FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / J R Soc Interface / Mechanical modelling of tooth wear.
Journal of the Royal Society, Interface2016; 13(120); 20160399; doi: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0399

Mechanical modelling of tooth wear.

Abstract: Different diets wear teeth in different ways and generate distinguishable wear and microwear patterns that have long been the basis of palaeodiet reconstructions. Little experimental research has been performed to study them together. Here, we show that an artificial mechanical masticator, a chewing machine, occluding real horse teeth in continuous simulated chewing (of 100 000 chewing cycles) is capable of replicating microscopic wear features and gross wear on teeth that resemble wear in specimens collected from nature. Simulating pure attrition (chewing without food) and four plant material diets of different abrasives content (at n = 5 tooth pairs per group), we detected differences in microscopic wear features by stereomicroscopy of the chewing surface in the number and quality of pits and scratches that were not always as expected. Using computed tomography scanning in one tooth per diet, absolute wear was quantified as the mean height change after the simulated chewing. Absolute wear increased with diet abrasiveness, originating from phytoliths and grit. In combination, our findings highlight that differences in actual dental tissue loss can occur at similar microwear patterns, cautioning against a direct transformation of microwear results into predictions about diet or tooth wear rate.
© 2016 The Author(s).
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2016-07-15 PubMed ID: 27411727PubMed Central: PMC4971227DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0399Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research examines how different diets affect tooth wear patterns by using a mechanical model that simulated chewing with real horse teeth. Findings reveal that not only does diet have direct implications on tooth wear, but also it cautions against the assumption that similar microwear patterns equate to similar tooth wear rate or diet.

Objectives and Methodology

  • The main objective of this research was to understand the correlation between diet and tooth wear. The researchers hoped to identify distinct wear and microwear patterns that can provide insights into dietary considerations.
  • The study’s methodology involved the use of an artificial mechanical masticator, essentially a chewing machine, which functioned with real horse teeth. This machine was subjected to an extended simulation of chewing, performing 100,000 chewing cycles.
  • The experiment simulated pure attrition (chewing without food) and four different diet types containing varying levels of abrasive components. Each diet type was assigned to five different pairs of teeth for the test.

Findings

  • The researchers found that the different diets did indeed create unique microscopic wear patterns on the teeth. These patterns were observed using stereomicroscopy on the chewing surfaces of the teeth.
  • Differences in the number and quality of pits and scratches were observed on the chewing surfaces of the teeth. However, these differences were not always as anticipated by the research team.
  • Absolute wear was measured using computed tomography scanning on one tooth from each diet group. The wear was identified by calculating the mean height change after the simulation. It was found that with more abrasive diets, absolute wear increased.
  • Interestingly, the wear was not just caused by the plant material in the diet, but also from phytoliths (tiny silica particles produced by plants) and grit.

Implications

  • The significant revelation from the findings is that even with similar microwear patterns, the actual tooth loss could vary. This counters the assumption that microwear results can directly predict the diet or rate of tooth wear.
  • This discovery provides pertinent information for both historical and current dietary analysis. It cautions against drawing direct conclusions about diet or tooth wear rate based on microwear patterns.
  • Overall, the research emphasizes the intricate effects diet can have on dental health, with potential implications for dietary recommendations and oral health strategies in the future.

Cite This Article

APA
Karme A, Rannikko J, Kallonen A, Clauss M, Fortelius M. (2016). Mechanical modelling of tooth wear. J R Soc Interface, 13(120), 20160399. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0399

Publication

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface
ISSN: 1742-5662
NlmUniqueID: 101217269
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 13
Issue: 120
PII: 20160399

Researcher Affiliations

Karme, Aleksis
  • Department of Geosciences and Geography, Division of Biogeosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland aleksis.karme@helsinki.fi.
Rannikko, Janina
  • Department of Geosciences and Geography, Division of Biogeosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland janina.rannikko@helsinki.fi.
Kallonen, Aki
  • Department of Physics, Division of Materials Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Clauss, Marcus
  • Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Fortelius, Mikael
  • Department of Geosciences and Geography, Division of Biogeosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Mastication
  • Models, Biological
  • Molar / pathology
  • Molar / physiopathology
  • Tooth Wear / pathology
  • Tooth Wear / physiopathology

References

This article includes 50 references
  1. BAKER G, JONES LH, WARDROP ID. Cause of wear in sheeps' teeth.. Nature 1959 Nov 14;184(Suppl 20):1583-4.
    doi: 10.1038/1841583b0pubmed: 13795990google scholar: lookup
  2. Sanson GD, Kerr SA, Gross KA. Do silica phytoliths really wear mammalian teeth?. J. Archaeol. Sci. 34, 526–531.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2006.06.009google scholar: lookup
  3. Damuth J, Janis CM. On the relationship between hypsodonty and feeding ecology in ungulate mammals, and its utility in palaeoecology.. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2011 Aug;86(3):733-58.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00176.xpubmed: 21418504google scholar: lookup
  4. Lucas PW, Omar R, Al-Fadhalah K, Almusallam AS, Henry AG, Michael S, Thai LA, Watzke J, Strait DS, Atkins AG. Mechanisms and causes of wear in tooth enamel: implications for hominin diets.. J R Soc Interface 2013 Mar 6;10(80):20120923.
    doi: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0923pmc: PMC3565742pubmed: 23303220google scholar: lookup
  5. Lucas PW. The role of dust, grit and phytoliths in tooth wear. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 51, 143–152.
    doi: 10.5735/086.051.0215google scholar: lookup
  6. Xia J, Zheng J, Huang D, Tian ZR, Chen L, Zhou Z, Ungar PS, Qian L. New model to explain tooth wear with implications for microwear formation and diet reconstruction.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015 Aug 25;112(34):10669-72.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509491112pmc: PMC4553824pubmed: 26240350google scholar: lookup
  7. Maas MC. Enamel structure and microwear: an experimental study of the response of enamel to shearing force.. Am J Phys Anthropol 1991 May;85(1):31-49.
    doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330850106pubmed: 1853941google scholar: lookup
  8. Maas MC. A scanning electron-microscopic study of in vitro abrasion of mammalian tooth enamel under compressive loads.. Arch Oral Biol 1994 Jan;39(1):1-11.
    doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(94)90028-0pubmed: 8179503google scholar: lookup
  9. Danielson DR, Reinhard KJ. Human dental microwear caused by calcium oxalate phytoliths in prehistoric diet of the lower Pecos region, Texas.. Am J Phys Anthropol 1998 Nov;107(3):297-304.
    doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199811)107:3%3C297::AID-AJPA6%3E3.0.CO;2-Mpubmed: 9821494google scholar: lookup
  10. Schulz E, Piotrowski V, Clauss M, Mau M, Merceron G, Kaiser TM. Dietary abrasiveness is associated with variability of microwear and dental surface texture in rabbits.. PLoS One 2013;8(2):e56167.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056167pmc: PMC3566079pubmed: 23405263google scholar: lookup
  11. Müller J, Clauss M, Codron D, Schulz E, Hummel J, Fortelius M, Kircher P, Hatt JM. Growth and wear of incisor and cheek teeth in domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) fed diets of different abrasiveness.. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol 2014 Jun;321(5):283-98.
    doi: 10.1002/jez.1864pubmed: 24700486google scholar: lookup
  12. Müller J, Clauss M, Codron D, Schulz E, Hummel J, Kircher P, Hatt JM. Tooth length and incisal wear and growth in guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) fed diets of different abrasiveness.. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2015 Jun;99(3):591-604.
    doi: 10.1111/jpn.12226pubmed: 25041439google scholar: lookup
  13. Hoffman JM, Fraser D, Clementz MT. Controlled feeding trials with ungulates: a new application of in vivo dental molding to assess the abrasive factors of microwear.. J Exp Biol 2015 May 15;218(Pt 10):1538-47.
    doi: 10.1242/jeb.118406pubmed: 25852070google scholar: lookup
  14. Hua LC, Brandt ET, Meullenet JF, Zhou ZR, Ungar PS. Technical note: An in vitro study of dental microwear formation using the BITE Master II chewing machine.. Am J Phys Anthropol 2015 Dec;158(4):769-75.
    doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22823pubmed: 26767349google scholar: lookup
  15. Walker A, Hoeck HN, Perez L. Mecrowear of mammalian teeth as an indicator of diet.. Science 1978 Sep 8;201(4359):908-10.
    doi: 10.1126/science.684415pubmed: 684415google scholar: lookup
  16. Rensberger JM. Scanning electron microscopy of wear and occlusal events in some small herbivores. In Development, function and evolution of teeth (eds Butler PM, Joysey KA), pp. 415–438. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  17. Solounias N, Teaford M, Walker A. Interpreting the diet of extinct ruminants: the case of a non-browsing giraffid. Paleobiology 14, 287–300.
    doi: 10.1017/S009483730001201Xgoogle scholar: lookup
  18. Merceron G, Viriot L, Blondel C. Tooth microwear pattern in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) from Chizé (Western France) and relation to food composition. Small Ruminant Res. 53, 125–132.
    doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.10.002google scholar: lookup
  19. Rivals F, Takatsuki R, Albert RM, Macia L. Bamboo feeding and tooth wear of three sika deer (Cervus nippon) populations from northern Japan. J. Mamm. 95, 1043–1053.
    doi: 10.1644/14-MAMM-A-097google scholar: lookup
  20. Ryan AS. Anterior dental microwear and its relationship to diet and feeding behavior in three African primates (Pan troglodytes troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla gorilla, and Papio hamadryas). Primates 22, 533–550.
    doi: 10.1007/BF02381245google scholar: lookup
  21. Ungar PS, Grine FE, Teaford MF. Dental microwear and diet of the Plio-Pleistocene hominin Paranthropus boisei.. PLoS One 2008 Apr 30;3(4):e2044.
    doi: 10.1371/annotation/195120f0-18ee-4730-9bd6-0d6effd68fcfpmc: PMC2315797pubmed: 18446200google scholar: lookup
  22. Rodrigues HG, Merceron G, Viriot L. Dental microwear patterns of extant and extinct Muridae (Rodentia, Mammalia): ecological implications.. Naturwissenschaften 2009 Apr;96(4):537-42.
    doi: 10.1007/s00114-008-0501-xpubmed: 19127354google scholar: lookup
  23. Whitlock JA. Inferences of diplodocoid (Sauropoda: Dinosauria) feeding behavior from snout shape and microwear analyses.. PLoS One 2011 Apr 6;6(4):e18304.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018304pmc: PMC3071828pubmed: 21494685google scholar: lookup
  24. Solounias N, Sembrebon GM. Advances in the reconstruction of ungulate ecomorphology with application to early fossil equids. Am. Museum Novitates 3366, 1–49.
    doi: 10.1206/0003-0082(2002)366%3C0001:aitrou%3E2.0.co;231google scholar: lookup
  25. Teaford MF, Walker A. Quantitative differences in dental microwear between primate species with different diets and a comment on the presumed diet of Sivapithecus.. Am J Phys Anthropol 1984 Jun;64(2):191-200.
    doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330640213pubmed: 6380302google scholar: lookup
  26. Ungar PS. Dental microwear of European Miocene catarrhines: evidence for diets and tooth use. J. Hum. Evol. 31, 335–366.
    doi: 10.1006/jhev.1996.0065google scholar: lookup
  27. Karme A, Kallonen A, Galambosi S, Engström P, Fortelius M. Artificial chewing with real teeth. 72nd Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, Raleigh, NC, USA, 17–20 October 2012.
  28. Bertin T, Karme A, Fortelius M. Experimental study of dental microwear using a mechanical masticator. (M1 internship report), Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon/University of Helsinki.
  29. Wöhlbier W. Handelsfuttermittel. Band 2. Teil A Futtermittel pflanzlicher Herkunft. Stuttgart, Germany: Eugen Ulmer.
  30. Epstein E. The anomaly of silicon in plant biology.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994 Jan 4;91(1):11-7.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.1.11pmc: PMC42876pubmed: 11607449google scholar: lookup
  31. Bonin SJ, Clayton HM, Lanovaz JL, Johnston T. Comparison of mandibular motion in horses chewing hay and pellets.. Equine Vet J 2007 May;39(3):258-62.
    doi: 10.2746/042516407X157792pubmed: 17520978google scholar: lookup
  32. Merceron G, Blondel C, De Bonis L, Koufos DG, Viriot L. A new method of dental microwear analysis: application to extant primates and Ouranopithecus macedoniensis (Late Miocene of Greece). Palaios 20, 551–561.
    doi: 10.2110/palo.2004.p04-17google scholar: lookup
  33. Mihlbachler MC, Beatty BL, Caldera-Siu A, Chan D, Lee R. Error rates and observer bias in dental microwear analysis using light microscopy. Palaeontol. Electron. 15, 12A.
  34. Merceron G, Costeur L, Maridet O, Ramdarshan A, Göhlich UB. Multi-proxy approach detects heterogeneous habitats for primates during the Miocene climatic optimum in Central Europe.. J Hum Evol 2012 Jul;63(1):150-61.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.04.006pubmed: 22658333google scholar: lookup
  35. Karme A, Kallonen A, Matilainen VP, Piili H, Salminen A. Possibilities of CT scanning as analysis method in laser additive manufacturing. Phys. Proc. 78, 347–356.
    doi: 10.1016/j.phpro.2015.11.049google scholar: lookup
  36. Fraser D, Mallon JC, Furr R, Theodor JM. Improving the repeatability of low magnification microwear methods using high dynamic range imaging. Palaios 24, 818–825.
    doi: 10.2110/palo.2009.p09-064rgoogle scholar: lookup
  37. Butler P. The milk molars of the Perissodactyla, with remarks on molar occlusion. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 121, 777–817.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1952.tb00784.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  38. Fortelius M, Solounias N. Functional characterization of ungulate molars using the abrasion-attrition wear gradient: a new method for reconstructing palaeodiets. Am. Museum Noviates 3301, 1–36.
    doi: 10.1206/0003-0082(2000)301%3C0001:FCOUMU%3E2.0.CO;2google scholar: lookup
  39. Healy WB, Ludwig TG. Wear of sheep's teeth I: the role of ingested soil. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 8, 737–752.
    doi: 10.1080/00288233.1965.10423710google scholar: lookup
  40. Ludwig TG, Healy WB, Cutress TW. Wear of sheep's teeth III: seasonal variation in wear and ingested soil. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 9, 157–164.
    doi: 10.1080/00288233.1966.10420770google scholar: lookup
  41. Rabenold D, Pearson OM. Scratching the surface: a critique of Lucas et al. (2013)'s conclusion that phytoliths do not abrade enamel.. J Hum Evol 2014 Sep;74:130-133.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.02.001pubmed: 24613598google scholar: lookup
  42. Solounias N, Fortelius M, Freeman P. Molar wear rates in ruminants: a new approach. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 31, 219–227.
  43. Teaford MF, Oyen OJ. In vivo and in vitro turnover in dental microwear.. Am J Phys Anthropol 1989 Dec;80(4):447-60.
    doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330800405pubmed: 2513725google scholar: lookup
  44. Janis CM, Constable EC, Houpt KA, Streich WJ, Clauss M. Comparative ingestive mastication in domestic horses and cattle: a pilot investigation.. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2010 Dec;94(6):e402-9.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01030.xpubmed: 20662959google scholar: lookup
  45. Meyer K, Hummel J, Clauss M. The relationship between forage cell wall content and voluntary food intake in mammalian herbivores. Mamm. Rev. 40, 221–245.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2010.00161.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  46. Damuth J, Janis CM. A comparison of observed molar wear rates in extant herbivorous mammals. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 51, 188–200.
    doi: 10.5735/086.051.0219google scholar: lookup
  47. Jones ML. Longevity of mammals in captivity. Int. Zoo News 159, 16–19.
  48. Spinage CA. African ungulate life tables. Ecology 53, 645–652.
    doi: 10.2307/1934778google scholar: lookup
  49. Smuts GL. Age determination in Burchell's zebra (Equus burchelli antiquorum) from the Kruger National Park. J. S. Afr. Wildl. Manage. Assoc. 4, 103–115.
  50. Taylor LA, Müller DW, Schwitzer C, Kaiser TM, Castell JC, Clauss M, Schulz-Kornas E. Comparative analyses of tooth wear in free-ranging and captive wild equids.. Equine Vet J 2016 Mar;48(2):240-5.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12408pubmed: 25557934google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 9 times.
  1. Saarinen J, Lister AM. Fluctuating climate and dietary innovation drove ratcheted evolution of proboscidean dental traits.. Nat Ecol Evol 2023 Sep;7(9):1490-1502.
    doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02151-4pubmed: 37580434google scholar: lookup
  2. Valerio SO, Hummel J, Codron D, Hatt JM, Clauss M. The Ruminant sorting mechanism protects teeth from abrasives.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022 Dec 6;119(49):e2212447119.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.2212447119pubmed: 36459638google scholar: lookup
  3. Tamborini M. A Plea for a New Synthesis: From Twentieth-Century Paleobiology to Twenty-First-Century Paleontology and Back Again.. Biology (Basel) 2022 Jul 26;11(8).
    doi: 10.3390/biology11081120pubmed: 35892976google scholar: lookup
  4. Ledogar JA, Senck S, Villmoare BA, Smith AL, Weber GW, Richmond BG, Dechow PC, Ross CF, Grosse IR, Wright BW, Wang Q, Byron C, Benazzi S, Carlson KJ, Carlson KB, Pryor McIntosh LC, van Casteren A, Strait DS. Mechanical compensation in the evolution of the early hominin feeding apparatus.. Proc Biol Sci 2022 Jun 8;289(1976):20220711.
    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0711pubmed: 35703052google scholar: lookup
  5. Teaford MF, Ross CF, Ungar PS, Vinyard CJ, Laird MF. Grit your teeth and chew your food: Implications of food material properties and abrasives for rates of dental microwear formation in laboratory Sapajus apella (Primates).. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 2021 Dec 1;583.
    doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2021.110644pubmed: 34764513google scholar: lookup
  6. Ackermans NL, Winkler DE, Schulz-Kornas E, Kaiser TM, Martin LF, Hatt JM, Clauss M. Dental wear proxy correlation in a long-term feeding experiment on sheep (Ovis aries).. J R Soc Interface 2021 Jul;18(180):20210139.
    doi: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0139pubmed: 34283942google scholar: lookup
  7. Rodriguez-Rojas F, Borrero-Lopez O, Constantino PJ, Henry AG, Lawn BR. Phytoliths can cause tooth wear.. J R Soc Interface 2020 Nov;17(172):20200613.
    doi: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0613pubmed: 33143592google scholar: lookup
  8. van Casteren A, Lucas PW, Strait DS, Michael S, Bierwisch N, Schwarzer N, Al-Fadhalah KJ, Almusallam AS, Thai LA, Saji S, Shekeban A, Swain MV. Evidence that metallic proxies are unsuitable for assessing the mechanics of microwear formation and a new theory of the meaning of microwear.. R Soc Open Sci 2018 May;5(5):171699.
    doi: 10.1098/rsos.171699pubmed: 29892367google scholar: lookup
  9. Xia J, Tian ZR, Hua L, Chen L, Zhou Z, Qian L, Ungar PS. Enamel crystallite strength and wear: nanoscale responses of teeth to chewing loads.. J R Soc Interface 2017 Oct;14(135).
    doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0456pubmed: 29070592google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.