FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / J Anat / Morphometric study of the equine navicular bone: variations ...
Journal of anatomy1999; 193 ( Pt 4)(Pt 4); 535-549; doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19340535.x

Morphometric study of the equine navicular bone: variations with breeds and types of horse and influence of exercise.

Abstract: Navicular bones from the 4 limbs of 95 horses, classified in 9 categories, were studied. The anatomical bases were established for the morphometry of the navicular bone and its variations according to the category of horse, after corrections were made for front or rear limb, sex, weight, size and age. In ponies, navicular bone measurements were smallest for light ponies and regularly increased with body size, but in horses, navicular bone dimensions were smallest for the athletic halfbred, intermediate for draft horse, thoroughbreds and sedentary halfbreds and largest for heavy halfbreds. The athletic halfbred thus showed reduced bone dimensions when compared with other horse types. Navicular bones from 61 horses were studied histomorphometrically. Light horses and ponies possessed larger amounts of cancellous bone and less cortical bone. Draft horses and heavy ponies showed marked thickening of cortical bone with minimum intracortical porosity, and a decrease in marrow spaces associated with more trabecular bone. Two distinct zones were observed for the flexor surface cortex: an external zone composed mainly of poorly remodelled lamellar bone, disposed in a distoproximal oblique direction, and an internal zone composed mainly of secondary bone, with a lateromedial direction for haversian canals. Flexor cortex external zone tended to be smaller for heavy ponies than for the light ponies. It was the opposite for horses, with the largest amount of external zone registered for draft horses. In athletic horses, we observed an increase in the amount of cortical bone at the expense of cancellous bone which could be the result of reduced resorption and increased formation at the corticoendosteal junction. Cancellous bone was reduced for the athletic horses but the number of trabeculae and their specific surfaces were larger. Increased bone formation and reduced resorption could also account for these differences.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 1999-02-24 PubMed ID: 10029187PubMed Central: PMC1467879DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19340535.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study analyzes the variances in the size and structure of the navicular bone in horses, attributed to the breed, size, and lifestyle of the horse. It suggests that the bone’s dimensions and the proportion of cortical and cancellous bone differ depending on these factors.

Morphometry of the Navicular Bone

The study used navicular bones from all four limbs of 95 horses, which were further categorized into 9 types. It established the anatomical basis for the morphometry (measurement) of the navicular bone, noting variations in its dimensions and structure based on factors such as:

  • Type of horse – athletic halfbred, draft, thoroughbred, or heavy halfbred.
  • Physical parameters – front or rear limb, sex, weight, size, and age.

In ponies, the size of the navicular bone was found to be smallest for light ponies and increased proportionally with body size. In contrast, athletic halfbred horses were observed to have the smallest navicular bones among the horse types.

Results of the Histomorphometric Studies

A histomorphometric study of navicular bones from 61 horses showed:

  • Light horses and ponies had more cancellous bone (spongy or trabecular bone) than cortical bone (dense and hard bone that forms the outer layer).
  • Draft horses and heavy ponies had a significant thickening of the cortical bone with the least intracortical porosity (spaces within the bone). They also showed a decrease in marrow spaces in correlation with an increase in trabecular bone.
  • They identified two distinct zones on the flexor surface cortex of the bone:
    • External zone – mainly composed of poorly remodeled lamellar bone in a distoproximal oblique direction.
    • Internal zone – primarily made up of secondary bone, with haversian canals going in a lateromedial direction.

The study also identified differences in the proportions of these zones. Heavy ponies had a smaller external zone in the flexor surface cortex than light ponies. Conversely, draft horses had a larger external zone.

In athletic horses, an increase in cortical bone at the detriment of cancellous bone was observed. This could be due to reduced resorption (breaking down of the bone) and increased formation at the corticoendosteal junction (where the cortical bone meets the endosteum). The cancellous bone was reduced, but the number and specific surfaces of the trabeculae (tiny structures inside the bone) were larger. Again, this could be due to increased bone formation and reduced resorption.

Cite This Article

APA
Gabriel A, Jolly S, Detilleux J, Dessy-Doize C, Collin B, Reginster JY. (1999). Morphometric study of the equine navicular bone: variations with breeds and types of horse and influence of exercise. J Anat, 193 ( Pt 4)(Pt 4), 535-549. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19340535.x

Publication

Journal of anatomy
ISSN: 0021-8782
NlmUniqueID: 0137162
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 193 ( Pt 4)
Issue: Pt 4
Pages: 535-549

Researcher Affiliations

Gabriel, A
  • Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Belgium.
Jolly, S
    Detilleux, J
      Dessy-Doize, C
        Collin, B
          Reginster, J Y

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Breeding
            • Horses / anatomy & histology
            • Horses / genetics
            • Physical Conditioning, Animal
            • Tarsal Bones / anatomy & histology

            References

            This article includes 48 references
            1. Hickman J. Navicular disease--what are we talking about?. Equine Vet J 1989 Nov;21(6):395-8.
              pubmed: 2686969doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1989.tb02182.xgoogle scholar: lookup
            2. Verschooten F, Roels J, Lampo P, Desmet P, De Moor A, Picavet T. Radiographic measurement from the lateromedial projection of the equine foot with navicular disease.. Res Vet Sci 1989 Jan;46(1):15-21.
              pubmed: 2922500
            3. Jensen KS, Mosekilde L, Mosekilde L. A model of vertebral trabecular bone architecture and its mechanical properties.. Bone 1990;11(6):417-23.
              pubmed: 2078435doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(90)90137-ngoogle scholar: lookup
            4. Rubin CT, McLeod KJ, Bain SD. Functional strains and cortical bone adaptation: epigenetic assurance of skeletal integrity.. J Biomech 1990;23 Suppl 1:43-54.
              pubmed: 2081744doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(90)90040-agoogle scholar: lookup
            5. Goldstein SA, Matthews LS, Kuhn JL, Hollister SJ. Trabecular bone remodeling: an experimental model.. J Biomech 1991;24 Suppl 1:135-50.
              pubmed: 1791174doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(91)90384-ygoogle scholar: lookup
            6. Martin RB. Determinants of the mechanical properties of bones.. J Biomech 1991;24 Suppl 1:79-88.
              pubmed: 1842337doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(91)90379-2google scholar: lookup
            7. Mathiasen FO, Gundersen HJ, Maunsbach AB, Skriver E. Surface areas of basolateral membranes in renal distal tubules estimated by vertical sections.. J Microsc 1991 Dec;164(Pt 3):247-61.
              pubmed: 1795384doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1991.tb03211.xgoogle scholar: lookup
            8. Savage CJ, Tidd LC, Melsen F, Jeffcott LB, Ostblom L. Bone biopsy in the horse. 2. Evaluation of histomorphometric examination.. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A 1991 Dec;38(10):784-92.
              pubmed: 1796681doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.1991.tb01079.xgoogle scholar: lookup
            9. McCarthy RN, Jeffcott LB. Effects of treadmill exercise on cortical bone in the third metacarpus of young horses.. Res Vet Sci 1992 Jan;52(1):28-37.
              pubmed: 1553435doi: 10.1016/0034-5288(92)90054-6google scholar: lookup
            10. Berry CR, Pool RR, Stover S, O'Brien TR, Koblik PD. Radiographic/morphologic investigation of a radiolucent crescent within the flexor central eminence of the navicular bone in thoroughbreds.. Am J Vet Res 1992 Sep;53(9):1604-11.
              pubmed: 1416363
            11. Pleasant RS, Baker GJ, Foreman JH, Eurell JA, Losonsky JM. Intraosseous pressure and pathologic changes in horses with navicular disease.. Am J Vet Res 1993 Jan;54(1):7-12.
              pubmed: 8427474
            12. Wright IM, Douglas J. Biomechanical considerations in the treatment of navicular disease.. Vet Rec 1993 Jul 31;133(5):109-14.
              pubmed: 8212500doi: 10.1136/vr.133.5.109google scholar: lookup
            13. Yeh JK, Aloia JF, Chen MM, Tierney JM, Sprintz S. Influence of exercise on cancellous bone of the aged female rat.. J Bone Miner Res 1993 Sep;8(9):1117-25.
              pubmed: 8237482doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650080913google scholar: lookup
            14. Leach DH. Treatment and pathogenesis of navicular disease ('syndrome') in horses.. Equine Vet J 1993 Nov;25(6):477-81.
              pubmed: 8275993doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1993.tb02997.xgoogle scholar: lookup
            15. Wright IM. A study of 118 cases of navicular disease: treatment by navicular suspensory desmotomy.. Equine Vet J 1993 Nov;25(6):501-9.
              pubmed: 8275996doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1993.tb03001.xgoogle scholar: lookup
            16. Chen MM, Yeh JK, Aloia JF, Tierney JM, Sprintz S. Effect of treadmill exercise on tibial cortical bone in aged female rats: a histomorphometry and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry study.. Bone 1994 May-Jun;15(3):313-9.
              pubmed: 8068453doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(94)90294-1google scholar: lookup
            17. Dik KJ, van den Broek J. Role of navicular bone shape in the pathogenesis of navicular disease: a radiological study.. Equine Vet J 1995 Sep;27(5):390-3.
              pubmed: 8654355doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb04075.xgoogle scholar: lookup
            18. Jeffcott LB, Buckingham SH, McCarthy RN, Cleeland JC, Scotti E, McCartney RN. Non-invasive measurement of bone: a review of clinical and research applications in the horse.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1988 Sep;(6):71-9.
              pubmed: 9079066doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1988.tb04651.xgoogle scholar: lookup
            19. McCarthy RN, Jeffcott LB. Monitoring the effects of treadmill exercise on bone by non-invasive means during a progressive fitness programme.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1988 Sep;(6):88-92.
              pubmed: 9079068doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1988.tb04653.xgoogle scholar: lookup
            20. Lanyon LE. The physiological basis of training the skeleton. The Sir Frederick Smith Memorial Lecture.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1990 Jun;(9):8-13.
              pubmed: 9259799doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1990.tb04727.xgoogle scholar: lookup
            21. Gabriel A, Yousfi S, Detilleux J, Dessy-Doizé C, Bernard C. Morphometric study of the equine navicular bone: comparisons between fore and rear limbs.. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A 1997 Dec;44(9-10):579-94.
              pubmed: 9465778doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.1997.tb01144.xgoogle scholar: lookup
            22. Dhem A. [Boring of the Haversian canals].. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1965 Oct-Nov;51(7):583-93.
              pubmed: 4221568
            23. Whitehouse WJ, Dyson ED, Jackson CK. The scanning electron microscope in studies of trabecular bone from a human vertebral body.. J Anat 1971 Apr;108(Pt 3):481-96.
              pubmed: 4930228
            24. Wintzer HJ, Dämmrich K. [Pathogenesis of the so-called navicular disease in horses].. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 1971 Jun 15;84(12):221-5.
              pubmed: 5103956
            25. Colles CM, Hickman J. The arterial supply of the navicular bone and its variations in navicular disease.. Equine Vet J 1977 Jul;9(3):150-4.
              pubmed: 891518doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1977.tb04009.xgoogle scholar: lookup
            26. Schryver HF. Bending properties of cortical bone of the horse.. Am J Vet Res 1978 Jan;39(1):25-8.
              pubmed: 629446
            27. Woo SL, Kuei SC, Amiel D, Gomez MA, Hayes WC, White FC, Akeson WH. The effect of prolonged physical training on the properties of long bone: a study of Wolff's Law.. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981 Jun;63(5):780-7.
              pubmed: 7240300
            28. Lanyon LE, Goodship AE, Pye CJ, MacFie JH. Mechanically adaptive bone remodelling.. J Biomech 1982;15(3):141-54.
              pubmed: 7096367doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(82)90246-9google scholar: lookup
            29. Ostblom L, Lund C, Melsen F. Histological study of navicular bone disease.. Equine Vet J 1982 Jul;14(3):199-202.
              pubmed: 7106082doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1982.tb02391.xgoogle scholar: lookup
            30. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE. Limb mechanics as a function of speed and gait: a study of functional strains in the radius and tibia of horse and dog.. J Exp Biol 1982 Dec;101:187-211.
              pubmed: 7166694doi: 10.1242/jeb.101.1.187google scholar: lookup
            31. Colles C. Navicular disease and its treatment.. In Pract 1982 Mar;4(2):29-36.
              pubmed: 7186885doi: 10.1136/inpract.4.2.29google scholar: lookup
            32. Parfitt AM, Mathews CH, Villanueva AR, Kleerekoper M, Frame B, Rao DS. Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss.. J Clin Invest 1983 Oct;72(4):1396-409.
              pubmed: 6630513doi: 10.1172/JCI111096google scholar: lookup
            33. Gibson LJ. The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone.. J Biomech 1985;18(5):317-28.
              pubmed: 4008502doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(85)90287-8google scholar: lookup
            34. Matsuda JJ, Zernicke RF, Vailas AC, Pedrini VA, Pedrini-Mille A, Maynard JA. Structural and mechanical adaptation of immature bone to strenuous exercise.. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1986 Jun;60(6):2028-34.
              pubmed: 3722069doi: 10.1152/jappl.1986.60.6.2028google scholar: lookup
            35. MacGregor CM. Radiographic assessment of navicular bones, based on changes in the distal nutrient foramina.. Equine Vet J 1986 May;18(3):203-6.
              pubmed: 3732240doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1986.tb03599.xgoogle scholar: lookup
            36. Pool RR, Meagher DM, Stover SM. Pathophysiology of navicular syndrome.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1989 Apr;5(1):109-29.
              pubmed: 2650826doi: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30606-5google scholar: lookup
            37. Martin RB, Ishida J. The relative effects of collagen fiber orientation, porosity, density, and mineralization on bone strength.. J Biomech 1989;22(5):419-26.
              pubmed: 2777816doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(89)90202-9google scholar: lookup
            38. Raub RH, Jackson SG, Baker JP. The effect of exercise on bone growth and development in weanling horses.. J Anim Sci 1989 Oct;67(10):2508-14.
              pubmed: 2808156doi: 10.2527/jas1989.67102508xgoogle scholar: lookup
            39. Baddeley AJ, Gundersen HJ, Cruz-Orive LM. Estimation of surface area from vertical sections.. J Microsc 1986 Jun;142(Pt 3):259-76.
              pubmed: 3735415doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1986.tb04282.xgoogle scholar: lookup
            40. Mosekilde L, Mosekilde L, Danielsen CC. Biomechanical competence of vertebral trabecular bone in relation to ash density and age in normal individuals.. Bone 1987;8(2):79-85.
              pubmed: 3593611doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(87)90074-3google scholar: lookup
            41. Carter DR, Fyhrie DP, Whalen RT. Trabecular bone density and loading history: regulation of connective tissue biology by mechanical energy.. J Biomech 1987;20(8):785-94.
              pubmed: 3654678doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90058-3google scholar: lookup
            42. Frost HM. Bone "mass" and the "mechanostat": a proposal.. Anat Rec 1987 Sep;219(1):1-9.
              pubmed: 3688455doi: 10.1002/ar.1092190104google scholar: lookup
            43. Carter DR. Mechanical loading history and skeletal biology.. J Biomech 1987;20(11-12):1095-109.
              pubmed: 3323201doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90027-3google scholar: lookup
            44. Gundersen HJ, Jensen EB. The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction.. J Microsc 1987 Sep;147(Pt 3):229-63.
              pubmed: 3430576doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1987.tb02837.xgoogle scholar: lookup
            45. Currey JD. The effect of porosity and mineral content on the Young's modulus of elasticity of compact bone.. J Biomech 1988;21(2):131-9.
              pubmed: 3350827doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(88)90006-1google scholar: lookup
            46. Müller-Gerbl M, Schulte E, Putz R. The thickness of the calcified layer of articular cartilage: a function of the load supported?. J Anat 1987 Oct;154:103-11.
              pubmed: 3446655
            47. Michel RP, Cruz-Orive LM. Application of the Cavalieri principle and vertical sections method to lung: estimation of volume and pleural surface area.. J Microsc 1988 May;150(Pt 2):117-36.
              pubmed: 3411604doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1988.tb04603.xgoogle scholar: lookup
            48. Ostblom L, Lund C, Melsen F. Navicular bone disease: a comparative histomorphometric study.. Equine Vet J 1989 Nov;21(6):431-3.
              pubmed: 2591358doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1989.tb02189.xgoogle scholar: lookup

            Citations

            This article has been cited 2 times.
            1. Paśko S, Dzierzęcka M, Purzyc H, Charuta A, Barszcz K, Bartyzel BJ, Komosa M. The Osteometry of Equine Third Phalanx by the Use of Three-Dimensional Scanning: New Measurement Possibilities.. Scanning 2017;2017:1378947.
              doi: 10.1155/2017/1378947pubmed: 29109801google scholar: lookup
            2. Gabrie A, Detilleux J, Jolly S, Reginster J-Y, Collin B, Dessy-Doizé C. Morphometric study of the equine navicular bone: age-related changes and influence of exercise.. Vet Res Commun 1999 Jan;23(1):15-40.
              doi: 10.1023/a:1006102921304pubmed: 10905816google scholar: lookup
            Subscribe to our newsletter
            Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.