FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / PLoS One / Noseband Use in Equestrian Sports – An International S...
PloS one2017; 12(1); e0169060; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169060

Noseband Use in Equestrian Sports – An International Study.

Abstract: Nosebands are used by riders to prevent the horse from opening its mouth, to increase control and, in some cases, to comply with the competition rules. While equestrian texts traditionally recommend that two adult human fingers should be able to fit under a fastened noseband, noseband tightness levels are not, in general, regulated in competition. Possible detrimental consequences for the horse, of excessively tight nosebands, include discomfort, pain or tissue damage. The current study investigated noseband usage in equestrian competition. Data regarding noseband type, position, width and tightness were collected from 750 horses in eventing (n = 354), dressage (n = 334) and performance hunter (n = 62) competitions in Ireland, England and Belgium. Data were collected immediately before or after the performance. Using the ISES taper gauge as a guide, results were classified according to the number of 'fingers' that could fit under the noseband at the nasal planum, and assigned to six groups: greater than 2 fingers; 2 fingers; 1.5 fingers; 1 finger; 0.5 fingers; zero fingers. A calliper was used to measure noseband width and position relative to the facial crest. The data were not normally distributed so Kruskall-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used. In all, 44% of horses fell into the zero fingers classification while only 7% were in the two fingers classification. Significant differences emerged between disciplines (p<0.001), with the highest levels of noseband tightness measured among eventers followed by dressage horses with lowest levels among performance hunters. Noseband tightness did not differ significantly with horse age (p>0.05), which ranged from 4 to 19 years. The flash noseband was the most commonly used noseband (n = 326) and was significantly tighter than the cavesson (p < 0.001), drop noseband (p < 0.001) and the Micklem (p < 0.005). Noseband width ranged from 10 to 50 mm. Noseband position varied widely with the distance between the facial crest and upper noseband margin ranging from 0 to 70 mm. The high proportion of very tight nosebands found in this study raises concerns regarding the short and long term behavioural and physiological consequences of such tight nosebands are for the horse. Although these data are currently lacking, the findings are of concern.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2017-01-03 PubMed ID: 28045961PubMed Central: PMC5207535DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169060Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article investigates how nosebands are used in equestrian sports and the possible negative consequences for horses if nosebands are too tight. The study gathered data from various horse riding competitions and classified horses according to the noseband’s tightness level.

Methodology

  • The study compiled data on the type, position, width, and tightness of nosebands from 750 horses participating in eventing, dressage, and performance hunter competitions in Ireland, England, and Belgium.
  • Data was collected immediately before or after the horses’ performances.
  • The researchers used the ISES taper gauge to classify the observed noseband tightness according to the number of ‘fingers’ that could fit under it at the nasal planum.
  • Six groups were created based on the number of fingers that could fit under the noseband: greater than 2 fingers; 2 fingers; 1.5 fingers; 1 finger; 0.5 fingers; zero fingers.
  • A calliper was used to measure the width of the noseband and its position relative to the facial crest.

Results

  • The data was not normally distributed, and statistical tests like Kruskall-Wallis and Mann-Whitney were used for analysis.
  • The study found that 44% of horses fell into the zero fingers classification, indicating very tight nosebands, while only 7% were in the two fingers classification, reflecting recommended tightness.
  • Significant differences in noseband tightness emerged between disciplines, with the tightest nosebands measured among eventers then dressage horses, and the loosest nosebands among performance hunters.
  • Age had no significant effect on noseband tightness, with the horses’ ages under study ranging from 4 to 19 years.
  • Flash nosebands were the most commonly used and were significantly tighter than cavesson, drop noseband, and Micklem.
  • Noseband width varied from 10 to 50 mm, while noseband position (measured as the distance between the facial crest and upper noseband margin) varied from 0 to 70 mm.

Conclusion

  • The high proportion of extremely tight nosebands raised concerns about potential adverse behavioural and physiological effects on horses, both short-term and long-term.
  • Despite the current lack of data on these potential consequences, the study’s findings remain concerning. There is a need for further research and possibly tighter regulations on noseband usage in equestrian sports to ensure the welfare of horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Doherty O, Casey V, McGreevy P, Arkins S. (2017). Noseband Use in Equestrian Sports – An International Study. PLoS One, 12(1), e0169060. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169060

Publication

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
NlmUniqueID: 101285081
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 1
Pages: e0169060

Researcher Affiliations

Doherty, Orla
  • Department of Life Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Casey, Vincent
  • Department of Physics, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
McGreevy, Paul
  • Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Arkins, Sean
  • Department of Life Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

MeSH Terms

  • Adult
  • Animals
  • Belgium
  • England
  • Female
  • Horses / physiology
  • Humans
  • International Cooperation
  • Ireland
  • Male
  • Physical Conditioning, Animal / instrumentation
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sports

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

This article includes 35 references
  1. McGreevy P, McLean A. Equitation Science. Wiley-Blackwell;2010.
  2. McGreevy P, Warren-Smith A, Guisard Y. The effect of double bridles and jaw-clamping crank nosebands on temperature of eyes and facial skin of horses. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 2012;7:142–148.
  3. Casey V, McGreevy P, O' Muiris E, Doherty O. A preliminary report on estimating the pressures exerted by a crank noseband in the horse. Journal of Veterinary Behaviour, Clinical Applications and Research 2013;8:479–484.
  4. Anon. Horsemanship for the Pony Club. The British Horse Society; London, UK;1956.
  5. Stecken F. A book of dressage: training the horse and rider. Arco Publishing Company Inc., New York, NY;1977.
  6. Klimke R. Basic Training of the Young Horse, London, J.A. Allen & Company Limited;1994.
  7. Huntington P, Myers J, Owens E. Horse Sense: the guide to horse care in Australia and New Zealand. 2nd Ed Landlinks Press, Victoria, Australia;2004.
  8. Kapitzke G. Bit and the Reins: Developing Good Contact and Sensitive hands. London, J. A. Allen;2004.
  9. Muir S, Sly D. The Complete Horse and Rider. Leicestershire, UK, Anness Publishing Ltd;2012.
  10. FEI (International Equestrian Federation). Code of Conduct for the Welfare of the Horse;2013. http://www.fei.org/system/files/Code_of_Conduct_Welfare_Horse_1Jan2013_0.pdf
  11. Goody P. Horse Anatomy A Practical Approach to Equine Structure. London, Allen, J.A.;2004.
  12. Micklem W. Complete Horse Riding Manual. London, Penguin; 2003.
  13. Randle H, McGreevy P. The effect of noseband tightness on rein tension in the ridden horse. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 2013;8:e18–e19.
  14. Mclean AN, McGreevy PD. Ethical equitation: Capping the price horses pay for human glory. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 2010a;5:203–209.
  15. Mclean AN, McGreevy PD. Horse-training techniques that may defy the principles of learning theory and compromise welfare. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 2010b;5:187–195.
  16. McGreevy PD. Right under our noses. Equine Veterinary Education 2015;27(10):503–504.
  17. ISES (The International Society for Equitation Science). ISES position statement on restrictive nosebands; 2012. http://www.equitationscience.com/documents/Statements/RestrictiveNosebands_Jan2012.pdf
  18. Ekberg J, Timpka T, Ramel H, Valter L. Injury rates and risk-factors associated with eventing: A total cohort study of injury events among adult Swedish eventing athletes. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion 2011;18:261–267.
    doi: 10.1080/17457300.2010.545129pubmed: 21512929google scholar: lookup
  19. FEI. Dressage Rules. 25th ed.;2016. http://www.fei.org/sites/default/files/DRE-Rules_2016_GA-approved_clean.pdf
  20. Heuschmann G. Tug of war: Classical versus “modern” dressage. Schondorf: Wu Wei Verlag;2006.
  21. Pospisil K, Potz I, Peham C. The Effect of Noseband Tightness on Tensile Forces While Using Side Reins on Horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 2014;46(S46):46–47.
  22. Hockenhull J, Creighton E. Equipment and training risk factors associated with ridden behaviour problems in UK leisure horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2012:36–42.
  23. Ladewig J. Human safety and horse welfare-two sides of the same coin. Journal of veterinary behavior: Clinical applications and research 2011;6(5):292–293.
  24. Christensen JW, Zharkikh TL, Antoine A, Malmkvist J. Rein tension acceptance in young horses in a voluntary test situation. Equine Vet J 2011;43:223–8.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00151.xpubmed: 21592219google scholar: lookup
  25. Manfredi JM, Rosenstein D, Lanovaz JL, Nauwelaerts S, Clayton HM. Fluoroscopic study of oral behaviours in response to the presence of a bit and the effects of rein tension. Comparative Exercise Physiology 2009;6:143–148.
  26. Tell A, Egenvall A, Lundström T, Wattle O. The prevalence of oral ulceration in Swedish horses when ridden with bit and bridle and when unridden. The Veterinary Journal 2008;178:405–410.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.09.020pubmed: 19027332google scholar: lookup
  27. Shaw JA, Murray DG. The relationship between tourniquet pressure and underlying soft-tissue pressure in the thigh. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:1148–52.
    pubmed: 7130227
  28. Noordin S, Mcewen JA, Kragh JF, Eisen A, Masri BA. Surgical tourniquets in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91(12):2958–67.
    doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00634pubmed: 19952261google scholar: lookup
  29. Rydevik B, Lundborg G. Permeability of Intraneural Microvessels and Perineurium Following Acute, Graded Experimental Nerve Compression. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery 1977;11:179–187.
    pubmed: 609900
  30. Dobner J, Nitz A. Postmeniscectomy palsy and functional sequelae. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 1982;10:211–214.
    pubmed: 6896963
  31. Rorabeck CH, Kennedy JC. Tourniquet induced nerve ischemia complicating knee ligament surgery. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 1980;8:98–102.
    pubmed: 7361991
  32. Hagenouw R, Bridenbough P. Tourniquet Pain—A Volunteer Study. Anesthesia & Analgesia 1986;65(11).
    pubmed: 3767015
  33. Newton SA, Knottenbelt DC, Eldridge PR. Headshaking in horses: possible aetiopathogenesis suggested by the results of diagnostic tests and several treatment regimes used in 20 cases. Equine Veterinary Journal 2000;32(3):208–216.
    pubmed: 10836475
  34. Madigan JE, Bell SA. Owner survey of headshaking in horses. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2001;219(3):334–337.
    pubmed: 11497047
  35. Roberts VL, Perkins JD, Skärlina E, Gorvy DA, Tremaine WH, Williams et al. Caudal anaesthesia of the infraorbital nerve for diagnosis of idiopathic headshaking and caudal compression of the infraorbital nerve for its treatment, in 58 horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 2013;45(1):107–110.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00553.xpubmed: 22413870google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 23 times.
  1. Henshall C, McGreevy P, Shea G, Doherty O, Christensen JW, Fenner K, Warren-Smith A, McLean A. Commentary on MacKechnie-Guire et al. Measuring Noseband Tightness on the Lateral Aspect of the Horse's Face. Animals 2015, 15, 537. Animals (Basel) 2026 Jan 28;16(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani16030412pubmed: 41681393google scholar: lookup
  2. Doherty O, Conway R, McGreevy P. Using an Equine Cadaver Head to Investigate Associations Between Sub-Noseband Space, Noseband Tension, and Sub-Noseband Pressure at Three Locations. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jul 19;15(14).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15142141pubmed: 40723604google scholar: lookup
  3. Uldahl M, Mellor DJ. Regulatory Integrity and Welfare in Horse Sport: A Constructively Critical Perspective. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jun 30;15(13).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15131934pubmed: 40646833google scholar: lookup
  4. Faithfull R, Lewis K, Drury E, McBride S. Influences of Double Versus Snaffle Bridles on Equine Behaviour at Dressage Competitions and Factors That Interact with Their Effect. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jun 17;15(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15121782pubmed: 40564336google scholar: lookup
  5. MacKechnie-Guire R, Clayton H, Williams J, Marlin D, Fisher M, Fisher D, Walker V, Murray RC. Comparison of Rein Forces and Pressure Beneath the Noseband and Headpiece of a Snaffle Bridle and a Double Bridle. Animals (Basel) 2025 Apr 5;15(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15071058pubmed: 40218450google scholar: lookup
  6. MacKechnie-Guire R, Clayton H, Williams J, Marlin D, Fisher M, Fisher D, Walker V, Murray R. Measuring Noseband Tightness on the Lateral Aspect of the Horse's Face. Animals (Basel) 2025 Feb 13;15(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15040537pubmed: 40003019google scholar: lookup
  7. Clayton HM, Murray R, Williams JM, Walker V, Fisher M, Fisher D, Nixon J, Mackechnie-Guire R. Facial pressure beneath a cavesson noseband adjusted to different tightness levels during standing and chewing. Equine Vet J 2025 Jul;57(4):1127-1137.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14451pubmed: 39710981google scholar: lookup
  8. Biau S, Pycik E, Boichot L, Berg LC, Ruet A. Rein tensions and behaviour with five rein types in international-level vaulting horses. PLoS One 2024;19(10):e0311919.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311919pubmed: 39418261google scholar: lookup
  9. König von Borstel U, Kienapfel K, McLean A, Wilkins C, McGreevy P. Hyperflexing the horse's neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2024 Oct 2;14(1):22886.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72766-5pubmed: 39358404google scholar: lookup
  10. MacKechnie-Guire R, Murray R, Williams JM, Nixon J, Fisher M, Fisher D, Walker V, Clayton HM. Noseband type and tightness level affect pressure on the horse's face at trot. Equine Vet J 2025 May;57(3):774-788.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14420pubmed: 39305099google scholar: lookup
  11. Scholler D, Wittenberg J, Zablotski Y, May A. Do tight nosebands have an effect on the upper airways of horses?. Vet Med Sci 2024 Jul;10(4):e1478.
    doi: 10.1002/vms3.1478pubmed: 38885311google scholar: lookup
  12. Kim SM, Cho GJ. Analysis of Various Facial Expressions of Horses as a Welfare Indicator Using Deep Learning. Vet Sci 2023 Apr 10;10(4).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci10040283pubmed: 37104439google scholar: lookup
  13. Scholler D, Zablotski Y, May A. Evaluation of Substance P as a New Stress Parameter in Horses in a Stress Model Involving Four Different Stress Levels. Animals (Basel) 2023 Mar 24;13(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13071142pubmed: 37048398google scholar: lookup
  14. Seck M, Jobling R, Brown AF. Trialling Locally Made, Low-Cost Bits to Improve Bit-Related Welfare Problems in Cart Horses: Findings from a Study in Senegal. Animals (Basel) 2022 Dec 20;13(1).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13010002pubmed: 36611612google scholar: lookup
  15. Merkies K, Copelin C, Small N, Young J. Noseband Fit: Measurements and Perceptions of Canadian Equestrians. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 6;12(19).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12192685pubmed: 36230425google scholar: lookup
  16. Holmes TQ, Brown AF. Champing at the Bit for Improvements: A Review of Equine Welfare in Equestrian Sports in the United Kingdom. Animals (Basel) 2022 May 5;12(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12091186pubmed: 35565612google scholar: lookup
  17. Dyson S, Pollard D. Application of the Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram to Horses Competing in British Eventing 90, 100 and Novice One-Day Events and Comparison with Performance. Animals (Basel) 2022 Feb 25;12(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12050590pubmed: 35268159google scholar: lookup
  18. Quain A, Ward MP, Mullan S. What Would You Do? Types of Ethical Challenging Situations Depicted in Vignettes Published in the Veterinary Literature from 1990 to 2020. Vet Sci 2021 Dec 22;9(1).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci9010002pubmed: 35051086google scholar: lookup
  19. Furtado T, Preshaw L, Hockenhull J, Wathan J, Douglas J, Horseman S, Smith R, Pollard D, Pinchbeck G, Rogers J, Hall C. How Happy Are Equine Athletes? Stakeholder Perceptions of Equine Welfare Issues Associated with Equestrian Sport. Animals (Basel) 2021 Nov 12;11(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11113228pubmed: 34827960google scholar: lookup
  20. Rørvang MV, Nielsen BL, McLean AN. Sensory Abilities of Horses and Their Importance for Equitation Science. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:633.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00633pubmed: 33033724google scholar: lookup
  21. Pérez-Manrique L, León-Pérez K, Zamora-Sánchez E, Davies S, Ober C, Wilson B, McGreevy P. Prevalence and Distribution of Lesions in the Nasal Bones and Mandibles of a Sample of 144 Riding Horses. Animals (Basel) 2020 Sep 16;10(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10091661pubmed: 32947819google scholar: lookup
  22. Bergmann IM. Naturalness and the Legitimacy of Thoroughbred Racing: A Photo-Elicitation Study with Industry and Animal Advocacy Informants. Animals (Basel) 2020 Aug 26;10(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10091513pubmed: 32859112google scholar: lookup
  23. Tuomola K, Mäki-Kihniä N, Kujala-Wirth M, Mykkänen A, Valros A. Oral Lesions in the Bit Area in Finnish Trotters After a Race: Lesion Evaluation, Scoring, and Occurrence. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:206.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00206pubmed: 31355213google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.