FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Equine veterinary journal2021; 54(2); 334-346; doi: 10.1111/evj.13453

Movement asymmetries in horses presented for prepurchase or lameness examination.

Abstract: The increasing popularity of objective gait analysis makes application in prepurchase examinations (PPE) a logical next step. Therefore, there is a need to have more understanding of asymmetry during a PPE in horses described on clinical evaluation as subtly lame. Objective: The objective of this study is to objectively compare asymmetry in horses raising minor vet concerns in a PPE and in horses raising major vet concerns with that found in horses presented with subtle single-limb lameness, and to investigate the effect of age/discipline on the clinicians' interpretation of asymmetry on the classification of minor vet concerns in a PPE. Methods: Clinical case-series. Methods: Horses presented for PPE (n = 98) or subjectively evaluated as single limb low-grade (1-2/5) lame (n = 24, 13 forelimb lame, 11 hindlimb lame), from the patient population of a single clinic, were enrolled in the study provided that owners were willing to participate. Horses undergoing PPE were assigned a classification of having minor vet concerns (n = 84) or major vet concerns (n = 14) based on findings during the dynamic-orthopaedic part of the PPE. Lame horses were only included if pain-related lameness was confirmed by an objective improvement after diagnostic analgesia exceeding daily variation determined for equine symmetry parameters using optical motion capture. Clinical evaluation was performed by six different clinicians, each with ≥8 years of equine orthopaedic experience. Vertical movement symmetry was measured using optical motion capture, simultaneously with the orthopaedic examination. Data were analysed using previously described parameters and mixed model analysis and least squares means were used to calculate differences between groups. Results: There was no effect of age or discipline on the levels of asymmetry within PPE horses raising minor vet concerns. MinDiff and RUD of the head discriminated between forelimb lame and PPE horses raising minor vet concerns; MinDiff, MaxDiff, RUD of the Pelvis, HHDswing and HHDstance did so for hindlimb lameness. Two lameness patterns differentiated both forelimb and hindlimb lame from PPE horses with minor vet concerns: RUD Poll + MinDiff Withers - RUD Pelvis and RUD Pelvis + RUD Poll - MinDiff Withers. Correcting for vertical range of motion enabled differentiation of PPE horses with minor vet concerns from PPE horses with major vet concerns. Conclusions: Objective data only based on trot on soft surface, limited number of PPE horses with major vet concerns. Conclusions: Combinations of kinematic parameters discriminate between PPE horses with minor vet concerns and subtly lame horses, though overlap exists.
© 2021 The Authors. Equine Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of EVJ Ltd.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-06-09 PubMed ID: 33862666PubMed Central: PMC9291531DOI: 10.1111/evj.13453Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates the application of objective gait analysis in prepurchase examinations (PPE) of horses, specifically to understand asymmetry in subtly lame horses. The study compares asymmetry in horses raising minor and major vet concerns with horses showing single-limb lameness and examines the effects of age and discipline on the interpretation of asymmetry.

Methodology

  • The study was a clinical case-series involving 98 horses presented for PPE and 24 evaluated as single limb low-grade lame.
  • Data collection was done at a single clinic and participation was voluntary.
  • Horses undergoing PPE were classified based on the findings during the dynamic-orthopaedic part of the PPE as having either minor vet concerns or major vet concerns.
  • Only lame horses confirmed to have pain-related lameness that showed an objective improvement after diagnostic analgesia were included in the study.
  • Clinical evaluations were done by six different clinicians, each with more than eight years of equine orthopaedic experience.
  • Asymmetry was measured using optical motion capture, simultaneously with the orthopaedic examination.
  • Data were analysed using previously described parameters and a mixed model analysis.
  • Mean differences between groups were calculated using least squares.

Results

  • The study found that neither age nor discipline had any effect on the levels of asymmetry in PPE horses with minor vet concerns.
  • Different parameters of the head and pelvis movements were found capable of discriminating between forelimb lame and PPE horses raising minor vet concerns.
  • Certain lameness patterns were found to differentiate both forelimb and hindlimb lame from PPE horses with minor vet concerns.
  • Correcting for vertical range of motion enabled differentiation of PPE horses with minor vet concerns from those with major vet concerns.

Conclusion

  • The study concluded that combinations of kinematic parameters can discriminate between PPE horses with minor vet concerns and subtly lame horses, though overlap exists.
  • It is also indicated that more data collected on a soft surface trot and from PPE horses with major vet concerns may be necessary.

Cite This Article

APA
Hardeman AM, Egenvall A, Serra Bragança FM, Koene MHW, Swagemakers JH, Roepstorff L, van Weeren R, Byström A. (2021). Movement asymmetries in horses presented for prepurchase or lameness examination. Equine Vet J, 54(2), 334-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13453

Publication

Equine veterinary journal
ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 54
Issue: 2
Pages: 334-346

Researcher Affiliations

Hardeman, Aagje M
  • Tierklinik Luesche GmbH, Luesche, Germany.
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Egenvall, Agneta
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Serra Bragança, Filipe M
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Koene, Marc H W
  • Tierklinik Luesche GmbH, Luesche, Germany.
Swagemakers, Jan-Hein
  • Tierklinik Luesche GmbH, Luesche, Germany.
Roepstorff, Lars
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
van Weeren, Rene
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Byström, Anna
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Forelimb
  • Gait
  • Hindlimb
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horses
  • Lameness, Animal / diagnosis
  • Movement

Conflict of Interest Statement

No competing interests have been declared.

References

This article includes 34 references
  1. Welker MA. Industry Standards for Sport Horse Pre‐Purchase Examination in the United States. Proc Am Assoc Equine Practnrs 2018;64:256–8.
  2. Swagemakers JH. Equine Pre‐Purchase Examinations in the Sport Horse between Europe and the United States. Proc Am Assoc Equine Practnrs 2018;64:269–72.
  3. Werner HW. Prepurchase Examination in Ambulatory Equine Practice. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2012;28:207–47.
    pubmed: 22640588
  4. Vaughan J. The equine prepurchase examination. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007;231:1492–3.
    pubmed: 18020987
  5. Neuhaus L. Ursachen für Schadensersatzansprüche gegenüber Tierärzten nach Kaufuntersuchungen beim Pferd ‐ Eine Untersuchung von 189 Schadensfällen aus den Jahren 1978–2005. .
  6. Arkell M, Archer RM, Guitian FJ, May SA. Evidence of bias affecting the interpretation of the results of local anaesthetic nerve blocks when assessing lameness in horses. Vet Rec 2006;159:346–9.
    pubmed: 16963714
  7. Keegan KG. Evidence‐based lameness detection and quantification. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2007;23:403–23.
    pubmed: 17616320
  8. Parkes RSV, Weller R, Groth AM, May S, Pfau T. Evidence of the development of ‘domain‐restricted’ expertise in the recognition of asymmetric motion characteristics of hindlimb lameness in the horse. Equine Vet J 2009;41:112–7.
    pubmed: 19418737
  9. Dyson S. Recognition of lameness: Man versus machine. Vet J 2014;201:245–8.
    pubmed: 24923757
  10. Serra Bragança FM, Rhodin M, van Weeren PR. On the brink of daily clinical application of objective gait analysis: What evidence do we have so far from studies using an induced lameness model?. Vet J 2018;234:11–23.
    pubmed: 29680381
  11. Ishihara A, Reed SM, Rajala‐Schultz PJ, Robertson JT, Bertone AL. Use of kinetic gait analysis for detection, quantification, and differentiation of hind limb lameness and spinal ataxia in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2009;234:644–51.
    pubmed: 19250044
  12. Starke SD, Willems E, May SA, Pfau T. Vertical head and trunk movement adaptations of sound horses trotting in a circle on a hard surface. Vet J 2012;193:73–80.
    pubmed: 22104508
  13. Byström A, Egenvall A, Roepstroff L, Rhodin M, Serra Bragança FM, Hernlund E. Biomechanical findings in horses showing asymmetrical vertical excursions of the withers at walk. PLoS One 2018;13:1–15.
    pmc: PMC6160136pubmed: 30261019
  14. Rhodin M, Roepstorff L, French A, Keegan KG, Pfau T, Egenvall A. Head and pelvic movement asymmetry during lungeing in horses with symmetrical movement on the straight. Equine Vet J 2015;48:315–20.
    pmc: PMC5032979pubmed: 25808700
  15. Hardeman AM, Serra Braganca FM, Swagemakers JH, van Weeren PR, Roepstorff L. Variation in gait parameters used for objective lameness assessment in sound horses at the trot on the straight line and the lunge. Equine Vet J 2019;51:831–9.
    pmc: PMC6850282pubmed: 30648286
  16. Keegan KG, Kramer J, Yonezawa Y, Maki H, Frank Pai P, Dent EV. Assessment of repeatability of a wireless, inertial sensor‐based lameness evaluation system for horses. Am J Vet Res 2011;72:1156–63.
    pubmed: 21879972
  17. Ishihara A, Bertone AL, Rajala‐Schultz PJ. Association between subjective lameness grade and kinetic gait parameters in horses with experimentally induced forelimb lameness. Am J Vet Res 2005;66:1805–15.
    pubmed: 16273915
  18. Weishaupt MA, Wiestner T, Hogg HP, Jordan P, Auer JA. Vertical ground reaction force‐time histories of sound Warmblood horses trotting on a treadmill. Vet J 2004;168:304–11.
    pubmed: 15501148
  19. AAEP. Guide to veterinary services for horse shows, 7th edn. Lexington, Kentucky, USA: American Association of Equine Practitioners; 1999.
  20. Serra Bragança FM, Roepstorff C, Rhodin M, Pfau T, van Weeren PR, Roepstorff L. Quantitative lameness assessment in the horse based on upper body movement symmetry: The effect of different filtering techniques on the quantification of motion symmetry. Biomed Signal Process Control 2020;57:1–12.
  21. Roepstorff C, Dittman MT, Arpagaus S, Serra Bragança FM, Hardeman AM, Persson‐Sjödin E. Reliable and clinically applicable gait event classification using upper body markers in walking and trotting horses. J Biomech 2021;114:1–8.
    pubmed: 33290946
  22. Reed SK, Kramer J, Thombs L, Pitts JB, Wilson DA, Keegan KG. Comparison of results for body‐mounted inertial sensor assessment with final lameness determination in 1,224 equids. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2020;256:590–9.
    pubmed: 32068513
  23. Rhodin M, Persson‐Sjodin E, Egenvall A, Serra Bragança FM, Pfau T, Roepstorff L. Vertical movement symmetry of the withers in horses with induced forelimb and hindlimb lameness at trot. Equine Vet J 2018;50:818–24.
    pmc: PMC6175082pubmed: 29658147
  24. Serra Bragança FM, Brommer H, van den Belt AJM, Maree JTM, van Weeren PR, van Oldruitenborgh‐Oosterbaan MMS. Subjective and objective evaluations of horses for fit‐to‐compete or unfit‐to‐compete judgement. Vet J 2020;257:1–5.
    pubmed: 32546354
  25. Bathe AP, Judy CE, Dyson S. Letter to the Editor: Do we have to redefine lameness in the era of quantitative gait analysis?. Equine Vet J 2018;50:273.
    pubmed: 29281124
  26. Keegan KG, MacAllister CG, Wilson DA, Gedon CA, Kramer J, Yonezawa Y. Comparison of an inertial sensor system with a stationary force plate for evaluation of horses with bilateral forelimb lameness. Am J Vet Res 2012;73:368–74.
    pubmed: 22369528
  27. Keegan KG, Wilson DA, Kramer J, Reed SK, Yonezawa Y, Maki H. Comparison of a body‐mounted inertial sensor system‐based method with subjective evaluation for detection of lameness in horses. Am J Vet Res 2013;74:17–24.
    pubmed: 23270341
  28. Buchner HH, Savelberg HH, Schamhardt HC, Barneveld A. Head and trunk movement adaptations in horses with experimentally induced fore‐ or hindlimb lameness. Equine Vet J 1996;28:71–6.
    pubmed: 8565958
  29. Pfau T, Spicer‐Jenkins C, Smith RK, Bolt DM, Fiske‐Jackson A, Witte TH. Identifying optimal parameters for quantification of changes in pelvic movement symmetry as a response to diagnostic analgesia in the hindlimbs of horses. Equine Vet J 2014;46:759–63.
    pubmed: 24329685
  30. Pfau T, Boultbee H, Davis H, Walker A, Rhodin M. Agreement between two inertial sensor gait analysis systems for lameness examinations in horses. Equine Vet Educ 2016;28:203–8.
  31. Rhodin M, Egenvall A, Andersen PH, Pfau T. Head and pelvic movement asymmetries at trot in riding horses in training and perceived as free from lameness by the owner. PLoS One 2017;12:e0176253.
    pmc: PMC5404851pubmed: 28441406
  32. Peham C, Licka T, Girtler D, Scheidl M. The influence of lameness on equine stride length consistency. Vet J 2001;162:153–7.
    pubmed: 11531399
  33. van Weeren PR, Pfau T, Rhodin M, Roepstorff L, Serra Bragança FM, Weishaupt MA. What is lameness and what (or who) is the gold standard to detect it?. Equine Vet J 2018;50:549–51.
    pubmed: 29953639
  34. Erdmann S. Klinische und radiologische Verlaufsuntersuchung an den Strahlbeinen der Vorderextremitäten von Pferden ‐ Ein hinweis auf Entwicklung und klinische Relevanz von Befunden in Bezug auf den Röntgenleitfaden 2007 (RöLF 07). 2009.

Citations

This article has been cited 8 times.
  1. Meistro F, Ralletti MV, Rinnovati R, Spadari A. Objective Evaluation of Gait Asymmetries in Traditional Racehorses During Pre-Race Inspection: Application of a Markerless AI System in Straight-Line and Lungeing Conditions. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jun 18;15(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15121797pubmed: 40564348google scholar: lookup
  2. Haussler KK, le Jeune SS, MacKechnie-Guire R, Latif SN, Clayton HM. The Challenge of Defining Laterality in Horses: Is It Laterality or Just Asymmetry?. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jan 21;15(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15030288pubmed: 39943060google scholar: lookup
  3. Esselman AM, Johnson SA, Frisbie DD, Barrett MF, Zhou T, Contino EK. Substantial variability exists in the interpretation of survey radiographs among equine veterinarians. Equine Vet J 2025 Jan;57(1):169-182.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14045pubmed: 38194693google scholar: lookup
  4. Macaire C, Hanne-Poujade S, De Azevedo E, Denoix JM, Coudry V, Jacquet S, Bertoni L, Tallaj A, Audigié F, Hatrisse C, Hébert C, Martin P, Marin F, Chateau H. Asymmetry Thresholds Reflecting the Visual Assessment of Forelimb Lameness on Circles on a Hard Surface. Animals (Basel) 2023 Oct 25;13(21).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13213319pubmed: 37958073google scholar: lookup
  5. Egenvall A, Clayton HM, Byström A. Pilot study of locomotor asymmetry in horses walking in circles with and without a rider. PeerJ 2023;11:e16373.
    doi: 10.7717/peerj.16373pubmed: 37933258google scholar: lookup
  6. Byström A, Hardeman AM, Engell MT, Swagemakers JH, Koene MHW, Serra-Bragança FM, Rhodin M, Hernlund E. Normal variation in pelvic roll motion pattern during straight-line trot in hand in warmblood horses. Sci Rep 2023 Oct 10;13(1):17117.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44223-2pubmed: 37816848google scholar: lookup
  7. Macaire C, Hanne-Poujade S, De Azevedo E, Denoix JM, Coudry V, Jacquet S, Bertoni L, Tallaj A, Audigié F, Hatrisse C, Hébert C, Martin P, Marin F, Chateau H. Investigation of Thresholds for Asymmetry Indices to Represent the Visual Assessment of Single Limb Lameness by Expert Veterinarians on Horses Trotting in a Straight Line. Animals (Basel) 2022 Dec 11;12(24).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12243498pubmed: 36552418google scholar: lookup
  8. Hardeman AM, Egenvall A, Serra Bragança FM, Swagemakers JH, Koene MHW, Roepstorff L, van Weeren R, Byström A. Visual lameness assessment in comparison to quantitative gait analysis data in horses. Equine Vet J 2022 Nov;54(6):1076-1085.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13545pubmed: 34913524google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,928 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.