Analyze Diet
Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2021; 121; 104622; doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104622

Linear elastic and hyperelastic studies of equine hoof mechanical response at different hydration levels.

Abstract: Most simulation studies on equine hoof biomechanics employed linear elastic (LE) material models. However, the equine hoof wall's stress-strain relationship is nonlinear and varies with hydration level. Therefore, it is essential to investigate the accuracy of the LE model compared to more advanced material models, such as hyperelastic (HE) or viscoelastic models. The current research investigated performances of LE and three HE models (Mooney-Rivlin, Neo-Hookean, and Marlow) in describing equine hoof's mechanical behavior using finite element (FE) analysis. In the first attempt, a rectangular tissue specimen was simulated using the previously published experimental data. The Marlow HE model predicted the hoof wall stress-strain curve more accurately than the LE, Mooney-Rivlin, and Neo-Hookean models. The LE model accuracy, compared with the experimental results, varied within the reported range of the strain. However, the Marlow HE model perfectly matched the experimental data for a wide range of strains. In the second attempt, the entire hoof, including nine associated tissues, was modeled from computed tomography (CT) scans of an equine forelimb, and analyzed at trotting and standing modes of locomotion. The effect of environmental humidity on the hoof wall material properties was incorporated at four hydration levels; 0%, 53%, 75%, and 100%. The simulation results of the LE and HE models indicated that the minimum principal strain distribution on the hoof wall remained under 2% for various hydration levels and gait conditions. The numerical results of the Marlow HE model demonstrated better agreement with published experimental data compared to the LE, Mooney-Rivlin, and Neo-Hookean models. Higher hydration levels significantly increased the strains - a potential explanation could be the fact that the higher hydration levels decreased stiffness of the hoof wall tissues and ultimately increased strains. Higher ground reaction forces increased the von Mises stress at various points in the hoof wall, especially in the quarter regions and close to the coronet, where cracks and fractures are found more often in the physiological conditions.
Publication Date: 2021-06-05 PubMed ID: 34116431DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104622Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study compares the precision of different material models in predicting the mechanical behavior of an equine hoof under different hydration levels. The findings suggest that the Marlow hyperelastic model shows greater alignment with experimental data and physical observations, as compared to other models.

Research Objective and Method

  • The purpose of this research was to investigate and compare the accuracy of different models in predicting the mechanical performance of the equine hoof. More specifically, the authors aimed to understand how the hoof behaves under different humidity levels.
  • The researchers used both linear elastic (LE) and hyperelastic (HE) material models in their studies. Three HE models were used: Mooney-Rivlin, Neo-Hookean, and Marlow.
  • Two comparative studies were conducted. In the first, rectangular hoof samples were simulated using previously published experimental data. The second focused on simulating the entire hoof, including nine related tissues, using computerized tomography (CT) scans of an equine forelimb and analyzing it under different conditions.

Results of the Study

  • The researchers found that the Marlow hyperelastic model accurately predicted the stress-strain curve of the equine hoof, outperforming other models in the same context.
  • For the entire hoof model, the mechanical strain was consistently under 2% regardless of humidity conditions. Again, the results of the Marlow model demonstrated better alignment with experimental data.
  • The studies also found that higher hydration levels resulted in greater strains, suggesting such conditions might decrease tissue stiffness, and thereby increase strains. Additionally, greater ground reaction forces were observed to enhance stresses in certain parts of the hoof.

Conclusion and Implications

  • The study’s findings suggest that the Marlow hyperelastic model provides the most precise predictions for equine hoof behavior under varying hydration conditions. This result aids in better understanding of equine hoof mechanics, potentially assisting in preventing common hoof ailments.
  • The data also suggests that hydration levels and ground reaction forces need to be carefully considered in managing equine hoof health, as they can potentially influence the strain and stress levels endured by the hoof and its associated tissues.

Cite This Article

APA
Akbari Shahkhosravi N, Gohari S, Komeili A, Burvill C, Davies H. (2021). Linear elastic and hyperelastic studies of equine hoof mechanical response at different hydration levels. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 121, 104622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104622

Publication

ISSN: 1878-0180
NlmUniqueID: 101322406
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 121
Pages: 104622
PII: S1751-6161(21)00303-9

Researcher Affiliations

Akbari Shahkhosravi, Naeim
  • Department of Veterinary Biosciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia. Electronic address: akbarishahkh@unimelb.edu.au.
Gohari, Soheil
  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Komeili, Amin
  • School of Engineering, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd. E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Burvill, Colin
  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Davies, Helen
  • Department of Veterinary Biosciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Computer Simulation
  • Finite Element Analysis
  • Hoof and Claw
  • Horses
  • Stress, Mechanical

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Harrison SM, Whitton RC, Stover SM, Symons JE, Cleary PW. A Coupled Biomechanical-Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Model for Horse Racing Tracks. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022;10:766748.
    doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.766748pubmed: 35265590google scholar: lookup
  2. Mata F, Franca I, Araújo J, Paixão G, Lesniak K, Cerqueira JL. Investigating Associations between Horse Hoof Conformation and Presence of Lameness. Animals (Basel) 2024 Sep 17;14(18).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14182697pubmed: 39335286google scholar: lookup
  3. Bai M, Tang X, Zhang M, Wang H, Wang Z, Shao A, Ma Y. An in-situ polymerization strategy for gel polymer electrolyte Si||Ni-rich lithium-ion batteries. Nat Commun 2024 Jun 25;15(1):5375.
    doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49713-zpubmed: 38918392google scholar: lookup