FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2025; 15(4); doi: 10.3390/ani15040537

Measuring Noseband Tightness on the Lateral Aspect of the Horse’s Face.

Abstract: Measuring tools designed to objectively determine equine noseband tightness are inserted on the dorsal nasal planum in a rostro-caudal direction. The lateral aspect of the horse's head has several areas where minimal soft tissue intervenes between the skin and underlying bone, which makes them potentially useful sites for measuring noseband tightness. One hundred horses were fitted with a snaffle bridle with a cavesson, Swedish or dropped noseband in random order. The tightness of each noseband type was adjusted sequentially to 2.0, 1.5, 1.0, 0.5 and 0.0 finger-equivalents using an ISES Taper Gauge. For each adjustment, a digital calliper determined the distance (mm) between the inner surface of the noseband at three lateral locations: (1) lateral nasal bone, (2) lateral maxilla rostral to the facial crest, and (3) lateral mandible. Friedman's analysis was used to test the differences between locations (p < 0.02). No differences were found between 2.0 and 1.5 finger-equivalent tightness at the nasal and maxillary sites for the cavesson (p = 0.89, p = 0.03, respectively) and Swedish (p = 0.06, p = 0.40, respectively) noseband. When adjusted between 2.0 to 0.5 finger-equivalent tightness, the coefficient of variation was "good" for the nasal (16%) and maxilla (19%) sites. These results indicate that a lateral measuring site may provide a suitable addition to dorsal midline measurements.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-02-13 PubMed ID: 40003019PubMed Central: PMC11851643DOI: 10.3390/ani15040537Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates a method for objectively determining the tightness of a horse’s noseband, an important part of equine welfare. Through a study on 100 horses fitted with different types of nosebands, it explores the potential of using lateral measuring points on a horse’s face to supplement traditional dorsal midline measurements.

Research Methodology

  • The research study examined the effectiveness of a tool designed for assessing the tightness of the noseband, an essential part of a horse’s bridle.
  • Various types of nosebands (cavesson, Swedish, or dropped) were fitted on one hundred horses in random order.
  • The tightness of each noseband type was sequentially adjusted to 2.0, 1.5, 1.0, 0.5, and 0.0 finger-equivalents with the help of an ISES Taper Gauge.
  • The study used a digital caliper to measure the distance between the inner surface of the noseband and three different points on the lateral aspect of the horse’s face: the lateral nasal bone, the lateral maxilla rostral to the facial crest, and the lateral mandible.

Findings and Conclusions

  • Data analyses demonstrated no significant differences between 2.0 and 1.5 finger-equivalent tightness at the nasal and maxillary sites for both the cavesson and Swedish nosebands.
  • The study’s outcomes laid emphasis on the importance of objectifying the measure of noseband tightness for the welfare of horses, providing an additional tool to complement the current dorsal midline measurements.
  • When the tightness was adjusted between 2.0 to 0.5 finger-equivalent, the coefficient of variation proved to be “good” for the nasal (16%) and maxilla (19%) sites.
  • The results led the researchers to conclude that lateral measuring sites could add to the accuracy of determinations of noseband tightness, offering a more comprehensive approach to ensuring the comfort and welfare of equine animals.

These conclusions, busting myths about noseband tightness and advocating for the objective measurement, adds knowledge to the field of equine welfare studies. The findings will potentially safeguard the health and welfare of horses by educating horse handlers and enhancing the development of welfare-oriented horse equipment.

Cite This Article

APA
MacKechnie-Guire R, Clayton H, Williams J, Marlin D, Fisher M, Fisher D, Walker V, Murray R. (2025). Measuring Noseband Tightness on the Lateral Aspect of the Horse’s Face. Animals (Basel), 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15040537

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 4

Researcher Affiliations

MacKechnie-Guire, Russell
  • Equine Department, Hartpury University, Hartpury, Gloucester GL19 3BE, UK.
Clayton, Hilary
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, 736 Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Williams, Jane
  • Equine Department, Hartpury University, Hartpury, Gloucester GL19 3BE, UK.
Marlin, David
  • Animalweb Ltd., The Granary, Hermitage Court, Hermitage Lane, Maidstone, Kent ME16 9NT, UK.
Fisher, Mark
  • Woolcroft Equine Services, May Lane, Wisbech PE13 5BU, UK.
Fisher, Diana
  • Woolcroft Equine Services, May Lane, Wisbech PE13 5BU, UK.
Walker, Victoria
  • Equine Department, Hartpury University, Hartpury, Gloucester GL19 3BE, UK.
Murray, Rachel
  • Ibikus Ltd., Bury St Edmunds IP32 7AR, UK.

Grant Funding

  • xx / Federation Equestre Internationale

Conflict of Interest Statement

Author David Marlin was employed by the company Animalweb Ltd. Authors Mark Fisher and Diana Fisher were employed by the company Woolcroft Equine Services. Author Rachel Murray was employed by the company Ibikus Ltd. ALL authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 23 references
  1. Clayton HM, Williams JM. Know your noseband: An exploration of factors that influence riders’ choice of noseband.. J. Vet. Behav. 2022;47:1–11.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2021.09.008google scholar: lookup
  2. Merkies K, Copelin C, Small N, Young J. Noseband Fit: Measurements and Perceptions of Canadian Equestrians.. Animals 2022;12:2685.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12192685pmc: PMC9559623pubmed: 36230425google scholar: lookup
  3. Fenner K, Yoon S, White P, Starling M, Mc Greevy P. The Effect of Noseband Tightening on Horses’ Behavior, Eye Temperature, and Cardiac Responses.. PLoS ONE 2016;11:e0154179.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154179pmc: PMC4854461pubmed: 27140187google scholar: lookup
  4. McGreevy P, Warren-Smith A, Guisard Y. The effect of double bridles and jaw-clamping crank nosebands on temperature of eyes and facial skin of horses.. J. Vet. Behav. 2012;7:142–148.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2011.08.001google scholar: lookup
  5. Uldahl M, Clayton HM. Lesions associated with the use of bits, nosebands, spurs and whips in Danish competition horses.. Equine Vet. J. 2018;51:154–162.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12827pubmed: 29502345google scholar: lookup
  6. Doherty O, Casey V, McGreevy P, Arkins S. Noseband Use in Equestrian Sports—An International Study.. PLoS ONE 2017;12:e0169060.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169060pmc: PMC5207535pubmed: 28045961google scholar: lookup
  7. Visser EK, Kuypers MF, Stam JM, Riedstra B. Practice of Noseband Use and Intentions Towards Behavioural Change in Dutch Equestrians.. Animals 2019;9:1131.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9121131pmc: PMC6940946pubmed: 31842468google scholar: lookup
  8. Clayton HM, Murray R, Williams JM, Walker V, Fisher M, Fisher D, Nixon J, Mackechnie-Guire R. Facial pressure beneath a cavesson noseband adjusted to different tightness levels during standing and chewing.. Equine Vet. J. 2024. early view.
    pubmed: 39710981
  9. MacKechnie-Guire R, Murray R, Williams JM, Nixon J, Fisher M, Fisher D, Walker V, Clayton HM. Noseband type and tightness level affect pressure on the horse’s face at trot.. Equine Vet. J. 2024. early view.
    pmc: PMC11982415pubmed: 39305099
  10. Doherty O, Conway T, Conway R, Murray G, Casey V. An Objective Measure of Noseband Tightness and Its Measurement Using a Novel Digital Tightness Gauge.. PLoS ONE 2017;12:e0168996.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168996pmc: PMC5207410pubmed: 28045955google scholar: lookup
  11. Murray R, Guire R, Fisher M, Fairfax V. A Bridle Designed to Avoid Peak Pressure Locations Under the Headpiece and Noseband Is Associated with More Uniform Pressure and Increased Carpal and Tarsal Flexion, Compared with the Horse’s Usual Bridle.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2015;35:947–955.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.08.023google scholar: lookup
  12. Aronhime S, Calcagno C, Jajamovich GH, Dyvorne HA, Robson P, Dieterich D, Fiel MI, Martel-Laferriere V, Chatterji M, Rusinek H. DCE-MRI of the liver: Effect of linear and nonlinear conversions on hepatic perfusion quantification and reproducibility.. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2014;40:90–98.
    doi: 10.1002/jmri.24341pmc: PMC4058642pubmed: 24923476google scholar: lookup
  13. Body R, Carlton E, Sperrin M, Lewis PS, Burrows G, Carley S, McDowell G, Buchan I, Greaves K, Mackway-Jones K. Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) decision aid: Single biomarker re-derivation and external validation in three cohorts.. Emerg. Med. J. 2017;34:349–356.
    doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205983pmc: PMC5502241pubmed: 27565197google scholar: lookup
  14. Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: A fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine.. Clin. Chem. 1993;39:561–577.
    doi: 10.1093/clinchem/39.4.561pubmed: 8472349google scholar: lookup
  15. Greiner M, Pfeiffer D, Smith R. Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests.. Prev. Vet. Med. 2000;45:23–41.
    doi: 10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00115-Xpubmed: 10802332google scholar: lookup
  16. Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied Logistic Regression.. Volume 398 John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2013.
  17. Mandrekar JN. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment.. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2010;5:1315–1316.
    doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ec173dpubmed: 20736804google scholar: lookup
  18. Monaghan TF, Rahman SN, Agudelo CW, Wein AJ, Lazar JM, Everaert K, Dmochowski RR. Foundational statistical principles in medical research: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.. Medicina 2021;57:503.
    doi: 10.3390/medicina57050503pmc: PMC8156826pubmed: 34065637google scholar: lookup
  19. Evans KE, McGreevy PD. Conformation of the equine skull: A morphometric study.. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 2006;35:221–227.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0264.2005.00663.xpubmed: 16836585google scholar: lookup
  20. Campbell MLH. An Ethical Framework for the Use of Horses in Competitive Sport: Theory and Function.. Animals 2021;11:1725.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11061725pmc: PMC8230307pubmed: 34207809google scholar: lookup
  21. Williams J, Tabor G. Rider impacts on equitation.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2017;190:28–42.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.019google scholar: lookup
  22. Wathan J, Burrows AM, Waller BM, McComb K. EquiFACS: The Equine Facial Action Coding System.. PLoS ONE 2015;10:e0131738.
    pmc: PMC4526551pubmed: 26244573
  23. Costa ED, Pascuzzo R, Leach MC, Dai F, Lebelt D, Vantini S, Minero M. Can grimace scales estimate the pain status in horses and mice? A statistical approach to identify a classifier.. PLoS ONE 2018;13:e0200339.
    pmc: PMC6070187pubmed: 30067759

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Henshall C, McGreevy P, Shea G, Doherty O, Christensen JW, Fenner K, Warren-Smith A, McLean A. Commentary on MacKechnie-Guire et al. Measuring Noseband Tightness on the Lateral Aspect of the Horse's Face. Animals 2015, 15, 537. Animals (Basel) 2026 Jan 28;16(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani16030412pubmed: 41681393google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,928 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.