Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2026; doi: 10.1002/evj.70225

Maxillary and mandibular fracture repair using a modified bis-acryl reinforced interdental wiring technique: Description of the technique and report of 11 cases.

Abstract: Repair options for maxillary and mandibular fractures in horses are dictated by the proximity of dentition, fracture configuration, and implant design. Jaw fractures can be repaired by minimising tension forces via intraoral splint constructs when dentition is present on either side of the fracture line. This repair option reduces iatrogenic damage to dentition while achieving reduction and stability until appliance removal. Objective: To first report a modified technique for jaw fracture repair in horses with cadaveric example images. Second, to report the clinical outcome of maxillary and mandibular fracture repair in clinical cases of horses that were treated with a modified wire-reinforced bis-acryl composite interdental splint with tubing (MWIST). Methods: Multi-institutional retrospective clinical case series. Methods: Medical records from three university hospitals and three private practices were searched for cases of equine mandibular or maxillary fractures treated with the MWIST technique from 2018 to 2025. Animals included in the study underwent oral examination, skull radiography or computed tomography, fracture repair with MWIST, and follow-up imaging at time of appliance removal. Results: Eleven horses met the inclusion criteria. Nine cases involved fracture of the mandible and two involved fracture of the maxilla/premaxilla. Eight cases had fracture configurations that involved adjacent dentition. Appliances remained in place for an average of 8.9 weeks (median 8 weeks, range 6-20 weeks). Complications were generally minor and readily resolved, including wire loosening or breakage and bone sequestration. Conclusions: The main limitation to this study is the multi-institutional retrospective nature, which limits standardisation across diagnostic and surgical procedures, patient follow-up, and inclusion of a control group. Conclusions: The use of this modified repair technique in horses is feasible, cost effective, and biomechanically advantageous. The favourable outcome of all cases followed to appliance removal supports the application of this surgical technique on future equine jaw fracture cases.
Publication Date: 2026-07-09 PubMed ID: 42423169DOI: 10.1002/evj.70225Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study presents a new method for repairing jaw fractures in horses using a wire-reinforced bis-acryl composite interdental splint with tubing (MWIST).
  • The researchers describe the technique, illustrate it with images, and report successful outcomes in 11 clinical cases treated with this method.

Background and Objective

  • Jaw fractures in horses require repair methods that consider the nearby teeth, fracture pattern, and implant design.
  • Common repair emphasizes reducing tension forces through intraoral splints that use the horse’s own teeth to stabilize fractures, minimizing damage to the teeth.
  • The study aimed to:
    • Describe a modified technique called MWIST for repairing maxillary (upper jaw) and mandibular (lower jaw) fractures.
    • Report on the clinical outcomes of horses treated with MWIST across multiple institutions.

Methodology

  • A retrospective review was conducted across three university hospitals and three private practices, spanning from 2018 to 2025.
  • Inclusion criteria involved horses diagnosed with maxillary or mandibular fractures treated using the MWIST technique.
  • Diagnostic procedures included:
    • Oral examinations
    • Skull radiography or computed tomography (CT)
  • Fracture repair was performed with the modified wire-reinforced bis-acryl composite interdental splint with tubing (MWIST).
  • Follow-up imaging was done at the time of appliance removal to assess healing.

Technique Description

  • MWIST combines bis-acryl composite material with wire reinforcement and tubing to create a strong, durable interdental splint.
  • This splint is applied intraorally, stabilizing fracture fragments by anchoring across the dentition adjacent to the fracture site.
  • The technique is designed to minimize harmful tension, optimize biomechanical stability, and lessen damage to the horses’ teeth compared to other methods.
  • Cadaveric examples were used to illustrate the application of the method.

Results

  • Eleven horses met the criteria and received the MWIST repair:
    • Nine had mandibular fractures.
    • Two had maxillary or premaxillary fractures.
    • Eight had fractures involving nearby teeth.
  • The splint devices stayed in place for an average of 8.9 weeks (range 6 to 20 weeks).
  • Complications were minor and manageable, including:
    • Wire loosening or breaking
    • Bone sequestration (small dead bone fragments)
  • All cases followed through appliance removal showed favorable healing outcomes.

Limitations

  • The study is retrospective and involved multiple institutions, which introduces variability in:
    • Diagnostic modalities and protocols
    • Surgical procedures
    • Follow-up schedules
  • There was no control group for direct comparison with other fracture repair techniques.

Conclusions and Implications

  • The MWIST technique is practical, cost-effective, and provides biomechanical advantages for equine jaw fracture repairs.
  • The positive clinical results suggest this method is a promising option for treating maxillary and mandibular fractures in horses.
  • The technique reduces the risk to surrounding teeth and provides adequate stabilization during the healing period.
  • Future controlled studies could further validate and standardize this approach.

Cite This Article

APA
Wright AL, Broman A, Chiero N, Griffin C, Hunt J, Rice M, Tanner B, Henry T. (2026). Maxillary and mandibular fracture repair using a modified bis-acryl reinforced interdental wiring technique: Description of the technique and report of 11 cases. Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1002/evj.70225

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Wright, Alexandra L
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Broman, Ashton
  • Rood and Riddle Equine Hospital, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Chiero, Naomi
  • Equine Veterinary Dental Services, Newark, Ohio, USA.
Griffin, Cleet
  • Department of Veterinary Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Hunt, Jessica
  • Midwest Veterinary Dental Services, Elkhorn, Wisconsin, USA.
Rice, Molly
  • Midwest Veterinary Dental Services, Elkhorn, Wisconsin, USA.
Tanner, Brad
  • Rood and Riddle Equine Hospital, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Henry, Travis
  • Midwest Veterinary Dental Services, Elkhorn, Wisconsin, USA.

References

This article includes 31 references
  1. DeBowes RM. Fractures of the mandible & maxilla. In: Nixon A, editor. Equine fracture repair. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley‐Blackwell; 2019.
  2. Henninger RW, Beard WL, Schneider RK, Bramlage LR, Burkhardt HA. Fractures of the rostral portion of the mandible and maxilla in horses: 89 cases (1979‐1997). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999;214(11):1648–1652.
  3. Beard W. Fracture repair techniques for the equine mandible and maxilla. Equine Vet Educ 2009;21(7):352–357.
    doi: 10.2746/095777309x431294google scholar: lookup
  4. Tremaine WH, Barnett TP. Treatment of head and dental trauma. In: Easley J, Dixon P, du Toit N, editors. Equine dentistry and maxillofacial surgery. 1st ed. Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2022. p. 622–642.
  5. Monck SL, KC MG, Easley JT. Biomechanical comparison of locking compression plate fixation and a novel pedicle screw external fixation to repair equine mandibular fractures. Vet Surg 2020;49(5):997–1006.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.13416google scholar: lookup
  6. Grant MJ, Barnett TP. Iatrogenic fracture of the premaxilla during standing exodontia. Equine Vet Educ 2017;29(11):584–588.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12659google scholar: lookup
  7. Dixon PM, du Toit N, Stasyk C. Equine dental anatomy. In: Easley J, Dixon P, du Toit N, editors. Equine dentistry and maxillofacial surgery. 1st ed. Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2022. p. 5.
  8. Snyder CJ. Maxillofacial fracture repair using noninvasive techniques. In: Verstraete FJM, Lommer MJ, Arzi B, editors. Oral and maxillofacial surgery in dogs and cats. 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2020. p. 250–261.
  9. Iacopetti I, De Benedictis GM, Faughnan M, Perazzi A, Busetto R. Treatment of incisive bone fracture in a horse using an acrylic splint. Equine Vet Educ 2009;21(7):346–351.
    doi: 10.2746/095777309x422915google scholar: lookup
  10. Naddaf H, Sabiza S, Kavosi N. Surgical treatment and a unique management of rostral mandibular fracture with cerclage wire in a horse. Vet Res Forum 2015;6(2):181–183.
  11. Rizk A, Hamed M. The use of cerclage wire for surgical repair of unilateral rostral mandibular fracture in horses. Iran J Vet Res 2018;19(2):123–127.
  12. Godoy VM, de Oliveira E Oliveira NF, Paretsis NF, da Silva SC, de Souza AF, do Valle De Zoppa AL, Corrêa RR. Treatment of a mandibular diastemal fracture using locking compression plate and cerclage wire in a mare. J Vet Dent 2023;40(1):75–80.
    doi: 10.1177/08987564221129986google scholar: lookup
  13. Haralambus RMA, Werren C, Brehm W, Tessier C. Use of a pinless external fixator for unilateral mandibular fracture repair in nine equids. Vet Surg 2010;39(6):761–764.
  14. Nelson BB, Easley J, Steward SKT, Smanik LE, Koch DW, Rawlinson JE. Polyaxial pedicle screw external fixation to stabilize oblique mandibular fractures in three standing, sedated horses. Vet Surg 2021;50(3):659–667.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.13587google scholar: lookup
  15. Mählmann K, Noguera Cender A, Ehrle A, Lischer CJ. Application of locking compression plates as type 1 external fixators to treat unilateral mandibular fractures in four equids and one dromedary. Vet Surg 2022;51(2):341–352.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.13748google scholar: lookup
  16. Jansson N. Conservative management of unilateral fractures of the mandibular rami in horses.. Vet Surg 2016;45(8):1063–1065.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.12561google scholar: lookup
  17. Guzu M, Hennet PR. Mandibular body fracture repair with wire‐reinforced interdental composite splint in small dogs.. Vet Surg 2017;46(8):1068–1077.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.12691google scholar: lookup
  18. Pakula J, Freeman A, Perry A. Clinical outcomes of mandibular body fracture management using wire‐reinforced intraoral composite splints in 15 cats.. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1552682.
  19. Castejón González AC, Mestrinho LA, Reiter AM. Healing of mandibular body fractures with wire‐reinforced interdental bis‐acryl composite splints.. J Feline Med Surg 2025;27(3):1098612X251314346.
    doi: 10.1177/1098612x251314346google scholar: lookup
  20. Kern DA, Smith MM, Grant JW, Rockhill AD. Evaluation of bending strength of five interdental fixation apparatuses applied to canine mandibles.. Am J Vet Res 1993;54(7):1177–1182.
  21. Lothamer C, Snyder CJ, Duenwald‐Kuehl S, Kloke J, McCabe RP, Vanderby R. Crown preservation of the mandibular first molar tooth impacts the strength and stiffness of three non‐invasive jaw fracture repair constructs in dogs.. Front Vet Sci 2015;2:18.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00018google scholar: lookup
  22. Bettiol N, Dixon PM. An anatomical study to evaluate the risk of pulpar exposure during mechanical widening of equine cheek teeth diastemata and “bit seating”.. Equine Vet J 2011;43(2):163–169.
  23. Colahan PT, Pascoe JR. Stabilization of equine and bovine mandibular and maxillary fractures, using an acrylic splint.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1983;182(10):1117–1119.
  24. Durket E, Kersh K, Dembek K, Riedesel E, Silverstone A, Kraus KH. Influence of plate type and placement on the immobilization of bilateral equine mandibular osteotomies: ex vivo study.. Vet Surg 2019;48(8):1450–1455.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.13198google scholar: lookup
  25. Castejon‐Gonzalez AC, Friday CS, Hast MW, Reiter AM. Mechanical evaluation of mandibular fractures stabilized with absorbable implants or intraoral splints in cats.. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1525586.
  26. Geddes AT, Thatcher GP, Hetzel S, McCabe RP, Vandereby R, Snyder CJ. Biomechanical testing of a calcium phosphate‐phosphoserine‐based mineral‐organic adhesive for non‐invasive fracture repair of mandibular fractures in dogs.. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:59.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00059google scholar: lookup
  27. Kot CCS, Verstraete FJM, Garcia TC, Stover SM, Arzi B. Biomechanical evaluation of locking versus nonlocking 2.0‐mm malleable L‐miniplate fixation of simulated caudal mandibular fractures in cats.. Am J Vet Res 2022;83(8): 1–10.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.22.03.0043google scholar: lookup
  28. Carmalt JL, Carmalt KP, Barber SM. The effect of occlusal equilibration on sport horse performance.. J Vet Dent 2006;23(4):226–230.
  29. Carmalt JL, Townsend HGG, Allen AL. Effect of dental floating on the rostrocaudal mobility of the mandible of horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003;223(5):666–669.
  30. Crijns CP, Weller R, Vlaminck L, Verschooten F, Schauvliege S, Powell SE. Comparison between radiography and computed tomography for diagnosis of equine skull fractures.. Equine Vet Educ 2019;31(10):543–550.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.12863google scholar: lookup
  31. Porter EG, Werpy NM. New concepts in standing advanced diagnostic equine imaging. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2014;30(1):239–268.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.