Analyze Diet
Journal of veterinary internal medicine2025; 39(2); e70039; doi: 10.1111/jvim.70039

Longitudinal Changes in Fecal Microbiota During Hospitalization in Horses With Different Types of Colic.

Abstract: Research on fecal microbiota changes during hospitalization of horses with colic is emerging. Objective: Describe changes of the fecal microbiota during hospitalization of horses with colic caused by inflammatory (INFL), simple (SIMPLE), and strangulated (STR) obstructions, and investigate associations with survival. Methods: Twenty-three horses with colic: 9 in INFL, 5 in STR, and 9 in SIMPLE groups. Seventeen horses survived, and 6 were euthanized. Methods: Prospective observational study. Fecal samples were collected on admission (D1), on days 3 (D3) and 5 (D5). Bacterial taxonomy profiling was obtained by V1V3 16S amplicon sequencing. Data were compared using a 2-way permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size (LEfSE) analysis identified significant bacterial population differences, with significance set at p  3.0. Results: Alpha diversity indices remained stable during hospitalization within each colic group. However, at D5, the INFL group had significantly higher richness (p < 0.01) and diversity (Shannon, p < 0.001 and Simpson, p < 0.05) than other colic types. Beta diversity (Jaccard membership and Bray-Curtis indices) was significantly different in the INFL compared to SIMPLE and STR groups (both p < 0.001) but not between SIMPLE and STR. Beta diversity membership analysis by analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) indicated a significant difference between survivors and non-survivors within the INFL group (p < 0.01). Increased relative abundances of Bacilliculturomica and Saccharofermentans were associated with survival. Conclusions: Microbiota showed no significant variation over 5 days of hospitalization. Colic type influenced fecal microbiota more than hospitalization duration. Specific bacterial populations may differ between survival and non-survival groups.
Publication Date: 2025-03-06 PubMed ID: 40048584PubMed Central: PMC11884602DOI: 10.1111/jvim.70039Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study investigated how hospitalization affects the fecal microbiota of horses suffering from different types of colic, and explored correlations between changes in these bacterial populations and the horses’ survival rates. The main findings were that the type of colic had a greater impact on the horses’ gut bacteria than the duration of hospitalization, and that horses with a higher abundance of certain bacteria were more likely to survive.

Methodology

  • Twenty-three horses with colic were enrolled in this prospective observational study. Of these, nine had inflammatory obstructions (INFL group), five had strangulated obstructions (STR group), and nine had simple obstructions (SIMPLE group).
  • Fecal samples were obtained when the horses were first admitted to the hospital (D1) and then again on the third (D3) and fifth (D5) days of their hospital stay.
  • The research team used V1V3 16S amplicon sequencing to profile the bacteria present in the samples.
  • Data was analysed using a 2-way permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA), and a test called linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSE) was used to identify significant differences in bacterial populations, with a significance level of p  3.0 for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA).

Results

  • Alpha diversity indices, which measure the variety of organisms in a group, remained stable during hospitalization for each colic group.
  • However, the INFL group had significantly higher microbial richness (a greater number of unique species) and diversity by D5 compared to the other colic types.
  • The composition of the gut bacteria, or ‘beta diversity’, was significantly different in the INFL group compared to the SIMPLE and STR groups. But there was no significant difference between the SIMPLE and STR groups.
  • An additional beta diversity membership analysis showed a significant difference between horses that survived and those that did not in the INFL group.
  • Increased relative abundances of two specific bacterial groups, Bacilliculturomica and Saccharofermentans, were associated with survival.

Conclusions

  • The microbial composition of the horses’ gut did not change significantly over the five-day hospitalisation period.
  • The type of colic made a larger impact on the fecal microbiota than the duration of the horse’s hospital stay.
  • Specific bacterial populations appeared to differ between horses that survived and those that did not, suggesting a possible connection between gut bacteria and outcomes for horses with different types of colic.

Cite This Article

APA
Loublier C, Costa M, Taminiau B, Lecoq L, Daube G, Amory H, Cesarini C. (2025). Longitudinal Changes in Fecal Microbiota During Hospitalization in Horses With Different Types of Colic. J Vet Intern Med, 39(2), e70039. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.70039

Publication

ISSN: 1939-1676
NlmUniqueID: 8708660
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 39
Issue: 2
Pages: e70039
PII: e70039

Researcher Affiliations

Loublier, Clémence
  • Equine Clinical Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
  • Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals & Health (FARAH), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Costa, Marcio
  • Department of Veterinary Biomedicine, University of Montreal, Q, Canada.
Taminiau, Bernard
  • Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals & Health (FARAH), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
  • Department of Food Sciences-Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, Liège, Belgium.
Lecoq, Laureline
  • Equine Clinical Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
  • Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals & Health (FARAH), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Daube, Georges
  • Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals & Health (FARAH), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
  • Department of Food Sciences-Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, Liège, Belgium.
Amory, Hélène
  • Equine Clinical Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
  • Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals & Health (FARAH), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Cesarini, Carla
  • Equine Clinical Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
  • Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals & Health (FARAH), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Colic / veterinary
  • Colic / microbiology
  • Horse Diseases / microbiology
  • Feces / microbiology
  • Male
  • Female
  • Prospective Studies
  • Hospitalization
  • Gastrointestinal Microbiome
  • Bacteria / classification
  • Bacteria / genetics
  • Bacteria / isolation & purification

Grant Funding

  • Fonds Spu00e9ciaux de Recherche (DYSBIOHORSIRS)
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS (Veterinary MD. Ph.D. VETE-CCD)

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 43 references
  1. Curtis L, Burford JH, England GCW, Freeman SL. Risk Factors for Acute Abdominal Pain (Colic) in the Adult Horse: A Scoping Review of Risk Factors, and a Systematic Review of the Effect of Management‐Related Changes. PLoS One 14, no. 7 (2019): e0219307.
    pmc: PMC6622499pubmed: 31295284
  2. Cook VL, Hassel DM. Evaluation of the Colic in Horses. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 30, no. 2 (2014): 383–398.
    pubmed: 25016497
  3. Neish AS. Microbes in Gastrointestinal Health and Disease. Gastroenterology 136, no. 1 (2009): 65–80.
    pmc: PMC2892787pubmed: 19026645
  4. Kasubuchi M, Hasegawa S, Hiramatsu T, Ichimura A, Kimura I. Dietary Gut Microbial Metabolites, Short‐Chain Fatty Acids, and Host Metabolic Regulation. Nutrients 7, no. 4 (2015): 2839–2849.
    pmc: PMC4425176pubmed: 25875123
  5. Costa MC, Arroyo LG, Allen-Vercoe E. Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota of Healthy Horses and Horses With Colitis by High Throughput Sequencing of the V3‐V5 Region of the 16S rRNA Gene. PLoS One 7, no. 7 (2012): e41484.
    pmc: PMC3409227pubmed: 22859989
  6. Lynch SV, Pedersen O. The Human Intestinal Microbiome in Health and Disease. Phimister EG, Editor. New England Journal of Medicine 375, no. 24 (2016): 2369–2379.
    pubmed: 27974040
  7. McGorum BC, Pirie RS. Antimicrobial Associated Diarrhoea in the Horse. Part 1: Overview, Pathogenesis and Risk Factors. Equine Veterinary Education 21, no. 11 (2009): 610–616.
  8. Weese JS, Holcombe SJ, Embertson RM. Faecal Microbiota in Post Partum Colic. Equine Veterinary Journal 47, no. 6 (2015): 641–649.
    pubmed: 25257320
  9. Salem SE, Maddox TW, Antczak P, Ketley JM, Williams NJ, Archer DC. Acute Changes in the Colonic Microbiota Are Associated With Large Intestinal Forms of Surgical Colic. BioMed Central Veterinary Research 15, no. 1 (2019): 468.
    pmc: PMC6925886pubmed: 31864369
  10. Stewart HL, Southwood LL, Indugu N, Vecchiarelli B, Engiles JB, Pitta D. Differences in the Equine Faecal Microbiota Between Horses Presenting to a Tertiary Referral Hospital for Colic Compared With an Elective Surgical Procedure. Equine Veterinary Journal 51, no. 3 (2019): 336–342.
    pubmed: 30153353
  11. Stewart HL, Pitta D, Indugu N. Changes in the Faecal Bacterial Microbiota During Hospitalisation of Horses With Colic and the Effect of Different Causes of Colic. Equine Veterinary Journal 53, no. 6 (2021): 1119–1131.
    pubmed: 33222287
  12. Costa MC, Silva G, Ramos RV. Characterization and Comparison of the Bacterial Microbiota in Different Gastrointestinal Tract Compartments in Horses. Veterinary Journal 205, no. 1 (2015): 74–80.
    pubmed: 25975855
  13. Schoster A, Mosing M, Jalali M, Staempfli HR, Weese JS. Effects of Transport, Fasting and Anaesthesia on the Faecal Microbiota of Healthy Adult Horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 48, no. 5 (2015): 595–602.
    pubmed: 26122549
  14. Whitfield-Cargile CM, Chamoun-Emanuelli AM, Cohen ND, Richardson LM, Ajami NJ, Dockery HJ. Differential Effects of Selective and Non‐Selective Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors on Fecal Microbiota in Adult Horses. PLoS One 13, no. 8 (2018): e0202527.
    pmc: PMC6107168pubmed: 30138339
  15. Arnold C, Pilla R, Chaffin K, Lidbury J, Steiner J, Suchodolski J. Alterations in the Fecal Microbiome and Metabolome of Horses With Antimicrobial‐Associated Diarrhea Compared to Antibiotic‐Treated and Non‐Treated Healthy Case Controls. Animals: An Open Access Journal From MDPI 11, no. 6 (2021): 1807.
    pmc: PMC8235368pubmed: 34204371
  16. Lozupone CA, Stombaugh JI, Gordon JI, Jansson JK, Knight R. Diversity, Stability and Resilience of the Human Gut Microbiota. Nature 489, no. 7415 (2012): 220–230.
    pmc: PMC3577372pubmed: 22972295
  17. Ayoub C, Arroyo LG, MacNicol JL, Renaud D, Weese JS, Gomez DE. Fecal Microbiota of Horses With Colitis and Its Association With Laminitis and Survival During Hospitalization. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 36, no. 6 (2022): 2213–2223.
    pmc: PMC9708523pubmed: 36271677
  18. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T. Introducing Mothur: Open‐Source, Platform‐Independent, Community‐Supported Software for Describing and Comparing Microbial Communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75, no. 23 (2009): 7537–7541.
    pmc: PMC2786419pubmed: 19801464
  19. Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, Highlander SK, Schloss PD. Development of a Dual‐Index Sequencing Strategy and Curation Pipeline for Analyzing Amplicon Sequence Data on the MiSeq Illumina Sequencing Platform. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 79, no. 17 (2013): 5112–5120.
    pmc: PMC3753973pubmed: 23793624
  20. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L. Metagenomic Biomarker Discovery and Explanation. Genome Biology 12, no. 6 (2011): R60.
    pmc: PMC3218848pubmed: 21702898
  21. D'Auria G, Galán JC, Rodríguez-Alcayna M, Moya A, Baquero F, Latorre A. Complete Genome Sequence of Acidaminococcus intestini RYC‐MR95, a Gram‐Negative Bacterium From the Phylum Firmicutes. Journal of Bacteriology 193, no. 24 (2011): 7008–7009.
    pmc: PMC3232847pubmed: 22123762
  22. Kobek-Kjeldager C, Moustsen VA, Pedersen LJ, Theil PK. Impact of Litter Size, Supplementary Milk Replacer and Housing on the Body Composition of Piglets From Hyper‐Prolific Sows at Weaning. Animal 15, no. 1 (2021): 100007.
    pubmed: 33516024
  23. Stanton TB, Canale-Parola E. Treponema Bryantii Sp. Nov., a Rumen Spirochete That Interacts With Cellulolytic Bacteria. Archives of Microbiology 127, no. 2 (1980): 145–156.
    pubmed: 7425785
  24. Buford TW. (Dis)trust Your Gut: The Gut Microbiome in Age‐Related Inflammation, Health, and Disease. Microbiome 5, no. 1 (2017): 80.
    pmc: PMC5512975pubmed: 28709450
  25. Arroyo LG, Rossi L, Santos BP, Gomez DE, Surette MG, Costa MC. Luminal and Mucosal Microbiota of the Cecum and Large Colon of Healthy and Diarrheic Horses. Animals 10, no. 8 (2020): 1403.
    pmc: PMC7460328pubmed: 32806591
  26. Willette JA, Pitta D, Indugu N. Experimental Crossover Study on the Effects of Withholding Feed for 24 h on the Equine Faecal Bacterial Microbiota in Healthy Mares. BioMed Central Veterinary Research 17, no. 1 (2021): 3.
    pmc: PMC7786913pubmed: 33402190
  27. Costa MC, Stämpfli HR, Arroyo LG, Allen-Vercoe E, Gomes RG, Weese JS. Changes in the Equine Fecal Microbiota Associated With the Use of Systemic Antimicrobial Drugs. BioMed Central Veterinary Research 11, no. 1 (2015): 19.
    pmc: PMC4323147pubmed: 25644524
  28. Forry SP, Servetas SL, Kralj JG. Variability and Bias in Microbiome Metagenomic Sequencing: An Interlaboratory Study Comparing Experimental Protocols. Scientific Reports 14, no. 1 (2024): 9785.
    pmc: PMC11059151pubmed: 38684791
  29. Biddle AS, Black SJ, Blanchard JL. An In Vitro Model of the Horse Gut Microbiome Enables Identification of Lactate‐Utilizing Bacteria That Differentially Respond to Starch Induction. PLoS One 8, no. 10 (2013): e77599.
    pmc: PMC3788102pubmed: 24098591
  30. Van Nood E, Vrieze A, Nieuwdorp M. Duodenal Infusion of Donor Feces for Recurrent Clostridium Difficile. New England Journal of Medicine 368, no. 5 (2013): 407–415.
    pubmed: 23323867
  31. Cammarota G, Ianiro G, Tilg H. European Consensus Conference on Faecal Microbiota Transplantation in Clinical Practice. Gut 66, no. 4 (2017): 569–580.
    pmc: PMC5529972pubmed: 28087657
  32. Chamorro N, Montero DA, Gallardo P. Landscapes and Bacterial Signatures of Mucosa‐Associated Intestinal Microbiota in Chilean and Spanish Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Microbial Cell 8, no. 9 (2021): 223–238.
    pmc: PMC8404152pubmed: 34527721
  33. Lepage P, Häsler R, Spehlmann ME. Twin Study Indicates Loss of Interaction Between Microbiota and Mucosa of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterology 141, no. 1 (2011): 227–236.
    pubmed: 21621540
  34. De Weerth C, Fuentes S, De Vos WM. Crying in Infants: On the Possible Role of Intestinal Microbiota in the Development of Colic. Gut Microbes 4, no. 5 (2013): 416–421.
    pmc: PMC3839988pubmed: 23941920
  35. Kaakoush NO, Day AS, Huinao KD. Microbial Dysbiosis in Pediatric Patients With Crohn's Disease. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 50, no. 10 (2012): 3258–3266.
    pmc: PMC3457451pubmed: 22837318
  36. Suchodolski JS, Dowd SE, Wilke V, Steiner JM, Jergens AE. 16S rRNA Gene Pyrosequencing Reveals Bacterial Dysbiosis in the Duodenum of Dogs With Idiopathic Inflammatory Bowel Disease. PLoS One 7, no. 6 (2012): e39333.
    pmc: PMC3376104pubmed: 22720094
  37. Elzinga SE, Weese JS, Adams AA. Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota in Horses With Equine Metabolic Syndrome and Metabolically Normal Controls Fed a Similar all‐Forage Diet. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 44 (2016): 9–16.
  38. Costa M, Di Pietro R, Bessegatto JA. Evaluation of Changes in Microbiota After Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in 6 Diarrheic Horses. Canadian Veterinary Journal 62, no. 10 (2021): 1123–1130.
    pmc: PMC8439339pubmed: 34602643
  39. Costa MC, Weese JS. The Equine Intestinal Microbiome. Animal Health Research Reviews 13, no. 1 (2012): 121–128.
    pubmed: 22626511
  40. Dougal K, Harris PA, Edwards A. A Comparison of the Microbiome and the Metabolome of Different Regions of the Equine Hindgut. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 82, no. 3 (2012): 642–652.
    pubmed: 22757649
  41. Schoster A, Arroyo LG, Staempfli HR, Weese JS. Comparison of Microbial Populations in the Small Intestine, Large Intestine and Feces of Healthy Horses Using Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism. BioMed Central Research Notes 6, no. 1 (2013): 91.
    pmc: PMC3622624pubmed: 23497580
  42. Ericsson AC, Johnson PJ, Lopes MA, Perry SC, Lanter HR. A Microbiological Map of the Healthy Equine Gastrointestinal Tract. PLoS One 11, no. 11 (2016): e0166523.
    pmc: PMC5112786pubmed: 27846295
  43. van Weyenberg S, Sales J, Janssens GPJ. Passage Rate of Digesta Through the Equine Gastrointestinal Tract: A Review. Livestock Science 99, no. 1 (2006): 3–12.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.