FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Noseband Fit: Measurements and Perceptions of Canadian Eques...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2022; 12(19); doi: 10.3390/ani12192685

Noseband Fit: Measurements and Perceptions of Canadian Equestrians.

Abstract: Recent concerns regarding horse welfare during competition has highlighted the occurrence of overtightened nosebands on competition horses. Current rules are often vague—e.g., “nosebands may never be so tightly fixed as to harm the horse.” To investigate the need and acceptance prior to any rule changes Equestrian Canada (EC) launched a pilot noseband measuring project. Nineteen officiating stewards measured noseband fit using the ISES taper gauge (TG) at 32 equestrian events of various disciplines in 2021. Additionally, stakeholder surveys collected data from 1528 EC members and 27 stewards regarding opinions and perceptions on noseband use, fit, measurement and rules. Descriptive and qualitative statistics along with Pearson chi-squared examined relationships between specific variables. Of the 551 horses tested with the TG, 71% passed the 1.5 cm (two-fingers) measurement and an additional 19% passed the 1 cm (one-finger) measurement. Stewards unanimously agreed that overtightened nosebands present a welfare issue although 63% believed this to represent only a small subset of riders. While 60% of stewards believed the current rules were sufficient, 40% did not. Despite the fact that 84% of stewards believe there should be a standardized fit across disciplines, 52% felt the use of the TG should be at their discretion. The top three reasons riders indicated for using nosebands were discipline expectation (41%), requirement for competition (39%) or for control/safety (32%). Open comments referred to an option to not wear a noseband in competition. Professional riders believed overtightened nosebands were less of a welfare issue than amateur riders (76% vs. 88% respectively; p < 0.025) and correspondingly did not feel the TG was a fair method (44% vs. 68% respectively; p < 0.001). Slightly more than half of the respondents (51.5%) believed that measuring noseband fit on the frontal nasal plane was the appropriate location. To advance equestrian practice, more education is needed to inform stakeholders of the reasons for noseband measurements and appropriate fit.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2022-10-06 PubMed ID: 36230425PubMed Central: PMC9559623DOI: 10.3390/ani12192685Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates the prevalence of tight nosebands on competition horses, perceptions of equestrians and possible need for updated rules in Canada. It calls for more education on appropriate noseband fit to improve horse welfare.

Methodology

  • The research was carried out by Equestrian Canada using the ISES taper gauge (TG) — a known measurement tool for horse nosebands — throughout various equestrian events held in 2021.
  • A total of 19 stewards utilized the tool, and 551 horses underwent examination.
  • The researchers administered two types of surveys: one for general Equestrian Canada members (1528 respondents) and another for stewards (27 respondents). The surveys collected opinions and perceptions about noseband use, fit, measurement, and rules.
  • Descriptive and qualitative statistical analyses, including Pearson chi-squared tests, determined relationships between different variables.

Findings

  • Results found that 71% of the measured horses could accommodate a 1.5 cm (or two fingers) space within the noseband, and additional 19% could fit 1 cm (or one finger).
  • All stewards agreed that overtightened nosebands are detrimental to horse welfare. Still, they perceived the issue as affecting only a small number of riders (63%).
  • While a majority (60%) of stewards felt the existing rules were sufficient, 40% did not.
  • Although a large percentage (84%) agreed on a need for standardizing the fit across all disciplines, slightly over half (52%) felt that using the TG tool should be at their discretion.
  • Riders reported using nosebands out of discipline expectation (41%), competition requirements (39%), or for control/safety purposes (32%).
  • Notably, professional riders viewed overtightened nosebands as less of a welfare issue than amateur riders (76% vs. 88% respectively) and were less likely to regard the TG as a fair measurement method (44% vs. 68% respectively).
  • Slightly more than half of respondents (51.5%) believed that the frontal nasal plane was the appropriate location for measuring noseband fit.

Conclusion and Recommendations

  • The study concludes that although a significant number of horses pass the noseband fit test, there is a need for more education about appropriate noseband fit and measurement to ensure horse welfare.
  • The study also suggests considering rule changes considering the varied opinions on the sufficiency of current rules, standardized fit, and measurements.

Cite This Article

APA
Merkies K, Copelin C, Small N, Young J. (2022). Noseband Fit: Measurements and Perceptions of Canadian Equestrians. Animals (Basel), 12(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12192685

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 19

Researcher Affiliations

Merkies, Katrina
  • Department of Animal Bioscience, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
  • Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Reproduction, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Copelin, Caleigh
  • Department of Animal Bioscience, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Small, Nicolas
  • Department of Animal Bioscience, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Young, Joelene
  • Department of Animal Bioscience, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

Conflict of Interest Statement

One author (C.C.) is a member of Equestrian Canada but did not participate in the member survey. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 53 references
  1. Chechushkov I.V., Usmanova E.R., Kosintsev P.A.. Early evidence for horse utilization in the Eurasian steppes and the case of the Novoil’inovskiy 2 Cemetery in Kazakhstan.. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2020;32:102420.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102420google scholar: lookup
  2. Clayton H.M., Williams J.M.. Know your noseband: An exploration of the factors that influence riders’ choice of noseband.. J. Vet. Behav. 2022;47:1–11.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2021.09.008google scholar: lookup
  3. Holmes T.Q., Brown A.F.. Champing at the Bit for Improvements: A Review of Equine Welfare in Equestrian Sports in the United Kingdom.. Animals 2022;12:1186.
    doi: 10.3390/ani12091186pmc: PMC9100173pubmed: 35565612google scholar: lookup
  4. McGreevy P.D., Doherty O., Channon W., Kyrklund K., Webster J.. The use of nosebands in equitation and the merits of an international equestrian welfare and safety committee: A commentary.. Vet. J. 2017;222:36–40.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.03.002pubmed: 28410674google scholar: lookup
  5. Casey V., McGreevy P.D., O’Muiris E., Doherty O.. A preliminary report on estimating the pressures exerted by a crank noseband in the horse.. J. Vet. Behav. 2013;8:479–484.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2013.06.003google scholar: lookup
  6. Doherty O., Casey V., McGreevy P., Arkins S., Munderloh U.G.. Noseband Use in Equestrian Sports—An International Study.. PLoS ONE 2017;12:e0169060.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169060pmc: PMC5207535pubmed: 28045961google scholar: lookup
  7. Hill E., McGreevy P.D., Caspar G., White P., McLean A.N.. Apparatus use in popular equestrian disciplines in Australia.. J. Vet. Behav. 2015;10:147–152.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2014.11.006google scholar: lookup
  8. Hawson L.A., McLean A.N., McGreevy P.D.. The roles of equine ethology and applied learning theory in horse-related human injuries.. J. Vet. Behav. 2010;5:324–338.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2010.06.001google scholar: lookup
  9. Condon V.M., McGreevy P.D., McLean A.N., Williams J.M., Randle H.. Associations between commonly used apparatus and conflict behaviors reported in the ridden horse in Australia.. J. Vet. Behav. 2022;49:1–14.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2021.10.014google scholar: lookup
  10. Fenner K., Yoon S., White P., Starling M., McGreevy P.D., Munderloh U.G.. The effect of noseband tightening on horses’ behavior, eye temperature, and cardiac responses.. PLoS ONE 2016;11:e0154179.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154179pmc: PMC4854461pubmed: 27140187google scholar: lookup
  11. McGreevy P., Warren-Smith A., Guisard Y.. The effect of double bridles and jaw-clamping crank nosebands on temperature of eyes and facial skin of horses.. J. Vet. Behav. 2012;7:142–148.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2011.08.001google scholar: lookup
  12. Uldahl M., Clayton H.M.. Lesions associated with the use of bits, nosebands, spurs, and whips in Danish completion horses.. Eq. Vet. J. 2018;51:154–162.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12827pubmed: 29502345google scholar: lookup
  13. Dyson S., Bondi A., Routh J., Pollard D., Preston T., McConnell C., Kydd J.H.. An investigation of behavior during tacking-up and mounting in ridden sports and leisure horses.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2021;34:e245–e257.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13432google scholar: lookup
  14. Dyce K.M., Sack W.O., Wensing C.J.G.. Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy.. 4th ed. Saunders Elsevier; St. Louis, MO, USA: 2010. pp. 501–508.
  15. Doherty O.M.. An Investigation into the Oro-Nasal Pressures Used in the Control of the Ridden Horse.. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Limerick; Limerick, Ireland: Apr 16, 2016.
  16. Robinson N., Bye T.L.. Noseband and poll pressures underneath bitted and bitless bridles and the effects on equine locomotion.. J. Vet. Behav. 2021;44:18–24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2021.05.002google scholar: lookup
  17. Rydevik B., Lundborg G.. Permeability of intraneural microvessels and perineurium following acute, graded experimental nerve compression.. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1977;11:179–187.
    doi: 10.3109/02844317709025516pubmed: 609900google scholar: lookup
  18. Crago F., Shea G., James O., Schemann K., McGreevy P.D.. An opportunistic pilot study of radiographs of equine nasal bones at the usual site of nosebands.. J. Vet. Behav. 2019;29:70–76.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.03.012google scholar: lookup
  19. Perez-Manrique L., Leon-Perez K., Zamora-Sanchez E., Davies S., Ober C., Wilson B., McGreevy P.D.. Prevalence and distribution of lesions in the nasal bones and mandibles of a sample of 144 riding horses.. Animals 2020;10:1661.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10091661pmc: PMC7552251pubmed: 32947819google scholar: lookup
  20. Federation Equestre Internationale. Dressage Rules. 25th Edition.. 2022. Switzerland.
  21. Hawson L.A., McLean A.N., McGreevy P.D.. Variability of scores in the 2008 Olympic dressage competition and implications for horse training and welfare.. J. Vet. Behav. 2010;5:170–176.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2009.12.010google scholar: lookup
  22. Equestrian Canada. Equestrian Canada Rules. Section A: General Regulations.. 2022.
  23. Doherty O., Conway T., Conway R., Murray G., Casey V.. An Objective Measure of Noseband Tightness and Its Measurement Using a Novel Digital Tightness Gauge.. PLoS ONE 2017;12:e0168996.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168996pmc: PMC5207410pubmed: 28045955google scholar: lookup
  24. Visser E.K., Kuypers M.M.F., Stam J.S.M., Riedstra B.. Practice of noseband use and intentions towards behavioral change in Dutch equestrians.. Animals 2019;9:1131.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9121131pmc: PMC6940946pubmed: 31842468google scholar: lookup
  25. Pahl D., Kienapfel K.. Noseband tightness on National German leisure competition in low and medium classes. Proceedings of the International Conference Equitation Science; Rome, Italy. 21–24 September 2018; p. 100.
  26. Merkies K., Copelin C., McPhedran C., McGreevy P.. The presence of various tack and equipment in sale horse advertisements in Australia and North America.. J. Vet. Behav. 2022;55–56:63–70.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2022.07.010google scholar: lookup
  27. ederation Equestre Internationale. Jumping Rules. 27th Edition.. 2022. Switzerland.
  28. Federation Equestre Internationale. Driving Rules. 12th Edition.. 2022. Switzerland.
  29. Federation Equestre Internationale. Eventing Rules. 25th Edition.. 2022. Switzerland.
  30. Weller D., Franklin S., Shea G., White P., Fenner K., Wilson B., Wilkins C., McGreevy P.. The reported use of noseband in racing and equestrian pursuits.. Animals 2020;10:776.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10050776pmc: PMC7278451pubmed: 32365844google scholar: lookup
  31. Manfredi J., Clayton H.M., Derksen F.J.. Effects of different bits and bridles on frequency of induced swallowing in cantering horses.. Equine Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2005;2:241–244.
    doi: 10.1079/ECP200569google scholar: lookup
  32. Ödberg F.O., Bouissou M.-F.. The development of equestrianism from the baroque period to the present day and its consequences for the welfare of horses.. Equine Vet. J. 1999;31((Suppl. S28)):26–30.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb05152.xpubmed: 11314231google scholar: lookup
  33. Murray R., Guire R., Fisher M., Fairfax V.. A bridle designed to avoid peak pressure locations under the headpiece and noseband is associated with more uniform pressure and increased carpal and tarsal flexion, compared with the horse’s usual bridle.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2015;35:947–955.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.08.023google scholar: lookup
  34. Doherty O., Casey V., Conway R.. Changes in pressures exerted on sub-noseband tissues by tightening the noseband. Proceedings of the International Society for Equitation Science Annual Conference; Guelph, ON, Canada. 19–21 August 2019; p. 40.
  35. Rutjens B.T., Heine S.J., Sutton R.M., van Harreveld F.. Attitudes towards science.. Adv. Exper. Soc. Psych. 2017;57:125–165.
    doi: 10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.08.001google scholar: lookup
  36. van Weeren P.R.. How long will equestrian traditionalism resist science?. Vet. J. 2008;175:289–290.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.06.017pubmed: 17851100google scholar: lookup
  37. Moser D., Steiglechner P., Schlueter A.. Facing global environmental change: The role of culturally embedded cognitive biases.. Environ. Dev. 2022;44:100735.
    doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2022.100735google scholar: lookup
  38. Thompson K., Haigh L.. Perceptions of Equitation Science revealed in an online forum: Improving equine health and welfare by communicating science to equestrians and equestrian to scientists.. J. Vet. Behav. 2018;25:1–8.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.02.002google scholar: lookup
  39. Lofgren E.A., Rice B.M.G., Brady C.M.. Exploring perceptions of equine welfare scenarios using a positive approach.. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2022;25:54–61.
    doi: 10.1080/10888705.2020.1790372pubmed: 32654524google scholar: lookup
  40. Pickering P., Hockenhull J.. Optimising the efficacy of equine welfare communications: Do equine stakeholders differ in their information-seeking behavior and communication preferences?. Animals 2020;10:21.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10010021pmc: PMC7022754pubmed: 31861909google scholar: lookup
  41. Equestrian Canada. Equestrian Canada Rules. Section C: Driving and Para-Driving.. 2022.
  42. Equestrian Canada. Equestrian Canada Rules. Section G: Hunter, Jumper, Equitation and Hack.. 2022.
  43. Equestrian Canada. Equestrian Canada Rules. Section D: Eventing.. 2022.
  44. Equestrian Canada. Equestrian Canada Rules. Section E: Dressage and Para-Dressage Article.. 2022.
  45. Equestrian Canada. Equestrian Canada Rules. Section B: Breeds.. 2022.
  46. Equestrian Canada. Equestrian Canada Rules. Section F: General Performance, Western, Equitation.. 2022.
  47. Equestrian Canada. Equestrian Canada Rules. Section J: Endurance.. 2022.
  48. Equestrian Canada. Equestrian Canada Rules. Section K: Reining and Para-Reining.. 2022.
  49. Equestrian Canada. Equestrian Canada Rules. Section K: Vaulting.. 2022.
  50. DuBois C., Nakonechny L., Derisoud E., Merkies K.. Examining Canadian equine industry participants’ perceptions of horses and their welfare.. Animals 2018;8:201.
    doi: 10.3390/ani8110201pmc: PMC6262281pubmed: 30405030google scholar: lookup
  51. DuBois C., Hambly-Odame H., Haley D.B., Merkies K.. An exploration of industry expert perception of Canadian equine welfare using a modified Delphi technique.. PLoS ONE 2018;13:e0201363.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201363pmc: PMC6066239pubmed: 30059509google scholar: lookup
  52. Bell C., Rogers S., Taylor J., Busby D.. Improving the recognition of equine affective states.. Animals 2019;9:1124.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9121124pmc: PMC6941154pubmed: 31835886google scholar: lookup
  53. Lesté-Lasserre C.. A Look at Switzerland’s Equine Protection Laws.. The Horse Jun 28, 2015.

Citations

This article has been cited 6 times.
  1. Doherty O, Conway R, McGreevy P. Using an Equine Cadaver Head to Investigate Associations Between Sub-Noseband Space, Noseband Tension, and Sub-Noseband Pressure at Three Locations. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jul 19;15(14).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15142141pubmed: 40723604google scholar: lookup
  2. MacKechnie-Guire R, Clayton H, Williams J, Marlin D, Fisher M, Fisher D, Walker V, Murray RC. Comparison of Rein Forces and Pressure Beneath the Noseband and Headpiece of a Snaffle Bridle and a Double Bridle. Animals (Basel) 2025 Apr 5;15(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15071058pubmed: 40218450google scholar: lookup
  3. MacKechnie-Guire R, Clayton H, Williams J, Marlin D, Fisher M, Fisher D, Walker V, Murray R. Measuring Noseband Tightness on the Lateral Aspect of the Horse's Face. Animals (Basel) 2025 Feb 13;15(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15040537pubmed: 40003019google scholar: lookup
  4. MacKechnie-Guire R, Murray R, Williams JM, Nixon J, Fisher M, Fisher D, Walker V, Clayton HM. Noseband type and tightness level affect pressure on the horse's face at trot. Equine Vet J 2025 May;57(3):774-788.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14420pubmed: 39305099google scholar: lookup
  5. Scholler D, Wittenberg J, Zablotski Y, May A. Do tight nosebands have an effect on the upper airways of horses?. Vet Med Sci 2024 Jul;10(4):e1478.
    doi: 10.1002/vms3.1478pubmed: 38885311google scholar: lookup
  6. Scholler D, Zablotski Y, May A. Evaluation of Substance P as a New Stress Parameter in Horses in a Stress Model Involving Four Different Stress Levels. Animals (Basel) 2023 Mar 24;13(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13071142pubmed: 37048398google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.