Analyze Diet
The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice1988; 4(3); 493-513; doi: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30625-9

Normal and cryptorchid castration.

Abstract: Surgical exploration of the horse that has presumably had a normal castration or a previously successful cryptorchid surgery remains a distinct challenge. No hard and fast rules dictate a proper course of action for each case. If a horse was anesthetized for routine castration, discovered to have only one scrotal testis, had a brief exploratory on the nondescended side and was recovered, trauma to the inguinal region would probably be sufficiently minimal that an inguinal approach could be used at subsequent exploratory surgery. If the inguinal canal was extensively manipulated and the tail of the epididymis was inadvertently removed, however, one of the alternate approaches would be advisable. Where previous history is unknown, external and rectal palpation, hormonal assays, and careful evaluation of the scrotal/inguinal scars under anesthesia are advisable prior to proceeding with a specific course of action. As previously cited, "one hopes for the best but prepares for the worst." Where inguinal canals are being explored in the supposedly previously castrated horse that still has aggressive male behavior, the surgeon is searching for vaginal process and contents or the stump of the spermatic cord. If the stump is identified to suggest complete previous castration, the stump should contain cremaster muscle, parietal vaginal tunic, testicular vessels, and ductus deferens. If a second nonvascular tubular structure is found but no testicular vessels are found, the tail of the epididymis was inadvertently removed and assumed to be hypoplastic testis. This determination can be difficult to make on gross observation of the stump. Again, a thorough case workup helps one plan in advance for what should be found at surgery.
Publication Date: 1988-12-01 PubMed ID: 2905205DOI: 10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30625-9Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research discusses the challenges in surgical exploration of horses who have undergone normal castration, or previously successful cryptorchid surgeries, and the ways to determine an appropriate approach for each case.

Objective Of Research

  • The research primarily attempts to portray the challenges encountered in the surgical exploration of horses that have either had a normal castration or a previously successful crypto-engineering surgery.
  • The researchers examine different situations that might arise and the most apt course of action to undertake in each of these cases.

Approach To Different Scenarios

  • If the horse was anesthetized for routine castration, and only a single scrotal testis was found, a brief exploration of the non-descended side can be performed. In this scenario, if the trauma to the inguinal region is minimal, subsequent surgery can apply an inguinal approach.
  • However, if the inguinal canal was extensively manipulated or the tail of the epididymis was accidentally removed, alternative approaches would be preferred.

Evaluation & Preoperation Measures

  • When no previous history is available, the researchers advise for external and rectal palpation, hormonal assays, and thorough evaluation of the scrotal/inguinal scars under anesthesia.
  • This evaluation is deemed necessary to determine the proper course of action. The researchers refer to being “prepared for the worst” in such cases.

Exploration of the Inguinal Canal

  • During exploration of inguinal canals in voraciously male behaving horses, even after supposed castration, the surgeon looks for vaginal process, contents, or the stump of the spermatic cord.
  • If the stump suggests complete prior castration, it should contain the cremaster muscle, parietal vaginal tunic, testicular vessels, and ductus deferens.
  • If a second nonvascular tubular structure is found but without testicular vessels, it is assumed that the tail of the epididymis was inadvertently removed and considered as hypoplastic testis.
  • Such a determination can be hard to identify based on the gross observation of the stump.
  • Again, a detailed case workup prior to the surgery can facilitate better planning for what should be encountered during surgery.

Cite This Article

APA
Trotter GW. (1988). Normal and cryptorchid castration. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract, 4(3), 493-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0739(17)30625-9

Publication

ISSN: 0749-0739
NlmUniqueID: 8511904
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 4
Issue: 3
Pages: 493-513

Researcher Affiliations

Trotter, G W
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Fort Collins.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cryptorchidism / surgery
  • Cryptorchidism / veterinary
  • Horse Diseases / surgery
  • Horses / surgery
  • Male
  • Orchiectomy / veterinary

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Straticò P, Varasano V, Guerri G, Celani G, Palozzo A, Petrizzi L. A Retrospective Study of Cryptorchidectomy in Horses: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcome and Complications in 70 Cases.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 21;10(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10122446pubmed: 33371184google scholar: lookup