FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Front Vet Sci / Long-Term Follow-Up of Restorations of Equine Cheek Teeth In...
Frontiers in veterinary science2022; 8; 793631; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.793631

Long-Term Follow-Up of Restorations of Equine Cheek Teeth Infundibula (2006-2017).

Abstract: Caries of the infundibula of equine cheek teeth can lead to significant dental disease including increased attritional wear, pulpar and apical disease, secondary sinusitis, and dental fracture. Restorations of cavities of equine cheek teeth infundibula have been performed since 1889. Recent advances in dental materials, instrumentation, and techniques have facilitated the use of dental restoration techniques by equine veterinary practitioners. No studies to date have demonstrated the safety or efficacy of restorations of equine cheek teeth infundibula. Objective: To assess the long-term results of restorations of equine cheek teeth affected by infundibular caries, to report on the safety of the procedure, and to give guidelines for future restorative therapies. Methods: Retrospective analysis of results of clinical and oroscopic examination of horses that underwent infundibular restoration procedures between 2006 and 2017. Methods: A total of 223 infundibula in 185 maxillary cheek teeth in 92 horses were restored using a variety of dental materials including glass ionomer cement, flowable and compactible resin composites. The time between restoration and re-examination was recorded along with findings of clinical signs in the interim, restorative material loss, and any further pathological changes of the teeth including caries progression, fracture, or apical disease. Follow-up examinations were performed over two study periods 2006-2012 and in 2017. Results: Over the full study period, 99% of treated horses available for follow-up examinations had no adverse clinical signs or developed any abnormalities of restored teeth observable on oroscopic examination. Of horses re-examined, 83% of restorations were shown to have minimal or no loss of the restoration material, with occlusal surface wear visibly comparable to other adjacent maxillary teeth. Statistical analysis showed success of the procedure was related to the restorative material used, the restoration technique, and the caries grade present at the time of restoration (grade 3 is more successful than grade 2). Conclusions: There are no case controls in this study and therefore it is not clear if restoration of equine infundibula is a consistently beneficial procedure, or at which grade of caries progression restorations should be performed for optimum benefit. The procedures were not re-examined at consistent regular times creating some difficulties in standardizing results. Re-examinations of treated horses did not consistently include radiography or computed tomography and therefore some apical changes may have occurred in treated teeth without visual oroscopic or external clinical signs. Conclusions: Restoration of equine infundibula using materials developed for human dentistry including flowable resin composites is a safe and long-lasting procedure and appears to prevent the development of further pathological changes including apical infection and dental fracture.
Copyright © 2022 Pearce and Brooks.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-01-14 PubMed ID: 35127882PubMed Central: PMC8809405DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.793631Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates the long-term effects and safety of restoration procedures carried out on equine cheek teeth affected by infundibular caries from 2006 to 2017. It then provides insight into future restorative therapies.

Research Method

  • A retrospective analysis was carried out on the clinical and oroscopic examinations of horses that had undergone infundibular restoration procedures between 2006 and 2017.
  • The study included a total of 223 infundibula in 185 maxillary cheek teeth from 92 horses, and these were restored using different dental materials such as glass ionomer cement, flowable and compactible resin composites.
  • The period between the restoration and the re-examination was recorded. Additionally, various observations were made during that period, such as clinical signs, restorative material loss, and further teeth pathological changes like caries progression, fracture, or apical disease.
  • The study was divided into two periods for examination: 2006-2012 and in 2017.

Research Findings

  • The research revealed that over the entire study period, 99% of the treated horses had no adverse clinical signs or observable abnormalities on the restored teeth during the oroscopic examination.
  • It was found that 83% of the restorations had minimal or no loss of the restoration material, and the occlusal surface wear was visibly similar to adjacent maxillary teeth.
  • The successfulness of the procedure was statistically related to the restorative material used, the restoration technique, and the caries grade at the time of the restoration where grade 3 was more successful than grade 2.

Research Conclusions

  • The study has no case controls, making it unclear whether restoration of equine infundibula is consistently beneficial or the grade at which caries progression restorations should be performed for optimal benefits.
  • There were some difficulties encountered in standardizing results due to inconsistent re-examination times.
  • Not all re-examinations of treated horses included radiography or computed tomography. It’s, therefore, likely that some apical changes may have happened in treated teeth without visual oroscopic or external clinical signs.
  • The use of materials for human dentistry, such as flowable resin composites, for the restoration of horses’ teeth, was deemed safe and long-lasting. The procedure also appears to prevent further pathological changes such as apical infection and dental fractures.

Cite This Article

APA
Pearce CJ, Brooks N. (2022). Long-Term Follow-Up of Restorations of Equine Cheek Teeth Infundibula (2006-2017). Front Vet Sci, 8, 793631. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.793631

Publication

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 8
Pages: 793631
PII: 793631

Researcher Affiliations

Pearce, Christopher J
  • Equine Dental Clinic Ltd, Wimborne, United Kingdom.
Brooks, Nicky
  • Equine Dental Clinic Ltd, Wimborne, United Kingdom.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 41 references
  1. Sisson S. The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. 2nd ed. Philadephia: W.B.Saunders Company; (1927).
  2. Suske A, Pöschke A, Schrock P, Kirschner S, Brockmann M, Staszyk C. Infundibula of equine maxillary cheek teeth. Part 1: Development, blood supply and infundibular cementogenesis.. Vet J 2016 Mar;209:57-65.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.07.029pubmed: 26832811google scholar: lookup
  3. Suske A, Pöschke A, Müller P, Wöber S, Staszyk C. Infundibula of equine maxillary cheek teeth: Part 2: Morphological variations and pathological changes.. Vet J 2016 Mar;209:66-73.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.11.023pubmed: 26831172google scholar: lookup
  4. Fitzgibbon CM, Du Toit N, Dixon PM. Anatomical studies of maxillary cheek teeth infundibula in clinically normal horses.. Equine Vet J 2010 Jan;42(1):37-43.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X474761pubmed: 20121911google scholar: lookup
  5. Horbal A, Smith S, Dixon PM. A Computed Tomographic (CT) and Pathological Study of Equine Cheek Teeth Infundibulae Extracted From Asymptomatic Horses. Part 1: Prevalence, Type and Location of Infundibular Lesions on CT Imaging.. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:124.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00124pmc: PMC6494954pubmed: 31106213google scholar: lookup
  6. Horbal AA. Computed tomographic and pathological study of equine cheek teeth infundibular caries. [Doctoral thesis]: The University of Edinburgh (2017).
  7. Baker JG. Incidence of caries and periodontal disease in horses.. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1969 May;51(2):384.
    pubmed: 5814167
  8. Wafa NSY. A Study of Dental Disease in the Horse. Dublin: University College Dublin; (1988).
  9. Kilic S, Dixon PM, Kempson SA. A light microscopic and ultrastructural examination of calcified dental tissues of horses: 1. The occlusal surface and enamel thickness.. Equine Vet J 1997 May;29(3):190-7.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb01668.xpubmed: 9234011google scholar: lookup
  10. Dacre IT. A Pathological Study of Equine Dental Disorders. [PhD Thesis]. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh; (2004).
  11. Baker GJ. A Study of Dental Disease in the Horse. [PhD Thesis]. Glasgow: University of Glasgow; (1979).
  12. Johnson TJ, Porter CM. Infundibular caries. In: Focus on Dentistry. Indianapolis, IN: American Association of Equine Practitioners; (2006). p. 101–7.
  13. Dacre I, Kempson S, Dixon PM. Pathological studies of cheek teeth apical infections in the horse: 5. Aetiopathological findings in 57 apically infected maxillary cheek teeth and histological and ultrastructural findings.. Vet J 2008 Dec;178(3):352-63.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.09.024pubmed: 19022689google scholar: lookup
  14. Kilic S, Dixon PM, Kempson SA. A light microscopic and ultrastructural examination of calcified dental tissues on horses: 4. Cement and the amelocemental junction.. Equine Vet J 1997 May;29(3):213-9.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb01671.xpubmed: 9234014google scholar: lookup
  15. Borkent D. Epidemiological, pathological and microbiological study of equine dental caries. [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Edinburgh; (2018).
  16. Windley Z, Weller R, Tremaine WH, Perkins JD. Two- and three-dimensional computed tomographic anatomy of the enamel, infundibulae and pulp of 126 equine cheek teeth. Part 1: Findings in teeth without macroscopic occlusal or computed tomographic lesions.. Equine Vet J 2009 May;41(5):433-40.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X390214pubmed: 19642402google scholar: lookup
  17. Baker GJ. Some aspects of equine dental decay.. Equine Vet J 1974 Jul;6(3):127-30.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1974.tb03945.xpubmed: 4854323google scholar: lookup
  18. Hofmeyr CFB. Comparative dental pathology (with particular reference to caries and paradontal disease in the horse and dog). J S Afr Vet Med Assoc (1960) 29:471–80.
  19. Blood DC, Studdert VP. Saunders Comprehensive Veterinary Dictionary. London: W.B.Saunders Company; (1999).
  20. Lundström TS, Dahlén GG, Wattle OS. Caries in the infundibulum of the second upper premolar tooth in the horse.. Acta Vet Scand 2007 Mar 28;49(1):10.
    doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-49-10pmc: PMC1847679pubmed: 17391523google scholar: lookup
  21. Baker GJ. Some aspects of equine dental disease. Equine Vet J (1970) 2:105–10.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1970.tb04168.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  22. Dixon PM, Dacre I. A review of equine dental disorders.. Vet J 2005 Mar;169(2):165-87.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.03.022pubmed: 15727909google scholar: lookup
  23. Arnbjerg J. Lack of cementum in infundibulum (Hypocementosis) in equine cheek teeth. SOC Vet Sci (2018) 4:1–6.
    doi: 10.15226/2381-2907/4/3/00163google scholar: lookup
  24. Borkent D. Epidemiological, pathological and microbiological study of equine dental caries. (2018).
    pubmed: 0
  25. Toit ND. Clinical significance of equine cheek teeth infundibular caries.. Vet Rec 2017 Sep 2;181(9):233-234.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.j4033pubmed: 28864510google scholar: lookup
  26. Becker E. Dental disease in 30,000 army horses. Z Vetkdo (1945) 32–6.
  27. Dacre I, Kempsot S, Dixon PM. Equine idiopathic cheek teeth fractures. Part 1: Pathological studies on 35 fractured cheek teeth.. Equine Vet J 2007 Jul;39(4):310-8.
    doi: 10.2746/042516407X182721pubmed: 17722721google scholar: lookup
  28. Joest E, Chorin A, Finger H, Westman O. Studien über das Backzahngebiss des Pferdes mit besonderer Berücksichtigung seiner postembryonalen Entwicklung und seines Einflusses auf den Gesichtsschädel und die Kieferhöhl. Berlin: Richard Schoetz; (1922).
  29. Colyer F. Abnormal conditions of the teeth of animals in their relationship to similar conditions in man. The Dental Board of the U.K (1931).
  30. Klugh DO, Basile T, Brannan R. Infundibular decay in equine maxillary teeth.. J Vet Dent 2001 Mar;18(1):26-7.
    doi: 10.1177/089875640101800104pubmed: 11968910google scholar: lookup
  31. Bernardini F, Tuniz C, Coppa A, Mancini L, Dreossi D, Eichert D, Turco G, Biasotto M, Terrasi F, De Cesare N, Hua Q, Levchenko V. Beeswax as dental filling on a neolithic human tooth.. PLoS One 2012;7(9):e44904.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044904pmc: PMC3446997pubmed: 23028670google scholar: lookup
  32. Wilwerding TD. History of dentistry. (2001).
  33. Hinenbauch TD. Filling horses' teeth. In: Veterinary Dental Surgery for Students, Practitioners and Stockmen. Indiana, IN: Lafayette College; (1889). p. 224–39.
  34. Becker E. Treatment of dental disease in horses. Dt. Tierarztl (1939).
  35. Honma K, Yamakawa M, Yamauchi S, Hosoya S. Statistical study on the occurrence of dental caries in domestic animals. Jl S Afr Vet Med Ass (1962) 29:471–80.
  36. Han SH, Park SH. Incremental and Bulk-fill Techniques With Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Different Cavity Configurations.. Oper Dent 2018 Nov Dec;43(6):631-641.
    doi: 10.2341/17-279-LRpubmed: 29630486google scholar: lookup
  37. Veraa S, Voorhout G, Klein WR. Computed tomography of the upper cheek teeth in horses with infundibular changes and apical infection.. Equine Vet J 2009 Dec;41(9):872-6.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X452143pubmed: 20383984google scholar: lookup
  38. O'Neill HD, Boussauw B, Bladon BM, Fraser BS. Extraction of cheek teeth using a lateral buccotomy approach in 114 horses (1999-2009).. Equine Vet J 2011 May;43(3):348-53.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00169.xpubmed: 21492213google scholar: lookup
  39. Opdam NJ, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E, Cenci MS, Bottenberg P, Pallesen U, Gaengler P, Lindberg A, Huysmans MC, van Dijken JW. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. J Dent Res 2014 Oct;93(10):943-9.
    doi: 10.1177/0022034514544217pmc: PMC4293707pubmed: 25048250google scholar: lookup
  40. Kikushima D, Shimada Y, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength of adhesive systems to cementum.. Am J Dent 2005 Oct;18(5):364-8.
    pubmed: 16335047
  41. Pearce CJ. Treatment of maxillary cheek teeth apical infection caused by patent infundibula in six horses (2007-2013). Equine Vet Educ (2016) 28:600–8.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12334google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Bishop IT. Diagnostic value of full-mouth radiography in horses.. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:971886.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.971886pubmed: 36277061google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.