Non-isotopic immunoassay drug tests in racing horses: a review of their application to pre- and post-race testing, drug quantitation, and human drug testing.
Abstract: We have introduced large scale non-isotopic immunoassay testing into pre- and post-race drug testing in racehorses. The technologies utilized are Particle Concentration Fluorescence Immuno Assay (PCFIA) and the one-step Enzyme Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay (ELISA). These technologies are rapid, inexpensive, and highly effective. On introduction into post-race testing in the Western United States, these ELISA tests exposed several previously undetected patterns of drug abuse. The drugs detected were buprenorphine, oxymorphone, mazindol, sufentanil and cocaine. This led to the suspension of a large number of trainers and exposed the high false negative rate of thin layer chromatography (TLC) based testing. More recently, we have introduced both PCFIA and ELISA assays into pre- and post-race testing in Illinois. Within days, our pre-race PCFIA tests detected signs of acepromazine abuse. Directed searches of post-race urines from these horses showed evidence for acepromazine metabolites in the urine of these horses. Examination of frozen samples from associated horses yielded about 70 ELISA "positives" for acepromazine. To date, about 25 of these ELISA "positives" have been confirmed by mass spectrometry. We have also raised antibodies to phenylbutazone and furosemide to enable rapid and inexpensive quantitation of these permitted medications. Furosemide is a particular problem since its use requires a pre-race detention barn. For furosemide, we have developed a regulatory schedule based on our immunoassay test that allows elimination of the detention barn. For phenylbutazone, we have developed a similar immunoassay that allows rapid and inexpensive quantitation of this drug in blood. To enable racing authorities to test jockeys and other racetrack personnel, we have adapted PCFIA technology to human drug testing, and a full range of very sensitive tests for human drugs of abuse is available. These immunoassays are sufficiently sensitive to control abuse of the most potent drugs available to horsemen. In principle, an immunoassay can be raised to any drug within about six months, and made available worldwide at competitive rates. It appears clear that these non-isotopic immunoassays provide racing with the only technological basis that is sufficiently sensitive to detect the most potent abused drugs pre- and post-race, and has the flexibility to be readily adaptable to different drugs. Because of the high false negative rate generated by TLC, credible pre- and post-race testing programs cannot be based on TLC alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Publication Date: 1988-12-01 PubMed ID: 3065859
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Comparative Study
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
- Diagnosis
- Diagnostic Technique
- Disease control
- Disease Diagnosis
- Disease Etiology
- Disease Management
- Disease Outbreaks
- Disease Prevention
- Disease Surveillance
- Disease Transmission
- Disease Treatment
- Drug
- Equine Health
- Horse Racing
- Horses
- Infectious Disease
- Public Health
- Veterinary Care
- Veterinary Medicine
- Veterinary Procedure
- Veterinary Research
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research explores the use of non-isotopic immunoassay testing methods in the detection of drug use in racehorses, both before and after races. The methods proved effective in uncovering previously overlooked drug abuse patterns, and can also be adapted for use in human drug testing.
Methodology
- The researchers used two technologies in their testing – Particle Concentration Fluorescence Immuno Assay (PCFIA) and Enzyme Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay (ELISA).
- Both methods were found to be fast, cost-effective, and extremely accurate in detecting several types of illicit substances in horses.
- The drugs these tests were successful in identifying included buprenorphine, oxymorphone, mazindol, sufentanil, and cocaine. These were all being used to gain competitive advantage in horse racing, yet went undetected by the previously-used thin layer chromatography (TLC) testing.
Results and Findings
- The introduction of these testing methods in the Western United States uncovered several patterns of drug abuse among racehorses that had previously gone unnoticed. This led to the suspension of a large number of trainers.
- The poor performance of TLC tests was highlighted by the high rate of false negatives they produced in comparison to the ELISA tests.
- In Illinois, pre-race testing using PCFIA methods discovered signs of acepromazine abuse. Once these horses were identified, post-race samples of their urine confirmed the presence of acepromazine metabolites.
- The researchers also used these tests to quantify permitted medications, phenylbutazone and furosemide, in a fast and cost-effective manner.
- For the drug furosemide, a schedule was developed using immunoassay tests that eliminated the need for a detention barn prior to the race. Similarly, a quick and inexpensive quantitation of phenylbutazone in the blood was achieved using these tests.
Adaption for Human Drug Testing
- The researchers were also able to adapt PCFIA technology for human drug testing, enabling racing authorities to test jockeys and other staff for drug usage.
- These immunoassays were sensitive enough to detect and thus control the abuse of even the most potent drugs available to racehorse trainers.
- In principle, these tests could be developed for any drug within a six-month period, and distributed globally at competitive prices.
- The researchers concluded that non-isotopic immunoassays are the only technological tool sensitive and flexible enough to detect the most potent abused drugs before and after matches, and can be easily adaptable to different drugs.
- Because TLC tests generate a high amount of false negatives, the researchers argue that they are not a credible basis for pre- and post-race testing programs.
Cite This Article
APA
Tobin T, Watt DS, Kwiatkowski S, Tai HH, Blake JW, McDonald J, Prange CA, Wie S.
(1988).
Non-isotopic immunoassay drug tests in racing horses: a review of their application to pre- and post-race testing, drug quantitation, and human drug testing.
Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol, 62(3), 371-395.
Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Maxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40546-0099.
MeSH Terms
- Acepromazine / urine
- Animals
- Chromatography, Thin Layer
- Diagnostic Errors
- Doping in Sports / legislation & jurisprudence
- Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
- Evaluation Studies as Topic
- Fluorescent Antibody Technique
- Furosemide / urine
- Horses
- Humans
- Illinois
- Immunoassay
- Phenylbutazone / urine
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists