Analyze Diet

Kinematic differences between the distal portions of the forelimbs and hind limbs of horses at the trot.

Abstract: In literature, it has been hypothesized that the concussion at impact in the equine forelimb is larger than that in the hind limb, and therefore, eventually more clinical lameness may develop in the distal portion of the forelimbs. As the functional anatomy of the distal forelimb and hind limb segments is similar, a study was undertaken to compare the kinematics of hoof and fetlock in the forelimbs and hind limbs. For this purpose, the trot of 24 clinically normal (sound) horses on a treadmill (4 m/s) was recorded, using modern gait analysis equipment. It appeared that vertical hoof velocity at impact and the resulting vertical hoof acceleration were higher in the forelimb than in the hind limb. In contrast, horizontal hoof velocity at impact and the resulting horizontal acceleration were higher in the hind limb. Just after impact, the fetlock was more rapidly extended in the forelimb than the hind limb. The peak maximal and minimal accelerations of that joint also were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the forelimb than in the hind limb. Results of this study indicate that, at the beginning of the stance phase, the distal portion of the forelimb is subjected to more kinematic stress than the distal portion of the hind limb. The higher angular velocity of the fetlock can be interpreted as more rapid loading of this joint, whereas the higher peak accelerations represent the higher oscillatory changes in fetlock movement. It is known from literature that repetitive impulsive joint loading and rapid oscillations in joint movement, even within physiologic limits, contribute to development of osteoarthrosis. Therefore, the differences between distal forelimb and hind limb kinematics found in this study may be related to the generally known higher incidence of chronic lameness in the forelimbs.
Publication Date: 1995-11-01 PubMed ID: 8585667
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research explores the differences between the movement of horses’ forelimbs and hind limbs during trotting. The study found that the distal portion of the forelimbs undergoes more kinematic stress than the hind limbs, which could be linked to the higher incidence of lameness in the forelimbs.

Objective of the Research

  • The primary objective of the research was to compare the movement patterns (kinematics) of the hoof and fetlock in the forelimbs and hind limbs of horses while trotting.

Methodology

  • The research used 24 clinically normal horses performing a trot on a treadmill at a speed of 4 m/s.
  • Modern gait analysis equipment was used to record the movements and calculate the vertical and horizontal hoof velocity at impact, vertical and horizontal hoof acceleration, and the rate and extent of fetlock extension.

Key Findings

  • The researchers found that at the beginning of the stance phase, the forelimb experiences more kinematic stress compared to the hind limb.
  • The data showed a higher vertical hoof velocity and resulting acceleration in the forelimb than the hind limb.
  • Conversely, the horizontal velocity and resulting acceleration were found to be higher in hind limbs.
  • The fetlock joint of the forelimb was observed to extend at a faster rate after impact, with its peak maximum and minimum accelerations also significantly higher.

Interpretations and Implications

  • The findings suggest the distal portion of the forelimb is loaded more rapidly and goes through more oscillatory changes, which may make it more prone to osteoarthrosis.
  • This could explain the known higher incidence of chronic lameness in horses’ forelimbs, as mentioned in current literature.

Conclusion

  • This study therefore identifies important differences in hoof and fetlock kinematics between forelimbs and hind limbs in horses, which potentially contribute to a higher risk of lameness disorders.

Cite This Article

APA
Back W, Schamhardt HC, Hartman W, Barneveld A. (1995). Kinematic differences between the distal portions of the forelimbs and hind limbs of horses at the trot. Am J Vet Res, 56(11), 1522-1528.

Publication

ISSN: 0002-9645
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 56
Issue: 11
Pages: 1522-1528

Researcher Affiliations

Back, W
  • Department of General and Large Animal Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Schamhardt, H C
    Hartman, W
      Barneveld, A

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Female
        • Forelimb / anatomy & histology
        • Forelimb / physiology
        • Gait
        • Hindlimb / anatomy & histology
        • Hindlimb / physiology
        • Horses / physiology
        • Locomotion
        • Male
        • Reference Values
        • Time and Motion Studies

        Citations

        This article has been cited 5 times.
        1. Tijssen M, Hernlund E, Rhodin M, Bosch S, Voskamp JP, Nielen M, Serra Braganςa FM. Automatic hoof-on and -off detection in horses using hoof-mounted inertial measurement unit sensors.. PLoS One 2020;15(6):e0233266.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233266pubmed: 32492034google scholar: lookup
        2. Clayton HM, Hobbs SJ. A Review of Biomechanical Gait Classification with Reference to Collected Trot, Passage and Piaffe in Dressage Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Oct 3;9(10).
          doi: 10.3390/ani9100763pubmed: 31623360google scholar: lookup
        3. Stutz JC, Vidondo B, Ramseyer A, Maninchedda UE, Cruz AM. Effect of three types of horseshoes and unshod feet on selected non-podal forelimb kinematic variables measured by an extremity mounted inertial measurement unit sensor system in sound horses at the trot under conditions of treadmill and soft geotextile surface exercise.. Vet Rec Open 2018;5(1):e000237.
          doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2017-000237pubmed: 29955366google scholar: lookup
        4. McCarty CA, Thomason JJ, Gordon KD, Burkhart TA, Milner JS, Holdsworth DW. Finite-Element Analysis of Bone Stresses on Primary Impact in a Large-Animal Model: The Distal End of the Equine Third Metacarpal.. PLoS One 2016;11(7):e0159541.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159541pubmed: 27459189google scholar: lookup
        5. Starke SD, Clayton HM. A universal approach to determine footfall timings from kinematics of a single foot marker in hoofed animals.. PeerJ 2015;3:e783.
          doi: 10.7717/peerj.783pubmed: 26157641google scholar: lookup