysis of the CEPEF4 multicentre cohort. Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1002/evj.70317

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Redondo, J I
  • Departamento de Medicina y Cirugía Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.
Taylor, P M
  • Taylor Monroe, Little Downham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Bettschart-Wolfensberger, R
  • Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Johnston, G M
  • Vetstream Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Domenech, L
  • Departamento de Matemáticas, Física y Ciencias Tecnológicas, Escuela Superior de Enseñanzas Técnicas, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, Spain.
Gozalo-Marcilla, M
  • The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Grant Funding

  • Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists
  • Kate Borer-Weir Memorial Fund
  • G2023 / Horse Trust

References

This article includes 28 references
  1. Taylor PM, Gozalo‐Marcilla M, Bettschart‐Wolfensberger R, Redondo JI, Johnston GM. Sixty years of equine anaesthesia – are we getting better at it?. Vet Anaesth Analg 2025;52:720–729.
  2. Bainbridge D, Martin J, Arango M, Cheng D, Group for the E.P.C.O.R. (EPiCOR). Perioperative and anaesthetic‐related mortality in developed and developing countries: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Lancet 2012;380:1075–1081.
  3. Johnston G, Eastment J, Wood J, Taylor P. The confidential enquiry into perioperative equine fatalities (CEPEF): mortality results of Phases 1 and 2. Vet Anaesth Analg 2002;29:159–170.
  4. Redondo JI, Martínez‐Taboada F, Viscasillas J, Doménech L, Marti‐Scharfhausen R, Hernández‐Magaña EZ. Anaesthetic mortality in cats: a worldwide analysis and risk assessment. Vet Rec 2024;195:e4147.
  5. Gozalo‐Marcilla M, Redondo JI, Bettschart‐Wolfensberger R, Domenech L, Doménech J, Johnston GM. The confidential enquiry into perioperative equine fatalities: phase 4 (CEPEF4) – a worldwide observational, prospective, multicentre cohort study in 2025. Vet Anaesth Analg 2025;52:525–538.
  6. Redondo JI, Otero PE, Martínez‐Taboada F, Doménech L, Hernández‐Magaña EZ, Viscasillas J. Anaesthetic mortality in dogs: a worldwide analysis and risk assessment. Vet Rec 2024;195:e3604.
  7. Dugdale AH, Obhrai J, Cripps PJ. Twenty years later: a single‐centre, repeat retrospective analysis of equine perioperative mortality and investigation of recovery quality. Vet Anaesth Analg 2016;43:171–178.
  8. Laurenza C, Ansart L, Portier K. Risk factors of anesthesia‐related mortality and morbidity in one equine hospital: a retrospective study on 1,161 cases undergoing elective or emergency surgeries. Front Vet Sci 2020;6:514.
  9. Cremer J, Ross J, Paranjape V. Complications in equine anesthesia. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2025;41:473–493.
  10. Dagnall C, Khenissi L, Love E. Monitoring techniques for equine anaesthesia. Equine Vet Educ 2022;34:644–659.
  11. Stefanik E, Drewnowska O, Lisowska B, Turek B. Causes, effects and methods of monitoring gas exchange disturbances during equine general Anaesthesia. Animals 2021;11:2049.
  12. Nyman G, Funkquist B, Kvart C, Frostell C, Tokics L, Strandberg Å. Atelectasis causes gas exchange impairment in the anaesthetised horse. Equine Vet J 1990;22:317–324.
  13. Nyman G, Hedenstierna G. Ventilation‐perfusion relationships in the anaesthetised horse. Equine Vet J 1989;21:274–281.
  14. Auckburally A, Nyman G. Review of hypoxaemia in anaesthetized horses: predisposing factors, consequences and management. Vet Anaesth Analg 2017;44:397–408.
  15. Loomes K, de Grauw J, Gozalo‐Marcilla M, Redondo JI, Bettschart‐Wolfensberger R. A systematic review of the prevalence of post‐operative complications after general anaesthesia in adult horses (2000–2023). Equine Vet J 2025;57:827–861.
  16. Redondo JI, Rubio M, Soler G, Serra I, Soler C, Gómez‐Villamandos RJ. Normal values and incidence of cardiorespiratory complications in dogs during general Anaesthesia. A review of 1281 cases.. J Vet Med A 2007;54:470–477.
  17. Portier K, Ida KK. The ASA physical status classification: what is the evidence for recommending its use in veterinary anesthesia?—a systematic review.. Front Vet Sci 2018;5:204.
  18. Parliament E. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation – GDPR). 2016 [cited 2025 Aug 10].
  19. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.. BMJ 2007;335:806–808.
  20. Domenech L, Redondo JI, Taylor PM, Bettschart‐Wolfensberger R, Johnston GM, Doménech J. Error management in large data sets: a critical component of data collection in veterinary medicine.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2024;52:516–524.
  21. Wohlfender FD, Doherr MG, Driessen B, Hartnack S, Johnston GM, Bettschart‐Wolfensberger R. International online survey to assess current practice in equine anaesthesia.. Equine Vet J 2014;47:65–71.
  22. Savvas I, Pavlidou K, Braun C, Schauvliege S, Staffieri F, Moens Y. Evaluation of the effect of the inspired oxygen fraction on blood oxygenation during inhalant Anaesthesia in horses: a systematic review with meta‐analysis.. Animals (Basel) 2021;11:2245.
  23. Meier M, Kazmir‐Lysak K, Kälin I, Torgerson PR, Ringer SK. The influence of hypoxaemia, hypotension and hypercapnia (among other factors) on quality of recovery from general anaesthesia in horses.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2024;51:135–143.
  24. Román‐Durá B, Dunham O, Grulke S, Salciccia A, Dupont J, Sandersen C. A retrospective study on pre‐ and intraoperative predictors on the recovery quality of horses after general anesthesia.. Vet Sci 2025;12:262.
  25. Tomasic M, Nann LE. Comparison of peripheral and core temperatures in anesthetized horses.. Am J Vet Res 1999;60:648–651.
  26. Mayerhofer I, Scherzer S, Gabler C, van den Hoven R. Hypothermia in horses induced by general anaesthesia and limiting measures.. Equine Vet Educ 2005;17:53–56.
  27. Belda E, Blissitt K, Duncan J, Laredo FG, de Montes MEG, Clutton RE. The bispectral index during recovery from halothane and sevoflurane anaesthesia in horses.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2010;37:25–34.
  28. Tokushige H, Kakizaki M, Ode H, Okano A, Okada J, Kuroda T. Validation of the bispectral index as an indicator of anesthetic depth in thoroughbred horses anesthetized with sevoflurane.. J Equine Sci 2016;27:169–173.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.